The prospective clinical and scintigraphic assessment of patients with preserved left ventricular systolic function after transmyocardial laser revascularisation.

AIM: To analyse the clinical outcome and myocardial perfusion and function after transmyocardial revascularisation (TMR) in patients with normal left ventricular function and multivessel coronary artery disease non-amenable for standard revascularisation. METHOD AND RESULTS: Twenty three severely symptomatic patients (CCS score median 4) with normal left ventricular systolic function but coronaries non-amenable for either PTCA or CABG were subjected to TMR. The angina score, left ventricular systolic and diastolic function in radionuclide ventriculography at rest, exercise tolerance and myocardial perfusion--Thallium-201 SPECT (adenosine stress 74 and 37 MBq under nitrate cover) were evaluated before and 3, 6, 12 months post-operatively. After an average of 40 +/- 12 (range 14-56) TMR channels angina score decreased significantly (p< 0.0001) and the exercise tolerance increased (from 6.0 +/- 4.5 to 9.1 +/- 4.6 after 6 months, p< 0.05) in 21 patients. During the follow up period two patients had a myocardial infarction and one committed suicide after 6 months. Ejection fraction dropped significantly only after 1 year post-TMR from 70 +/- 13 to 63 +/- 0.13%, p < 0.05. The overall perfusion improved initially in 14 patients with subsequent deterioration in time. The changes in segmental perfusion were not associated with the symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Transmyocardial revascularisation in patients with normal ejection fraction may improve the angina class, exercise tolerance and overall but not segmental perfusion and does not show any immediate effect on left ventricular function.

The comparison of two gated SPET protocols: adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin and treadmill exercise Tc-99m MIBI.

BACKGROUND: The effect of adenosine and exercise on gated SPET left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end diastolic volume (EDV) and end systolic volume (ESV) has not been fully investigated. The aim of the study was to compare functional measurements obtained in one-day adenosine rest and two-day stress-rest protocols in relation to ischaemia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Out of 226 consecutive patients examined with submaximal treadmill stress-rest 700 MBq Tc-99m MIBI, 26 were chosen to match those subjected to adenosine (140 micro g/kg/min) enhanced by a low level exercise protocol (300 MBq and 700 MBq Tc-99m tetrofosmin for stress and rest respectively). All images were acquired on a double head system and were gated using 8 frames, 25 s per frame. RESULTS: ED and ES volumes increased after adenosine but decreased after treadmill resulting in the post-stress LVEF being significantly greater than after adenosine, 60 +/- 11 v. 51 +/- 13% (p < 0.01). This was caused by the smaller post-stress ESV in the treadmill group 40 +/- 20 v. 51 +/- 34, p < 0.05. In non-ischaemic scans the LVEF was greater (61 +/- 8 v. 51 +/- 14, p < 0.01) and EDV and ESV smaller after both stress and rest. CONCLUSIONS: The adenosine test may have an opposite influence on the EDV and ESV in comparison to the submaximal treadmill test and therefore the left ventricular function measurements after adenosine infusion should be interpreted carefully and may not represent those acquired after physical exercise. In the gated SPET scans showing ischaemia the post-stress EDV and ESV may be greater and the LVEF lower than at rest.