Assessment of Intracellular Auto-Modification Levels of ARTD10 Using Mono-ADP-Ribose-Specific Macrodomains 2 and 3 of Murine Artd8.

Mono-ADP-ribosylation is a posttranslational modification, which is catalyzed in cells by certain members of the ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin-like family (ARTD) of ADP-ribosyltransferases (aka PARP enzymes). It involves the transfer of a single residue of ADP-ribose (ADPr) from the cofactor NAD+ onto substrate proteins. Although 12 of the 17 members of the ARTD family have been defined as mono-ARTDs in in vitro assays, relatively little is known about their exact cellular functions. A major challenge is the detection of mono-ADP-ribosylated (MARylated) proteins in cells as no antibodies are available that detect exclusively MARylated proteins. As an alternative to classical antibodies, the MAR-specific binding domains macro2 and macro3 of Artd8 can be utilized alone or in combination, to demonstrate intracellular auto-modification levels of ARTD10 in cells in both co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization experiments. Here we demonstrate that different macrodomain constructs of human ARTD8 and murine Artd8, alone or in combination, exert differences with regard to their interaction with ARTD10 in cells. Precisely, while the macrodomains of murine Artd8 interacted with ARTD10 in cells in a MARylation-dependent manner, the macrodomains of human ARTD8 interacted with ARTD10 independent of its catalytic activity. Moreover, we show that a combination of macro2 and macro3 of murine Artd8 was recruited more efficiently to ARTD10 during co-localization experiments compared to the single domains. Therefore, murine Artd8 macrodomain constructs can serve as a tool to evaluate intracellular ARTD10 auto-modification levels using the described methods, while the human ARTD8 macrodomains are less suited because of ADPr-independent binding to ARTD10. Protocols for co-immunoprecipitation and co-localization experiments are described in detail.

Nucleolar-nucleoplasmic shuttling of TARG1 and its control by DNA damage-induced poly-ADP-ribosylation and by nucleolar transcription.

Macrodomains are conserved protein folds associated with ADP-ribose binding and turnover. ADP-ribosylation is a posttranslational modification catalyzed primarily by ARTD (aka PARP) enzymes in cells. ARTDs transfer either single or multiple ADP-ribose units to substrates, resulting in mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylation. TARG1/C6orf130 is a macrodomain protein that hydrolyzes mono-ADP-ribosylation and interacts with poly-ADP-ribose chains. Interactome analyses revealed that TARG1 binds strongly to ribosomes and proteins associated with rRNA processing and ribosomal assembly factors. TARG1 localized to transcriptionally active nucleoli, which occurred independently of ADP-ribose binding. TARG1 shuttled continuously between nucleoli and nucleoplasm. In response to DNA damage, which activates ARTD1/2 (PARP1/2) and promotes synthesis of poly-ADP-ribose chains, TARG1 re-localized to the nucleoplasm. This was dependent on the ability of TARG1 to bind to poly-ADP-ribose. These findings are consistent with the observed ability of TARG1 to competitively interact with RNA and PAR chains. We propose a nucleolar role of TARG1 in ribosome assembly or quality control that is stalled when TARG1 is re-located to sites of DNA damage.

ADP-Ribosylation, a Multifaceted Posttranslational Modification Involved in the Control of Cell Physiology in Health and Disease.

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) regulate protein functions and interactions. ADP-ribosylation is a PTM, in which ADP-ribosyltransferases use nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) to modify target proteins with ADP-ribose. This modification can occur as mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylation. The latter involves the synthesis of long ADP-ribose chains that have specific properties due to the nature of the polymer. ADP-Ribosylation is reversed by hydrolases that cleave the glycosidic bonds either between ADP-ribose units or between the protein proximal ADP-ribose and a given amino acid side chain. Here we discuss the properties of the different enzymes associated with ADP-ribosylation and the consequences of this PTM on substrates. Furthermore, the different domains that interpret either mono- or poly-ADP-ribosylation and the implications for cellular processes are described.

The conserved macrodomains of the non-structural proteins of Chikungunya virus and other pathogenic positive strand RNA viruses function as mono-ADP-ribosylhydrolases.

Human pathogenic positive single strand RNA ((+)ssRNA) viruses, including Chikungunya virus, pose severe health problems as for many neither efficient vaccines nor therapeutic strategies exist. To interfere with propagation, viral enzymatic activities are considered potential targets. Here we addressed the function of the viral macrodomains, conserved folds of non-structural proteins of many (+)ssRNA viruses. Macrodomains are closely associated with ADP-ribose function and metabolism. ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification controlling various cellular processes, including DNA repair, transcription and stress response. We found that the viral macrodomains possess broad hydrolase activity towards mono-ADP-ribosylated substrates of the mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases ARTD7, ARTD8 and ARTD10 (aka PARP15, PARP14 and PARP10, respectively), reverting this post-translational modification both in vitro and in cells. In contrast, the viral macrodomains possess only weak activity towards poly-ADP-ribose chains synthesized by ARTD1 (aka PARP1). Unlike poly-ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase, which hydrolyzes poly-ADP-ribose chains to individual ADP-ribose units but cannot cleave the amino acid side chain - ADP-ribose bond, the different viral macrodomains release poly-ADP-ribose chains with distinct efficiency. Mutational and structural analyses identified key amino acids for hydrolase activity of the Chikungunya viral macrodomain. Moreover, ARTD8 and ARTD10 are induced by innate immune mechanisms, suggesting that the control of mono-ADP-ribosylation is part of a host-pathogen conflict.

Players in ADP-ribosylation: Readers and Erasers.

ADP-ribosylation describes an ancient and highly conserved posttranslational modification (PTM) of proteins. Many cellular processes have been identified that are regulated by ADP-ribosylation, including DNA repair, gene transcription and signaling processes. Enzymes catalyzing ADP-ribosylation use NAD+ as a cofactor to transfer ADP-ribose to a substrate under release of nicotinamide. In mammals extracellular and intracellular enzymes have been described. ADP-ribosylation is catalyzed by ADP-ribosyltransferases (ARTs) and some Sirtuins. Extracellular and intracellular ARTs belong to the cholera toxin-like (ARTC) and the diphtheria toxin-like (ARTD) subclass, respectively. ARTDs can be further subdivided depending on their ability to either generate poly-ADP-ribose chains, or to mono-ADP-ribosylate substrates. Similar to the latter, ARTCs and Sirtuins are restricted to mono-ADP-ribosylation. Recent findings have provided information about the functional consequences of ADP-ribosylation. Analogous to other PTMs, ADP-ribosylation can exert allosteric effects on enzymes, thereby controlling their catalytic activity. Moreover, this PTM can be read by multiple protein motifs and domains mediating protein-protein interactions. Typically these readers can distinguish between mono- and poly-ADP-ribosylation. Furthermore, with the description of proteins that can erase ADP-ribosylation, this posttranslational modification is fully reversible and thus provides an additional mechanism to transiently control protein functions and networks. In this review we will describe the most recent findings on motifs and domains that are related to ADP-ribosylation processes with a particular focus on readers and erasers. These new findings provide evidence for broad functional roles of ADP-ribosylation and a high diversity of mechanisms that contribute to the downstream consequences of this modification.

Intracellular Mono-ADP-Ribosylation in Signaling and Disease.

A key process in the regulation of protein activities and thus cellular signaling pathways is the modification of proteins by post-translational mechanisms. Knowledge about the enzymes (writers and erasers) that attach and remove post-translational modifications, the targets that are modified and the functional consequences elicited by specific modifications, is crucial for understanding cell biological processes. Moreover detailed knowledge about these mechanisms and pathways helps to elucidate the molecular causes of various diseases and in defining potential targets for therapeutic approaches. Intracellular adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribosylation refers to the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD⁺)-dependent modification of proteins with ADP-ribose and is catalyzed by enzymes of the ARTD (ADP-ribosyltransferase diphtheria toxin like, also known as PARP) family as well as some members of the Sirtuin family. Poly-ADP-ribosylation is relatively well understood with inhibitors being used as anti-cancer agents. However, the majority of ARTD enzymes and the ADP-ribosylating Sirtuins are restricted to catalyzing mono-ADP-ribosylation. Although writers, readers and erasers of intracellular mono-ADP-ribosylation have been identified only recently, it is becoming more and more evident that this reversible post-translational modification is capable of modulating key intracellular processes and signaling pathways. These include signal transduction mechanisms, stress pathways associated with the endoplasmic reticulum and stress granules, and chromatin-associated processes such as transcription and DNA repair. We hypothesize that mono-ADP-ribosylation controls, through these different pathways, the development of cancer and infectious diseases.

CD44 regulates the apoptotic response and promotes disease development in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

The cell-surface glycoprotein CD44 is expressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but its functional role in this disease is poorly characterized. We therefore investigated the contribution of CD44 to CLL in a murine disease model, the Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mouse, and in CLL patients. Surface CD44 increased during murine CLL development. CD44 expression in human CLL was induced by stimulation with interleukin 4/soluble CD40 ligand and by stroma cell contact. Engagement of CD44 by its natural ligands, hyaluronic acid or chondroitin sulfate, protected CLL cells from apoptosis, while anti-CD44 small interfering RNAs impaired tumor cell viability. Deletion of CD44 during TCL1-driven murine leukemogenesis reduced the tumor burden in peripheral blood and spleen and led to a prolonged overall survival. The leukemic cells from these CD44 knockout animals revealed lower levels of antiapoptotic MCL1, a higher propensity to apoptosis, and a diminished B-cell receptor kinase response. The inhibitory anti-CD44 antibodies IM7 and A3D8 impaired the viability of CLL cells in suspension cultures, in stroma contact models, and in vivo via MCL1 reduction and by effector caspase activation. Taken together, CD44 expression in CLL is mediated by the tumor microenvironment. As a coreceptor, CD44 promotes leukemogenesis by regulating stimuli of MCL1 expression. Moreover, CD44 can be addressed therapeutically in CLL by specific antibodies.