Survival in breast cancer patients with a delayed DIEP flap breast reconstruction after adjustment for socioeconomic status and comorbidity.

PURPOSE: Overall survival in breast cancer patients receiving a delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is better than in those without delayed breast reconstruction. This study aimed at determining the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) and comorbidity on these observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This matched cohort study included all consecutive women undergoing a delayed DIEP flap reconstruction at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, between 1999 and 2013. Controls had not received any delayed breast reconstruction and were relapse-free after a corresponding follow-up interval. Matching was by year of and age at mastectomy, tumour stage and lymph node status. Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and socioeconomic data were obtained from national registers. Associations with breast cancer-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Women in the DIEP group (N = 254) more often continued education after primary school (88.6% versus 82.6%, P = 0.026), belonged to the high-income group (76.0% versus 63.1%, P < 0.001), were in a partnership (57.1% versus 55.7%, P = 0.024) and healthier (median CCI 1.00 (range 0-13) versus 2.00 (range 0-16), P = 0.021) than the control group (N = 729). After adjustment for tumour and treatment factors, SES and comorbidity, OS remained significantly better for the DIEP group than the control group (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.44-3.55). CONCLUSION: Women with a delayed DIEP flap reconstruction are a subgroup of higher socioeconomic status and better health. Higher survival estimates for the DIEP group persisted after adjusting for those differences, suggesting the presence of further unmeasured covariates.

Increased salvage rates with early reexploration: A retrospective analysis of 547 free flap cases.

BACKGROUND: Free flap complications are generally rare, but not negligible since they may exert paramount impact on both patients and care providers. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for reexploration and assess predictors associated with increased salvage rates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for free flaps performed between 2006 and 2015. Patient demographics, indications and flap types were analyzed together with complications and time to reexploration. RESULTS: Among 547 consecutive free flaps, 11.5% required acute reexploration. Hematoma together with vascular compromise was the main cause (41.9%) for reexploration, followed by hematoma only (19.4%), venous (16.1%) and arterial (6.5%) thrombosis. Hematoma was associated with an increased risk for concomitant vascular complication (p < 0.02). The incidence of total and partial flap necrosis was 3.5% and 3.7% respectively. There was an overall 71.4% salvage rate. The median time from detection of a compromised flap to reexploration was 3.0 h. Significantly higher salvage rates were observed for cases reexplored within (82.4%) compared to after (57.1%) 3.0 h (OR 3.50 (95% CI 1.10 to 11.13, p = 0.034)). CONCLUSIONS: The current study highlights the importance of early intervention, including evacuation of hematomas that may lead to vascular compromise. Adequate monitoring of venous outflow was found necessary to improve flap salvage rates, whereas arterial complications were mainly related to persistent arterial injury in traumatized extremities with reduced salvage rates. Free flap surgery requires trained staff and immediate access to operating facilities to ensure high flap survival rates.

Risk of recurrence and death in patients with breast cancer after delayed deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is increasingly being performed in patients with breast cancer. The procedure induces extensive tissue trauma, and it has been hypothesized that the release of growth factors, angiogenic agonists and immunomodulating factors may reactivate dormant micrometastasis. The aim of the present study was to estimate the risk of breast cancer recurrence in patients undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction compared with that in patients treated with mastectomy alone. METHODS: Each patient who underwent delayed DIEP flap reconstruction at Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, between 1999 and 2013, was compared with up to four controls with breast cancer who did not receive a DIEP flap. The control patients were selected using incidence density matching with respect to age, tumour and nodal status, neoadjuvant therapy and year of mastectomy. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-specific survival. Survival analysis was carried out using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included 250 patients who had 254 DIEP flap reconstructions and 729 control patients. Median follow-up was 89 and 75 months respectively (P = 0·053). Breast cancer recurrence developed in 50 patients (19·7 per cent) in the DIEP group and 174 (23·9 per cent) in the control group (P = 0·171). The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival rate was 92·0 per cent for patients with a DIEP flap and 87·9 per cent in controls (P = 0·032). Corresponding values for 5-year overall survival were 91·6 and 84·7 per cent (P < 0·001). After adjustment for tumour and patient characteristics and treatment, patients without DIEP flap reconstruction had significantly lower overall but not breast cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSION: The present findings do not support the hypothesis that patients with breast cancer undergoing DIEP flap reconstruction have a higher rate of breast cancer recurrence than those who have mastectomy alone.

Somatosensory status after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a retrospective study.

The transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is widely used in autologous breast reconstructions. In transferring tissue as a pedicled or free flap, alterations in sensibility are unavoidable. This study evaluated somatosensory function in the reconstructed breast at least 2 years after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery. Thirteen patients who had a pedicled TRAM flap and 13 patients who had a free TRAM flap participated in the study. The patients completed a questionnaire regarding subjective sensibility and their general opinion of the reconstructed breast. Somatosensory examinations to study the sensations of touch, warmth, cold, and pain were performed using nonquantitative and quantitative techniques. An age-matched control group of eight women who had never had breast surgery was also examined because the majority of the women who had breast reconstruction also had a mammaplasty performed on the contralateral breast, which disqualified it as a control. The majority of the patients reported that the reconstructed breast felt like a real breast. However, sensibility to touch, warmth, cold, and pain was decreased in the study groups compared with the control group. No clinically significant differences existed in sensibility between the pedicled and free TRAM flap groups.

Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study.

The main disadvantage when the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is used for breast reconstruction is the potential for weakening of the abdominal wall. This prospective study was initiated to objectively evaluate abdominal muscle strength after pedicled and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions over time. Twenty-three patients with pedicled TRAM flaps and 19 patients with free TRAM flaps were included. A dynamic dynamometer system, KIN-COM, was used to measure maximal voluntary trunk flexor and extensor strength preoperatively and 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The patients' subjective opinions 1 year postoperatively were recorded by means of a questionnaire. A transient decrease in abdominal strength, in both groups, occurred at 6 months but was essentially regained at 12 months. The use of a pedicled or free TRAM flap did not influence postoperative abdominal strength per se. The balance between the abdominal strength and back strength remained in the free flap group but was altered postoperatively in the pedicled flap group; back strength was increased and remained so after 12 months. The difference between the two procedures is relatively small compared with individual variations, indicating that there are more important factors than the kind of surgery influencing the restoration of muscle strength. The questionnaire revealed a greater occurrence of abdominal wall bulging in the free flap group (82 percent) versus 48 percent in the pedicled flap group. No postoperative differences regarding exercise frequency or sensitivity of the abdominal wall were found between the pedicled and free TRAM flap groups.

Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts.

A pilot study was carried through to assess the reproducibility of a new method of measuring breast volume. Twenty healthy female volunteers participated. A negative replica of the breast was made with thermoplastic cast material. The volume was measured by filling the cast with water until it reached two opposite points of the boundaries of the breast delineated on the cast. Three measurements were made of every cast and the mean was calculated. The range of the three measurements expressed as a percentage of the mean volume was 2.9 (SD 1.6)%. Each volunteer's breasts were measured twice with a brief intervening pause. The coefficient of variation between the two corresponding measurements was 6%.