[When workplace becomes the place where a relative with cancer is cared: How do caregiver, patient and healthcare professionals interact?] / Quand le lieu de travail devient le lieu d'accueil d'un proche atteint de cancer : quelles interactions entre aidant, patient, soignants ?

INTRODUCTION: Three clinical situations explored the interactions between patients treated for cancer in oncology, their family caregivers working as doctors or nurses in the same establishment or service, and the healthcare team providing the patient's care, as well as the repercussions of such a context on these three players. METHODS: In each situation, the patient, the family caregiver and a member of the team were interviewed using a semi-directive interview guide. The 8 interviews were recorded and transcribed in full, then subjected to thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The tension between "wanting to stay in their place as a relative" and facilitating/accelerating the patient's medical journey was heightened when the patient is being cared for in the institution/service in which the family's caregiver works. The healthcare team reported additional psychological pressure, but few arrangements are made by the team to support the specific nature of these situations. Various factors, such as the severity of the illness, the closeness of the relationship between the caregiver and the patient, existence of a hierarchical link between the caregiver and the team, and the presence of the caregiver on the ward, seemed to potentiate the difficulties felt by the healthcare team and the individual suffering of the caregiver. DISCUSSION: These situations generated intra- and interpersonal psychological tensions for all concerned, each oscillating between their status as family caregiver and healthcare professional, or as colleague and healthcare professional. These situations have raised ethical and psychological questions for all involved, which need to be anticipated.

Supporting Family Members in Palliative Phases of Cancer: A Qualitative Study Comparing Health Care Professionals and Non-Health Care Professionals.

This comparative and exploratory multicenter study explored the experiences of 2 groups of family members caring for relatives in palliative phases of cancer: caregivers practicing health care professionals (doctors/nurses) and caregivers who were not health care professionals. The ill family members of the 2 groups were also interviewed. Twenty-seven volunteer caregiving relatives (including 16 health professionals) and 18 cancer patients participated in psychologist-conducted semistructured interviews exploring psychological experiences of the support (including daily, personal, and medical care) and, for caregivers, of the interactions with medical teams. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for inductive thematic analysis. Caregiving relatives, irrespective of their profession, all reported developing closer bonds with their relative since the cancer diagnosis and being highly involved in the palliative care. They also all reported psychological stress with additional stress linked to health care professionals' acute knowledge of the disease and treatments often experienced as a burden. Whereas non-health care professional caregivers reported hope for favorable disease progression, health professional caregivers did not. Interactions with the health care team were generally described as satisfactory. A minority of health care professional caregivers reported difficulties when the health care team perceived their investment in the patient's care as negative. Patients' perceptions were consistent with caregiver perceptions.

French adaptation of the PO-Bado short form, an interview-based expert rating scale for distress screening.

OBJECTIVE: Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (PO-Bado) is a hetero-assessment and psychosocial burden documentation tool for cancer patient caregivers (across all types and stages). Recently, the psychometric properties of the standard 12-item version of PO-Bado were published. However, the standard version is relatively time-consuming for the caregivers. Here, we developed and examined psychometric properties of a French short-form of PO-Bado (PO-Bado-FSF) with seven items derived from the validated standard version. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one cancer patients (M age = 58.4 years, SD = 13.9 years; 68.6% were women) participated in this study during a supportive care following the first diagnosis of cancer or a relapse. All patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), in addition to the PO-Bado-FSF. RESULTS: PO-Bado-FSF scores exhibit sound psychometric qualities such as internal consistency, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and scalability (i.e. Mokken's scalability coefficients); all items loaded significantly on the single CFA factor and yielded coefficients 0.40 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the value of using PO-Bado-FSF to identify psychological distress in cancer patients in research and practice. PO-Bado-FSF presents good psychometric properties and is less time-consuming than the standard version.

[An interview guide for screening for psychological pain in oncology]. / Un guide d'entretien pour le dépistage de la souffrance psychologique en cancérologie.

An interview guide has been introduced with patients treated in oncology in order to assess their psychological pain. It helps to structure the nurse interview. It also combines the identification of the patient's psychological needs with the creation of an opportunity to talk, thereby initiating a help relationship.

The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (PO-Bado): an innovative tool to combine screening for psychological distress and patient support at cancer diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: The Basic Documentation for Psycho-Oncology (PO-Bado) is a semi-directive instrument for assessing psychosocial difficulties in cancer patients. It is based on subjective status and not on degree of symptom severity. Our objectives were to assess whether use of the PO-Bado during post-cancer-diagnosis consultations improves the quality of communication by establishing a supportive relationship between nurses and patients and to assess nurses' satisfaction of their communication skills. METHODS: Data were collected from post-diagnosis 'bad-news' consultations across four Cancer treatment centres in South West France. Eleven nurses who had never used the PO-Bado ('inexperienced group') received training on the instrument (short-form). Twenty-one pre-training consultations without the PO-Bado were recorded and compared with 21 post-training consultations with the PO-Bado. Twenty consultations with four nurses with experience using the PO-Bado ('experienced group') were included for between-group comparisons. Nurses' satisfaction was evaluated through semi-directive consultations at the end of the study and completed by a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: We transcribed and analysed 62 consultations. We observed greater use of techniques encouraging patient expression in consultations with PO-Bado-experienced nurses (p < 0.01); after PO-Bado training for 'inexperienced' nurses (p < 0.05) and less use of non-encouraging techniques after PO-Bado training for 'inexperienced' nurses (p < 0.01). Nurses felt more satisfied with their communications skills after PO-Bado training and stated that they felt more competent, particularly for referrals to psychologists. CONCLUSIONS: The PO-Bado is beneficial for the quality of the communication between nurses and patients at bad-news delivery consultations and for the satisfaction of nurses with regard to their relational skills.