RESUMO
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the most effective non-pharmacological approach in the reduction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence. However, it is crucial to thoroughly screen every patient for contraindications for RFA and provide appropriate pharmacological prophylaxis, if needed, since adverse effects may be fatal. Case summary: A 77-year-old male with multi-vessel coronary artery disease, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III), with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was admitted to our clinic due to recurrent life-threatening VT. The patient presented several concomitant diseases: dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease in Stage IIIB. He had a history of two myocardial infarctions and coronary artery bypass grafts complicated by mediastinitis and dehiscence of a sternotomy scar (2013). Radiofrequency ablation and pace mapping of VT were performed in sterile conditions, but no pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. There were no local or general complications in the post-operative period. The patient was discharged from the clinic in good condition. A week later, the patient suffered from septic shock and infective endocarditis of mitral valve complicated with infiltration of the ventricular septum, wall dissection of the left ventricle (LV), pseudoaneurysm, and abscess of the LV. At the time of the second hospitalization extensive dental carries were found and oral cavity sanitation was performed. Due to the severity of the condition, patient did not survive. Conclusion: Oral cavity infections are common but often overlooked, mainly when the RFA procedure is urgent. A thorough physical examination, including a dental check-up, is crucial to minimize the risk of potential infection of the endocardial tissue and maximize the benefits of the therapy. Still, it is possible that the myocardial infection was not a result of oral cavity infection but a result of other undiagnosed and untreated infection. Contamination of the procedure site with patients' own microbiota or foreign microorganisms by the medical personnel is also a likely and unfortunate scenario. The presented case highlights the significance of not only prophylaxis, screening, and treatment of possible inflammation sites before RFA but also the need for sustaining sanitary standards and sterile conditions.
RESUMO
The recently introduced HCM-AF Risk Calculator allows the prognosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical application of the HCM-AF Risk Score in the prediction of the clinical outcomes of Polish patients. The study included 92 patients (50.0% female, median age 55 years), with a baseline sinus rhythm diagnosed between 2013 and 2018. The analysis involved the incidence of clinical characteristics and outcomes, total mortality, rehospitalisation, and the course of heart failure (HF). According to the HCM-AF Risk Score, the HCM population was stratified into three subgroups, with a low (13/14.2%), intermediate (30/32.6%), and high risk of AF (49/53.2%). Subgroups differed significantly: the high-risk subgroup was older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and more advanced signs of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and left atrium (LA) dilatation. The registered AF incidence was 31.5% and 43.5% in the 2- and 5-year follow-ups, and it was significantly higher than in the HCM-AF Risk Score population, which had 4.6% in the 2-year follow-up, and 10.7% in the 5-year follow-up. In the whole population, the AF incidence in both the 2- and 5-year follow-ups revealed a strong correlation with the HCM-AF Risk Score (r = 0.442, p < 0.001; r = 0.346, p < 0.001, respectively). The clinical outcomes differed among the subgroups: the total mortality was 15.4% vs. 20.0% vs. 42.9% (p < 0.05); rehospitalisation was 23.1% vs. 53.3% vs. 71.4% (p < 0.05). The highest HF progression was in the high-risk subgroup (36.7%). Regardless of the high results of the HCM-Risk Score in Polish patients, the score underestimates the real-life high level of AF incidence. The HCM-AF Risk Score seems to be useful in the prediction of the general clinical outcomes in HCM patients.
RESUMO
Background and Objectives: Management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) during pregnancy is challenging and usually requires eminence-based decisions due to limited strong-evidence data in this field. The purpose of our study was to compare the attitudes of anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, and gynaecologists towards the diagnosis and treatment of potentially life-threatening CVDs during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was performed among 111 doctors (55 anaesthesiologists, 36 cardiologists, 20 gynaecologists). Personal opinions on the recommendations (n = 19) regarding rare, potentially life-threatening CVDs during pregnancy were recorded using a five-item Likert scale. Results: Opinions regarding eight statements (42%) varied substantially between specialties (p < 0.05). The most distinctive differences between physicians concerned the following recommendations: "thrombolysis should only be used in pulmonary embolism with cardiogenic shock" (agree: 52.7% of anaesthesiologists, 80.4% of cardiologists, 25.0% of gynaecologists; p < 0.001); "women with the antiphospholipid syndrome should restart treatment with vitamin K antagonists from the second trimester of pregnancy" (agree: 12.7% of anaesthesiologists, 69.4% of cardiologists, 20.0% of gynaecologists; p < 0.001); "women with symptomatic pulmonary hypertension should have a Swan-Ganz catheter inserted for labour" (agree: 20.0% of anaesthesiologists, 11.1% of cardiologists, 55.0% of gynaecologists; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Physicians' opinions regarding diagnostics and treatment of CVDs in pregnancy remain controversial. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of management in these unique medical conditions.
