Exploration of Male Attitudes on Partnerships and Sexuality with Female BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Women with BRCA mutations are inundated with decisions about managing cancer risks and childbearing considerations. Decisions become more complicated when women face disclosing their mutation and risk-reduction options to a romantic partner. This study identifies the concerns and perspectives of male romantic partners regarding these unique decisions. Twenty-five male participants completed an online survey posted to cancer support group message boards. Participants reported relationship changes regarding intimacy levels (n = 9), attraction (n = 2), and communication (n = 22) after mutation disclosure. Participants whose partners had not undergone prophylactic mastectomy (n = 14) reported concerns regarding sexual relations (n = 5), post-surgical appearance (n = 2), post-surgical attraction (n = 5), and health/lifespan (n = 9). Participants did not express attitude changes toward childbearing. While mutation disclosure conversations and surgical options are concerns for many BRCA mutation carriers in relationships, male partners share these concerns. Aspects of the relationship may change, but male study participants continued to support their partners. This information can benefit female BRCA mutation carriers, their current or future partners, and genetic counselors working with this particular population.

Does a History-Indicated Cerclage Affect Gestational Age at Delivery in Women with Evidence of Recurrent Cervical Insufficiency?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with recurrent evidence of cervical insufficiency (CI) and with a history-indicated cerclage (HIC) placed at the beginning of the second trimester will deliver later than the index case. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study of singleton pregnancy with history-consistent CI. Patients had a cerclage placed between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation. Transvaginal cervical measurement was done between 18 and 24 weeks. Those with a cervical measurement 25 mm were considered to have recurrent CI (Group A). Gestational age at delivery of the index case (Group C) and the cerclage patients (Groups A and B), which are the same patients as Group C, was compared using Student's t test. They have the same genetics and anatomy. RESULTS: A total of 124 women had an HIC. Sixteen (13%) had recurrent CI (Group A). Comparing cases, the proximate average age at delivery was 22 weeks as compared with 33 weeks and 3 days for those with a cerclage (p < 0.001) (Group A vs. B). In those with a cervical length > 25 mm (Group B), 96 (89%) had a term delivery. In the index cases 64% delivered at 22 weeks or less (Group C). CONCLUSION: Cerclage in those patients with recurrent CI has a significantly improved outcome as compared with the index case. This minimizes pregnancy loss.