Psychiatric trainees as second victims after exposure to patient suicide: a French qualitative study.

Background: The exposure to patient suicide (PS) has been identified as one of the most frequent and troubling professional experience for psychiatric trainees. Further studies are needed to better understand how residents cope with these experiences and the association between perceived support and the impacts of PS. Method: In this qualitative study, we aimed to assess the impact of exposure to PS during psychiatric residency on trainees' professional career and practical experience. A total of 19 French psychiatric residents participated in 4 focus-groups performed between November 2017 and May 2019. Results: A total of 4 thematic clusters were identified through a five-step content analysis, namely: (a) reactions to the exposure; (b) coping strategies; (c) professional impact; and (d) prevention and postvention proposals. All participants described the critical impact of the support provided after PS, especially by their senior staff. Those who felt supported by their superior reported less negative impact, both in emotional and professional dimensions. Participants also shared proposals to improve the prevention and postvention issues related to the exposure to PS. Conclusion: We performed the first qualitative study based on focus groups on the impact of PS on psychiatric residents, which allowed for an in-depth understanding of the participants' lived experiences of the exposure to PS. The narratives inform the need and means to implement prevention and postvention strategies designed to buffer the negative impact of the exposure to PS in psychiatric trainees.

Impact of exposure to severe suicidal behaviours in patients during psychiatric training: An online French survey.

AIM: Patient suicide (PS) has been identified as a frequent and stressful "occupational hazard" for mental health professionals. Studies are needed to assess the impact on psychiatric trainees of the exposure to severe patient suicidal behaviours. METHODS: Our cross-sectional study aimed to measure the prevalence of exposure to PS and severe patient suicide attempts (SPSA) in French psychiatric trainees. We also assessed the emotional, traumatic and professional impacts and perceived support in the aftermath through a 62-item online questionnaire that included the French version of the IES-R, a composite emotional score and questions about professional practice and perceived support. All French psychiatric trainees were contacted regarding participation in the study through email and social networks between November 2017 and March 2018. RESULTS: A total of 409 trainees participated in the survey (response rate = 16.4%). 253 trainees fully completed the questionnaire. Of the 253 trainees, 43.2% were exposed to PS and 13.8% to SPSA. The exposure mostly occurred in the early stage of the training period. Ten to 15% of exposed trainees showed a high level of traumatic and emotional impact and 8.1% exhibited clinically relevant symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We found that 21.6% received no support in the aftermath, especially after PS. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of psychiatric trainees encounter severe suicidal behaviours of patients, and a substantial part of them is highly impacted. Our results thus stress the need for programmes dedicated to the prevention of the deleterious effects of the exposure to PS or SPSA in psychiatric trainees.

The SUPPORT-S Protocol Study: A Postvention Program for Professionals After Patient or User Suicide.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to patient or user suicide (PUS) is identified as a challenging occupational hazard for mental health and social work professionals. Professionals exposed to PUS may encounter several ranges of emotional, traumatic or professional impacts in the aftermath. A high proportion of exposed professionals reports a lack of support in the aftermath of PUS. SUPPORT is a postvention program designed to provide a comprehensive, adaptative and effective support to professionals impacted by PUS. The aims of the SUPPORT-S study are to (1) improve the design of the SUPPORT program, (2) evaluate the effectiveness of the program to buffer the emotional, traumatic and professional impacts and to improve the perceived social support for professionals exposed to PUS, and (3) provide more insights into the consequences of PUS on both professionals and organizations. METHOD: The SUPPORT-S study is a mixed method collaborative and participatory action research. The simultaneous and complementary collection and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data will offer an in-depth evaluation of the implementation and the effectiveness of the program. The qualitative evaluation includes: (a) an ethnographic observation; (b) 25 semi-directed interviews with randomized participants; (c) an activity analysis with providers of the program; and (d) collaborative sharing of the results with providers and participants. The quantitative evaluation includes pre- and post-measures in participants of: (a) emotional impact (Differential Emotions Scale IV); (b) traumatic impact (Impact of Event Scale-Revised); (c) professional impact (non-validated questionnaire); and (d) perceived social support (Perceived Social Support Scale for Professionals). The action research design will rely on: (a) the cycling process of implementation/evaluation/data sharing/adjustment and (b) the participatory approach through data sharing with providers and participants. Triangulation, saturation, randomization, and participatory design will also reduce the risk of biases and will improve the generalizability of conclusions. EXPECTED RESULTS: We expect the SUPPORT-S study to evaluate and improve the design of the SUPPORT program to effectively help professionals to cope with PUS. CONCLUSION: The results of the study will allow us to disseminate an effective and adaptive postvention program for professionals and institutions encountering PUS.

Moving towards shared decision making in the physician-patient encounter in France: State of the art and future prospects.

In this paper we present the evolution of shared decision making since the mid-nineties in terms of legislation, official statements and guidelines. We outline the goals and declarations of the French Ministry of Health and the French National Authority for Health, for whom informing patients and shared decision-making are central concerns. Finally, we discuss research projects and clinical initiatives in shared decision-making in France and provide a general overview of progress and barriers to progress.

[Intestinal microbiota and emergence of new representations of the body: a psychosocial approach]. / Microbiote intestinal et émergence de nouvelles représentations du corps - Une approche psychosociale.

In view of the growing importance attached to the gut microbiota in preventive medicine and treatment, it would seem essential to identify and analyse the modalities of its representation in a psychosocial approach. In the first part of this article, we will discuss the renewal of representations of the digestive tract brought about by scientific discourse on the gut microbiota, mainly regarding the anthropological status of the intestines and faeces. Then in the second part we will focus on ways of taking advantage of the variable nature of the microbiota by food choices, and we will also focus on therapeutic approaches that use transplantations of faecal matter, and the ensuing loss of privacy entailed (an anthropological notion of defil).

[Qualitative and collaborative research with cancer patients. Experience narratives of treatments for peritoneal carcinomatosis]. / Une recherche qualitative et collaborative auprès de patients atteints de cancer. Récits d'expérience des traitements de la carcinose péritonéale.

UNLABELLED: This CORCAN study is concerned with the way patients hospitalised for peritoneal carcinosis perceive surgical treatment and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify and analyse, using concepts of social representation and accounts of the illness, characteristics of the way this treatment is experienced; (2) to inform doctors and healthcare workers about patients' representations, with a view to adjusting the treatment, the care and the information given to patients. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-eight directive and nondirective interviews were conducted longitudinally with 21 patients (13 women and 7 men) hospitalised for treatment by cell killing and HIPEC. RESULTS: Five important elements of concern were raised and discussed by the patients at different stages of the disease, then reported and discussed with the doctors and healthcare workers. These were patients' experiences of: the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), randomisation, intensive care, the effects of surgery on the digestive system, reorganising their diet, and returning home.

Medication and the patient-doctor relationship: a qualitative study with patients suffering from fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is characterized by a diffuse and predominantly axial and chronic pain, for which there is no explicit rationale for treatment options. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study aims to understand the medication experience of patients with fibromyalgia and their relationship with the doctors derived from treatment negotiation. DESIGN: A qualitative approach was used, based on interviews with patients. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews were held in a public hospital, with 35 patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia. Qualitative content analysis was performed. RESULTS: The first axis is centred on the unsuccessful quest for an effective treatment for pain and the feeling of dismissal of patients, who are in search of validation and recognition. The second part of the accounts explains the medication adjustments and the search for collaboration. Developing a model of partnership with the doctor enables the patients to shape their own illness, through the medication. DISCUSSION: It is by mediating their relationship with medication that patients gain access to this state of co-expertise and that they put sense into the collaboration they develop with their doctors. Through this collaboration, useful drugs are identified and adjusted to treat the pain.

[Qualitative evaluation of the enforcement of the perinatal decree--strengthening mechanisms for over-medicalisation]. / Evaluation qualitative de l'application du décret périnatalité. Un renforcement des mécanismes de la surmédicalisation.

In France, the policy on decentralisation and the organisation of prenatal care is governed and mandated by a decree issued in 1998 whose objective is to improve prevention of pre-maturity and prenatal risks. Within this context, 49 maternal and child health professionals were interviewed by using a qualitative questionnaire to evaluate the implementation and enforcement of the decree specifically in the region of Lyon. This report presents an analysis of the mechanisms and psychosocial issues of the over-medicalisation of birth. This over-medicalisation stems from the inseparable interactions between the ranking of skills within a firm hierarchy - linked in and of itself to the hierarchical status of health facilities - and the progression of attributing the birthing process as one with is more disease-based, surgically-based and judicially-based.