Genomic landscape of treatment refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a complex and heterogeneous disease with few standard and targeted treatment options. Next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue was performed to identify cancer driver mutations to discover possible personalized treatment options, as targeted treatment possibilities are limited for this patient population. Results of genomic sequencing in patients with treatment-refractory mCRC are described in this retrospective analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Clinico-pathological characteristics and genomic sequence results of consecutive patients with refractory mCRC, referred to the Experimental Cancer Therapy Unit (ECTU) at Department of Oncology, Herlev & Gentofte Hospital in the period from 1 October 2015 to 14 December 2018 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Tumor tissue from the patients was analyzed by next-generation sequencing using the Oncomine Comprehensive primer panel to detect actionable variants of cancer driver mutations and microsatellite instability status. From August 2018 tumor mutational burden was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 80 patients with treatment-refractory mCRC and in a fairly good performance were referred to the ECTU during this period. Genomic sequencing of tumor tissue was performed for all 80 patients and a cancer driver mutation was identified in 90% (n = 72) of the patients. A total of 31.3% (n = 25) of the patients received therapy either as targetable therapy outside an available trial (n = 2), FDA approved therapy (n = 2), or treatment in phase 1 or 2 trials, independent of the genomic signature 26.3% (n = 21). CONCLUSION: Most mCRC patients refractory to standard anti-neoplastic therapies, presented with a cancer driver mutation, however, only a few of these mutations gave rise to matched therapies as only 2.5% of the patients from this period received targeted therapy.

Severity and 1-month outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with solid cancers: a Danish nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are vulnerable to infections, are older and often have comorbidities in comparison to the general population, which increases the risk for severe outcomes related to COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS: This study is a prospective, nationwide study in patients with solid cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection included between 10 March to 15 June 2020. Patient's baseline characteristics were collected. The study's primary outcome was overall survival within 30 days of verified SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes were hospital admission, admission to an ICU, and need for supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients with a cancer diagnosis and verified SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. After one month of follow up, hospitalization was required for 54% (n = 61) and 21% of the patients had died and 14 of the 23 deceased cancer patients were ≥70 years. Most patients were classified with mild COVID-19 symptoms (66%, n = 74); however, 48% (n = 23) of the ≥70-year-olds patients were classified with severe or critical COVID-19 symptoms. Among the total study population, 61% (n = 68) had comorbidities and comorbidity were more frequently observed among the deceased (91%, n = 21) and older cancer patients (≥70 years, 81%, n = 39). CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the low sample size in this study, our work shows that age and comorbidities, but not recent cytotoxic therapy, are associated with adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection for patients with solid cancer. Particularly, patients with progressive disease seem to be at greater risk of a fatal outcome from COVID-19.HighlightsAge, performance status, and comorbidities are strong predictors of adverse outcome in cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.Patients with progressive cancer disease seem to be at greater risk of a fatal outcome from COVID-19.Recent cytotoxic therapy, however, did not seem to be associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection for patients with solid cancer.

An open label phase 1 study evaluation safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose of oral administration of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine.

PURPOSE: Oral administration of chemotherapy offers several advantages in comparison with intravenous administration. Previously, data on a new oral formulation of irinotecan have been published. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of the new oral irinotecan formulation in combination with oral capecitabine. METHODS: The study was an open label, phase 1, single center, extension part in which oral irinotecan was investigated in combination with capecitabine. The MTD of irinotecan in combination with capecitabine was 17.5 mg/m2 once daily for 14 consecutive days in combination with capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily. Eligible patients were adults with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors for which no standard curative or palliative therapies existed. RESULTS: 14 patients were included in the extension part. No grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities were observed. Non-hematological toxicities included grade 1 and 2 diarrhea, fatigue, cholinergic syndrome, vomiting, and weight loss. Totally, 3 grade 3 toxicities and no grade 4 event were reported. No objective responses were observed. Five patients had stable disease lasting median 14 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine in combination with oral irinotecan could be a new treatment option offering a more convenient and patient friendly treatment strategy compared to intravenous irinotecan. The combination is fairly tolerated; however, further investigations are needed to assess the efficacy of this regimen.

Inflammation and uPAR-Expression in Colorectal Liver Metastases in Relation to Growth Pattern and Neo-adjuvant Therapy.

Proteolytic activity and inflammation in the tumour microenvironment affects cancer progression. In colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases it has been observed that three different immune profiles are present, as well as proteolytic activity, determined by the expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR).The main objectives of this study were to investigate uPAR expression and the density of macrophages (CD68) and T cells (CD3) as markers of inflammation in resected CRC liver metastases, where patients were neo-adjuvantly treated with chemotherapy with or without the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab. Chemonaive patients served as a control group. The markers were correlated to growth patterns (GP) of liver metastases, i.e. desmoplastic, pushing and replacement GP. It was hypothesised that differences in proteolysis and inflammation could reflect tumour specific growth and therapy related changes in the tumour microenvironment. In chemonaive patients, a significantly higher level of uPAR was observed in desmoplastic liver metastases in comparison to pushing GP (p = 0.01) or replacement GP (p = 0.03). A significantly higher density of CD68 was observed in liver metastases with replacement GP in comparison to those with pushing GP (p = 0.01). In liver metastases from chemo treated patients, CD68 density was significantly higher in desmoplastic GP in comparison to pushing GP (p = 0.03). In chemo and bevacizumab treated patients only a significant lower CD3 expression was observed in liver metastases with a mixed GP than in those with desmoplastic (p = 0.01) or pushing GP (p = 0.05). Expression of uPAR and the density of macrophages at the tumour margin of liver metastasis differ between GP in the untreated patients. A higher density of T cells was observed in the bevacizumab treated patients, when desmoplastic and pushing metastases were compared to liver metastases with a mix of the GP respectively, however no specific correlations between the immune markers of macrophages and T cells or GP of liver metastases could be demonstrated.

Growth pattern of colorectal liver metastasis as a marker of recurrence risk.

Despite improved therapy of advanced colorectal cancer, the median overall survival (OS) is still low. A surgical removal has significantly improved survival, if lesions are entirely removed. The purpose of this retrospective explorative study was to evaluate the prognostic value of histological growth patterns (GP) in chemonaive and patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy. Two-hundred-fifty-four patients who underwent liver resection of colorectal liver metastases between 2007 and 2011 were included in the study. Clinicopathological data and information on neo-adjuvant treatment were retrieved from patient and pathology records. Histological GP were evaluated and related to recurrence free and OS. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were used. The 5-year OS was 41.8% (95% CI 33.8-49.8%). Growth pattern evaluation of the largest liver metastasis was possible in 224 cases, with the following distribution: desmoplastic 63 patients (28.1%); pushing 77 patients (34.4%); replacement 28 patients (12.5%); mixed 56 patients (25.0%). The Kaplan-Meier analyses demonstrated that patients resected for liver metastases with desmoplastic growth pattern had a longer recurrence free survival (RFS) than patients resected for non-desmoplastic liver metastases (p=0.05). When patients were stratified according to neo-adjuvant treatment in the multivariate Cox regression model, hazard ratios for RFS compared to desmoplastic were: pushing (HR=1.37, 95% CI 0.93-2.02, p=0.116), replacement (HR=2.16, 95% CI 1.29-3.62, p=0.003) and mixed (HR=1.70, 95% CI 1.12-2.59, p=0.013). This was true for chemonaive patients as well as for patients who received neo-adjuvant treatment.