Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Highlighting the Patient Selection Process.

Patients with advanced emphysema frequently experience severe dyspnea that is inadequately treated with medical therapy alone. Over the past 4 years, we have seen increased usage of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves. Success of the procedure is dependent on patient selection because it is not necessarily appropriate for all patients with severe emphysema. (Table 1) The purpose of this review is to highlight the selection process at a single institution. We also discuss the influence of this process on outcomes. Between March 1, 2019, and October 12, 2021, 2402 patients were referred to a dedicated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease clinic at Mayo Clinic - Rochester, whereas 161 patients were subsequently referred for multidisciplinary BLVR review. Of those patients, 53 (32.9%) were selected to receive valves and 35 (21.7%) ultimately underwent the procedure. The main reasons for exclusion included an incompatible quantitative computed tomography analysis (n=37, 34.3%), presence of pulmonary nodule or active malignancy (n=14, 13.0%), or need for completion of pulmonary rehabilitation (n=9, 8.3%). Full or partial (>70%) target lobe collapse was observed in 58.6% of patients who received valves. Those with collapse experienced statistically significant improvements in spirometric measures. Twelve patients experienced a pneumothorax (34.3%), with 10 patients requiring thoracostomy tube placement and prolonged hospitalization (median, 11 days; range, 4-39 days). Nineteen patients required a secondary procedure within the first year. The study highlights how a multidisciplinary approach to the BLVR selection process enables individualization of a complex procedure and enhances the exclusion of inappropriate candidates.

A 64-year-Old patient assigned male at birth with COPD and worsening dyspnea while on estrogen and antiandrogen agents.

Among patients with COPD, ventilatory inefficiency in response to exercise can be due to respiratory muscle dysfunction or expiratory flow limitation causing air-trapping and dynamic hyperinflation. We discuss a case of severe ventilatory limitation in response to exercise due to reduced respiratory muscle mass in the setting of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), and how the interpretation of pulmonary function testing (PFT) and respiratory symptoms among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients can be influenced by GAHT.

A population-based cohort study on the risk of obstructive lung disease after bilateral oophorectomy.

There is increasing evidence that sex hormones may impact the development of obstructive lung disease (OLD). Therefore, we studied the effect of bilateral oophorectomy (oophorectomy) on the development of OLD. Women were identified from the Mayo Clinic Cohort Study of Oophorectomy and Aging-2. Data were collected using the Rochester Epidemiology Project records-linkage system. A total of 1653 women who underwent oophorectomy and 1653 referent women of similar age were assessed for OLD using diagnostic codes and medical record abstraction. Women who underwent oophorectomy had an overall higher risk of all OLD, all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, and chronic bronchitis but not of all asthma, confirmed asthma, or confirmed COPD. The association with all OLD was stronger in women who were age ≤45 years at oophorectomy, never smokers, non-obese, and in women with benign indications; however, the interactions were not statistically significant. There was an increased risk of all asthma in women age ≤45 years at oophorectomy who took estrogen therapy. Never smokers of all ages had a stronger association of oophorectomy with all asthma and all COPD, whereas smokers had a stronger association of oophorectomy with emphysema and chronic bronchitis. Non-obese women of all ages had a stronger association of oophorectomy with all COPD, emphysema, and chronic bronchitis. The results of this study combined with the increased risk of several chronic diseases reported in previous studies suggest that oophorectomy in premenopausal women should be avoided unless there is clear evidence of a high genetic risk of ovarian cancer.

Prevention of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) with endobronchial valves (EBVs) has emerged as an important treatment method for patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are a frequent complication following BLVR with EBV. However, there is no consensus on the prevention of AECOPD. OBJECTIVES: Our study aims to compare the outcomes of different prophylactic measures on the occurrence of AECOPD after BLVR with EBV. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients who underwent BLVR with EBV at six different institutions. Emphasis was directed towards the specific practices aimed at preventing AECOPD: antibiotics, steroids, antibiotics plus steroids, or no prophylaxis. Subgroups were compared, and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were reviewed. The rate of AECOPD was 21.2% for the full cohort. Patients who received prophylaxis had a significantly lower rate of AECOPD compared with those who did not (16.7% vs. 46.2%; p = 0.001). The rate was lowest in patients who received antibiotics alone (9.2%). There was no significant difference in the rate of AECOPD between patients who received steroids alone or antibiotics plus steroids, compared with the other subgroups. The OR for AECOPD was 4.3 (95% CI: 1.8-10.4; p = 0.001) for patients not receiving prophylaxis and 3.9 (95% CI: 1.5-10.1; p = 0.004) for prophylaxis other than antibiotics alone. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of antibiotics after BLVR with EBV was associated with a lower rate of AECOPD. This was not observed with the use of steroids or in combination with antibiotics.