A phase I/II study of 4 monthly courses of high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa for metastatic breast cancer patients.

This pilot phase I/II study intended to determine the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa administered on four consecutive courses with peripheral blood progenitor cell and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support, as first-line therapy for hormone-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. Twenty-eight patients were entered in the study. After two courses of epirubicin (120 mg m(-2)) and cyclophosphamide (2 g m(-2)) followed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor injection and leukaphereses, patients received four cycles of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa. Each cycle was followed by peripheral blood progenitor cell and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor supports, then repeated every 28 to 35 days. Six escalating dose levels of cyclophosphamide and thiotepa were planned, beginning at cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and thiotepa 200 mg m(-2). At least three patients were enrolled for each dose level. Eighteen patients completed the study. The maximum tolerated dose was 3000 mg m(-2) cyclophosphamide and 400 mg m(-2) thiotepa per course. Haematological toxicity was manageable on an outpatient basis and did not increase significantly with dose escalation. Dose-limiting toxicity was chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression, which resulted in one toxic death and two life-threatening infections. Median times to treatment failure and survival were 11 and 26 months, respectively. Three patients were alive, free of disease 30 months after completion of the study. Such therapy allows for high-dose intensity and high cumulative doses on a short period of time with manageable toxicity.

[Huriet law: application in a regional cancer centre (Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon)]. / Loi Huriet: bilan d'application dans un centre régional de lutte contre le cancer (centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon).

Clinical research is one of the main activities in cancer centres and is submitted in France to a specific law (named "loi Huriet") which includes good clinical practices. We are now conducting a general program of quality evaluation and improvement in the regional cancer centre of Lyon (centre Léon-Bérard). Part of this program is an audit of the application of the Huriet law. Since no instrument exist for measuring this application, we have created a specific one, that attribute notation according to the different aspects of the law. Results show a good level of conformity but sometime non sufficient. There is no difference between the two studied years. Quality changes according to promoters (private or academic) and monitoring. Written procedures and specific training for the different actors are required to improve quality of clinical research with focus on the patient interest.

Multivariable analysis of prognostic factors for toxicity and survival for patients enrolled in phase I clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced solid tumors may be included in phase I clinical trials. In such studies, the benefit expected is generally lower than the likelihood of toxicity and may even be non-existent if the patient's life expectancy is too short. This study was performed to identify prognostic variables for toxicity and survival in patients who participate in phase I clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-four patients treated on a phase I clinical trial in our institute were evaluated retrospectively. Univariable and multivariable analyses of patients' characteristics were undertaken to determine their effects on the probability of grade 3 and 4 toxicity and on survival. RESULTS: Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was experienced by 56 patients (36%): dosage level at entry (P < 0.001) and age over 65 years (P = 0.03) were independently associated with the risk of toxicity. Median overall survival was 5 months. The multivariable analysis identified performance status 2 or 3 (P < 0.001) and lactate dehydrogenase levels greater than 600 UI (P < 0.001) as independent adverse prognostic variables for overall survival. Using these two parameters, we determined a prognostic index which allowed us to discriminate three risk groups of patients with an observed median survival of 8.5, 4.5 and 1.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subgroups with different survival expectancy can be identified among patients who are eligible for phase I clinical trials. If confirmed, the proposed prognostic model may be useful for therapeutic decision making in palliative oncology.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of S9788, a new multidrug-resistance reversal agent given alone and in combination with doxorubicin to patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this phase I study were to evaluate the toxic effects and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S9788, a new modifier of multidrug resistance (MDR), when given alone and in combination with doxorubicin to patients with advanced solid tumors; to achieve a potentially active plasma concentration of S9788; and to study the pharmacokinetics of both drugs. METHODS: A total of 26 patients (median age 58 years) entered the study. S9788 was given alone as a 30-min infusion at day 1 and in combination with a 50-mg/m2 bolus of doxorubicin at days 8 and 29. Dose levels of S9788 were escalated from 8 to 96 mg/m2 according to the modified Fibonacci scheme. Plasma samples were taken predose as well as during and up to 48 h after the beginning of infusion for S9788 and doxorubicin quantitation. Fractionated urine samples were also collected for up to 24 h for S9788 determination. RESULTS: The dose-limiting side effects of S9788 consisted of bradycardia, sometimes associated with faintness or dizziness. The MTD of S9788 was 96 mg/m2. No enhancement of doxorubicin toxicity was observed. One partial response (duration 140 days) was observed at 96 mg/m2 in a patient with multiple lung metastases from a refractory urothelial carcinoma. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in 24 patients. Since the mean apparent elimination half-life of S9788 was 46 +/- 23 h and the last plasma sampling time was 48 h, only model-independent parameters were considered. Plasma levels of S9788 were below the limit of quantitation (4 x 10[-3] microM) before each drug administration. S9788 plasma levels of up to 3.7 microM could be obtained with this administration schedule. The urinary elimination of the unchanged drug was negligible, whatever the collection period. In spite of the large inter- and intraindividual variability, plasma pharmacokinetics of S9788 given as a 30-min i.v. infusion were linear up to 96 mg/m2 and were not modified by doxorubicin administration. Doxorubicin pharmacokinetic parameters did not seem to be influenced by S9788 coadministration. CONCLUSION: The dose-limiting toxicity of S9788 consisted of bradycardia or clinical symptoms suggesting a vasovagal impact such as faintness or dizziness. The MTD of S9788 was 96 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetic parameters of doxorubicin in this study were close to those usually described and were not influenced by escalation of the S9788 dose. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between S9788 and doxorubicin. The clinical tolerability of the combined treatment is in good agreement with the pharmacokinetic findings, since no enhancement of doxorubicin toxicity was observed.

Phase I studies of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in patients with metastatic offast cancer: the French experience.

In an attempt to develop new, active, and convenient outpatient combination-chemotherapy regimens for patients with metastatic breast cancer, we performed two phase I studies combining paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) plus anthracycline for the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, without the use of hematopoietic growth factors. Study I was designed to test the tolerability and antitumor activity of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in combination with an epirubicin intravenous bolus. Study 2 explored a three-drug chemotherapy regimen: a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks. If any dose-limiting events occurred in two or more of six patients in the first course of a given dose level, that dose level was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Dose-limiting criteria included the following: neutrophils less than 0.25 x 10(9)/L lasting for > or = 5 days, any febrile neutropenia, World Health Organization grade 4 thrombocytopenia, World Health Organization grade > or = 3 nonhematologic toxicity or grade > or = 3 mucositis for more than 5 days, and absence of hematologic recovery at day 35. In both studies, paclitaxel doses were escalated in subsequent groups of three to six patients. For study I, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (110 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2). To date 40 patients have entered the study at eight dose levels. Of the 181 cycles evaluated, grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 63% of courses, with only five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity was observed in 43% of patients. Two patients experienced clinical heart failure. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached so far. At dose level 7 (paclitaxel [250 mg/m2]/epirubicin [50 mg/m2]), only one patient of six experienced febrile neutropenia. We are currently testing paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/epirubicin (75 mg/m2). Preliminary evaluation of response documents two complete and 16 partial responses in 37 evaluable patients (48% overall response rate). In study 2, the initial dose level consisted of paclitaxel (150 mg/m2)/epirubicin (50 mg/m2)/cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2). To date, three dose levels have been investigated in 16 evaluable patients (82 cycles). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic episodes were observed in 80% of courses, and five episodes were associated with neutropenic fever. Grade 2 neurotoxicity was observed in 28% of patients. The dose-limiting toxicity has not been reached, and we are currently investigating dose level 4 (paclitaxel 225 mg/m2). These trials confirm the tolerability of combined paclitaxel/epirubicin and paclitaxel/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. The antitumor activity is encouraging.

[Efficacy of massage and mobilization of the upper limb after surgical treatment of breast cancer]. / Efficacité du massage et de la mobilisation du membre supérieur après traitement chirurgical du cancer du sein.

We have compared different modes of rehabilitation after breast cancer surgery on a population of 257 patients treated at the Institute Gustave-Roussy in 1990 and 1991. The mode of rehabilitation was randomized according to a 2 X 2 design, between physiotherapy alone, shoulder movement alone, both or neither. Treatment began the day after breast surgery and continued for 7 days. Afterwards, all patients had physiotherapy and shoulder movements until the end of hospitalisation. Treatment efficacy was evaluated at day 7 by the volume of lymph drained, and by degree of shoulder movement. The volume of lymph collected by day 7 was reduced in the physiotherapy groups, but was not modified in the groups with shoulder movement. The degree of motion was larger in the group who had had both physiotherapy and shoulder movement. The frequencies of complications at day 7 and later were similar in the four treatment groups, but locoregional pain was less frequent in the two groups with shoulder movement than in the two other groups. An early treatment including both physiotherapy and shoulder movement seems advisable.

Phase I study of paclitaxel and epirubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary report on safety.

Attempting to develop a new active, convenient regimen, we initiated a phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) combined with epirubicin (Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to standard eligibility criteria, patients with chemotherapy-naive metastasis and at least one measurable lesion had to have left ventricular ejection fractions of at least 50%; the metastatic relapse had to have occurred more than 6 months after adjuvant treatment. Anthracycline-pretreated patients could not have received cumulative doses of more than 300 mg/m2 doxorubicin, 450 mg/m2 epirubicin, or 70 mg/m2 mitoxantrone. An intravenous bolus dose of epirubicin was followed by a 3-hour paclitaxel infusion, with courses repeated every 3 weeks. To date, seven dose levels have been investigated and 31 patients have been treated, 19 of whom had already received anthracyclines. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 37% and 19% of 123 courses, respectively, with five episodes of febrile neutropenia. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity has been observed in 42% of patients and cardiac toxicity in four patients (13%), all of whom had already received anthracyclines. One patient experienced transient myocardial ischemia, one had an asymptomatic decrease in ejection fraction, and two patients had clinical heart failure that required treatment. Dose-limiting toxicity was reached at dose level 5 (paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus epirubicin 60 mg/m2), with two of three patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Reducing the epirubicin dose to 50 mg/m2, however, allowed the paclitaxel dose to be escalated to 250 mg/m2. At this dose level, only one of six patients experienced febrile neutropenia. At a preliminary response evaluation (dose levels 1 to 6), 11 patients (44%) had partial responses, 12 patients (48%) had stable disease, and disease progressed in two patients. We conclude that the combination paclitaxel/epirubicin is safe for patients with metastatic breast cancer and, at this early evaluation, shows promising antitumor activity. Additional patients will be treated at dose level 5 to confirm whether dose-limiting toxicity occurs at this step. Indeed, we took into consideration that dose-limiting toxicity observed at this particular dose level in two of three patients might be due to hazard, since paclitaxel dose escalation up to 250 mg/m2 was further possible in association with 50 mg/m2 epirubicin.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a novel mitomycin C analog KW-2149.

KW-2149 is a new, semisynthetic, C-7-N-substituted, mitomycin C (MMC) analog showing equal or superior antitumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo assays. The preclinical activity profile combined with the hematological toxicity data in rodents and the water solubility of the compound compare favorably with MMC. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the toxicity profile and the optimal dosage of KW-2149. In this phase I study 37 patients received 97 courses of KW-2149 administered as an i.v. bolus injection every 21 days at sequential dose levels: 5, 10, 17, 25, 35, 47, 60, 75, 90 and 100 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity was moderate even at the 100 mg/m2 dose level. Grade IV leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in one of three patients at the 100 mg/m2 dose level. There was some evidence of a delayed-type bone marrow toxicity. Pulmonary toxicity was dose limiting, with grade III toxicity occurring in all three patients treated at a dose of 100 mg/m2. The type of lung toxicity was similar to the one observed with other antitumor antibiotics. No renal or cardiac toxicity was observed. Other toxicities were generally mild. Antitumor activity was observed in four patients. Data of drug monitoring demonstrated rapid metabolism and/or distribution of KW-2149 with a short half-life and the emergence of the cytotoxic metabolites M-16 and M-18. The dose-limiting toxicity of KW-2149 is pulmonary toxicity.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor activity of Irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with refractory solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients were entered in this phase I study. CPT-11 was administered intravenously over 30 minutes for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Dose levels ranged from 33 mg/m2/day to 115 mg/m2/day on days 1 through 3. The pharmacokinetics of total CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 were assayed by HPLC. RESULTS: The combination of leukopenia and diarrhea was dose-limiting toxicity at 115 mg/m2/day dose level, since 50% of the patients (5/10) experienced either grade 3-4 leukopenia, or diarrhea, or both. Leukopenia appeared to be a cumulative toxicity, with a global increase in its incidence and severity upon repeated administration of CPT-11. Other toxicities included nausea, vomiting, fatigue and alopecia. CPT-11 and active metabolite SN-38 pharmacokinetics were determined in 21 patients (29 courses). Both CPT-11 and SN-38 pharmacokinetics presented a high interpatient variability. CPT-11 mean maximum plasma concentrations reached 2034 ng/ml at the MTD (115 mg/m2). The terminal-phase half-life was 8.3 h and the mean residence time 10.2 h. The mean volume of distribution at steady state was 141 l/m2/h. CPT-11 rebound concentrations were observed in many courses at about 0.5 to 1 hour following the end of the i.v. infusion, which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling. Total body clearance did not vary with increased dosage (mean = 14.3 l/h/m2), indicating linear pharmacokinetics within the dose range administered in this trial. The total area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) increased proportionally to the CPT-11 dose. Mean metabolite SN-38 peak levels reached 41 ng/ml at the MTD. A significant correlation was observed between CPT-11 area under the curve (AUC) and its corresponding metabolite SN-38 AUC (r = 0.52, p < 0.05). SN-38 rebound concentrations were observed in many courses at about 0.5 to 1 hour following the end of the i.v. infusion, which is suggestive of enterohepatic recycling. Mean 24-h urinary excretion of CPT-11 accounted for 10% of the administered dose by the third day, whereas SN-38 urinary excretion accounted for 0.18% of the CPT-11 dose. In this phase I trial, the hematological toxicity correlated with neither CPT-11 nor SN-38 AUC. Diarrhea grade correlated significantly with CPT-11 AUC. Two partial (breast adenocarcinoma and carcinoma of unknown primary) and 2 minor (hepatocarcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma) responses were observed. CONCLUSION: The MTD for CPT-11 administered in a 3 consecutive-days-every-3 weeks schedule in this patient population is 115 mg/m2/day. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 100 mg/m2/day.

Phase I study of RP 49532A, a new protein-synthesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors.

Giroline (RP 49532A) is a new protein-synthesis inhibitor with broad antitumor activity in experimental models. In the present phase I study, Giroline was given by 24-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 3 to 15 mg/m2 to 12 patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. The dose-limiting toxic effects were delayed hypotension and severe asthenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 15 mg/m2. Transient nausea and vomiting during infusion were reported at all dose levels. Mild reversible prolongation of prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time was observed in most patients at dose levels above 3 mg/m2. No antitumor activity was observed. The toxicity profile of Giroline precludes further evaluation in cancer patients.

A phase I antiemetic study of MDL 73,147EF, a novel 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist in cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase I study with MDL 73,147EF, a new 5 hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, in 25 patients requiring emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 5 groups of 5 patients received rising unit doses of MDL 73,147EF (10 to 50 mg) intravenously before chemotherapy, with two additional doses per day if needed. Nausea was assessed by a patient-completed visual analogue scale and episodes of vomiting were recorded by an independent observer. RESULTS: 42% of the patients were complete or major responders on day one. Five patients were given other rescue antiemetic therapy. Adverse effects included headache (16%) diarrhea (8%) and other minor events. The best results were obtained with the 30, 40 and 50 mg doses. CONCLUSIONS: MDL 73,147EF is a well-tolerated and probably effective antiemetic agent which requires further evaluation in randomised controlled clinical studies.

Double-blind clinical study comparing alprazolam and doxepin in primary unipolar depression.

The therapeutic effect and safety of alprazolam and doxepin were studied in 126 outpatients suffering from primary unipolar depression. The 6-week study was double-blind with a random allocation of treatment. Patients were treated with a flexible dose of 1.0-4.5 mg of alprazolam and 50-225 mg of doxepin per day. The mean final doses were 2.7 mg for alprazolam and 137.5 mg for doxepin. The results indicate that alprazolam and doxepin were equally efficacious. The incidence of side-effects was lower in the alprazolam treatment group.