Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs): A case report for a mischief entity.

BACKGROUND: Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcomas with significantly variable presentation, management, and prognosis. This makes it crucial to report the different institutional experiences of encountering extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST). CASE PRESENTATION: We report 3 cases of EGIST diagnosis at American University of Beirut Medical Center for 2 males and 1 female in the 5th, 6th, and 7th decades of life, respectively. For the first case, the tumor was initially suspected to be ovarian cancer, but biopsy revealed a diagnosis of EGIST, and the patient was started on neoadjuvant therapy. In the second case, the tumor was retro-gastric and prelim diagnosis was gastric cancer but again biopsy revealed an EGIST histopathology, and the patient underwent surgery and adjuvant treatment. For the third case, a previous history of testicular cancer prompted an initial suspicion of recurrence with metastasis but biopsy and immunohistochemistry staining revealed EGIST with related markers. The patient underwent treatment at a different institution in his home country. CONCLUSION: This report sheds light on the importance of keeping EGIST amongst any differential list for abdominal and pelvic tumors. It also shows that EGIST-focused studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of the different treatment modalities available when utilized specifically for EGIST. This would allow for better oncological outcomes and improved quality of life.

MEBO versus topical Diltiazem versus a combination of both ointments in the treatment of acute anal fissure: a randomized clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Anal fissure is a common complication of the anorectal region and one of the most reported causes of anal pain. Acute anal fissure can be cured by surgery or medical treatment. There is an increase in the use of topical therapy for the treatment of anal fissures. A common topical drug used is Diltiazem (DTZ), a calcium-channel blocker, which relaxes the anal sphincter and thus promotes healing of the anal fissure. Moist exposed burn ointment (MEBO) is an ointment that is effective for the treatment of burns and wound healing and is becoming popular in the treatment of anal fissures. METHODS: This is a 1:1:1 randomized, controlled, parallel design, with endpoint measures of change in pain score, wound healing, defecation strain score and patient's global impression of improvement. The study will be conducted at AUBMC over a 10-week period. Patients will be randomized to three treatment arms: MEBO, Diltiazem, and a combination of MEBO and Diltiazem ointments. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will allow physicians to assess the efficacy and safety of MEBO in the treatment of acute anal fissure, and also in comparison to Diltiazem. This trial will generate evidence-based conclusions regarding the use of a herbal/natural-based product (MEBO ointment) for the treatment of anal fissures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04153032 . Clinical Trial Registration Date: 06-NOVEMBER-2019.

Protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing wound COmplications in elective midline laparotomies after FAscia Closure using two different Techniques Of Running sutures: COFACTOR trial.

BACKGROUND: Wound complications following midline laparotomies are common and the main source of postoperative morbidity including superficial or deep wound infection, skin dehiscence, fascia dehiscence, and incisional hernia. Abdominal closure complications are strongly associated with suture technique and material, in addition to other factors related to the patient and type of surgery performed. The traditional technique is to place the fascia sutures 1 cm apart and at least 1 cm away from the fascia edge. A Swedish study described a new technique of placing the sutures 5 mm apart and 5 mm away from the fascia edge, resulting in lower rates of abdominal wound complications. This study has a number of limitations. There is a need for improved quality evidence to convince the surgical community to change the closure technique of abdominal wounds aiming to reduce morbidity, which is exemplified in incisional hernias and other various postop complications. METHODS: This is a 1:1 randomized, controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded, parallel design, superiority trial, with a primary endpoint of incisional hernia at 1 year. The study will be conducted at AUBMC over a 3-year period. Patients planned for a non-emergent midline laparotomy for general surgery or vascular procedure will be randomized to either fascia closure technique. In order to detect a drop of 12% in the incidence of incisional hernia, with 80% power and an alpha of 0.05, we will need to recruit 114 patients per arm. After adjusting for loss to follow-up, target recruitment is 274 subjects. We will compare both arms for the primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes, using chi-square or t test as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression will be done. DISCUSSION: This trial will assess postop complications following abdominal midline wound closures via two different suturing techniques. This trial will generate evidence-based conclusions that will allow surgeons to assess the role of a new abdominal closure technique in decreasing short- and long-term postoperative complications, for a commonly performed procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03527433 . Registered on 17 May 2018 before starting participant enrollment.

Intracystic papillary carcinoma: clinical presentation, patterns of practice, and oncological outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Intracystic/encapsulated papillary carcinoma remains a poorly understood disease of the breast with a little amount of reports that describe it. It shares features with DCIS and IDC and predominantly affects postmenopausal women. This study aims to evaluate the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes in IPC patients managed at our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively pooled twenty-eight IPC patients' medical records at our institution. Descriptive analysis of clinicopathological characteristics, approach, and outcomes was done along with a quantitative statistical analysis. RESULTS: Cases were divided into three groups: isolated IPC, IPC associated with DCIS, and IPC associated with Invasive Carcinoma. Treatment modalities varied according to the IPC type and its associated components. All patients presented with a palpable mass. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that all isolated IPCs were ER and PR positive and HER2 negative. Lymph node dissection proved necessary only in IPC associated invasive carcinoma. Irregular borders and lobulations, among others, were found on non-invasive core biopsies that turned out to be associated with invasion on surgical pathology. All patients were alive after a median follow-up time of 23 months when the study was over with no reports of recurrence. CONCLUSION: IPC cases and treatment approaches at our institution appear similar to the available literature and confirm the excellent prognosis among IPC. Even more, further studies into the key features such as BMI, family history, and radiological findings are necessary for a potential algorithm that could assess for risk of finding invasion in surgical pathology and subsequently the need for axillary/sentinel lymph node biopsy.