Risk factors for emergency surgery for diverticulitis: A retrospective multicentric French study at 41 hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The observed increase in the incidence of complicated diverticulitis may lead to the performance of more emergency surgeries. This study aimed to assess the rate and risk factors of emergency surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis. METHOD: The primary outcomes were the rate of emergency surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis and its associated risk factors. The urgent or elective nature of the surgical intervention was provided by the surgeon and in accordance with the indication for surgical treatment. A mixed logistic regression with a random intercept after multiple imputations by the chained equation was performed to consider the influence of missing data on the results. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2021, 6,867 patients underwent surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in the participating centers, of which one-third (n = 2317) were emergency cases. In multivariate regression analysis with multiple imputation by chained equation, increasing age, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, neurologic and pulmonary comorbidities, use of anticoagulant drugs, immunocompromised status, and first attack of sigmoid diverticulitis were independent risk factors for emergency surgery. The likelihood of emergency surgery was significantly more frequent after national guidelines, which were implemented in 2017, only in patients with a history of sigmoid diverticulitis attacks. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights a high rate (33%) of emergency surgery for sigmoid diverticulitis in France, which was significantly associated with patient features and the first attack of diverticulitis.

Impact of the first wave of COVID-19 epidemy on the surgical management of sigmoid diverticular disease in France: National French retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the surgical management of sigmoid diverticular disease (SDD) before, during, and after the first containment rules (CR) for the first wave of COVID-19. METHODS: From the French Surgical Association multicenter series, this study included all patients operated on between January 2018 and September 2021. Three groups were compared: A (before CR period: 01/01/18-03/16/20), B (CR period: 03/17/20-05/03/20), and C (post CR period: 05/04/20-09/30/21). RESULTS: A total of 1965 patients (A n = 1517, B n = 52, C n = 396) were included. The A group had significantly more previous SDD compared to the two other groups (p = 0.007), especially complicated (p = 0.0004). The rate of peritonitis was significantly higher in the B (46.1%) and C (38.4%) groups compared to the A group (31.7%) (p = 0.034 and p = 0.014). As regards surgical treatment, Hartmann's procedure was more often performed in the B group (44.2%, vs A 25.5% and C 26.8%, p = 0.01). Mortality at 90 days was significantly higher in the B group (9.6%, vs A 4% and C 6.3%, p = 0.034). This difference was also significant between the A and B groups (p = 0.048), as well as between the A and C groups (p = 0.05). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of postoperative morbidity. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the management of SDD was impacted by COVID-19 at CR, but also after and until September 2021, both on the initial clinical presentation and on postoperative mortality.

Abdominal adipose tissue quantification and distribution with CT: prognostic value for surgical and oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Obesity is a known factor of poor surgical and oncological outcomes in patients who undergo surgery for colorectal cancer. There are physiological differences between abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Evaluation of its quantity and distribution is possible with routine clinical imaging techniques, such as computed tomography. The goal of this study was to explore the associations and find correlations of fat measurements and distribution with surgical morbidity, long-term mortality and disease progression in patients who underwent surgery for rectal cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent rectal cancer resection between 2006 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography fat area measurements were assessed on preoperative computed tomography scans and were compared with postoperative outcomes (local and general complications), long-term survival and oncological response. RESULTS: Of 202 patients included, 50 (25%) died with a median survival time of 34 months, and 152 (75%) were still alive at the end of the study. Death and disease progression were significantly associated with a high intermuscular/subcutaneous fat ratio at the L4-L5 level, with a cut-off established at 0.12 (p < 0.05). Patients with a low (< 1.15) subcutaneous/visceral fat ratio at the L2-L3 level experienced significantly more local complications (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients with a low subcutaneous fat area/visceral fat area ratio had more local postoperative complications and that a high intermuscular fat area/subcutaneous fat area ratio was associated with worse survival outcomes, as well as a high postoperative complication rate. KEY POINTS: • A low subcutaneous/visceral fat ratio seems to be associated with more local postsurgery complications in patients with rectal cancer, while a high intermuscular/subcutaneous fat ratio seems to be associated with worse survival and oncological outcomes. • A high intermuscular/subcutaneous fat ratio seems to be associated with worse survival outcomes or progressing disease, as well as a higher postoperative complication rate. • Computed tomography abdominal fat area measurements are correlated with one another on multiple anatomical levels.

Influence of non-clinical factors on restorative rectal cancer surgery: An analysis of four specialized population-based digestive cancer registries in France.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to measure the association between deprivation, health care accessibility and health care system with the likelihood of receiving non-restorative rectal cancer surgery (NRRCS). METHODS: All adult patients who had rectal resection for invasive adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2007 and 2016 in four French specialised cancer registries were included. A multilevel logistic regression with random effect was used to assess the link between patient and health care structure characteristics on the probability of NRRCS. RESULTS: 2997 patients underwent rectal cancer resection in 68 health care structures: 708 (23.63%) had NRRCS. The likelihood of receiving NRCCS was associated with patients' characteristics (97%): age, sub peritoneal rectal tumors, neoadjuvant therapy, residual tumour and stage III . There was no impact of European Deprivation Index or remoteness on NRRCS. Inter-health care structure variability was modest (3%), of which 50% was explained by the high group volume of colorectal procedures and the type of health care structure which were associated with less NRRCS (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: There is an influence of operating volume and type of structure on the probability of NRRCS, but it has truly little importance in explaining differences in performances. The probability of NRRCS is mainly affected by clinical determinant.

Deciphering Promoter Hypermethylation of Genes Encoding for RASSF/Hippo Pathway Reveals the Poor Prognostic Factor of RASSF2 Gene Silencing in Colon Cancers.

The aims of this study were to assess the frequency of promoter hypermethylation of the genes encoding the Ras associated domain family (RASSF)/Hippo pathway, as well as the impact on overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a single-center retrospective cohort of 229 patients operated on for colon cancers. Hypermethylation status was investigated by methylation-specific PCR on the promoters of the RASSF1/2, STK4/3 (encoding Mammalian Ste20-like protein 1 and 2 (MST1 and 2), respectively), and LATS1/2 genes. Clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were analysed. We found the RASSF/Hippo pathway to be highly silenced in colon cancer, and particularly RASSF2 (86%). The other promoters were hypermethylated with a lesser frequency of 16, 3, 1, 10 and 6%, respectively for RASSF1, STK4, STK3, LATS1, and LATS2 genes. As the hypermethylation of one RASSF/Hippo family member was by no means exclusive from the others, 27% of colon cancers displayed the hypermethylation of at least two RASSF/Hippo member promotors. The median overall survival of the cohort was 60.2 months, and the median recurrence-free survival was 46.9 months. Survival analyses showed a significantly poorer overall survival of patients when the RASSF2 promoter was hypermethylated (p = 0.03). The median OS was 53.5 months for patients with colon cancer with a hypermethylated RASSF2 promoter versus still not reached after 80 months follow-up for other patients, upon univariate analysis (HR = 1.86, [95% CI: 1.05-3.3], p < 0.03). Such difference was not significant for relapse-free survival as in multivariate analysis. A logistic regression model showed that RASSF2 hypermethylation was an independent factor. In conclusion, RASSF2 hypermethylation is a frequent event and an independent poor prognostic factor in colon cancer. This biomarker could be investigated in clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant Treatment in Upper Rectal Cancer Does Not Improve Oncologic Outcomes But Increases Postoperative Morbidity.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation/radiation therapy in locally advanced (LA) upper rectal adenocarcinoma management remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and upfront surgery (US). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients were retrospectively included from 5 centers (79 treated with US and 48 with CRT). CRT and US groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications and long-term oncological and functional results. RESULTS: Total mesorectal excision (TME) was more frequent in CRT (58% vs. 20% in US, p<0.001). CRT was associated with more overall and severe postoperative complications (60% vs. 30%, p<0.001 and 17% vs. 1%, p=0.002, respectively), and was the only risk factor [OR=18.8 (2.2-160.2), p=0.007]. Five-year overall survival and 5-year recurrence-free survival were similar between CRT and US (96% vs. 91% p=0.256 and 85.4% vs. 85%, p=0.495). The functional results were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: CRT did not improve long-term oncological outcomes in patients with LA upper rectal adenocarcinoma, but increased postoperative complications compared with US.

What to Propose After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding: One- or Two-step Procedure?

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can be proposed in case of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). The main question is whether the revisional procedure is carried out in one or two stages. OBJECTIVE: Postoperative outcomes between the one-step approach and the two-step approach of conversion of failed LAGB to RYGB or SG were, respectively, compared. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature published until June 2019 was conducted. All studies comparing one-step and two-step approaches after failed LAGB were included. Primary outcomes include both mortality and morbidity at 30 days postoperatively according to Dindo-Clavien classification. Among the studies included, a random effect model was used with Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). RESULTS: A total of 3895 patients had conversion of failed LAGB to RYGB (n = 3214) or SG (n = 681), respectively. The conversion was carried out in one-step (n = 2767) or two-step (n = 1128) approaches. Meta-analysis did not show statistical difference for overall morbidity rate (OR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.78-1.30, p = 0.96) whether it is for SG (OR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.73-2.14, p = 0.42) or RYGB (OR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.71-1.26, p = 0.69) and for major postoperative morbidity (OR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.59-1.56, p = 0.87) whether it is for SG (OR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.22-1.97, p = 0.46) or RYGB (OR = 1.05, 95%CI = 0.61-1.81, p = 0.86). Moreover, there was no statistical difference for specific morbidity rate including reoperation, leak, abscess, postoperative bleeding, and late postoperative complications. LIMITATIONS: Given the retrospective nature of the studies, these results should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSION: This updated meta-analysis suggests that conversion of failed LAGB to RYGB or SG can be safely performed in one-step or two-step approaches.

'French LARS score': validation of the French version of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Many bowel problems following low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer considerably impair the quality of life (QoL) of patients. The LAR syndrome (LARS) scale is a self-report questionnaire to identify and assess bowel dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery. It has been translated and validated in several languages but not in French (metropolitan French). The primary objective is to adapt the LARS scale to the French language (called French-LARS score) and to assess its psychometric properties. Secondary objectives are to assess both the prevalence and severity of LARS and to measure their impact on QoL. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A French multicentre observational cohort study has been designed. The validation study will include translation of the LARS scale following the current international recommendations, assessment of its reliability, convergent and discriminant validities, sensitivity, internal consistency, internal validity and confirmatory analyses. One thousand patients will be enrolled for the analyses. The questionnaire will be initially administered to the first 100 patients to verify the adequacy and degree of comprehension of the questions. Then reproducibility will be investigated by a test-retest procedure in the following 400 patients.An analysis will be conducted to determine the correlation between the LARS score and the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ; European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer's QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29). Risk factors linked to QoL deterioration will be identified and their impact will be measured. This study will meet the need for a validated tool to improve patient care and QoL. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The institutional review board of the University Hospital of Caen and the ethics committee (CPP Nord Ouest I, 25 January 2019) approved the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03569488.

Digestive and genitourinary sequelae in rectal cancer survivors and their impact on health-related quality of life: Outcome of a high-resolution population-based study.

BACKGROUND: With the rising number of rectal cancer survivors, more patients with sphincter-preserving surgery are having to live with a potentially impaired quality of life. The survey aimed to assess bowel and genitourinary sequelae and their impact on quality of life in an unselected registry-based population of rectal cancer survivors. METHODS: This cross-sectional cohort survey (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; ID: NCT03459235) included patients with rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery with sphincter-preserving surgery from January 1, 2007 to January 31, 2015. Patients with recurrent disease, intestinal stoma, or cognitive disorders were excluded. Validated scoring system included the Urinary Symptom Profile in women and the International Prostate Symptom Score in men for urinary function, International Index for Erectile Function 5 in men and Female Sexual Function Index in women for sexual function, and Core 30/ Colo Rectal 29 questionnaires for quality of life and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score for bowel function. The impact of functional sequelae on global quality of life was evaluated by multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Responders (45.3%, 92/203 patients) and nonresponders were comparable according to sex, age, tumor stage, and neoadjuvant chemoradiation. With a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, 65.2% of the rectal cancer survivors had bowel dysfunction, of whom 41.3% experienced major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and 80% of rectal cancer survivors experienced genitourinary dysfunction. In multiple linear regression, poor bowel function was a significant predictor of global quality of life in men (P = .04) and women (P = .0003). CONCLUSION: This survey highlights the importance of sexual and bowel dysfunction in rectal cancer survivors and the strong correlation between high Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score and inferior quality of life. Further studies are needed to improve knowledge on how to predict bowel dysfunction and how to best support patients with bowel dysfunction.

Impact of socioeconomic status on survival in patients with ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Socioeconomic status may impact survival in cancer patients. This study assessed whether low socioeconomic status has an impact on survival in patients with ovarian cancer and investigated whether differences in survival may be explained by type of therapy received. METHODS: The study population comprised 318 patients with ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2011 and 2015 in the François Baclesse regional cancer care center in Caen, North-West France. Socioeconomic status was assessed by using the European deprivation index and overall survival was calculated at 3 years. RESULTS: The unadjusted 3-year overall survival rate was 52% (95% CI 47 to 58). In a multivariable logistic regression model, a low socioeconomic status was associated with a lower probability of surgical resection (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.74). A high socioeconomic status was associated with improved survival, adjusted for age, performance status, grade, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (adjusted HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.26). When adjusting for treatment variables, there was no longer any significant difference in survival according to socioeconomic status (adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.84). CONCLUSIONS: Higher socioeconomic status is associated with a greater probability of undergoing surgical resection and with improved survival in patients with ovarian cancer.

Socioeconomic status impacts survival and access to resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A high-resolution population-based cancer registry study.

BACKGROUND: Survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is very poor. Resection status is highly associated with prognosis but only 15%-20% are resectable. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on PA survival and to define which management steps are affected. METHODS: Between 01/01/2000 and 31/12/2014, 1451 incident cases of PA recorded in the digestive cancer registry of the French department of Calvados were included. The population was divided between less deprived areas (quintile 1) and more deprived areas (quintile 2,3,4,5 aggregated). RESULTS: Patients from less deprived areas were younger at diagnosis than those from more deprived areas (69.9 vs 72.3 years, p = 0.01). There was no difference in stage or comorbidities. Three- and 5-year survival rates were significantly higher for less deprived areas than more deprived areas: 10.5% vs 5.15% and 4.7% vs 1.7% respectively (p = 0.01). In univariate analysis, those living in less deprived areas had a better survival than those in more deprived areas (HR = 0.81 [0.69-0.95], p = 0.009) but not in multivariable analysis (HRa = 0.93 [0.79-1.11], p = 0.383) or analysis stratified on resection. In multivariable regression, less deprived areas had more access to surgery than more deprived areas (ORa = 1.73 [1.08-2.47], p = 0.013). No difference was observed on access to adjuvant chemotherapy (ORa = 0.95 [0.38-2.34], p = 0.681). CONCLUSION: The key to reducing survival inequalities in PA is access to resection, so future studies should investigate the factors impacting this issue.