Case Report of a Hemangioblastoma Originating from the T1 Spinal Nerve Treated with in Toto Resection, Hemicorporectomy and Pedicle Screw Stabilization.

Introduction: Previously, only 40 cases with extradural hemangioblastoma at the spinal nerve (none at the T1 nerve root) have been described in the medical literature. In toto, resection of this hypervascular tumor is essential to avoid bleeding complications. Surgery for hemangioblastoma at the cervicothoracic junction is complex and nerve resection of the T1 results in specific neurodeficits of the hand muscles which are not well known. Case Report: A 34-year-old woman was diagnosed with a slowly growing tumor located at the left foramen T1/T2. Pressure from the tumor resulted in Horner's syndrome and pain and paresthesia in the upper extremity. The tumor was resected in toto through a posterior midline approach and rib resection and transection of the left T1 and T2 spinal nerves. T2 hemicorporectomy and spinal stabilization were performed to gain access to and mobilize the tumor ventrally. Ptosis decreased after surgery and no neurodeficit was observed except the expected deficit (no deficit was present preoperatively) caused by the T1 resection specifically a small decrease in strength of the abductor and flexor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis and the lateral two lumbricals. Histological examination of the tumor demonstrated a hemangioblastoma. von Hippel-Lindau disease was ruled out by genetic testing of the patient's blood. Eight-month postoperatively, all pre-operative symptoms had decreased considerably and the radiographic examination shoved unchanged pedicle screw/rod stabilization of the cervicothoracic junction. Conclusion: Hemangioblastoma is a rare hypervascular tumor very rarely located at the spinal nerve. The tumor should be resected in toto to avoid recurrence and bleeding. In the current case, the location was at the T1 root necessitating complex surgery with laminectomies and hemicorporectomy of T2 and a posterior rib resection/thoracotomy. Spinal stabilization is mandatory. Preferably embolization should be performed preoperatively. T1 transection results in a specific neurodeficit which should be explained to the patient preoperatively. The patients should undergo genetic testing for Hippel-Lindau disease.

Team-based digital communication reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital and improved patient satisfaction after orthopedic surgery: a randomized controlled trial in 70 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-discharge inquiries to the hospital are predominantly conducted through phone calls. The rigid timing of these calls is inconvenient for patients and disrupts the workflows of healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a team-based digital communication intervention (eDialogue) facilitated through a messenger-like commercial solution on patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital after discharge. Secondarily, we investigated other patient-initiated contacts, patients' perception of continuity of care, and their perception of feeling safe and satisfied after hospital discharge. METHODS: On the day of discharge, 70 surgically treated orthopedic patients were randomized to the intervention group with access to eDialogue (n = 35) or the control group with standard communication pathways by phone call (n = 35) for the following 8 weeks. Through eDialogue, the intervention group had access to team-based asynchronous digital communication in text and photos with healthcare professionals across disciplines and sectors. Inclusion criteria were discharge to own home and receipt of rehabilitation services from both hospital and primary care after discharge. RESULTS: We found a significant reduction in the mean number of patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital from 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.1) in the control group to 0.5 (CI 0.3-1.0) in the intervention group (P = 0.004). Across groups, patients reported similar perceptions of continuity of care; however, the participants in the intervention group expressed significantly improved perceptions of, and satisfaction with, access to healthcare after discharge. CONCLUSION: Access to eDialogue reduced patient-initiated phone calls to the hospital, enhanced patient satisfaction with healthcare accessibility, and did not compromise patients' perception of continuity of care after discharge compared with standard communication pathways.

Inter- and intrarater reliability of measuring lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods on digital radiographs.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine inter- and intraobserver reliability of delta rod extension, and total rod length measured on digital x-rays in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). For the last decade, patients with EOS have been treated with MCGR. Replacement of MCGR relies heavily on the measurement done at every lengthening session. Only a few studies have looked at inter- and intraobserver reliability of rod lengthening, and none have used the delta extension before. METHODS: 202 radiographs presented in random order were rated and measured twice with at least a 14-day interval and differing order of the radiographs. The measuring was done at both rods. All x-rays came from 15 patients diagnosed with EOS and treated with MCGR from 2009 until 2019. The total extension length and the delta extension (the difference in total extension length between two lengthening in succession) were measured, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) calculated for both measurements RESULTS: Intrarater ICC scores varied from moderate to good, but non-significantly. Interrater reliability increased significantly from moderate (ICC 0.72 [0.68; 0.76] and 0.73 [0.69; 0.77] to excellent (ICC 0.91 [0.88; 0.93] and 0.97 [0.96: 0.98]), when examining delta extension every sixth instead of every second month. CONCLUSION: Measuring rod lengthening on x-rays can be done every 6 months, with an ample reliability. The ICC's for the delta extension with 2-3 months interval were only moderately precise, compared to the near perfect ICC's for the total extension length.

Comparison of interventions for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Implants for use in disc herniation surgery have been commercially available for some time. Several clinical trials have shown promising results. There are now a wide variety of surgical methods for treating lumbar disc herniation. PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review was to compare all current surgical methods for disc herniation, including newer methods with implants for annulus repair and dynamic stabilization. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. METHODS: PRISMA-P guidelines were followed in this review. Literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases identified eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies comparing interventions for lumbar disc surgery. The investigated outcomes were: changes in pain score, disability score and reoperation rate with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Risk of bias was assessed in concordance with Cochrane Neck and Back Review Group recommendation. A network meta-analysis was performed using gemtc and BUGSnet software, and each outcome evaluated using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). RESULTS: Thirty-two RCT studies, with 4,877 participants, and eight different interventions were identified. A significant difference was seen in change of pain score, as all treatments were superior to conservative treatment and percutaneous discectomy. This difference was only found to be of clinically importance when comparing conservative treatment and dynamic stabilization. There was no significant difference in reoperation rates or change in disability score, regardless of treatment. However, SUCRA plots showed a trend in ranking annulus repair and dynamic stabilization highest. Risk of bias assessment showed that 15 studies had a high overall risk of bias. Meta-regression with risk of bias as covariate did not indicate any influence in risk of bias on the model. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis evaluation showed a high level of confidence for all treatment comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: With this network meta-analysis, we have aimed to compare all treatments for herniated lumbar disc in one large comprehensive systematic review and network meta-analysis. We have compared across the three main outcomes: disability score, pain score and reoperation rate. We were not able to rank one single treatment as the best. Most of the treatment performed at the same level. However percutaneous discectomy and conservative treatment consistently performed worse than the other treatments. In general, the CINeMA evaluation according to the GRADE recommendations gave a high level of confidence for the study comparisons.

Magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) may result in disability and a reduced life expectancy. The aim of this study was to report the results of primary magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) in a consecutive group of patients with EOS diagnosed and operated at Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark, from 2009 and onwards and with at least two years of follow-up. METHODS: Data were extracted from the electronic patient records and the Picture Archiving and Communication System. All data were extracted by an unbiased observer. Demographics, any complication and the Cobb angles and maximal kyphosis angles preoperatively and post-operatively were recorded. Likewise, the total expansion of the MCGR and the increase in T1-T12 and T1-S1 heights were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (three females) were followed for an average of 3.75 years. The Cobb angles were corrected on average by 68% and the maximal kyphosis angle by 45%. The thoracic height increased significantly with only two patients (still undergoing expansions) with a T1-S1 height below 22 cm. Four complications were recorded (one deep infection and three non-functioning rods), all resulting in rod exchange. The complication rate was 27% or 0.07 per patient per year. CONCLUSIONS: The MCGR may reduce the deformity and support thoracic and pulmonary growth without any need for repeated surgeries. The number of complications in the present series was low compared with the literature with an average of 0.07 complications per year per patient or a total complication rate of 27%. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Cumulative radiation exposure during current scoliosis management.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing scoliosis management are exposed to repeated radiological imaging. Previous studies have shown an increase in incidence of cancer among these patients. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the radiographic examinations and cumulative radiation dose to which scoliotic patients are exposed. A secondary aim was to compare in-house algorithms of scoliosis management and radiographic follow-up to international spine centres and current consensus literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre retrospective review evaluating type and frequency of radiographic imaging and total cumulative radiation exposure to patients treated for scoliosis. Inclusions: patients followed for idiopathic scoliosis in the years 2013-2016. A survey asking for information on management and radiological follow-up algorithms was sent to a number of international spine centres for comparison with the in-house algorithm. RESULTS: Patients who underwent surgery received an approximately ten-fold higher median cumulative radiation dose than those treated conservatively. A variety of radiological follow-up algorithms among eight spine centres was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cumulative radiation dose during scoliosis treatment varies substantially depending on radiographic follow-up protocol, intraoperative and ancillary imaging. By using low-dose X-ray systems in combination with a low-dose protocol for intraoperative navigation, it is possible to keep exposure to patients at a minimum while still providing optimal care. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Surgical Treatment of Degenerative Disk Disease in Three Scandinavian Countries: An International Register Study Based on Three Merged National Spine Registers.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic low back pain resistant to nonoperative treatment often face a poor prognosis for recovery. The aim of the current study was to compare the variation and outcome of surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease in the Scandinavian countries based on The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement core spine data sets. METHODS: Anonymized individual level data from 3 national registers were pooled into 1 database. At the time of surgery, the patient reports data on demographics, lifestyle topics, comorbidity, and data on health-related quality of life such as Oswestry Disability Index, Euro-Qol-5D, and back and leg pain scores. The surgeon records diagnosis, type of surgery performed, and complications. One-year follow-ups are obtained with questionnaires. Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were analyzed to expose any differences between the countries. RESULTS: A total of 1893 patients were included. At 1-year follow-up, 1315 (72%) patients responded. There were statistically significant baseline differences in age, smoking, comorbidity, frequency of previous surgery and intensity of back and leg pain. Isolated fusion was the primary procedure in all the countries ranging from 84% in Denmark to 76% in Sweden. There was clinically relevant improvement in all outcome measures except leg pain. CONCLUSIONS: In homogenous populations with similar health care systems the treatment traditions can vary considerably. Despite variations in preoperative variables, patient reported outcomes improve significantly and clinically relevant with surgical treatment.

Paper #9: Nano-Dose Protocol for 3D Reconstruction of the Spine in Early Onset Scoliosis: Preliminary Results of a Phantom Based and Clinically Validated Study using Stereo-Radiography.

This is a prospective study validating the reproducibility of 3D reconstruction of the spine using a new reduced micro-dose protocol. A pilot group of children with scoliosis underwent micro-dose- and additional reduced micro-dose (nano-dose) full-spine imaging. 3D reconstructions of both protocols were evaluated.