Photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of residual refractive error with Intacs intrastromal corneal ring segments in place.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for residual refractive errors in patients who had previous insertion of intrastromal corneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology, Inc.) for treatment of low myopia. SETTING: Shiley Eye Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective case series comprised patients who had Intacs segment implantation and subsequently developed myopic regression. Eight eyes of 5 patients had PRK over the Intacs in situ for the correction of the residual refractive error. RESULTS: Six (75%) of the 8 eyes had plano refraction with 20/20 or better uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) 1 month after PRK enhancement. Three months postoperatively, all eyes had plano refraction with 20/20 or better acuity. At the last follow-up examination (up to 2 years), all eyes had near plano vision (20/10 to 20/25). The corneal surface epithelium in all eyes healed in 3 to 5 days. One patient had subepithelial haze in both eyes, which resolved with epithelial scraping with mitomycin-C (MMC) application and a phototherapeutic keratectomy enhancement. CONCLUSIONS: This small series showed that PRK can be used to treat residual refractive error after Intacs insertion. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in all cases after PRK enhancement. The incidence of post-PRK haze in this series of patients was high; topical MMC might be used in future cases to mitigate the problem.

The effect of cyclosporine A (Restasis) on recovery of visual acuity following LASIK.

PURPOSE: To compare the recovery of uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) following LASIK in patients treated with topical cyclosporine A 0.05% and patients treated with a standard postoperative regimen. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label, retrospective study, a standard refractive workup was performed in 45 patients (85 eyes) who underwent LASIK and did not have preexisting dry eye. In 36 eyes, a standard postoperative eye drop regimen was followed, and in 49 eyes, cyclosporine A 0.05% was added to the standard regimen for 12 weeks. Uncorrected visual acuity was measured 1 week and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: One week postoperatively, 22 (44.9%) eyes in the cyclosporine A group and 8 (22.2%) eyes in the standard treatment group had UCVA of 20/15. Cumulatively, 36 (73.5%) eyes in the cyclosporine A group and 24 (66.7%) eyes in the standard treatment group had UCVA of 20/20 or better. One month postoperatively, 37 (75.5%) in the cyclosporine A group and 23 (63.9%) eyes in the standard treatment group had UCVA of 20/20 or better. Three months postoperatively, 40 (81.6%) eyes in the cyclosporine A group and 25 (69.4%) eyes in the standard treatment group had UCVA of 20/20 or better. Mean UCVA in the cyclosporine A group showed statistically significant improvements compared with the standard treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine A 0.05%, in the form of Restasis, may be an effective treatment for reducing the time needed for visual recovery after LASIK. Use of cyclosporine A was associated with overall better and faster recovery of UCVA.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infectious keratitis following refractive surgery.

PURPOSE: To elucidate risk factors, clinical course, visual outcomes, and treatment of culture-proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infectious keratitis following refractive surgery. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: Multicenter chart review of 13 cases of MRSA keratitis following refractive surgery and literature review. RESULTS: Thirteen eyes of 12 patients, nine of whom were either healthcare workers or exposed to a hospital surgical setting, developed MRSA keratitis following refractive surgery. All patients presented with a decrease in visual acuity and complaints of pain or irritation in the affected eye. Common signs on slit-lamp biomicroscopy were corneal epithelial defects, focal infiltrates with surrounding edema, conjunctival injection, purulent discharge, and hypopyon. All patients were diagnosed with infectious keratitis on presentation and treated with two antibiotics. All eyes were culture-positive for MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: According to a computerized MEDLINE literature search, this is the first case series of MRSA infectious keratitis following refractive surgery, the first reports of MRSA keratitis after refractive surgery in patients with no known exposure to a healthcare facility, the first report of MRSA keratitis after a laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement, and the first reports of MRSA keratitis after prophylaxis with fourth-generation fluoroquinolones. MRSA keratitis is a serious and increasing complication following refractive surgery. Patients with exposure to a healthcare environment should be considered at additional risk for developing MRSA keratitis. However, in addition, surgeons should now be vigilant for community-acquired MRSA. Prompt identification with culturing and appropriate treatment of MRSA keratitis after refractive surgery is important to improve visual rehabilitation.

Eye banking error: report of a donor cornea with a soft contact lens left in place.

PURPOSE: To report the first known case of a donor cornea being examined and shipped with a soft contact lens in place. METHODS: Case Report. RESULTS: Surgery was cancelled, the two involved eye-banks were notified, and the patient underwent successful keratoplasty 2 days later. CONCLUSION: Eye banking is essential to the practice of Ophthalmology. Rarely, errors occur despite the strict protocols and procedures that have been instituted over the years. These errors force us to reevaluate and update those policies as technology rapidly advances. We present here the first reported case of donor ocular tissue being examined and then shipped with a contact lens on the cornea. It is possible that there are other errors that are not published. It behooves us to disclose these and to discuss any of these errors openly to allow us to maintain confidence in our local eye banks, and to help us practice the safest medicine possible for our patients.

Gaze-induced Desçemet's folds secondary to a primary pterygium.

PURPOSE: To report a case of gaze-induced Desçemet's folds secondary to a primary pterygium. METHODS: Interventional case report, chart review, and literature review. RESULTS: Slitlamp examination of a 49-year-old man showed Desçemet's folds in the left eye on extreme right gaze secondary to the restrictive effect of a primary pterygium. The folds correlated with increasing astigmatism documented on corneal topography and restricted ocular motility and diplopia on attempted adduction. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of folds induced in Desçemet's membrane secondary to the tethering effect of a primary pterygium.

Effect of hinge width on corneal sensation and dry eye after laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of hinge width on corneal sensation and dry-eye syndrome after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: TLC Laser Eye Center, Garden City, New York, USA. METHODS: Fifty-four patients at least 18 years of age had bilateral LASIK with a narrow nasal hinge microkeratome flap in 1 eye and a wider nasal hinge microkeratome flap in the other eye. In all eyes, the flaps were 160 microm in thickness with a diameter of 9.5 mm. Masked Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry was performed in the central cornea preoperatively and at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. Dry eye was evaluated at the same intervals by lissamine green corneal and conjunctival staining, Schirmer test with anesthesia, and tear-film breakup time. RESULTS: Corneal sensation was significantly reduced from preoperative levels through 6 months in the narrow-hinge group and through 3 months in the wider-hinge group (P< or =.002). The mean corneal sensation was greater in corneas with a wider hinge flap than in those with a narrow hinge flap at all postoperative examinations; the difference was significant at 1 and 3 months (P< or =.002). The loss of sensation was greatest at 1 week and improved at all subsequent examinations. Overall, dry-eye signs and symptoms were greatest immediately postoperatively and improved at subsequent intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal sensation and dry-eye signs and symptoms improved at all intervals between 1 week and 6 months. The loss of corneal sensation and presence of dry-eye syndrome were greater in eyes with a narrow hinge flap than in eyes with a wider hinge flap.

The effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye after LASIK.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of hinge position on corneal sensation and dry eye syndrome after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, self-controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two patients >/=18 years of age undergoing bilateral LASIK. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent bilateral LASIK with the superior-hinge Hansatome microkeratome in one eye and the nasal-hinge Amadeus microkeratome in the other eye. In all eyes, the flaps were 160 micro m thick, with a diameter of 9.5 mm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Masked Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry was performed centrally before surgery and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Dry eye was evaluated at the same time intervals with lissamine green corneal and conjunctival staining, Schirmer testing with anesthesia, and tear-film breakup time. Subjective evaluation of dry eye sensation was performed at 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Corneal sensation was reduced in eyes with either superior- or nasal-hinge corneal flaps at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery (P < 0.001). Compared with preoperative values, a significant reduction in corneal sensation remained at 6 months in corneas with superior-hinge flaps (P < 0.001) but not in corneas with nasal-hinge flaps (P = 0.263). Mean corneal sensation was greater in corneas with a nasal-hinge flap compared with corneas with a superior-hinge flap at all postoperative visits (P < 0.001). The loss of sensation was greatest at 1 week and showed improvement at each subsequent time interval up to 6 months. Overall, dry eye signs and symptoms were greatest during the immediate postoperative period and improved at all subsequent time intervals. Dry eye signs and symptoms were generally greatest in the eyes with a superior-hinge flap and milder in eyes with a nasal-hinge flap. CONCLUSIONS: The long posterior corneal nerves, which innervate the cornea, enter the eye at 3- and 9-o'clock. A superior-hinge flap transects both arms of the neuroplexus, whereas a nasal hinge transects only the temporal arm. LASIK results in a significant reduction in corneal sensation. Corneal sensation and dry eye signs and symptoms decreased immediately after LASIK and improved at all time periods between 1 week and 6 months in eyes with both a nasal-hinge flap and a superior-hinge flap. However, the loss of corneal sensation and presence of dry eye syndrome were greater in eyes with a superior-hinge flap than in eyes with a nasal-hinge flap.