Factors Contributing to Patient Satisfaction Among VA Medical Center and Non-VA Medical Center Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Veteran satisfaction of care within the Veterans Affairs is typically very high. Yet recommendation ratings of VA medical center (VA) hospitals as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems are generally lower than non-VA hospitals.Therefore, it was our objective to assess Veteran satisfaction and recommendation scores and then examine whether satisfaction correlates to recommendation. METHODS: We identified all acute care VAs as our primary analytic cohort. As a comparator group, we also included all acute care academic hospitals (non-VAs), as designated by the Centers for Medicare Services. Using data from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) Value Model, we collated patient satisfaction scores, as well as markers of surgical safety from Hospital Compare. We then analyzed the correlation within VAs and non-VAs, primarily focusing the relationship between the "would you recommend Hospital Rating" and subdomains of the "Overall Hospital Rating," as well as a composite score of patient safety. RESULTS: A total of 133 VAs and 1116 non-VAs were identified. Among VAs, the "Would you Recommend" hospital rating was significantly and positively correlated with markers of patient satisfaction including care transitions (Pearson's r = 0.59, P = 0.03), Nursing communication (Pearson's R 0.79, P = 0.001), and percent of primary care provider wait times less than 30 min (Pearson's r = 0.25, P = 0.01). VA-recommended scores were negatively correlated with factors such as time to emergency department discharge, and the "leaving the emergency department before being evaluated." When looking at non-VAs, correlation directions were similar, albeit with stronger associations at almost every metric. While recommended scores correlated strongly to overall hospital ratings for both groups, VAs had no significant correlation between "would you recommend" and patient safety. However, there was a slight negative correlation between patient safety and "recommend" among non-VAs. CONCLUSIONS: Although satisfiers and dissatisfiers of care appear similar between VAs and non-VAs, "would you recommend" is a far weaker marker of patient perceptions of safety and quality. These seemingly empathetic markers such as "would you recommend" should be used with caution as they may not address the fundamental question being asked.

Does Long-Term Bowel Function Change After Colectomy for Colon Malignancy?

INTRODUCTION: Current understanding of bowel function after colectomy for colon cancer is informed by conflicting data, making preoperative patient counseling difficult. Our previous work demonstrates bowel movement frequency increases by postoperative follow-up, while overall function does not change. Long-term changes are unknown. We aimed to evaluate changes to patient-reported bowel function after colectomy for colon malignancy. METHODS: This is an observational study of patients that underwent colectomy for colon malignancy and completed the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire at preoperative and 30-d postoperative clinic visits. Long-term bowel function was assessed using the same questionnaire via telephone or surveillance clinic visit. Mean domain and Total COREFO scores were compared baseline to long-term using paired t-tests. Quality of life analysis was obtained using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 Global Health questionnaire for patients who completed this measure at surveillance visits or via telephone. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Median time between baseline and long-term questionnaire completion was 16 mo (interquartile range 11-30). Stool-related aspects (pain and bleeding with bowel movements, anal skin irritation) improved significantly from baseline to long-term. There were no other differences in any domain or Total COREFO score. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 scores demonstrated quality of life equivalent to the general US population. CONCLUSIONS: Over the long-term, after colectomy for colon cancer, patients report improvements in stool-related aspects (pain and bleeding with bowel movements, anal skin irritation). Evidence-based preoperative patient counseling should include these findings.

Trends of Concomitant Diabetes and Peripheral Artery Disease and Lower Extremity Amputation in US Medicare Patients, 2007 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrate geographic and racial/ethnic variation in diagnosis and complications of diabetes and peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, recent trends for patients diagnosed with both PAD and diabetes are lacking. We assessed the period prevalence of concurrent diabetes and PAD across the United States from 2007 to 2019 and regional and racial/ethnic variation in amputations among Medicare patients. METHODS: Using Medicare claims from 2007 to 2019, we identified patients with both diabetes and PAD. We calculated period prevalence of concomitant diabetes and PAD and incident cases of diabetes and PAD for every year. Patients were followed to identify amputations, and results were stratified by race/ethnicity and hospital referral region. RESULTS: 9 410 785 patients with diabetes and PAD were identified (mean age, 72.8 [SD, 10.94] years; 58.6% women, 74.7% White, 13.2% Black, 7.3% Hispanic, 2.8% Asian/API, and 0.6% Native American). Period prevalence of diabetes and PAD was 23 per 1000 beneficiaries. We observed a 33% relative decrease in annual new diagnoses throughout the study. All racial/ethnic groups experienced a similar decline in new diagnoses. Black and Hispanic patients had on average a 50% greater rate of disease compared with White patients. One- and 5-year amputation rates remained stable at ≈1.5% and 3%, respectively. Native American, Black, and Hispanic patients were at greater risk of amputation compared with White patients at 1- and 5-year time points (5-year rate ratio range, 1.22-3.17). Across US regions, we observed differential amputation rates, with an inverse relationship between the prevalence of concomitant diabetes and PAD and overall amputation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Significant regional and racial/ethnic variation exists in the incidence of concomitant diabetes and PAD among Medicare patients. Black patients in areas with the lowest rates of PAD and diabetes are at disproportionally higher risk for amputation. Furthermore, areas with higher prevalence of PAD and diabetes have the lowest rates of amputation.

Surgical Providers' Perceptions of the Patient Portal: Before and After the 21st Century Cures Act.

INTRODUCTION: In April 2021, the Information Blocking Rule (IBR) of the 21st Century Cures Act went into effect giving patients immediate access to notes, radiology reports, lab results, and surgical pathology. We aimed to examine changes in surgical providers' perceptions of patient portal usage before and after its implementation. METHODS: We administered a 37-question survey prior to the implementation of the IBR and a 39-question follow-up survey 3 mo later. The survey was sent to all surgeons, advanced practice providers, and clinic nurses in our surgical department. RESULTS: The response rate to pre surveys and post surveys was 33.7% and 30.7%, respectively. Providers' preference for communication via the patient portal (compared to phone or in person) regarding lab, radiology, or pathology results remained similar. While there was an increase in messages received from patients, there was no difference in the self-reported time spent on the electronic health record (EHR). Prior to the implementation of the blocking rule, 75.8% of providers believed that the portal increased workload which decreased to 57.4% on our follow-up survey. About one-third of providers screened positive for burnout before (32%) which decreased slightly (27.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although 43.9% of providers reported the Cures Act had changed their practice, there was no difference in self-reported EHR usage, preferred method of interaction with patients, overall workload, or burnout. Initial concerns regarding the IBR's effect on job satisfaction, patient anxiety, and quality of care had lessened. Further exploration into how patients having immediate access to their EHRs has changed surgical practice is needed.

Extreme Elevation of Baseline Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Measurements: Should Usual Protocols Apply?

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring is routinely used to facilitate minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Many IOPTH protocols exist for predicting biochemical cure. Some patients are found to have extremely high baseline IOPTH levels (defined in this study as >500 pg/mL), which may affect the likelihood of satisfying certain final IOPTH criteria. We aimed to discover whether clinically significant differences exist in patients with extremely high baseline IOPTH and which IOPTH protocols are most appropriately applied to these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 237 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy with IOPTH monitoring for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) from 2016 to 2020. Baseline IOPTH levels, drawn prior to manipulation of parathyroid glands, were grouped into categories labeled "elevated" (>65-500 pg/mL) and "extremely elevated" (>500 pg/mL). Final IOPTH levels were analyzed to determine whether there was a >50% decrease from baseline and whether a normal IOPTH value was achieved. 6-wk postoperative calcium levels were also examined. RESULTS: Of the patients in this cohort, 76% were in the elevated group and 24% in the extremely elevated group. Male sex and higher preoperative PTH levels were correlated with higher baseline IOPTH levels. Patients with extremely elevated baseline IOPTH were less likely to have IOPTH fall into normal range at the conclusion of the case (P = 0.019), and final IOPTH levels were higher (P < 0.001), but the IOPTH was equally likely to decrease >50% from baseline. There was no difference in the mean postoperative calcium levels between the two groups at 6-wk or at longer term follow-up (mean 525 d). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of baseline IOPTH levels >500 pg/mL during parathyroidectomy performed for pHPT is not uncommon. IOPTH in patients with extremely elevated baseline levels were less likely to fall into normal range, but follow-up calcium levels were equal, suggesting that applying more stringent IOPTH criteria for predicting biochemical cure may not be appropriate for this population.

The global burden of peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous efforts to characterize the burden of peripheral artery disease (PAD) have focused on national populations. A need for a more detailed analysis of how PAD impacts the global population has been identified. Our objective was to study in greater detail the global burden of PAD, including its impact on mortality, over the past three decades. METHODS: Using data and models from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study, we estimated the prevalence, years of life lost, years lived with disability and disability-adjusted life-years (a measure accounting for incurred morbidity and mortality), attributable to PAD. We analyzed results over time and stratified by sex, age, and sociodemographic index (SDI) group. We compared PAD with other atherosclerosis-related conditions and assessed the contribution of risk factors to PAD disability-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: We observed a 72% increase in the global prevalence of PAD from an estimated 65,764,499 persons in 1990 to 113,443,016 in 2019. Prevalence per 100,000 persons increased 13% and the prevalence per 100,000 age-standardized decreased 22%. Similar patterns were seen for years of live lost, mortality, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years. The prevalence and disability were higher among women, whereas mortality and years of life lost were higher among men. Disease burden increased with increasing SDI. These increases in PAD were in contrast with global trends for the overall burden of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke, which had decreasing prevalence and disease-related mortality over the same time frame. Overall, only approximately 55% of PAD disease burden could be attributed to identified risk factors, with tobacco use, diabetes, and hypertension being the three major contributors in all SDI groups. CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence and mortality associated with PAD has increased substantially, in contrast with other forms of ischemic cardiovascular disease. Globally, there is a growing need for vascular surgical resources to manage PAD, as well as public health efforts to address risk factors for this increasing health threat.

Deriving International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revision, codes for identifying and following up patients with diabetic lower extremity ulcers.

Objective: Administrative claims data offer a rich data source for clinical research. However, its application to the study of diabetic lower extremity ulceration is lacking. Our objective was to create a widely applicable framework by which investigators might derive and refine the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th revision (ICD-9 and ICD-10, respectively) codes for use in identifying diabetic, lower extremity ulceration. Methods: We created a seven-step process to derive and refine the ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding lists to identify diabetic lower extremity ulcers. This process begins by defining the research question and the initial identification of a list of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes to define the exposures or outcomes of interest. These codes are then applied to claims data, and the rates of clinical events are examined for consistency with prior research and changes across the ICD-9 to ICD-10 transition. The ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes are then cross referenced with each other to further refine the lists. Results: Using this method, we started with 8 ICD-9 and 43 ICD-10 codes used to identify lower extremity ulcers in patients with known diabetes and peripheral arterial disease and examined the association of ulceration with lower extremity amputation. After refinement, we had 45 ICD-9 codes and 304 ICD-10 codes. We then grouped the codes into eight clinical exposure groups and examined the rates of amputation as a rudimentary test of validity. We found that the rate of lower extremity amputation correlated with the severity of lower extremity ulceration. Conclusions: We identified 45 ICD-9 and 304 ICD-10 ulcer codes, which identified patients at risk of amputation from diabetes and peripheral artery disease. Although further validation at the medical record level is required, these codes can be used for claims-based risk stratification for long-term outcomes assessment in the treatment of patients at risk of limb loss.

Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling.

BACKGROUND: This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. RESULTS: There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. CONCLUSIONS: The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.

Physicians perceive that ostomates have decreased quality of life but not overall health: An international survey of physicians.

AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate physicians' perceptions of ostomates' quality of life (QoL) and comfort of care among an international sample of physicians caring for ostomates. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional survey study. We conducted a survey of primary care physicians (PCP), gastroenterologists (GI), and general surgeons (GS) from three continents using the SERMO online physician platform. We piloted the survey for content, clarity and domain development using a pilot sample of physicians from each speciality before use. We summarized responses to questions related to physician comfort of ostomate care with descriptive statistics. We conducted multiple logistic regression with the primary outcome of physician perception of ostomate QoL. RESULTS: A total of 617 physicians (PCP 264, GI 176, GS 177) completed the survey representing North America, Europe and Australia similarly. The average age was 46 years and 21% were women. Ninety per cent of physicians care for an ostomate at least once per month. Eighty eight per cent had access to enterostomal nurses. Eighty two per cent of physicians believed that ostomates have decreased QoL. Forty seven per cent believed that ostomates have decreased overall health. Almost half of respondents answered incorrectly to a 'bogus question' citing fake clinical evidence supporting a negative impact of ostomies on social relationships. Increased physician comfort in ostomy care (OR 1.30, p = 0.04) and US-based physicians (OR 1.75, p = 0.01) were associated with increased odds of answering that ostomates have no decreased QoL. CONCLUSION: Among a diverse international sample, most physicians believe that ostomates have decreased QoL but not overall health. Physician implicit bias, physician comfort and geographical variability account for these findings. Targeted efforts to increase physician comfort in ostomate care and establish universal best practices is needed.

Effect of a Decision Aid on Agreement Between Patient Preferences and Repair Type for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can choose open repair or endovascular repair (EVAR). While EVAR is less invasive, it requires lifelong surveillance and more frequent aneurysm-related reinterventions than open repair. A decision aid may help patients receive their preferred type of AAA repair. Objective: To determine the effect of a decision aid on agreement between patient preference for AAA repair type and the repair type they receive. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cluster randomized trial, 235 patients were randomized at 22 VA vascular surgery clinics. All patients had AAAs greater than 5.0 cm in diameter and were candidates for both open repair and EVAR. Data were collected from August 2017 to December 2020, and data were analyzed from December 2020 to June 2021. Interventions: Presurgical consultation using a decision aid vs usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had agreement between their preference and their repair type, measured using χ2 analyses, κ statistics, and adjusted odds ratios. Results: Of 235 included patients, 234 (99.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 73 (5.9) years. A total of 126 patients were enrolled in the decision aid group, and 109 were enrolled in the control group. Within 2 years after enrollment, 192 (81.7%) underwent repair. Patients were similar between the decision aid and control groups by age, sex, aneurysm size, iliac artery involvement, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Patients preferred EVAR over open repair in both groups (96 of 122 [79%] in the decision aid group; 81 of 106 [76%] in the control group; P = .60). Patients in the decision aid group were more likely to receive their preferred repair type than patients in the control group (95% agreement [93 of 98] vs 86% agreement [81 of 94]; P = .03), and κ statistics were higher in the decision aid group (κ = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95) compared with the control group (κ = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74). Adjusted models confirmed this association (odds ratio of agreement in the decision aid group relative to control group, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.10-7.70). Conclusions and Relevance: Patients exposed to a decision aid were more likely to receive their preferred AAA repair type, suggesting that decision aids can help better align patient preferences and treatments in major cardiovascular procedures. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03115346.

Use of real-world data and clinical registries to identify new uses of existing vascular endografts: combined use of GORE EXCLUDER Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis and GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endoprosthesis.

Objective: To assess the feasibility of collecting, examining and reporting observational, real-world evidence regarding the novel use of the GORE EXCLUDER Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) in conjunction with the GORE VIABAHN VBX Balloon Expandable Endoprosthesis (IBE+VBX stent graft). Design: Multicentre retrospective cohort study. Setting: Four real-world data sources were used: a national quality improvement registry, a statewide clinical research network, a regional quaternary health system and two tertiary academic medical centres. Participants: In total, 30 patients with 37 IBE+VBX stent graft were identified. Of those, the mean age was 72±10.2 years and 90% were male. The cohort was 77% white, 10% black, 3% Hispanic and 10% other. Main outcome measures: Outcome measures included: proportion of percutaneous vs open surgical access, intensive care admission, intensive care unit (ICU) length-of-stay (LOS), total LOS, postoperative complications, discharge disposition and 30-day mortality. Results: The majority (89%) of cases were performed percutaneously, 5% required surgical exposure following failed percutaneous access and 6% required open surgical exposure outright. Nearly half (43%) required intensive care admission with a median ICU LOS of 1 day (range: 1-2). Median total LOS was 1 day (IQR: 1-2). There were zero postoperative myocardial infarctions, zero reported leg embolisations and no reported reinterventions. Access site complications were described in 1 of 28 patients, manifesting as a haematoma or pseudoaneurysm. Ultimately, 97% were discharged to home and one patient was discharged to a nursing home or rehabilitation facility. There were no 30-day perioperative deaths. Conclusions: This project demonstrates the feasibility of identifying and integrating real-world evidence, as it pertains to an unapproved combination of endovascular devices (IBE+VBX stent graft), for short-term outcomes analysis. This new paradigm of evidence has potential to be used for device monitoring, submission to regulatory agencies, or consideration in indication expansions and approvals with further efforts to systematise data collection and transmission mechanisms.

Factors associated with preference of choice of aortic aneurysm repair in the PReference for Open Versus Endovascular repair of AAA (PROVE-AAA) study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients can choose between open repair and endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, the factors associated with patient preference for one repair type over another are not well-characterized. Here we assess the factors associated with preference of choice for open or endovascular AAA repair among veterans exposed to a decision aid to help with choosing surgical treatment. METHODS: Across 12 Veterans Affairs hospitals, veterans received a decision aid covering domains including patient information sources and understanding preference. Veterans were then given a series of surveys at different timepoints examining their preferences for open versus endovascular AAA repair. Questions from the preference survey were used in analyses of patient preference. Results were analyzed using χ2 tests. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with preference for open repair or preference for EVAR. RESULTS: A total of 126 veterans received a decision aid informing them of their treatment choices, after which 121 completed all preference survey questions; five veterans completed only part of the instruments. Overall, veterans who preferred open repair were typically younger (70 years vs 73 years; P = .02), with similar rates of common comorbidities (coronary disease 16% vs 28%; P = .21), and similar aneurysms compared with those who preferred EVAR (6.0 cm vs 5.7 cm; P = .50). Veterans in both preference categories (28% of veterans preferring EVAR, 48% of veterans preferring open repair) reported taking their doctor's advice as the top box response for the single most important factor influencing their decision. When comparing the tradeoff between less invasive surgery and higher risk of long-term complications, more than one-half of veterans preferring EVAR reported invasiveness as more important compared with approximately 1 in 10 of those preferring open repair (53% vs 12%; P < .001). Shorter recovery was an important factor for the EVAR group (74%) and not important in the open repair group (76%) (P = .5). In multivariable analyses, valuing a short hospital stay (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-135.70) and valuing a shorter recovery (odds ratio, 15.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-240.20) were associated with a greater odds of preference for EVAR, whereas finding these characteristics not important was associated with a greater odds of preference for open repair. CONCLUSIONS: When faced with the decision of open repair versus EVAR, veterans who valued a shorter hospital stay and a shorter recovery were more likely to prefer EVAR, whereas those more concerned about long-term complications preferred an open repair. Veterans typically value the advice of their surgeon over their own beliefs and preferences. These findings need to be considered by surgeons as they guide their patients to a shared decision.

Mental health diagnosis, not patient-reported outcomes, is predictive of failing to meet the expected outcomes after successful implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol after elective colon resection.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols have demonstrated decreased complication rates and length of stay. However, the influence of mental health on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery success is unknown. METHOD: A retrospective study of patient-reported outcomes for physical and mental health. We included patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colon resections, who completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10 questionnaire preoperatively, and who had successful implementation of perioperative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery components. We evaluated the predictors of having successful expected Enhanced Recovery After Surgery outcomes using a multiple logistic regression, controlling for baseline patient characteristics, history of a mental health diagnosis, inpatient opiate use, and preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10 scores. RESULTS: In total, 163 patients met inclusion criteria, with 23% failing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, and 32% having a preoperative mental health diagnosis. The most common reason for failure of expected Enhanced Recovery After Surgery outcomes was length of stay (55.3%) followed by postoperative ileus (31.6%). Age, sex, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10 scores were not significantly different between those who failed or succeeded, whereas length of stay was typically longer for those who failed Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (5.7 days failure vs 2.2 days success, P < .001). Patients with a previous mental health diagnosis, where depression and anxiety were most common, had significantly lower odds of successfully meeting expected Enhanced Recovery After Surgery outcomes (odds ratio of 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.55, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with a mental health diagnosis have a lower likelihood of successfully meeting expected Enhanced Recovery After Surgery outcomes. The majority of these patients self-report normal mental and physical health preoperatively, indicating that even well-controlled mental health diagnoses have a negative impact on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery success.

The Impact of Work Status and Age in Choosing Type of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

INTRODUCTION: The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial aimed to determine the efficacy of a validated decision aid to enable better alignment between patient preference and their ultimate repair. We sought to determine the key factors influencing the decision-making of veterans for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: A total of 235 veterans in the PROVE-AAA trial were asked their information sources regarding repairs, employment status, and preferred intervention. Answers were coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis to generate nonoverlapping themes, then stratified by employment status. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (17.8% of enrollees) provided their source of information for OSR prior to using a decision aid. 81% of retired veterans were greater than 70 y old, while 58% of nonretired veterans were greater than 70 (P = 0.003). The most common information source was from a vascular surgeon/professional or unspecified MD/other health professionals (51.4%), while sources from outside this group made up the remaining 48.5%. The most preferred procedure was EVAR. However, nonretired individuals were more likely to prefer OSR. These data on information source and preferred procedure were similar in patients who provided their source for EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans in the PROVE-AAA study were more likely to be retired and more likely to rely on information from an unspecified MD/other health professionals for EVAR. Although both retired and nonretired veterans preferred EVAR the most, nonretired veterans were more likely to prefer OSR despite being younger.

Minimally Invasive Surgery Approach is Not Associated With Differences in Long-Term Bowel Function Patient-Reported Outcomes After Elective Sigmoid Colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bowel function is a common concern for patients undergoing a sigmoidectomy. We have previously demonstrated that patients with symptomatic bowel function preoperatively have substantial improvement at long-term follow-up. However, the effect of the operative approach on patient-reported bowel function is largely unknown. We aimed to evaluate the differences in long-term patient-reported bowel function after robotic or laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies for benign and malignant disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected institutional database from July 2015 to July 2020. Patients included underwent a sigmoid colectomy for benign or malignant disease and completed the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire at preoperative presentation, postoperatively, and long-term follow-up. Differences between preoperative and postoperative scores, as well as differences between the robotic and laparoscopic cohorts, were compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 61 y, and 55% of the patients underwent robotic sigmoid colectomy, with the most common diagnosis being diverticular disease (62%). There was no significant difference between the presentation, short-term, or long-term follow-up total COREFO scores or subdomains based on the surgical technique. Patients that present asymptomatic remain asymptomatic, while those that are symptomatic demonstrate improvements for both the robotic and laparoscopic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported long-term global bowel function does not appear to differ between patients who underwent elective robotic or laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for benign or malignant disease. Patients that present asymptomatic remain asymptomatic, while those that are symptomatic demonstrate improvements, regardless of surgical technique.

Comparison of Social Media Utilization Among Vascular Surgeons, Interventional Cardiologists, and Interventional Radiologists at Academic Training Institutions.

BACKGROUND: Social media platforms, especially Twitter, are increasingly utilized across medical practice, education, and research. However, little is known about differences in social media use among physicians of varying specialties and its impact on recruitment of trainees. Our objective was to describe differences in social media use among vascular interventional proceduralists at academic training institutions. METHODS: We identified institutions with training programs in vascular surgery (VS), interventional radiology (IR), and interventional cardiology (IC). Faculty providers were identified in each specialty at these institutions. A standardized search was used to identify non-anonymous social media profiles on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter in September 2019. Influencers were defined as physicians with more than 1,000 Twitter followers. Follow ratio was defined as the number of followers divided by the number of accounts followed. Between-specialty differences were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,330 providers (n = 454 VS, n=451 IR, n = 425 IC) were identified across 47 institutions in 27 states. Across all physicians, a minority of providers utilize social media (Facebook: 24.9%, n = 331; Instagram: 10.8%, n = 143; Twitter: 18.0%, n = 240). VS were significantly more likely to use Instagram (P = 0.001) but there was not a significant difference in utilization of Facebook and Twitter. Among Twitter users, VS had fewer followers on average (median 178, inter-quartile range [IQR] 39-555) than IR (median 272, IQR 50-793, P = 0.26) and IC (median 286, IQR 71-1257, P = 0.052). IC were most likely to be influencers (30.9%, n = 25) followed by IR (17.9%, n = 15) and VS (10.7%, n = 8, P = 0.006). On average, interventional cardiologists had the highest follow ratio (mean 4.9 ± 7.1) compared to interventional radiologists (mean 3.2 ± 5.5) and vascular surgeons (mean 2.5 ± 3.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A minority of academic vascular interventional proceduralists utilize social media in a non-anonymous manner. On Twitter, interventional cardiologists are most likely to be influencers based on number of followers and, on average, have the highest follow ratio. Vascular surgeons could potentially benefit from pursuing greater influence and visibility on social media as a means to recruit trainees.

Reducing New Ileostomy Readmissions in a Rural Health Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Readmission after ileostomy creation continues to be a major cause of morbidity with rates ranging from 15% to 30% due to dehydration and obstruction. Rural environments pose an added risk of readmission due to larger travel distances and lack of consistent home health services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reduce ileostomy-related readmission rates in a rural academic medical center. DESIGN: This is a rapid cycle quality improvement study. SETTING: This single-center study was conducted in a rural academic medical center. PATIENTS: Colorectal surgery patients receiving a new ileostomy were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Improvement initiatives were identified through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (enhanced team continuity, standardized rehydration, nursing/staff education). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day readmission, average length of stay, and average time to readmission served as main outcome measures. RESULTS: Roughly equal rates of ileostomy were created in each time point, consistent with a tertiary care colorectal practice. The preimplementation readmission rate was 29%. Over the course of the entire quality improvement initiative, re-admission rates decreased by more than 50% (29% to 14%). PDSA cycle 1, which involved integrating a service-specific physician assistant to the team, allowed for greater continuity of care and had the most dramatic effect, decreasing rates by 27.5% (29% to 21%). Standardization of oral rehydration therapy and the implementation of a patient-directed intake/output sheet during PDSA cycle 2 resulted in further improvement in readmission rates (21% to 15%). Finally, implementation of nurse and physician assistant (PA)-driven patient education on fiber supplementation resulted in an additional yet nominal decrease in readmissions (15% to 14%). Latency to readmission also significantly increased throughout the study period. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size in a single-center study. CONCLUSION: Implementation of initiatives targeting enhanced team continuity, the standardization of rehydration therapies, and improved patient education decreased readmission rates in patients with new ileostomies. Rural centers, where outpatient resources are not as readily available or accessible, stand to benefit the most from these types of targeted interventions to decrease readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B771. REDUCCIN EN LAS READMISIONES POR ILEOSTOMAS NE MEDIOS DE ATENCIN MDICA RURAL INICIATIVA DE MEJORA EN LA CALIDAD: ANTECEDENTES:La readmisión después de la creación de una ileostomía sigue siendo una de las principales causas de morbilidad con tasas que oscilan entre el 15% y el 30% debido a la deshidratación y la oclusión. Un entorno rurale presenta un riesgo adicional de readmisión debido a las mayores distancias de viaje y la falta de servicios de salud domiciliarios adecuados.OBJETIVO:Reducir las tasas de reingreso por ileostomía en un centro médico académico rural.DISEÑO:Estudio de mejoría de la calidad de ciclo rápido.AJUSTE:Estudio unicéntrico en una unidad de servicio médico académico rural.PACIENTES:Pacientes de cirugía colorrectal a quienes se les confeccionó una ileostomía.INTERVENCIONES:Iniciativas de mejoría identificadas a través de los ciclos Planificar-Hacer-Estudiar-Actuar (Continuidad del equipo mejorada, rehidratación estandarizada, educación de enfermería / personal).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:30 días de readmisión, duración media de la estadía hospitalaria, tiempo medio de reingreso.RESULTADOS:Se crearon tasas aproximadamente iguales de ileostomías un momento dado de tiempo, subsecuentes en la práctica colorrectal de atención terciaria. La tasa de readmisión previa a la implementación del estudio fue del 29%. En el transcurso de toda la iniciativa de mejoría en la calidad, las tasas de readmisión disminuyeron en más del 50% (29% a 14%). El ciclo 1 de PDSA, que implicó la integración en el equipo de un asistente médico específico, lo que permitió una mayor continuidad en la atención y tuvo el mayor efecto disminuyendo las tasas en un 27,5% (29% a 21%). La estandarización de una terapia de rehidratación oral y la implementación de una hoja de ingresos / perdidas dirigida al paciente durante el ciclo 2 de PDSA resultó en una mejoría adicional en las tasas de readmisión (21% a 15%). Finalmente, la implementación de la educación del paciente impulsada por enfermeras y AF sobre el consumo suplementario de dietas con fibra dio como resultado una disminución adicional, aunque nominal, de las readmisiones (15% a 14%). La latencia hasta la readmisión también aumentó significativamente durante el período de estudio.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de un solo centro con un muestreo de pequeño tamaño.CONCLUSIONES:La implementación de iniciativas dirigidas a mejorar la continuidad en el equipo, la estandarización de las terapias de rehidratación y la mejoría en la información de los pacientes disminuyeron las tasas de readmisión en todos aquellas personas con nuevas ileostomías. Los centros rurales, donde los recursos para pacientes ambulatorios no están tan fácilmente disponibles o accesibles, son los que más beneficiaron de este tipo de intervenciones específicas para reducir las tasas de readmisión. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B771. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Current Barriers in Robotic Surgery Training for General Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the current barriers in robotic surgery training for general surgery residents. DESIGN: Multi-institutional web-based survey. SETTING: 9 academic medical centers with a general surgery residency. PARTICIPANTS: General surgery residents of at least PGY-3 training level. RESULTS: 163 general surgery residents were contacted with 80 responses (49.1%). The most common responders were PGY-3s (38.8%) followed by PGY-5s (27.5%). The Northeast represented 42.5% of responses. Colorectal cases were the most common robotic case residents were involved in (51.3%). Residents' typical roles were assisting at the bedside (31.3%) and splitting time between assisting at the bedside and operating at the surgeon console (31.3%). 43% report to be either extremely or somewhat dissatisfied with their robotic surgery experience. 62.5% report they do not intend to integrate robotic surgery into their future practice. 93.8% of residents have a standardized robotic curriculum. 47.5% report using the simulator only during required didactic time with 52.5% having the robotic simulator conveniently located. The majority of residents report that the presence of dual consoles and first-assists in robotic cases enhance their robotic training (93% - 62%, respectively). 72.5% felt like they had more autonomy during laparoscopic cases and 96.8% of residents felt that an attendings' lack of experience impacted their time operating at the surgeon console. CONCLUSIONS: General surgery residents report lack of effective OR teaching, real clinical experience, and simulated experience as main barriers in their robotic surgery training. Dual consoles and first-assistants are favorably looked upon. Lack of attending experience and comfort were universally negatively associated with resident participation. For residents interested in robotic surgery, advocating for more robust investment in dual consoles, first-assistants, and faculty development would likely improve their robotic surgery training experience. However, residency programs should consider whether robotic surgery should be a core competency of an already time restricted training paradigm.

Crowd-sourced hospital ratings are correlated with patient satisfaction but not surgical safety.

BACKGROUND: Hospital reviews posted online by patients are unsolicited and less structured than Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. The differences between online review platforms and their degrees of correlation with validated satisfaction and safety measures are unknown. METHODS: We identified 515 large acute care teaching hospitals in the United States. We collected patient satisfaction results and postsurgical patient safety indicators from Hospital Compare. We also collected hospital star ratings (1-5) from Facebook, Google, and Yelp. Mean ratings were compared with paired t tests. Concordance between ratings websites, Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores, and surgical safety indicators were assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Mean Facebook ratings (3.81, interquartile range 3.5-4.3) were more favorable than Google (3.26, interquartile range 2.8-3.6) or Yelp (2.59, interquartile range 2.3-2.9). Facebook ratings were least strongly correlated with the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems recommended hospital score (ρ = 0.356). Google was modestly correlated (ρ = 0.479), and Yelp was most strongly correlated (ρ = 0.500). The negative correlation between crowdsourced rating and composite safety indicator was too small to be meaningful on any platform. CONCLUSION: There is variation between platforms in consumer ratings of hospitals. Ratings on Facebook are more favorable than Google or Yelp. These are independently correlated with Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. These findings suggest that unstructured consumer reviews generally reflect similar directionality as Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems satisfaction scores. Users should be aware of the significant difference between platforms. Consumer ratings platforms are not consistently correlated with postsurgical patient safety indicators, so online ratings may not reflect the safety of surgical care received.