[Surgical management of suburethral sling complications and functional outcomes]. / Prise en charge chirurgicale des complications de bandelette sous-urétrale et résultats fonctionnels.

OBJECTIVES: To identify various clinical presentation leading to the diagnosis of mid-urethral sling (MUS) complications and to analyze the functional outcomes after surgical management of these complications. METHOD: Retrospective observational monocentric study of all patients treated by MUS section or removal, between December 2005 and October 2019, in a pelviperineology centre. RESULTS: During this study, 96 patients were included. MUS complications surgically managed were vaginal mesh exposure (48 %), urethral mesh exposure (17 %), bladder mesh exposure (10 %); dysuria (30 %), pain (6 %), and infection (3 %). The mean time to diagnosis was 2 years. This diagnosis delay was caused by a non-specific and heterogeneous symptomatology. Surgical management consisted in MUS partial removal (79 %) and MUS simple section (21 %) with low perioperative morbidity. At three months follow-up, 36 patients (53 %) had stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including 13 (19 %) de novo (meaning no SUI before MUS section/removal) and 19 (28 %) had overactive bladder, including 9 (13 %) de novo. Half of the patients with SUI after MUS section/removal were able to be treated by a second MUS with a success rate of 83 % at 3 years. CONCLUSION: Clinical presentation of MUS complications is heterogeneous. Surgical treatment was associated with low morbidity in our study. Post-operatively, half of the patients had SUI and a second MUS was a relevant treatment option after proper evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Antibiotic prophylaxis in urodynamics: Clinical practice guidelines using a formal consensus method]. / Antibioprophylaxie et bilan urodynamique : recommandations de bonne pratique par consensus formalisé.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to issue clinical practice guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in urodynamics (urodynamic studies, UDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical practice guidelines were provided using a formal consensus method. Guidelines proposals were drew up by a multidisciplinary experts group (pilot group = steering group), then rated by a panel of 12 experts (rating group) using a formal consensus method, and then peer reviewed by a reviewing/reading group of experts (different from the rating group). RESULTS: Urine (bacterial) culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing is recommended for all patients before UDS (strong agreement). In patients with no neurologic disease, the risk factors for tract urinary infection (UTI) after UDS are age > 70 years, recurrent UTI, and post-void residual volume > 100ml. In patients with neurologic disease, the risk factors for UTI after UDS are recurrent UTI, vesicoureteral reflux, and intermicturition pressure > 40cmH2O. If the urine culture is negative before UDS and there is no risk factor for UTI, antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended (Strong agreement). If the urine culture is negative before UDS, but there are one or more risk factors for UTI, antibiotic prophylaxis is optional. If antibiotic prophylaxis is initiated, a single oral dose (3g) of fosfomycin-tromethamine two hours before UDS is recommended (Strong agreement). If there is bacterial colonization on UCB before UDS, antibiotic therapy is optional (Undecided). If prescribed, it should be adapted to the antimicrobial susceptibility of the identified bacterium or bacteria, started the day before and stopped after UDS (except for fosfomycin-tromethamine: a single dose the day before UDS is necessary and sufficient) (Strong agreement). In the event of UTI before UDS, the UTI should be treated and UDS postponed (Strong agreement). The proposed recommendations should not be changed for patients with a hip or knee replacement (Strong agreement). No antibiotic prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis is necessary, including in high-risk patients with valvular heart disease (Strong agreement). CONCLUSION: These new guidelines should help to harmonize clinical practice and limit exposure to antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Urethral strictures treated with excision and primary anastomosis: Impact of etiology on care pathways and management]. / L'urétroplastie par résection­anastomose en un temps : impact du mécanisme lésionnel sur la prise en charge et les résultats.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Excision and primary anastomosis is a common treatment of the short urethral posterior strictures. Strictures can be associated to pelvic bone fractures, endourological procedure (iatrogenic) or idiopathic. Whether outcomes are different with respect to etiology is still under reported. Herein, we aimed to explore the impact of etiology on care pathway and management of patients treated with excision and primary anastomosis for urethral strictures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2015, 97 patients were referred and treated with excision and primary anastomosis for a short urethral stricture. Data were extracted from a single institutional registry and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were sorted into 3 groups with respect to the etiology: pelvic bone fracture (n=23), iatrogenic (n=24) and idiopathic (n=50). Preoperative patient's and stricture characteristics as well as postoperative outcomes of the three groups were compared using Student or Chi2 tests as appropriate. Specifically, recurrence rate and time to first recurrence was analyzed according to a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Patients with strictures caused by pelvic bone fracture were younger (P<0.001), more likely to have a suprapubic catheter (P=0.007), and no attempted procedures before the referral (P<0.001). Strictures length and maximum flowmetry were similar in all groups. Postoperatively, 90-d complications and flowmetry were similar in both groups. After a mean follow-up of 25±24 (range: 1-102) months, 27 (27.8 %) patients recurred. According to our model, etiology did not seem to impact overall recurrence rate. However, when the subgroup of patients with recurrence were analyzed, strictures associated with pelvic bone seemed to recur faster than the 2 remaining groups. CONCLUSION: With some limitations of due to the population size and the retrospective design of the analysis, etiology impacted care pathway in terms of referral and initial management of patients treated with excision and primary anastomosis for a short urethral posterior stricture. However, recurrence rate and mid-term outcomes seem less impacted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

[Fungal infections and ureteral material: How to manage?]. / Infections fongiques et matériel urétéral: quelle prise en charge?

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infections due to Candida species are mostly encountered in hospital environment. The management of candiduria on ureteral catheter is not consensual. The objective of our work was to make a review of medical literature related to definition, physiopathology, management and prevention of candiduria on ureteral catheter. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The research was made on Medline using the following keywords: Candida; fungal; urinary tract infection; ureteral stent; ureteric stent; double-J pigtail. RESULTS: The threshold defining candiduria is 10(5) CFU/mL. Candiduria corresponds to many different clinical presentations from colonization to candidemia. Species found are mostly Candida albicans (19-72%) and Candida glabrata (15.6-49.4%). The colonization of ureteral stent due to Candida is of 10% and comes with candiduria in 40% of the cases, due to the presence of biofilm. Prevention of infections on ureteral stents requires a regular change of material every 3-6 months depending on the patients risk groups. In case of symptomatic candiduria on ureteral stent, an anti-fungal therapy should be initiated 48 hours to 3 weeks before the change of the stent, in order to get a sterilization of urines and prevent the recolonization of the stent. Fluconazole is the drug of choice to use. CONCLUSION: Colonization of ureteral stents due to Candida is common and can be responsible of symptomatic infection. Anti-fungal therapy should be introduced before the change of the stent but a consensual duration of treatment before surgery is not found in the literature.

Fluorocholine (18F) and sodium fluoride (18F) PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: prospective comparison of diagnostic performance determined by masked reading.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluorocholine (18F) (FCH) or fluoride(18F) (FNa) for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer complaining from osteoarticular pain, taking into account whether they were referred for initial staging or recurrence localization. The initial hypothesis was that FCH site-based specificity would be superior to that of F Na, with no loss in sensitivity. METHODS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this prospective study, underwent both PET/CTs and were then followed-up for at least 6 months. The standard of truth (SOT) about the presence/absence and location of bone metastasis could be determined in 40 patients, by 2 independent medical assessors, blinded to the results of both PET/CTs. The comparison was performed according to the guideline of the European Medicines Agency, i.e. based on the results of blind reading with SOT as reference. RESULTS: Bone extension was present in 22 patients and absent in 18. Patient-based performance for FCH vs. FNa was 91% vs. 91% for sensitivity, 89% vs. 83% for specificity and 90% vs. 88% for accuracy (no significant difference). Of 360 skeletal sites, 68 were malignant and 292 non-invaded. There was no significant difference in site-based performance in the group of patients referred at initial staging, but in the group of patients referred for suspicion of recurrence, FCH was significantly more specific than FNa (96% vs. 91%, P=0.033 with Obuchowski's correction) while sensitivity was the same, 89%. CONCLUSION: Both radiopharmaceuticals, based on a very different metabolic approach, showed good diagnostic performance. If FCH is available, it should be preferred in patients after initial treatment.

[Surgical treatment of ureteropyelic junction stenosis using robotic-assisted laparoscopy]. / Traitement des sténoses de la jonction pyélo-urétérale par coeliochirurgie assistée par robot.

Since the introduction of mini-invasive surgery approximately thirty years ago, Laparoscopic surgery has significantly evolved both in terms of its extended field of application and of the tools used which were diversified and improved. More recently, the development of robotic-assisted laparoscopy has brought, among other improvements, three-dimensional vision, dexterity, and a comfortable working position, which have reduced the surgeon's fatigability, the difficulties related to the operations and the learning curves of standard laparoscopy. Urology, which makes slightly less use of standard laparoscopy than general or gynaecological surgery, largely benefits from robotics concerning the precision of movements, and has much increased the operating indications of laparoscopy, including the treatment of pyeloureteral junction, kidney tumourectomy, living donor nephrectomy and radical prostactectomy. This chapter describes the operative technique used for the treatment of the ureteropyelic junction stenosis by robotic-assisted laparoscopy, as carried out in Nancy University Hospital with the da Vinci robot (Intuitive Surgical).