Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(6): 547-553, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29573102

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Analysis of a private insurer's administrative data set revealed significant variation in the length of hospital stay following hernia surgery. OBJECTIVES: This review examined factors influencing the performance of day surgery for inguinal, femoral and umbilical hernia repair in adults. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) comparing same day hernia surgery to surgery followed by an overnight stay. REVIEW METHODS: Screening of studies by abstract and full text was completed by a single researcher and checked by a second. Studies were selected for inclusion based on a step-wise approach across three phases. RESULTS: Limited evidence from one systematic review, and three case series studies including 3213 patients found that same day hernia surgery was as safe and effective as an overnight stay. All identified CPGs recommended a same day procedure for most patients. Two case series studies reported that 3-8% of patients were ineligible for day procedures due to medical reasons; however, the characteristics of patients, in general, which are not suitable, have not been adequately investigated. CONCLUSIONS: Day surgery for groin hernia repair is safe and effective for most patients. However, evidence-based support is only one of many factors that may contribute to the uptake of day surgery in Australia. There is an opportunity for key stakeholders across the private healthcare system to deliver an equally effective but more sustainable and affordable hernia care by increasing the day surgery rates.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Herniorrafia/métodos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Lacunas da Prática Profissional , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Segurança do Paciente , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(5): 402-407, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29411485

RESUMO

In 2014, the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons identified, through internal analysis, a considerable attrition rate within its Surgical Education and Training programme. Within the attrition cohort, choosing to leave accounted for the majority. Women were significantly over-represented. It was considered important to study these 'leavers' if possible. An external group with medical education expertise were engaged to do this, a report that is now published and titled 'A study exploring the reasons for and experiences of leaving surgical training'. During this time, the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons came under serious external review, leading to the development of the Action Plan on Discrimination, Bullying and Sexual Harassment in the Practice of Surgery, known as the Building Respect, Improving Patient Safety (BRIPS) action plan. The 'Leaving Training Report', which involved nearly one-half of all voluntary 'leavers', identified three major themes that were pertinent to leaving surgical training. Of these, one was about surgery itself: the complexity, the technical, decision-making and lifestyle demands, the emotional aspects of dealing with seriously sick patients and the personal toll of all of this. This narrative literature review investigates these aspects of surgical education from the trainees' perspective.


Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Australásia , Bullying , Feminino , Humanos , Assédio Sexual , Carga de Trabalho
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(6): E507-E511, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982209

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) compared with multiphase CE computed tomography (CE-CT) scan to characterize suspected liver lesions in patients with known colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: A decision analytic model linking diagnostic accuracy to health outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma was constructed. The model assumed that CE-MRI has superior sensitivity and equivalent specificity to CE-CT, and patients with a colorectal liver metastasis could be eligible for curative surgery or chemotherapy and palliation. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis was associated with worse health outcomes (disutility). Cost-effectiveness was calculated as the incremental cost relative to the incremental benefit, the benefit was estimated using quality-adjusted life years. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: The clinical evidence supports increased sensitivity of CE-MRI compared with CE-CT (0.943 versus 0.768). CE-MRI was more effective and more costly than CE-CT. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated to be $40 548 per quality-adjusted life year gained. The model is most sensitive to the cost of MRI, cost of palliative treatment and the disutility associated with delayed palliative care. The results were also sensitive to the assumptions made about the clinical algorithm. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence of the potential cost-effectiveness associated with CE-MRI for the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with identified colorectal carcinoma. CE-MRI can be recommended as cost-effective provided it replaces CE-CT and that improved diagnostic accuracy results in earlier, curative, disease management.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Idoso , Austrália , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Meios de Contraste , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos
5.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 33(4): 434-441, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29241476

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is growing trend for some surgical procedures previously performed in hospitals to be done in alternative settings, including office-based facilities. There has been some safety concerns reported in the media, which document serious adverse events following procedures performed in an office-based setting. To understand the current regulatory oversight of surgery in this setting ASERNIP-S conducted a review of the legislative and accreditation process governing these facilities in Australia. METHODS: Using rapid review methodology, internet searches targeted government Web sites for relevant publicly-available documents. Use of consolidated versions of legislative instruments ensured currency of information. Standards were sourced directly from the issuing authorities or those that oversee the accreditation process. RESULTS: Within Australia, healthcare facilities for surgery and their licensing are defined by each state and territory, which results in significant jurisdictional variation. These variations relate to the need for anesthesia beyond conscious sedation and listing of procedures in legislative instruments. In 2013, Australia adopted National Safety and Quality Health Service standards (NSQHS standards) for the accreditation of hospitals and day surgery centers; however, there is no NSQHS standard for office-based facilities. The main legislative driver for compliance is access to reimbursement schemes for service delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The legislative and accreditation framework creates a situation whereby healthcare facilities that provide services outside the various legal definitions of surgery and those not covered by a reimbursement scheme, can operate without licensing and accreditation oversight. This situation exposes patients to potential increased risk of harm when receiving treatment in such unregulated facilities.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/normas , Credenciamento/normas , Fiscalização e Controle de Instalações/legislação & jurisprudência , Fiscalização e Controle de Instalações/normas , Acreditação/normas , Austrália , Certificação/normas , Sedação Consciente , Humanos , Licenciamento/normas , Segurança do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Segurança do Paciente/normas
6.
J Anesth ; 31(3): 432-452, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28271227

RESUMO

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks can provide analgesia postoperatively for a range of surgeries. Abundant clinical trials have assessed TAP block showing positive analgesic effects. This systematic review assesses safety and effectiveness outcomes of TAP block in all clinical settings, comparing with both active (standard care) and inactive (placebo) comparators. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the University of York CRD databases were searched. RCTs were screened for their eligibility and assessed for risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed on available data. TAP block showed an equivalent safety profile to all comparators in the incidence of nausea (OR = 1.07) and vomiting (OR = 0.81). TAP block was more effective in reducing morphine consumption [MD = 13.05, 95% CI (8.33, 51.23)] and in delaying time to first analgesic request [MD = 123.49, 95% CI (48.59, 198.39)]. Postoperative pain within 24 h was reduced or at least equivalent in TAP block compared to its comparators. Therefore, TAP block is a safe and effective procedure compared to standard care, placebo and other analgesic techniques. Further research is warranted to investigate whether the TAP block technique can be improved by optimizing dose and technique-related factors.


Assuntos
Analgesia/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Músculos Abdominais , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Morfina/administração & dosagem
7.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 45(1): 281-290, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27299482

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To establish the relative diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (GA-MRI) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), dynamic MRI (D-MRI), gadopentetic acid-enhanced MRI (GP-MRI), or gadobenic acid-enhanced MRI (GB-MRI) in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the University of York CRD databases were searched to February 29 2016 for any studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of GA-MRI to CE-CT, D-MRI, GP-MRI, or GB-MRI in patients with known or suspected HCC. Diagnostic accuracy outcomes (true positive, true negative, false positive, false negative) were extracted and analyzed using the bivariate model of Reitsma et al (2005). RESULTS: In studies comparing GA-MRI to CE-CT in patients with any-sized lesions, estimated sensitivities were 0.881 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.766, 0.944) and 0.713 (95% CI = 0.577, 0.819) respectively. Estimated specificities were 0.926 (95% CI = 0.829, 0.97) and 0.918 (95% CI = 0.829, 0.963), respectively. This difference was not statistically significant. In studies including patients with small lesions GA-MRI was superior to CE-CT, with estimated sensitivities of 0.919 (95% CI = 0.834, 0.962) and 0.637 (95% CI = 0.565, 0.704 and estimated specificities of 0.936 (95% CI = 0.882, 0.966) and 0.971 (95% CI = 0.937, 0.987), respectively. In studies comparing GA-MRI to D-MRI in patients with any-sized lesions estimated sensitivities were 0.907 (95% CI = 0.870, 0.934) and 0.820 (95% CI = 0.776, 0.857); estimated specificities were 0.929 (95% CI = 0.877, 0.961) and 0.934 (95% CI = 0.881, 0.964). CONCLUSION: GA-MRI has superior diagnostic ability to CE-CT in patients with small lesions. In patients with any-sized lesions there is no evidence that GA-MRI is superior to either CE-CT to D-MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:281-290.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiologia , Gadolínio DTPA , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/estatística & dados numéricos , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meglumina/análogos & derivados , Compostos Organometálicos , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
8.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 31(11): 1739-1749, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27682648

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management of hepatocyte-specific gadoxetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (GA-MRI) compared to contrast enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in patients with liver metastases. METHOD: Four biomedical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, York CRD) were searched from January 1991 to February 2016. Studies investigating the accuracy or management impact of GA-MRI compared to CE-CT in patients with known or suspected liver metastases were included. Bias was evaluated using QUADAS-II. Univariate meta-analysis of sensitivity ratios (RR) were conducted in the absence of heterogeneity, calculated using I 2 , Tau values (τ) and prediction intervals. RESULTS: Nine diagnostic accuracy studies (537 patients with 1216 lesions) and four change in management studies (488 patients with 281 lesions) were included. Per-lesion sensitivity and specificity estimates for GA-MRI ranged from 86.9-100.0 % and 80.2-98.0 %, respectively, compared to 51.8-84.6 % and 77.2-98.0 % for CE-CT. Meta-analysis found GA-MRI to be significantly more sensitive than CE-CT (RR = 1.29, 95 % CI = 1.18-1.40, P < 0.001), with equivalent specificity (RR = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.910-1.042, P = 0.44). The largest difference was observed for lesions smaller than 10 mm for which GA-MRI was significantly more sensitive (RR = 2.21, 95 % CI = 1.47-3.32, P < 0.001) but less specific (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.87-0.98, P = 0.008). GA-MRI affected clinical management in 26 of 155 patients (16.8 %) who had a prior CE-CT; however, no studies investigated the consequences of using GA-MRI instead of CE-CT. CONCLUSION: GA-MRI is significantly more sensitive than CE-CT for detecting liver metastases, which leads to a modest impact on patient management in the context of an equivocal CE-CT result.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/química , Gadolínio DTPA/química , Hepatócitos/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde
9.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 50(6): 1010-1018, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27242357

RESUMO

A continuous paravertebral block is used when pain relief is required beyond the duration of a single-injection paravertebral block. Surgical procedures requiring an incision into the pleural cavity are some of the most painful procedures postoperatively and, if not managed appropriately, can lead to chronic pain. The current gold standard for post-cardiothoracic surgery pain management is epidural analgesia, which has contraindications, a failure rate of up to 12% and risk of complications such as epidural abscess and spinal haematoma. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the use of a continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the continuous paravertebral block against epidural analgesia, wound infiltration, placebo or standard care (intravenous opioids) for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia were considered for inclusion in the systematic review. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and the University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases were searched from inception to 15 September 2014. Risk of bias and generalizability were assessed using a modified Downs and Black checklist. A meta-analysis was conducted on suitable studies comparing the continuous paravertebral nerve block with epidural anaesthesia, with fixed-effects models being used to pool the effects. Twenty-three randomized controlled trials with 1120 participants were included. The continuous paravertebral block was associated with a significant improvement in incidence of nausea and vomiting (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval = [0.16, 0.56]), hypotension (odds ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = [0.06, 0.41]) and urinary retention (odds ratio = 0.22, 95% confidence interval = [0.09, 0.52]) compared with the epidural block. No statistically significant difference in pain relief was reported. The continuous paravertebral block has equivalent analgesic effects to epidural analgesia, wound infiltration and standard care, but is associated with a lower incidence of nausea and vomiting, hypotension and urinary retention than epidural analgesia.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Int Wound J ; 12(5): 537-44, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24028566

RESUMO

We present the case of a 53-year-old Caucasian male smoker with remote history of left lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and a strong family history of thrombosis, who presented to the Center for Wound Healing at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital with spontaneous left leg ulceration. Prothrombotic evaluation showed homozygosity for the factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was commenced with warfarin (Coumadin®) and the patient underwent successful debridement and Apligraf® followed by split-thickness skin graft (STSG) of two wounds. He had an uneventful postoperative course and on the 27th postoperative day the grafts were 95% intact. However, by postoperative day 41 there was 10% graft loss, and over the subsequent 2 weeks both grafts necrosed. On further questioning, it transpired that the patient had discontinued his warfarin on postoperative day 37 because he thought that it was no longer necessary. The patient is enrolled in the Wound Etiology and Healing (WE-HEAL) study, and at the time of the original graft, residual skin fragments from the STSG were transplanted onto a nude mouse for development of an animal model of wound healing. The mouse graft was successful and was harvested at postoperative day 87 for pathological examination. We review the mechanisms by which prothrombotic states, particularly FVL mutation, can contribute to skin graft failure and delayed wound healing. This case highlights the importance of considering prothrombotic conditions in patients with spontaneous leg ulcerations and the impact of therapeutic anticoagulation on healing. It further allows us to demonstrate the efficacy of the animal model in which residual fragments of STSG tissue are utilised for transplant onto nude mice for manipulation in the laboratory.


Assuntos
Resistência à Proteína C Ativada/complicações , Fator V/genética , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Úlcera da Perna/terapia , Mutação/genética , Transplante de Pele , Resistência à Proteína C Ativada/patologia , Animais , Colágeno , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Úlcera da Perna/etiologia , Úlcera da Perna/patologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Nus , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...