Pride Medical at Capitol Hill: A New Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning plus (LGBTQ+) Patient Care Option at Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States.

When accessing medical care, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning plus (LGBTQ+) individuals face many known challenges, including stigma, discrimination, and health disparities. Transgender and nonbinary individuals often encounter physicians and staff who are not knowledgeable about gender-affirming services and the transition journey. Finding an affirming physician can be a trial-and-error process, causing concern and uncertainty. In 2021, Kaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic States (KPMAS) researchers published a study examining the gaps in care and experience for transgender and nonbinary patients within the KPMAS healthcare system. KPMAS realized an opportunity to both close the gaps in care identified by transgender and nonbinary patients and enhance services for the broader LGBTQ+ patient community by creating Pride Medical at Capitol Hill-an additional and optional care site for individuals who identify as LGBTQ+. During the analysis timeframe of 30 June 2021 through 30 November 2022, 586 patients accessed care through 763 visits. A total of 675 visits (88%) were for primary care and 88 (12%) for OB/GYN. Over 50% (n = 384) of total visits were conducted virtually. The plurality of patients seen identified as a man (35%; n = 204) and gay (30%; n = 176). Postvisit survey results showed that 92% of survey respondents strongly agreed that the physician treated them with courtesy and respect, and 72% of survey respondents rated their overall care as excellent. Survey results show high acceptability of this program among the patients served. Pride Medical does not carve out care. The program offers patients access to a more specialized team of physicians-a similar model to other specialties-that is easily found by the division name Pride Medical. Layering additional specialty divisions on top of existing care, for interested patients, could be an option for other medical groups and health systems seeking to offer additional options of care for interested LGBTQ+ patients.

An observational study of dose dense chemotherapy with lipegfilgrastim support in early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent malignant diseases in women. The development of dose dense chemotherapy regimens has improved clinical outcomes but has been associated with increased hematological toxicity. Currently there is a paucity of data on the use of lipegfilgrastim in dose dense AC treatment in early breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of lipegfilgrastim in the treatment of early breast cancer and to examine the incidence of treatment-related neutropenia during the dose dense AC phase and subsequent paclitaxel treatment. METHODS: This was a single arm, non-interventional, prospective study. The primary endpoint was to determine the rate of neutropenia defined as ANC of < 1.0 × 109/L, during four cycles of dose dense AC with lipegfilgrastim support. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of febrile neutropenia, (temperature > 38 °C and ANC < 1.0 × 109/L), treatment delays, premature treatment cessation and toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-one participants were included in the study. Of the 160 planned dose dense AC treatments, 157 were administered, and 95% (152/160) of these were given on time. The rate of treatment delay was 5% (95% CI 2.2 to 9.9%) due to infection (4) and mucositis (1). Four (10%) patients developed febrile neutropenia. The most frequently occurring adverse event was grade 1 bone pain. CONCLUSION: Lipegfilgrastim is an effective option in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, and its use in everyday anti-cancer treatment can be considered.

The cost of cancer care: how far would you go for a trial?

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are often considered the gold standard in cancer care. However, patients face barriers in trial participation including distances to cancer centres and personal costs including changing employment status, cost of medications, inpatient admissions, and parking tariffs. AIM: Our aim was to compare the distances patients travelled for clinical trials compared to those receiving standard systemic anticancer therapy (SACT). We also investigated the additional costs associated with this. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of electronic patient medical records. The distance from the patients' home address to Beaumont was calculated as a one-way journey in kilometres. Patients attending for clinical trials were compared to those receiving standard of care SACT. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients receiving standard SACT over a 5-day period and 111 patients enrolled on 24 clinical trials were included. The median one-way distance travelled by patients enrolled in clinical trials was 41.4 km, compared to 14 km in those patients' receiving standard of care SACT. The median estimated cost was €13 vs €4.20 for those enrolled on clinical trials compared to those receiving standard of care treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients enrolled on clinical trials often travel more than twice as far to receive their anti-cancer treatment compared to those receiving standard of care SACT and incur an increased cost of travel expenses.

Phase Ib Trial of Copanlisib, A Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase (PI3K) Inhibitor, with Trastuzumab in Advanced Pre-Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer "PantHER".

BACKGROUND: Activation of the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is a resistance mechanism to anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. This phase Ib trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of copanlisib, an intravenous (IV) pan-class I PI3K inhibitor, combined with trastuzumab. METHODS: Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer and disease progression following at least one prior line of HER2 therapy in the metastatic setting were treated with copanlisib (45 or 60 mg) IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle with a fixed dose of trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled. The MTD was determined as copanlisib 60 mg plus trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly. The most common adverse events of any grade occurring in more than two patients were hyperglycaemia (58%), fatigue (58%), nausea (58%) and hypertension (50%). Stable disease was confirmed at 16 weeks in six participants (50%). PIK3CA mutations were detected in archival tumour of six participants (50%). PIK3CA hotspot mutations, were detectable in pre- and on-treatment plasma of all participants. Pre- and post-treatment tumour biopsies for two patients identified temporal genomic heterogeneity, somatic mutations in the TRRAP gene, which encodes a PI3K-like protein kinase, and emergent somatic mutations related to protein kinase signalling. CONCLUSION: Copanlisib and trastuzumab can be safely administered with fair overall tolerability. Preliminary evidence of tumour stability was observed in patients with heavily pre-treated, metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer. Several potential biomarkers were identified for further study in the current phase 2 clinical trial. NCT: 02705859.