Euploidy rates of embryos in young patients with good and low prognosis according to the POSEIDON criteria.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does an association exist between ovarian reserve, ovarian response and embryonic euploidy in female patients under age 35 years? DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies cycles among patients enrolled at Bahceci Fulya IVF Center between January 2016 and August 2019. A total of 133 patients in POSEIDON group 1 (suboptimal responder; female age <35 years, antral follicle count [AFC] ≥5, number of oocytes retrieved <10) (group A), 133 patients in POSEIDON group 3 (expected low responder; female age <35 years, AFC <5) (group B) and 323 in the non-low-prognosis group (female age <35 years, AFC ≥5 and number of oocytes retrieved >9) (group C) were included. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in euploidy rate per embryo among the three groups (61.7% [145/235] for group A versus 53.5% [68/127] for group B versus 62% [625/1008] for group C; P = 0.13). The cancellation rate in cycles without a euploid blastocyst was significantly lower in group C than groups A and B (8.4% versus 12.8% and 16.5%; P = 0.034). Multivariate regression analysis indicated that the ovarian response group did not significantly affect the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo. Trophectoderm score 'C' (odds ratio 0.520, P = 0.007) and inner cell mass score 'C' (odds ratio 0.480, P < 0.001) were associated with a decreased probability of obtaining a euploid embryo. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that POSEIDON group 1 and group 3 and non-low-prognosis patients have different probabilities of euploid embryos being obtained per cycle. However, euploidy rates per embryo are not affected by the patient's ovarian reserve and response.

The impact of patient, embryo, and translocation characteristics on the ploidy status of young couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) by next generation sequencing (NGS).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors that affect the incidence of euploid balanced embryos and interchromosomal effect (ICE) in carriers of different structural rearrangements. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 95 couples with reciprocal translocations (RecT) and 36 couples with Robertsonian translocations (RobT) undergoing Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Structural Rearrangements (PGT-SR) between March 2016 and July 2019. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was the technique used coupled with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Only cases with females under 38 years were included. A total of 532 blastocysts were evaluated. RESULTS: The euploidy rate was similar in RobT when compared with RecT carriers [57/156 (36.5%) vs. 112/376 (29.8%), p = 0.127]. The pure ICE rate was significantly higher in RobT carriers [48/156 (30.8%) vs. 53/376 (14.1%), p < 0.001] than it was in RecT carriers. Female age was the independent factor for the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo in RecT and RobT carriers, and increasing female age decreases the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo. In RecT carriers, no significant differences were observed in euploidy rates, pure ICE, or combined ICE according to the length of the translocated fragment and the chromosome group. However, total ICE was significantly lower when there was a breakpoint in the short chromosome arm together with a breakpoint in the long arm [(44/158 (27.8%) for pq or qp, 51/155 (32.9%) for pp and 30/63 (47.6%) for qq; p = 0.02]. CONCLUSION: The incidence of euploid/balanced blastocysts was similar in both types of translocations. However, there was a significant increase in pure ICE in RobT compared to RecT carriers. In RecT carriers, the presence of the breakpoints in the long arm of the chromosomes involved in the rearrangement resulted in a higher total ICE.

Elevation of progesterone on the trigger day exerts no carryover effect on live birth in freeze-all cycles.

AIM: To evaluate the effect of trigger day progesterone (P) levels on live birth in freeze-all cycles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1034 freeze-all female patients aged <38 years with single blastocyst transfers. Patients with (n = 268) or without (n = 766) preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy (PGT-A) arm were further categorized into three subgroups based on trigger day P levels; low (<0.80 ng/ml), medium (0.8-1.49 ng/ml), and high (≥1.50 ng/ml). RESULTS: Estradiol (E2) levels on trigger day, the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of mature oocytes increased significantly with increasing serum p values in cycles without and with PGT-A arms. Significant correlation was found between E2 levels on trigger day and serum P levels and between the number of total oocytes retrieved and serum P levels Live birth rates were similar in the three subgroups in without PGT-A arm (51%, 52.6%, and 51.5%, respectively; p = .922) and with PGT-A arm (55.1%, 55.1%, and 62.5%, respectively; p = .730). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that trigger day P levels were not significant for live birth. CONCLUSION: The proposal that trigger day progesterone elevation (PE) exerts a detrimental effect on oocyte and embryo competence has no clinical validity.

Being on the side of old findings: progesterone elevation on the day of oocyte maturation induction does not affect embryological parameters throughout the blastocyst culture period.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether there is any detrimental effect of progesterone elevation (PE) on the day of oocyte maturation induction on embryological development potentials. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included a total of 1485 individual intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles between January 2014 and December 2018. Serum progesterone (P) levels were measured on the day of oocyte maturation induction following the GnRH antagonist suppression protocol. Embryological parameters such as maturation, fertilization rate (FR), top-quality embryo (TQE) formation rate per 2PN on day 3, and excellent-quality blastocyst (EQB) formation rate per 2PN on day 5/6 were recorded. The inclusion criteria for women were an age ≤ 37 years, a BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, and access to a total sperm concentration ≥ 2 million. Groups were stratified according to the serum P levels using the cut-off levels of < 0.8 ng/ml; 0.8-1.49 ng/ml; and ≥ 1.5 ng/ml. RESULTS: Peak E2 level and total number of oocytes retrieved were significantly related to PE (p < 0.001). FR did not display a significance difference between groups (p = 0.108). The TQE and the blastulation rates were not affected by PE (p = 0.82 and p = 0.68, respectively). Chi square analysis revealed a significant relationship between PE and the EQB formation rate (p = 0.01). GEE analysis failed to present any statistical significance regarding the effect of PE on neither the TQE nor the EQB formation rates per 2PN [OR 1.07; 95% (0.98-1.16) p = 0.113 and OR 0.93; 95% (0.80-1.07) p = 0.32, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with previously published papers, our study could not find any detrimental effect of PE on embryological outcomes throughout the blastocyst culture period.

Impact of elective frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer strategies on cumulative live birth: Do deleterious effects still exist in normal & hyper responders?

BACKGROUND: Is freeze-all strategy effective in terms of cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) in all patients? METHODS: This retrospective single-center study analyzed the CLBRs of 2523 patients undergoing fresh or electively frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. In 1047, cycles, the fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy was applied for the 1st ET, whereas electively frozen ET (e-FET) was performed in 1476 cycles. Female age ≤ 37 and blastocysts frozen via vitrification were included. The patients in each arm were further stratified into four subgroups according to the number of oocytes retrieved as follows: Group A: 1-5, group B: 6-10, group C: 11-15 and group D: 16-25 oocytes retrieved. The primary endpoint was the CLBR. The secondary endpoints were the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate and the live birth rates (LBRs) following fresh ETs and e-FETs for the first transfers. RESULT(S): The CLBR was similar between the fresh ET and e-FET arms in group A (35/76 (46.1%) vs 29/67 (43.3%), p = 0.74) and group B (165/275 (60%) vs 216/324 (66.7%), p = 0.091), whereas significantly higher rates were detected in favor of the e-FET arm within group C (328/460 (71.3%) vs 201/348 (57.8%), p<0.001) and group D (227/348 (65.2%), vs 446/625 (71.5%), p<0.001). The OHSS rate was also found to be higher in the fresh ET arm among group C (12/348 (3.4%) vs 0/460 (0%), p<0.001) and group D (38/348 (10.9%) vs 3/625 (0.5%), p<0.001) patients than e-FET arm. Perinatal and obstetrical outcomes were nonsignificantly different between fresh and e-FET arms. However, the birth weights were significantly lower for fresh ET, 3064 versus 3201 g for singletons (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with a fresh-transfer strategy, the e-FET strategy resulted in a higher CLBR among patients with >10 oocytes retrieved during stimulated cycles.