The antibiotic resistome and microbiota landscape of refugees from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant bacteria represent a substantial global burden for human health, potentially fuelled by migration waves: in 2015, 476,649 refugees applied for asylum in Germany mostly as a result of the Syrian crisis. In Arabic countries, multiresistant bacteria cause significant problems for healthcare systems. Currently, no data exist describing antibiotic resistances in healthy refugees. Here, we assess the microbial landscape and presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in refugees and German controls. To achieve this, a systematic study was conducted in 500 consecutive refugees, mainly from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan and 100 German controls. Stool samples were subjected to PCR-based quantification of 42 most relevant ARGs, 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing-based microbiota analysis, and culture-based validation of multidrug-resistant microorganisms. RESULTS: The fecal microbiota of refugees is substantially different from that of resident Germans. Three categories of resistance profiles were found: (i) ARGs independent of geographic origin of individuals comprising BIL/LAT/CMA, ErmB, and mefE; (ii) vanB with a high prevalence in Germany; and (iii) ARGs showing substantially increased prevalences in refugees comprising CTX-M group 1, SHV, vanC1, OXA-1, and QnrB. The majority of refugees carried five or more ARGs while the majority of German controls carried three or less ARGs, although the observed ARGs occurred independent of signatures of potential pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, for the first time, assess antibiotic resistance genes in refugees and demonstrate a substantially increased prevalence for most resistances compared to German controls. The antibiotic resistome in refugees may thus require particular attention in the healthcare system of host countries.

[Antimicrobial Stewardship in Daily Life - "Ask Your Doctor and Your Pharmacist"]. / Antibiotic Stewardship im Alltag ­ "Fragen Sie Ihren Arzt und Apotheker!".

Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) cannot be practised as a one-man show. A well-established AMS-team with formal authority and dedicated time given by the hospital management can manage its tasks also in exceptional situations as for example an outbreak due to a multi-drug-resistant pathogen. Know-how of clinical infectious diseases is mandatory for all members of the AMS-team. The AMS-team plays various roles in an outbreak situation with the rational use of last-resort antibiotics and optimization of the dosage by therapeutic drug monitoring being most important. Restrictive usage of antibiotics can decrease the antibiotic selection pressure and counteract with the development of new bacterial resistances. Usage of last-resort antibiotics in an outbreak situation leads to an exceptional increase of therapeutic costs with fewer patients at the same time. Interdisciplinary work of infection control, the AMS-team, the different clinical departments and the hospital management are important for the prevention and the management of outbreak situations due to multi-drug-resistant pathogens.

Physicochemical compatibility and emulsion stability of propofol with commonly used analgesics and sedatives in an intensive care unit.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was the determination of the physicochemical compatibility and emulsion stability of propofol with other sedatives and analgesics (clonidine hydrochloride, dexmedetomidine, 4-hydroxybutyric acid, (S)-ketamine, lormetazepam, midazolam hydrochloride, piritramide, remifentanil hydrochloride and sufentanil citrate) that are frequently administered together intravenously. METHODS: Drugs were mixed with propofol and stored without light protection at room temperature. Samples were taken at 10 points of time over 7 days. The physical stability and emulsion stability in particular were analysed by visual and microscopical inspection and by measurement of the pH value, zeta potential and globule size distribution. In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry were used to identify chemical incompatibilities. RESULTS: 4-Hydroxybutyric acid, midazolam hydrochloride, piritramide and remifentanil hydrochloride are physically incompatible when mixed with propofol. The reason for this is the development of an increased fraction of oil droplets >5 µm leading to a higher risk of emboli. Moreover, propofol is chemically incompatible with remifentanil. The sorption of propofol to the rubber stopper of the syringe was another detectable incompatibility. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol should not be administered with 4-hydroxybutyric acid, remifentanil hydrochloride, midazolam hydrochloride and piritramide through the same intravenous line. Based on the risk of sorption to the rubber material, propofol should be used with caution. A drug loss might occur that leads to an underdosing of the patient requiring a dose adjustment to avoid any adverse consequences. As a result of this study, the drug safety in intensive care units could be optimised.