Randomized Secondary Prevention Trials in Participants With Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis.

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis is a prevalent cause of ischemic stroke worldwide. Its association with silent cerebral infarcts and its contribution to cognitive impairment and dementia emphasize the critical need for disease prevention and effective management strategies. Despite extensive research on secondary stroke prevention treatment over the past several decades, intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis continues to exhibit a notably higher recurrent stroke rate compared with other causes. This review focuses on randomized secondary prevention trials involving antithrombotic therapy, endovascular treatment, open surgical therapy, and remote ischemic conditioning. It aims to provide an insightful overview of the major findings from each trial and their implications for future research efforts.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Setting of Electroconvulsive Therapy in a Patient With an Unsecured Cerebral Aneurysm: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to report a case of a patient who experienced a fatal aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage during the course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). METHODS: This is a case report and review of the literature. RESULTS: Electroconvulsive therapy is widely viewed as a safe and effective treatment for major depressive disorder; however, there remains some uncertainty regarding the safety of ECT in patients with cerebral aneurysms. Many cases exist documenting the safety of ECT in patients with both secured and unsecured cerebral aneurysms; however, these patients had aneurysms that were associated with a low (ie, ≤2.6%) 5-year cumulative rupture rate, whereas the patient in our case had an aneurysm associated with a 14.5% five-year cumulative rupture rate. CONCLUSIONS: We stress that ECT should not be viewed as a universally safe procedure in patients with cerebral aneurysms and the 5-year cumulative aneurysm rupture rate should be used in the discussion of the risk-benefit ratio of ECT in patients with unsecured cerebral aneurysms.

Variability in Motor and Language Recovery during the Acute Stroke Period.

BACKGROUND: Most stroke recovery occurs by 90 days after onset, with proportional recovery models showing an achievement of about 70% of the maximal remaining recovery. Little is known about recovery during the acute stroke period. Moreover, data are described for groups, not for individuals. In this observational cohort study, we describe for the first time the daily changes of acute stroke patients with motor and/or language deficits over the first week after stroke onset. METHODS: Patients were enrolled within 24-72 h after stroke onset with upper extremity hemiparesis, aphasia, or both, and were tested daily until day 7 or discharge with the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke, the Boston Naming Test, and the comprehension domain from the Western Aphasia Battery. Discharge scores, and absolute and proportional changes were examined using t-tests for pairwise comparisons and linear regression to determine relative contributions of initial impairment, lesion volume, and age to recovery over this period. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 19 had motor deficits alone, 8 had aphasia alone, and 7 had motor and language deficits. In a group analysis, statistically significant changes in absolute scores were found in the motor (p < 0.001) and comprehension (p < 0.001) domains but not in naming. Day-by-day recovery curves for individual patients displayed wide variation with comparable initial impairment. Proportional recovery calculations revealed that, on average, patients achieved less than 1/3 of their potential recovery by the time of discharge. Multivariate regression showed that the amount of variance accounted for by initial severity, age, and lesion volume in this early time period was not significant for motor or language domains. CONCLUSIONS: Over the first week after stroke onset, recovery of upper extremity hemiparesis and aphasia were not predictable on the basis of initial impairment, lesion volume, or age. In addition, patients only achieved about 1/3 of their remaining possible recovery based on the anticipated 70% proportion found at 90 days. These findings suggest that the complex interaction between poststroke structural repair, regeneration, and functional reorganization during the first week after stroke has yet to be elucidated.