RESUMO
This article describes practices in patient blood management (PBM) in 4 countries on different continents that may provide insights for anesthesiologists and other physicians working in global settings. The article has its foundation in the proceedings of a session at the 2014 AABB annual meeting during which international experts from England, Uganda, China, and Brazil presented the programs and implementation strategies in PBM developed in their respective countries. To systematize the review and enhance the comparability between these countries on different continents, authors were requested to respond to the same set of 6 key questions with respect to their country's PBM program(s). Considerable variation exists between these country regions that is driven both by differences in health contexts and by disparities in resources. Comparing PBM strategies from low-, middle-, and high-income countries, as described in this article, allows them to learn bidirectionally from one another and to work toward implementing innovative and preferably evidence-based strategies for improvement. Sharing and distributing knowledge from such programs will ultimately also improve transfusion outcomes and patient safety.
Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Transfusão de Sangue/tendências , Países em Desenvolvimento , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Brasil , China , Comportamento Cooperativo , Países em Desenvolvimento/economia , Inglaterra , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Avaliação das Necessidades/tendências , Segurança do Paciente , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/economia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Reação Transfusional , Resultado do Tratamento , UgandaRESUMO
At the combined American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Annual Meeting/World Apheresis Association (WAA) Congress in San Francisco, California, in April of 2014, the opening session highlighted the status of apheresis outside of the United States. The organizers invited physicians active in apheresis in countries not usually represented at such international gatherings to give them a forum to share their experiences, challenges, and expectations in their respective countries with regard to both donor and therapeutic apheresis. Apheresis technology is expensive as well as technically and medically demanding, and low and median income countries have different experiences to share with the rest of the world. Apheresis procedures also require resources taken for granted in the developed world, such as reliable electrical power, that can be unpredictable in parts of the developing world. On the other hand, it was obvious that there are significant disparities in access to apheresis within the same country (such as in Brazil), as well as between neighboring nations in Africa and South America. A common trend in the presentations from Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and South Africa, was the need for more and better physicians and practitioners' training in the indications of the various apheresis modalities and patient oversight during the procedures. As ASFA and WAA continue to work together, and globalization allows for increased knowledge-sharing, improved access to apheresis procedures performed by qualified personnel with safety and high-quality standards will be increasingly available.
Assuntos
Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/tendências , Países em Desenvolvimento , África , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Remoção de Componentes Sanguíneos/economia , Plaquetas/citologia , Brasil , Eritrócitos/citologia , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Malásia , Motivação , Segurança do Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Education and training in transfusion medicine have improved over the past decade in developing countries but are still generally deficient for the purpose of maintaining the safety of the global blood supply. In 2009, the World Health Organization global database on blood safety indicated that only 72% of countries in the world were able to meet their training needs necessary for maintaining the safety of their local blood supply. Educational approaches in transfusion medicine vary widely between continents and world regions. In this article, we summarize a session on global health education and training in developing countries that took place at the 2012 AABB conference. The panel consisted of transfusion representatives from South America (Brazil), Asia (China), Africa (South Africa), and the Caribbean (Curaçao), as well as a description of capacitation issues in postearthquake Haiti and the pivotal role of the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) in transfusion training and education in Africa. We present here summaries of each of these panel presentations.