Adherence to early mobilisation: Key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been proven effective in liver surgery. Adherence to the ERAS pathway is variable. This study seeks to evaluate adherence to key components of an ERAS protocol in liver resection, and identify the components associated with successful clinical outcomes. METHOD: All patients undergoing liver resections for two consecutive years were included in our ERAS pathway. Six key components of ERAS included preoperative assessment, nutrition and gastrointestinal function, postoperative analgesia, mobilisation and discharges. Successful accomplishment of ERAS was defined as hospital discharge by postop day (POD) 6. Adherences of these elements were compared between the successful and un-successful groups. RESULTS: During the studied period, 223 patients underwent liver resections, among which 103 had major hepatectomies. N = 147 patients (66%) were discharged within our ERAS protocol target (6 days). On multivariable analysis, sitting out of bed by POD 1 (p < 0.03), walking by POD 3 (p = 0.03), removal of urinary catheter by POD 3 (p < 0.01), and avoiding major complications (p < 0.01) were factors associated with successful completion to our ERAS protocol; whereas advanced age (p = 0.34) and discontinuation of PCA/epidural by POD 3 (p = 0.50) were not significant parameters. There was a significant difference in the length of stay (p < 0.01) following major and minor liver resection, of which the indications for surgery also varied significantly. There was no difference in hospital re-admission rate, and morbidity and mortality between major and minor liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Facilitating early mobilisation and reducing postoperative complications are keys to successful outcomes of ERAS in liver resection.

Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation before planned liver resection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with low fitness as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) have higher mortality and morbidity after surgery. Preoperative exercise intervention, or prehabilitation, has been suggested as a method to improve CPET values and outcomes. This trial sought to assess the capacity of a 4-week supervised exercise programme to improve fitness before liver resection for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: This was a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a 4-week (12 sessions) high-intensity cycle, interval training programme in patients undergoing elective liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. The primary endpoint was oxygen uptake at the anaerobic threshold. Secondary endpoints included other CPET values and preoperative quality of life (QoL) assessed using the SF-36®. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were randomized (20 to prehabilitation, 18 to standard care), and 35 (25 men and 10 women) completed both preoperative assessments and were analysed. The median age was 62 (i.q.r. 54-69) years, and there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Prehabilitation led to improvements in preoperative oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (+1·5 (95 per cent c.i. 0·2 to 2·9) ml per kg per min) and peak exercise (+2·0 (0·0 to 4·0) ml per kg per min). The oxygen pulse (oxygen uptake per heart beat) at the anaerobic threshold improved (+0·9 (0·0 to 1·8) ml/beat), and a higher peak work rate (+13 (4 to 22) W) was achieved. This was associated with improved preoperative QoL, with the overall SF-36® score increasing by 11 (95 per cent c.i. 1 to 21) (P = 0·028) and the overall SF-36® mental health score by 11 (1 to 22) (P = 0·037). CONCLUSION: A 4-week prehabilitation programme can deliver improvements in CPET scores and QoL before liver resection. This may impact on perioperative outcome. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01523353 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).

Blood cultures in acute surgical admissions.

INTRODUCTION: Obtaining blood cultures prior to the administration of antimicrobial therapy was a key recommendation of the 2012 UK Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Few studies have examined the effect blood cultures have on clinical management and there have been none on acute surgical admissions. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the effect of blood cultures on clinical management in acute surgical admissions. METHODS: Data on acute surgical patients admitted between 1 January and 31 December 2012 were extracted from hospital records. Patients given intravenous antibiotics within 24 hours of admission were identified. Data collected included antibiotics administered, blood culture results, admission observations and white blood cell count. Case notes were reviewed for patients with positive cultures to establish whether the result led to a change in management. RESULTS: Of 5,887 acute surgical admissions, 1,346 received intravenous antibiotics within 24 hours and 978 sets of blood cultures were taken in 690 patients. The recommended two sets of cultures were obtained in 246 patients (18%). Patients who had blood cultures taken had the same in-hospital mortality as those who had none taken (3.6% vs 3.5%, p=0.97). Blood cultures were positive in 80 cases (11.6%). The presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome did not increase positivity rates (12.9% vs 10.3%, p=0.28). Overall, cultures altered management in two patients (0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Blood cultures rarely affect clinical management. In order to assess the additional value that blood cultures bring to sepsis management in acute surgical admissions, a prospective randomised trial focusing on outcome is needed.

A systematic review of the role of hepatectomy in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

AIM: This review sought to systematically appraise the literature to establish the role of hepatectomy in treating renal cell carcinoma hepatic metastases. METHOD: Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers reporting survival of patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Six studies containing 140 patients were included. There were no randomised controlled trials. Perioperative mortality was 4.3%, with reported morbidity between 13 and 30%. Patients with metachronous presentation, and a greater time interval between resection of primary tumour and development of metachronous metastases, appeared to have better survival. There was no difference in survival between patients with solitary and multiple metastases. CONCLUSION: Few patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma are suitable for hepatectomy as metastatic disease is usually widespread. Selected patients may experience a survival benefit, but identifying these patients remains difficult.

Radiological assessment of response to neoadjuvant transcatheter hepatic therapy with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI(®)) for colorectal liver metastases does not predict tumour destruction or long-term outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter hepatic therapy with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI(®)) allows targeted delivery of irinotecan direct to liver tissue and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Accurate assessment of tumour response to therapy is vital to guide optimal treatment. Preliminary work has suggested existing criteria for radiological response may not reflect pathological response after neoadjuvant DEBIRI. This study assessed the relationship between existing and novel radiological response criteria and pathological tumour response as well as long-term outcome. METHODS: Patients with easily resectable CRLM were treated with DEBIRI 4 weeks prior to resection and pathological tumour response graded using a validated system. Radiological response was assessed using RECIST and novel morphological response criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with 37 lesions were treated with DEBIRI. Median residual tumour was 20% (range 0-80), median necrosis 45% (10-100) and median fibrosis 10% (10-70). Twenty patients (91%) demonstrated stable disease by RECIST, with 11 (50%) demonstrating partial morphological response. Neither radiological response criteria correlated with pathological response. Overall median disease free survival (DFS) was 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7-22.5). Radiological response was not associated with DFS. CONCLUSION: Existing criteria reporting short-term radiological response to DEBIRI do not accurately predict pathological tumour response or long-term outcome. Further work is necessary to define the optimum timing and method of assessing response to DEBIRI.

Routine staging laparoscopy has no place in the management of colorectal liver metastases.

AIMS: Staging laparoscopy has been recommended in the management of patients with colorectal liver metastases prior to hepatectomy in order to reduce the incidence and associated morbidity of futile laparotomies. The utility of staging laparoscopy has not been assessed in patients undergoing CT, PET-CT and MRI as standard preoperative staging. METHODS: All patients undergoing attempted open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases between 1/4/2008 and 31/3/2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained research database. All patients who underwent futile laparotomy were identified, with demographics and operative notes subsequently analysed. RESULTS: A total of 274 patients underwent attempted open hepatectomy during the study period. At laparotomy 12 (4.4%) patients were found to have irresectable disease. There were no unifying demographic factors within the patients undergoing futile laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: With modern imaging, the potential yield of staging laparoscopy is low. Staging laparoscopy should not be used routinely, but may have a role in the case of specific clinical concerns.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of follow-up after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The evidence surrounding optimal follow-up after liver resection for colorectal metastases remains unclear. A significant proportion of recurrences occur in the early postoperative period, and some groups advocate more intensive review at this time. METHODS: A systematic review of literature published between January 2003 and May 2010 was performed. Studies that described potentially curative primary resection of colorectal liver metastases that involved a defined follow-up protocol and long-term survival data were included. For meta-analysis, studies were grouped into intensive (more frequent review in the first 5 years after resection) and uniform (same throughout) follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria, involving 7330 patients. Only five specifically addressed follow-up. Patients undergoing intensive early follow-up had a median survival of 39·8 (95 per cent confidence interval 34·3 to 45·3) months with a 5-year overall survival rate of 41·9 (34·4 to 49·4) per cent. Patients undergoing routine follow-up had a median survival of 40·2 (33·4 to 47·0) months, with a 5-year overall survival rate of 38·4 (32·6 to 44·3) months. CONCLUSION: Evidence regarding follow-up after liver resection is poor. Meta-analysis failed to identify a survival advantage for intensive early follow-up.