Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 89(1): 137-143, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30144416

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Veterans have higher prevalence of colorectal neoplasia than non-veterans; however, it is not known whether specific Veterans Affairs (VA) adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmarks are required. We compared ADRs of a group of endoscopists for colonoscopies performed at a VA center with their ADRs at a non-VA academic medical center. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of screening colonoscopies performed by endoscopists who practice at the Indianapolis VA and Indiana University (IU). Patients were average-risk men aged 50 years or older. ADR, proximal ADR, advanced ADR, and adenomas per colonoscopy were compared between IU and the VA groups. RESULTS: Six endoscopists performed screening colonoscopies at both locations during the study period (470 at IU vs 608 at the VA). The overall ADR was not significantly different between IU and the VA (58% vs 61%; P = .21). Advanced neoplasia detection rate (13% vs 17%; P = .46), proximal ADR (46% vs 47%; P = .31), and adenomas per colonoscopy (1.59 vs 1.84; P = .24) were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in cecal intubation rate (100% vs 99%; P = .13) or withdrawal time (10.9 vs 11.1 min; P = .28). In regression analysis, there was significant correlation between the attending-specific ADRs at IU and the VA (P = .041, r2 = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of average-risk men undergoing screening colonoscopies by the same group of endoscopists, the ADRs of VA and non-VA colonoscopies were not significantly different. This suggests that a VA-specific ADR target is not required for endoscopists with high ADRs.


Assuntos
Adenoma/diagnóstico , Benchmarking , Colonoscopia/normas , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Veteranos , Adenoma/patologia , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco
2.
Gastroenterology Res ; 11(4): 290-294, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30116428

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a proven quality metric for colonoscopy. The value of ADR for the evaluation of gastroenterology fellows is not well established. The aim of this study is to calculate and evaluate the utility of ADR as a measure of competency for gastroenterology fellows. METHODS: Colonoscopies for the purposes of screening and surveillance, on which gastroenterology fellows participated at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC (one of the primary training sites at Indiana University), during a 9-month period, were included. ADR, cecal intubation rate, and indirect withdrawal time were measured. These metrics were compared between the levels of training. RESULTS: A total of 591 screening and surveillance colonoscopies were performed by 14 fellows. This included six, four and four fellows, in the first, second and third year of clinical training, respectively. Fellows were on rotation at the VAMC for a mean of 1.9 months (range 1 to 3 months) during the study period. The average ADR was 68.8% (95% CI 65.37 - 72.24). The average withdrawal time was 27.59 min (95% CI 23.45 - 31.73). The average cecal intubation rate was 99% (95% CI 98-100%). There was no significant difference between ADRs, cecal intubation rates, and withdrawal times at different levels of training; however, a trend toward swifter withdrawal times with advancing training was noted. CONCLUSIONS: ADR appears not to be a useful measure of competency for gastroenterology fellows. Consideration should be given to alternative metrics that could avoid bias and confounders.

3.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther ; 7(1): 139-44, 2016 Feb 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26855820

RESUMO

AIM: To determine whether patients hospitalized with gastrointestinal (GI) blood loss anemia are being checked and treated for iron deficiency. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients admitted to a single tertiary care hospital between 11/1/2011 and 1/31/2012 for any type of GI bleeding. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who had their iron studies checked during a hospitalization for GI blood loss anemia. Secondary outcomes included percentage of anemic GI bleeders who had adequate documentation of anemia and iron deficiency, and those who were treated for their iron deficiency. Then we tried to identify possible predictors of checking iron studies in an attempt to understand the thought process that physicians go through when managing these patients. Iron deficiency was defined as Iron saturation less than 15% or ferritin level less than 45 µg/L. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin level less than 13 g/dL for males and 12 g/dL for females. RESULTS: Three hundred and seven GI bleeders were hospitalized during the study period, and 282 of those (91.9%) had anemia during their hospital stay. Ninety-five patients (30.9%) had iron studies performed during hospitalization, and 45 of those (47.4%) were actually found to be iron deficient. Only 29 of those 45 iron deficient patients were discharged home on iron supplements. Of the 282 patients that had anemia during hospitalization, 50 (17.7%) had no documentation of the anemia in their hospital chart. Of the 45 patients that had lab proven iron deficiency anemia (IDA), only 22 (48.5%) had documentation of IDA in at least one note in their chart. Predictors of checking iron studies in anemic GI bleeders were lower mean corpuscular volume, documentation of anemia, having fecal occult blood testing, not having hematemesis or past history of GI bleeding. There were no significant differences between the teaching and non-teaching services in any patient characteristics or outcomes. CONCLUSION: Iron deficiency is under-diagnosed, under-recognized even when iron studies were checked, and under-treated in hospitalized patients with GI bleeding.

4.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 2(3): 179-88, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25360301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current treatment of Helicobacter pylori consists of three or four drugs for 7-14 days with important associated cost and adverse events. AIMS: This study compared efficacy and safety of standard dose vs. half-dose concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy (NBQT) for 7 days. The standard dose consisted of twice daily rabeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized trial. (14)C-urea breath test was performed ≥4 weeks after treatment and ≥2 weeks off acid suppressive therapy. Compliance and adverse events were monitored during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 200 consecutive treatment-naïve patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with 15.5% of subjects reporting prior macrolide use. Eradication occurred in 78% (95% CI 68.6-85.7%) in both groups on intention-to-treat analysis. Per-protocol rates were 82.1 vs. 83.9% for standard-dose patients vs. half-dose patients, respectively (p = NS). Adverse events (only mild) were reported in 57 vs. 41% of standard-dose patients vs. half-dose patients (p = 0.024), with metallic taste and nausea notably less frequent in the latter (36 vs. 12% and 18 vs. 7%, respectively; p < 0.05 for both). Overall, eradication failed in 38.7% of prior macrolide users vs. 18.9% without such exposure (p = 0.019). On multivariate logistic regression, prior macrolide exposure was the only factor associated with failed eradication (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.06-6.39; p = 0.038). Treatment was cheaper with the half-dose regimen. INTERPRETATION: A 50% reduction in antibiotic dosage does not diminish efficacy of concomitant nonbismuth quadruple therapy but leads to significant reduction in cost and adverse events. Seven-day concomitant NBQT is suboptimal for H. pylori independent of prior macrolide exposure.

5.
Oncol Lett ; 8(5): 2221-2224, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25289100

RESUMO

Colon cancer is the second most common type of cancer in females and the third in males, worldwide. The most common sites of colon cancer metastasis are the regional lymph nodes, liver, lung, bone and brain. In this study, an extremely rare case of colon adenocarcinoma with extensive metastasis to the mediastinal lymph nodes without any other organ involvement is presented. A 44-year-old Caucasian male presented with abdominal pain, a change in bowel habits, melena and weight loss. Colonoscopy revealed a large friable, ulcerated, circumferential mass in the ascending colon. Biopsies were consistent with the diagnosis of invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, right colon resection was performed, and pathological analysis revealed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the right colon with extensive regional lymph node involvement. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the chest, abdomen and pelvis were performed preoperatively as part of routine staging for colon cancer. No liver or lung pathology was identified; however, multiple pathologically enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes were observed. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of the largest mediastinal lymph node, which measured 5.2×3.5 cm on CT scans, was performed. The pathology was again consistent with the diagnosis of metastatic colorectal primary adenocarcinoma. At present, no optimum treatment has been identified for metastatic colon cancer to the mediastinal lymph nodes. The patient in the current case received chemotherapy with folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), as well as with bevacizumab. Initial follow-up CT scans of the chest revealed a positive response to treatment. Physicians, in particular, radiologists, must consider the mediastinum during the first evaluation and further follow-up of patients with colorectal carcinoma even in the absence of metastasis.

6.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 78(6): 886-891, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23769143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colon preparations are generally poorly tolerated. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of sugar-free candy drops in improving palatability and tolerability of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E). DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: Ambulatory patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy. INTERVENTION: Menthol candy drops. Patients were randomly assigned to split-dose, 4-L, PEG-E ± cough drops. Palatability was assessed on a linear scale of 1 to 5 (1 = disgusting; 5 = tasty). Quality of preparation, remaining unconsumed volume, and side effects were secondary outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Palatability and tolerability of PEG-E. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were enrolled (50 control group, 49 candy drops-added group). The mean (± standard deviation) palatability score was significantly better in candy drop users versus controls (3.9 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 1.2, respectively; P < .001) as were the preparations scored as excellent (63.3% vs 34% of controls; P = .004). Side effects were similar except for nausea (24.5% candy drops vs 44% controls; P = .04). The amount of unconsumed PEG-E was not different between candy drop and control groups (128 [± 361 mL] versus 69 [± 194 mL], respectively; P = .32) but was significantly lower in excellent grade preparations versus other grades (31 [± 103 mL] versus 162 [± 384 mL], respectively; P = .024). On multivariate logistic regression, an excellent preparation was associated with candy drops (odds ratio [OR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-7.8; P = .006) and smaller unconsumed volume of same-day PEG-E [OR 0.996, 95% CI, 0.992-1.000; P = .044). LIMITATIONS: Single-center study. CONCLUSION: Sugar-free menthol candy drops are a safe and effective addition to split-dose PEG-E, resulting in improved tolerability and patient compliance, which appears to translate into improved bowel cleansing. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01541683.).


Assuntos
Doces , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Colonoscopia/métodos , Mentol/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Doces/efeitos adversos , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Catárticos/química , Eletrólitos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Mentol/efeitos adversos , Náusea/etiologia , Cooperação do Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/química , Método Simples-Cego , Paladar
7.
J Dig Dis ; 14(7): 382-7, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23551389

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the association between Streptococcus bovis (S. bovis) endocarditis and advanced colorectal neoplasia. METHODS: This was a case-control study of patients with S. bovis endocarditis undergoing colonoscopic evaluation. Patients were matched 1:20 with controls by gender and age (±2 years) from a large screening colonoscopy database. The baseline, colonoscopic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with S. bovis endocarditis were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2010, 18 adult patients with S. bovis bacteremia were identified, of whom 10 with infective endocarditis (IE) underwent colonoscopic evaluation. Endocarditis involved a native or prosthetic valve in six and four of those patients, respectively. All 10 patients recovered without recurrence of IE (mean follow-up duration 49.6 months). None had a concurrent or preceding history of colon disease and only one had subclinical chronic liver disease. Advanced neoplasia, defined as the presence of polyps ≥1 cm (n = 6), villous histology (n = 3), high-grade focal dysplasia (n = 1) or cancer (n = 1), was found under colonoscopy in 6 of the 10 cases (60.0%) compared with 13/200 (6.5%) matched controls (OR 21.6, 95% CI 5.4-86.1, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: S. bovis endocarditis is strongly associated with the presence of advanced colorectal neoplasia. In the absence of any contraindication, colonoscopic examination is strongly recommended in patients with endocarditis. The exact pathophysiological mechanisms underlying this association and the predilection for S. bovis bacteremia in patients with advanced colonic neoplasia remain unclear.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Endocardite Bacteriana/complicações , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações , Streptococcus bovis , Idoso , Bacteriemia/complicações , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Pólipos Intestinais/complicações , Pólipos Intestinais/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
8.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol ; 62(1): 41-9, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23474843

RESUMO

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism and cotherapy with rabeprazole or esomeprazole on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. Patients receiving clopidogrel 75 mg ± rabeprazole or esomeprazole underwent genotyping for CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein testing to measure platelet reactivity index (PRI). Two hundred thirty-nine consecutive patients were enrolled as follows: 92 clopidogrel (C group), 94 clopidogrel + rabeprazole (CR), and 53 clopidogrel + esomeprazole (CE). Forty-five patients had loss of function (LOF) polymorphism (43 heterozygous; 2 homozygous mutant for CYP2C19*2). The mean PRI was 20.7% ± 21.9% in the C group, 19.1% ± 20.9% in the CR group, and 24.5% ± 22.9% in the CE group (P = NS). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR), defined as PRI >50%, was observed in 12 (13.0%), 13 (13.8%), and 10 (18.9%) patients on C, CR, and CE, respectively (P = NS). HPR was similar in rapid metabolizers between groups. On multivariate logistic regression, neither CYP2C19 LOF alleles nor proton pump inhibitor cotherapy were associated with HPR. The use of proton pump inhibitors was indicated in 30.6% of recipients. As a conclusion, CYP2C19*2 LOF allele and the use of esomeprazole or rabeprazole have no effect on the action of clopidogrel.


Assuntos
Hidrocarboneto de Aril Hidroxilases/genética , Hidrocarboneto de Aril Hidroxilases/fisiologia , Esomeprazol/farmacologia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/farmacologia , Rabeprazol/farmacologia , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Plaquetas/efeitos dos fármacos , Clopidogrel , Estudos de Coortes , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos dos fármacos , Polimorfismo Genético/fisiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Ticlopidina/farmacologia
9.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 47(5): 420-5, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23164685

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The exact factors predisposing to colonic diverticulosis other than age are unknown. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy. A detailed dietary and social questionnaire was completed on all participants. A worldwide review of the literature was performed to further investigate any association between identified risk factors and diverticulosis. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-six consecutive individuals were enrolled (mean age, 61.1±8.3 y; female: male=0.98). Overall, the prevalence of diverticulosis was 32.8% (95% CI, 29.5-36.2). Diverticula were left-sided, right-sided, or both in 71.5%, 5.8%, and 22.7% of affected subjects, respectively. On univariate analysis, age, sex, adenomatous polyps, advanced neoplasia (adenoma≥1 cm, villous histology, or cancer), aspirin, and alcohol use were significantly associated with diverticulosis. Diet, body mass index, physical activity, and bowel habits were not associated with the disease. On multivariate analysis, increasing age (P<0.001), advanced neoplasia (P=0.021), and alcohol consumption (P<0.001) were significantly associated with diverticulosis. The adjusted odds ratio for diverticulosis in alcohol users was 1.91 (1.36 to 2.69), with increasing prevalence with higher alcohol consumption (P-value for trend=0.001). When the prevalence of diverticulosis reported from 18 countries was analyzed against alcohol use, there was a strong correlation with national per-capita alcohol consumption rates (Pearson correlation coefficient r=0.68; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol use is a significant risk factor for colonic diverticulosis and may offer a partial explanation for the existing East-West paradox in disease prevalence and phenotype. Further studies are needed to investigate this association and its putative pathophysiological mechanisms.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Diverticulose Cólica/complicações , Diverticulose Cólica/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Colonoscopia , Estudos Transversais , Diverticulose Cólica/diagnóstico , Diverticulose Cólica/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Metabolism ; 62(4): 518-26, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23102518

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with an increased risk of bone fractures. This study sought to evaluate the effect of PPIs on biochemical markers of calcium and bone metabolism. METHODS: Prospective matched controlled study involving healthy adult males (age 18-50years) suffering from frequent heartburn. Patients received standard-dose PPI for 12weeks and were matched by age with healthy controls. Blood studies were taken at 0, 1 and 3months for biochemical markers of mineral and bone metabolism. Two-way (time and PPI treatment) repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) and multiple linear regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 58 participants (29 per group) completed the study. Mean age of participants was 33.2±7.5years. Baseline characteristics and biomarkers were similar for both groups except for higher BMI (28.6 vs. 25.6kg/m(2), p=0.008) and serum C-terminal cross linked telopeptides of type I collagen [CrossLaps, (300 vs. 228pg/ml, p=0.028)] in the PPI group. There was no difference in parathormone (PTH), ionized calcium, vitamin D, osteocalcin and CrossLaps between the PPI and control subjects (all non-significant; 2-way RM-ANOVA). Multiple linear regression modeling showed no effect of PPIs on any of the studied calcium or bone metabolism biomarkers. CONCLUSION: PPI intake for 12weeks has no measurable effect on calcium or bone metabolism in healthy young males.


Assuntos
Osso e Ossos/metabolismo , Cálcio/metabolismo , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise de Variância , Biomarcadores , Osso e Ossos/efeitos dos fármacos , Colágeno Tipo I/sangue , Determinação de Ponto Final , Azia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA