RESUMO
Medicinal plants are rich sources of natural oils such as essential and fixed oils used traditionally for nutritive as well as medicinal purposes. Most of the traditional formulations or phytopharmaceutical formulations contain oil as the main ingredient due to their own therapeutic applications and thus mitigating several pathogeneses such as fungal/bacterial/viral infection, gout, psoriasis, analgesic, antioxidant, skin infection, etc. Due to the lack of quality standards and progressive adulteration in the natural oils, their therapeutic efficacy is continuously deteriorated. To develop quality standards and validate scientific aspects on essential oils, several chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques such as HPTLC, HPLC, NMR, LC-MS, and GC-MS have been termed as the choices of techniques for better exploration of metabolites, hence sustaining the authenticity of the essential oils. In this review, chemical profiling and quality control aspects of essential or fixed oils have been explored from previously reported literature in reputed journals. Methods of chemical profiling, possible identified metabolites in essential oils, and their therapeutic applications have been described. The outcome of the review reveals that GC-MS/MS, LC-MS/MS, and NMR-based chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques are the most liable, economic, precise, and accurate techniques for determining the spuriousness or adulteration of oils based on their qualitative and quantitative chemical profiling studies. This review occupies the extensive information about the quality standards of several oils obtained from natural sources for their regulatory aspects via providing the detailed methods used in chemoprofiling techniques. Hence, this review helps researchers in further therapeutic exploration as well as quality-based standardization for their regulatory purpose.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Nimodipine is a calcium (Ca2+) channel blocker as well as a PDE1 inhibitor and primarily used in subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) due to its blood-brain barrier crossing property. Nimodipine and vinpocetine inhibit the degradation of phosphodiester bond which increases cGMP and cAMP levels causing vasodilation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have divided rats randomly into Group I - Vehicle control; Group II - Toxic control (ISO 85 mg/kg, i.p.); Group III, IV and V - Nimodipine (5, 10 and 15 mg/kg, i.p. respectively) with ISO; Group VI- Nimodipine (15 mg/kg) alone; Group VII - Nimodipine + Vinpocetine (10 mg/kg + 10 mg/kg) with ISO; Group VIII - Nimodipine + Vinpocetine (10 mg/kg + 10 mg/kg) alone; Group IX- Diltiazem (25 mg/kg, p.o) with ISO; Group X- Diltiazem (25 mg/kg) alone and Group XI- Vinpocetine (10 mg/kg, p.o.) with ISO for 7 days. After 24 h of the last dose, haemodynamics were assessed then animals were sacrificed and biochemical, histopathological and ultrastructural changes were measured. RESULTS: Treatment with ISO significantly deviated the haemodynamic parameters (HR, SAP, DAP and MAP), biochemical parameters (CK-MB, LDH, SGOT, cGMP and Troponin-T) and antioxidant markers (TBARS, SOD, CAT, GSH, GPx, GST and GR). Haemotoxylin and eosin staining of the cardiac tissue and ultrastructural study also indicated significant myocardial damage. Pretreatment with nimodipine (10 and 15 mg/kg, i.p), vinpocetine (10 mg/kg, p.o) and their combination significantly restored the antioxidant status, haemodynamic profile, cellular architecture and ultrastructural changes in the heart. CONCLUSION: Nimodipine and vinpocetine both showed cardioprotection when given alone. However, their combination showed better restoration in terms of oxidative stress, cardiac membrane damage, haemodynamics, histopathology and ultrastructural changes.
