Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 38(2): 383-400, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32336332

RESUMO

More than half of pediatric malpractice cases arise from emergency departments, primarily due to missed or delayed diagnoses. All providers who take care of children in emergency departments should be aware of this risk and the most common diagnoses associated with medicolegal liability. This article focuses on diagnosis and management of high-risk diagnoses in pediatric patients presenting to emergency departments, including meningitis, pneumonia, appendicitis, testicular torsion, and fracture. It highlights challenges and pitfalls that may increase risk of liability. It concludes with a discussion on recognition and management of abuse in children, including when to report and decisions on disposition.


Assuntos
Emergências , Imperícia , Gestão de Riscos , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Apendicite/terapia , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Maus-Tratos Infantis/terapia , Pré-Escolar , Medicina de Emergência/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Meningite/diagnóstico , Meningite/terapia , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/terapia , Torção do Cordão Espermático/diagnóstico , Torção do Cordão Espermático/terapia , Ferimentos e Lesões/diagnóstico , Ferimentos e Lesões/terapia
2.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 58(14): 1509-1514, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31556702

RESUMO

Although informed consent is a cornerstone of medical ethics, it is unclear if the practice for obtaining informed consent is consistent among pediatric emergency departments. This study's goal is to describe the current practice for written informed consent in academic pediatric emergency departments for non-emergent procedures. A questionnaire distributed to pediatric emergency medicine fellowship directors queried whether written informed consent was standard of care for 15 procedures and assessed departmental consent policies and use of "blanket" consent-to-treat forms. Response rate was 80% (n = 64). Institutions obtained written consent for a mean of 4.4 procedures. Written informed consent was most commonly obtained for procedural sedation (82.5%), blood transfusion (72.9%), and lumbar puncture (66.5%). Twenty-one institutions (32.8%) had policies specifying procedures requiring written consent. Thirty-five institutions (54.7%) used "blanket" consent-to-treat forms. Our results suggest that there is variability in the use of written informed consent for non-emergent procedures among academic pediatric emergency departments.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Proteção da Criança/estatística & dados numéricos , Termos de Consentimento/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Consentimento Informado por Menores/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA