As we age: listening to the voice of LGBTQ older adults.

The LGBT+ community is gaining long-overdue public health attention within the rapidly expanding demographic of older adults. As a group, LGBT+ older adults represent a range of diverse biopsychosocial needs and life experiences that may differ markedly from the general population. This has translated into health disparities experienced by this group and the emergence of policies calling for improved services for this community. In response, this qualitative study engaged ten focus groups (a total of 48 participants) throughout one mid-Atlantic state to better understand the experiences and perceptions of LGBT+ older adults regarding their expectations and needs as they age. Themes included (1) an emphasis on the nuance of connection as an aging LGBT+ adult; (2) a rich discussion of experiences with and expectations for quality of services as this group ages; (3) the realities of planning for future living arrangements as a member of this population; and (4) a clearer understanding of the two sides of advocacy for this group, as a personal responsibility and a call for allyship. Based on insights shared by participants, implications are discussed for improved and more visible engagement of this community within our heath and humans service sectors. We also affirm the need for greater attention from researchers and policy makers in respect to the whole health needs of this group. As a society and as professionals, we need to respond to these needs in better support of equity in the aging process for LGBT+ older adults.

Indifference to the difference? Older lesbian and gay men's perceptions of aging services.

This qualitative study examined: 1) What older lesbians and gay men know about OAA-funded services; 2) attitudes towards the services; 3) experiences utilizing the services; 4) how current needs are met; and 5) plans for care as they age. Focus groups were conducted from June-August 2016. Purposive and snowball sampling yielded a sample size of 31. Five focus groups were conducted, and analysis used Grounded Theory. Four themes emerged: 1) low expectations of a welcoming environment, 2) the importance of being out, 3) need for LGBT-specific services, and 4) how to create inclusive services.