Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Perspect Biol Med ; 66(1): 145-159, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662013

RESUMO

Vaccine hesitancy continues to pose a formidable obstacle to increasing national COVID-19 vaccination rates in the US, but this is not the first time that American vaccination efforts have confronted resistance and apathy. This study examines the history of US vaccination efforts against smallpox, polio, and measles, highlighting persistent drivers of vaccine hesitancy as well as factors that helped overcome it. The research reveals that logistical barriers, negative portrayals in the media, and fears about safety stymied inoculation efforts as early as the 18th century and continue to do so. However, vaccine hesitancy has been markedly diminished when trusted community leaders have guided efforts, when ordinary citizens have felt personally invested in the success of the vaccine, and when vaccination efforts have been tied to broader projects to improve public health and social cohesion. Deliberately cultivating such factors could be an effective strategy for lessening opposition today, when COVID-19's distinctive characteristics make addressing vaccine hesitancy more urgent than it has ever been.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Sarampo , Poliomielite , Varíola , Hesitação Vacinal , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , Poliomielite/história , História do Século XX , Hesitação Vacinal/psicologia , Hesitação Vacinal/história , História do Século XIX , Varíola/prevenção & controle , Varíola/história , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Sarampo/história , História do Século XVIII , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos , SARS-CoV-2 , História do Século XXI , Vacinação/história , Vacinação/psicologia
3.
Acad Emerg Med ; 7(1): 21-7, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10894238

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify provider-based differences in the ED assessment and management of children presenting with uncomplicated, first-time febrile seizures. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of seven EDs in-the Chicago area: two tertiary academic pediatric EDs (PEDs) and five community-based general EDs (GEDs). The visits of all patients with a discharge diagnosis including the term "seizure" were identified from a 30-month period. Records of patients who met criteria for simple, first-time febrile seizure were reviewed (age 6-60 months; temperature > or =38.0 degrees C; single, generalized, tonic-clonic seizure <20 minutes; "alert" or "arousable" on presentation; absence of known neurologic disease). RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-five records were included: 330 and 125 patients presenting to GEDs and PEDs, respectively. The two groups did not differ in mean age, vital signs, reported duration of seizure, or prior antibiotic use. Lumbar puncture (LP) was performed more often in the GED group (33% vs 22%). No patients were found to have bacterial meningitis. The patients in the GED group were more likely to receive parenteral antibiotics in the ED (56% vs 22%) and to be admitted or transferred (18% vs 4%). In a logistic regression model incorporating age, temperature, seizure duration, seizure in the ED, prior antibiotic use, primary care, and insurance status, the GED patients remained more likely to have an LP (OR 1.5), receive parenteral antibiotics (OR 2.5), and be admitted or transferred (OR 2.5). CONCLUSIONS: There were significant setting-based differences in the evaluation and management of children with simple febrile seizures presenting to GEDs and PEDs.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Padrões de Prática Médica , Convulsões Febris/terapia , Adulto , Chicago , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA