Sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer, a challenge in oncology practice: results of the CLARIFY project.

BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction (SD) associated with oncological treatment is a common and understudied disorder. Our aim was to characterize SD in a cohort of Spanish patients. METHODS: Analytic observational study in patients included in the CLARIFY H2020 project at the Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro. Clinical variables and validated measures of sexual function were collected from October 2020 to May 2022. Frequency and quality of sexual activity were assessed. Descriptive, trend associations, and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients were included: breast cancer 68.14% (261), lung cancer 26.37% (101), and lymphoma 5.50% (21). Mean age was 56.5 years (range 33-88). 19.58% (75) were men and 80.42% (308) were women. 69% and 31% of men and women, respectively, reported being sexually active. The absolute frequency of overall sexual dissatisfaction was 76% in women and 24% in men. Women with breast cancer were most likely to have severe sexual dysfunction. Those with early disease had resolved complaints after 5 years. In multinomial logistic regression, significant associations were found in women with metastatic breast cancer and severe disorders of arousal (p 0.000), lubrication (p 0.002), orgasm (p 0.000), as well as dissatisfaction with sexual performance (p 0.000) and global sexual dissatisfaction (p 0.000). Women with lung cancer have severe arousal dysfunction (p 0.016) and global sexual dissatisfaction (p 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Our population has a high prevalence of SD, which supports the need to increase awareness of this disorder among the medical oncology team and the importance of including sexual health assessment in oncological patient follow-up.

End-of-Life Care and Advanced Directives in Hispanic/Latinx Patients: Challenges and Solutions for the Practicing Oncologist.

Advanced end-of-life care (EOL) comprises a group of strategies to provide comfort to patients at the end of life. These are associated with better quality of life, better satisfaction, and a lower rate of hospitalizations and aggressive medical treatment. Advanced EOL care, including advanced directives completion and hospice enrollment, is suboptimal among Hispanic/Latinx patients with cancer due to personal, socio-cultural, financial, and health system-related barriers, as well as due to a lack of studies specifically designed for this population. In addition, the extrapolation of programs that increase participation in EOL for non-white Hispanics may not work appropriately for Hispanic/Latinx patients and lead to overall lower satisfaction and enrollment in EOL care. This review will provide the practicing oncologist with the tools to address EOL in the Hispanic/Latinx population. Some promising strategies to address the EOL care disparities in Latinx/Hispanic patients have been culturally tailored patient navigation programs, geriatric assessment-guided multidisciplinary interventions, counseling sessions, and educational interventions. Through these strategies, we encourage oncologists to take advantage of every clinical setting to discuss EOL care. Treating physicians can engage family members in caring for their loved ones while practicing cultural humility and respecting cultural preferences, incorporating policies to foster treatment for the underserved migrant population, and providing patients with validated Spanish language tools.