Evaluation of different color measurement methods for determining tooth color.

AIM: The purpose of this study is to develop software at a low cost that enables the detection of tooth colors by capturing photographs using various devices, and to compare its effectiveness with existing expensive methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 anterior central incisor teeth from 30 individuals were included in the study. The CIELAB values (L,a,b) of each tooth were measured using a spectrophotometer, which is considered the gold standard. Subsequently, photographs of the teeth were taken using four different smartphones (iPhone- Xiaomi) and one digital camera (Canon). These images were then subjected to image processing techniques and compared with measurements obtained through computer-based analysis in order to assess the correlation. Data with three or more groups, the Kruskal-Wallis H test was utilized, and multiple comparisons were conducted using the Dunn test. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered. RESULTS: Upon examining the results of multiple comparisons, a statistically significant difference was observed (p<0.001) between the DeltaE values obtained from the camera of the iPhone and those obtained from the Canon DSLR and Xiaomi cameras. The iPhone cameras yielded result values ranging from 2.68 to 2.90 for DeltaE. CONCLUSIONS: It is reported that color determination methods based on image processing of photographs taken with iPhone mobile phones could potentially gain an advantageous position in routine clinical practice, as compared to spectrophotometry.

A new perspective for radiologic findings of bruxism on dental panoramic radiography.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate whether there is a relationship between the appositional classification in the mandible angle region and the mandibular cortical index (MCI) seen in bruxist individuals and to differentiate between the bruxist group without mandibular apposition and the non-bruxist group on panoramic radiographs. METHODS: The mandible angle region of 209 individuals, 170 bruxists and 39 non-bruxists, were included in the study. Each mandible angle apposition was classified as G0 (No directional change, no bone apposition)-G1 (Directional change on the basal cortex. No bone apposition)-G2 (Directional change plus generalized bone apposition with inhomogeneous surface)-G3 (Directional change plus localized bone apposition at one or more sites). The MCI of each individual was recorded according to their classified apposition. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the relationship between MCI and apposition severity in mandible angle grades in bruxist individuals (p = 0.063). A statistically significant difference was found between MCI and the bruxist G0/non-bruxist G0 groups (p < 0.001). While the MCI-C1 was higher in non-bruxist G0 individuals, the MCI-C2 was higher in bruxist G0 individuals. A statistically significant correlation was found between gender and severity of grades (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although it is known that appositional changes are seen in the mandible angle region in bruxism, MCI can be used as a valuable radiologic diagnostic criterion during the evaluation of bruxist and healthy individuals in the G0 grade who have not yet radiologically demonstrated bone apposition in the mandible angle.