Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Phlebology ; 38(9): 622-627, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37519033

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare telangiectasias disappearance after sclerotherapy with hypertonic glucose (HG) and different concentrations of sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS). METHODS: Women aged 18-70 years with telangiectasias were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was telangiectasia disappearance. The clearing of vessels was assessed using a six-point scale (from 0 to 5). RESULTS: A total of 116 women completed an 8-week follow-up: 31, 27, 25, and 33 were in the HG 75%, STS 0.05%, STS 0.1%, and STS 0.15% groups, respectively. The median score of vein disappearance was significantly lower in the STS 0.05% (3, 0.25-4), STS 0.1% (3, 1.25-4), and STS 0.15% (4, 2-4) groups than in the HG group (4, 3-5) after 56 days, p = .00002. CONCLUSION: Sclerotherapy of telangiectasias with 75% HG showed significantly better results than low concentrations of STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04132323.


Assuntos
Tetradecilsulfato de Sódio , Telangiectasia , Humanos , Feminino , Tetradecilsulfato de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Soluções Esclerosantes/uso terapêutico , Solução Hipertônica de Glucose , Estudos Prospectivos , Telangiectasia/tratamento farmacológico , Escleroterapia/métodos
2.
J Pers Med ; 12(11)2022 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36422109

RESUMO

Background: The efficacy and safety of gonadal vein embolization (GVE) with coils in the treatment of pelvic venous disease (PeVD) has not been fully investigated, and the outcomes after GVE do not always meet expectations of both doctors and patients. The study was aimed at assessing the incidence and causes of the complications after GVE with coils in patients with PeVD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 150 female patients with PeVD who underwent GVE with coils in 2000-2020. A total of 4975 patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) were examined, of which 1107 patients had the PeVD-related CPP and 305 underwent surgical or endovascular interventions on the gonadal veins. Complication rates were evaluated 30 days after GVE and classified according to the Society for Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse event classification system. The pain severity before and after GVE was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS). All patients underwent duplex ultrasound after GVE, while patients with persisting pain syndrome and suspected perforation of the gonadal vein were also evaluated using computed tomographic venography. Results: At 30 days after GVE, the CPP was decreased in 109 (72.6%) patients (from 8.2 ± 1.5 at baseline to 1.7 ± 0.8 scores, p = 0.0001) and persisted in 41 (27.4%) patients (mean change from 8.1 ± 0.7 at baseline to 7.8 ± 0.4 scores; p = 0.71). Post-embolic syndrome (PES) occurred in 22% of patients and was completely resolved in 1 month after GVE. The efficacy of GVE in the CPP relief after resolving PES was 94.6%. The GVE complications were identified in 52 (34.6%) patients. Minor complications included access-site hematoma (4%) and allergic reactions (1.3%), and major complications included protrusion of coils (5.3%), thrombosis of the parametrial/uterine veins (21.3%) and deep veins of the calf (2.7%). Conclusions: Gonadal vein embolization with coils in the treatment of PeVD is associated with the development of specific complications and adverse events. The most common complication was pelvic vein thrombosis. Post-embolization syndrome should be considered as an adverse event of this procedure.

3.
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord ; 9(6): 1417-1424, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34023538

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between the pattern and duration of pelvic venous reflux (PVR) and pelvic pain severity in patients with pelvic varicose veins (PVVs). METHODS: The present retrospective study included 600 female patients with PVVs. Of the 600 patients, 453 had had PVVs and pelvic congestion syndrome (group 1) and 147 had had an asymptomatic disease course (group 2). Pelvic venous pain (PVP) was assessed using a visual analog scale. All the patients had undergone duplex ultrasound of the left and right renal veins, external, internal, and common iliac veins, and parametrial, uterine, gonadal, and vulvar veins (PV, UV, GV, and VV, respectively), with an assessment of their patency and diameter and the presence and duration of reflux. Reflux in the pelvic veins was considered pathologic if it lasted for >1 second. RESULTS: In group 1, PVR type I (1-2 seconds), II (3-5 seconds), and III (>5 seconds or spontaneous reflux in the absence of a loading test) was found in 31%, 58%, and 11% of the patients, respectively. Moderate and severe reflux (types II and III) was associated with severe PVP (mean score, 8.3 ± 0.5) in 69% of the group 1 patients. A combination of reflux in the GV, PV, UV, and internal iliac vein was associated with severe PVP (mean score, 8.1 ± 0.3) in 51% of these patients. A combination of reflux in the PVs, UVs, and VVs was associated with moderate pain (mean score, 5.3 ± 0.2) in 49.2% of group 1. In group 2, PVR type I, II, and III was present in 95%, 4%, and 1% of the patients, respectively, and was observed in the PV only in patients with type I; in the GVs, PVs, UVs, and internal iliac veins in those with type II; and in the PVs and GVs in the patients with type III reflux. Reflux in the GVs and UVs was significantly more prevalent in group 1 than in group 2 (GVs, 51% vs 6%; P = .0001; UVs, 57% vs 7%; P = .0001). A combination of reflux in the GVs and UVs was a predictor of severe PVVs (odds ratio, 19.7; 95% confidence interval, 11.3-34.6). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PVVs, the presence and severity of pelvic pain will be determined by the type of PVR and its distribution in the pelvic veins. The combination of moderate to severe reflux (types II and III) in the PVs, UVs, and GVs was a predictor of severe PVP. Patients with asymptomatic PVVs were characterized by mild reflux (type I) in the PVs, with rare involvement of the GVs and UVs.


Assuntos
Dor Pélvica/etiologia , Varizes/complicações , Insuficiência Venosa/etiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pelve , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Insuficiência Venosa/classificação , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico
4.
Phlebology ; 36(6): 450-455, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33308030

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) utilization in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) in tertiary care. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of database of a tertiary hospital in 2016-2017. All the records of patients admitted for VTE or diagnosed with VTE being hospitalized for other reasons were extracted. The data collected were number of patients, who received IVCF, indications to filter insertion, PE and death rate after procedure, frequency of IVCF occlusion. RESULTS: 2399 patients with VTE were admitted to hospital. 442 (18,4%) of them received IVCF (239 in 2016 and 203 in 2017). Retrievable models were used in most cases (98,8%). In 119 (5,0%) patients cava filters were used due to contraindications for anticoagulation, while in 184 (7,7%) patients' anticoagulation was not effective and thrombosis progression was registered. 101 (4,2%) patients received IVCF due to high PE risk (length of floating thrombus ≥7 cm, in proximal location), high pulmonary hypertension was indication to IVCF insertion in 38 (1,6%) patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in combination with pulmonary embolism (PE). Overall mortality rate after IVCF insertion was 5 (0,2%). No fatal PE was registered. IVCF occlusion during hospitalization occurred in 116 (4,8%) cases. Only 29 (1,2%) of patients were admitted back for IVCF removal. CONCLUSIONS: Every one in five patients with proximal DVT and/or PE receives IVCF in a routine practice in tertiary hospital. The most common indications for IVCF implantation were inability for anticoagulation or anticoagulation failure. Removal rate of retrievable cava filters is low.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Filtros de Veia Cava , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento , Veia Cava Inferior , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA