Radiotherapy in the management of rare gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review.

The aim of this analysis is to assess radiotherapy's role and technical aspects in an array of rare gastrointestinal (GI) cancers for adult patients. Collection data pertaining to radiotherapy and digestive rare cancers were sourced from Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved outcomes for patients with esophageal undifferentiated carcinoma compared with esophageal salivary gland types of carcinomas. For rare gastric epithelial carcinoma, perioperative chemotherapy is the common treatment. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy showed no benefice compared with adjuvant chemotherapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Small bowel sarcomas respond well to radiotherapy. By analogy to anal squamous cell carcinoma, exclusive chemoradiotherapy provided better outcomes for patients with rectal squamous cell carcinoma. For anal adenocarcinoma, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by radical surgery, was the most effective regimen. For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, chemoradiotherapy can be a suitable option as postoperative or exclusive for unresectable/borderline disease. The stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a promising approach for hepatobiliary malignancy. Radiotherapy is a valuable option in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) for palliative intent, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistant disease, and unresectable or residual disease. Involved field (IF) radiotherapy for digestive lymphoma provides good results, especially for gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MALT). In conclusion, radiotherapy is not an uncommon indication in this context. A multidisciplinary approach is needed for better management of digestive rare cancers.

Volumetric modulated arctherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Clinical efficacy and late toxicity.

PURPOSE: We report our experience of 86 consecutive patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma who were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 86 patients with histologically proven primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with volumetric modulated arctherapy technique radiotherapy. Primary endpoints were local, regional, distant control, and overall survival, second endpoint was late toxicity. RESULTS: The median age was 47.5 years (range: 13-79 years) with sex ratio 1.09. At diagnosis, rhinologic symptoms represented the most common clinical presentation, reported by 61 patients (70.9%). Almost 88.4% of patients presented non-keratinizing undifferentiated carcinoma histology (n=76). Most of the patients presented a locally advanced disease defined by stage III and IVa (95.3%). Therefore, 31 patients were treated by concurrent chemoradiation (36%), 52 patients received induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (57%), three patients received induction chemotherapy followed by exclusive radiotherapy (3.5%). and three patients treated with exclusive irradiation (3.5%). With a median follow up of 15.7 months (range: 4-33.3 months), nine patients died (10.4%), three presented local or locoregional relapse (3.4%), while nine patients presented distant recurrences (10.4%). The two years overall and disease-free survival rates were 88.7% and 83.1% respectively, locoregional control was 100% at 12 months and 96.2% at 24 months, and the two years distant failure-free survival was 86.7%. Time to relapse was the only prognostic factor in univariate analysis for overall survival in our study. The therapeutic tolerance was good with 61.7% of grade 3 and 2.3% grade 4 hyposialia respectively, 46.5% of otological disorders and no radionecrosis was noted. CONCLUSION: Volumetric modulated arctherapy technique with concurrent chemoradiotherapy is an effective treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with excellent overall and locoregional control without severe toxicity. Distant metastasis is the major site of failure, so induction chemotherapy added to chemoradiotherapy must be discussed in multidisciplinary consultation meeting because it significantly improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival, as compared with chemoradiotherapy alone.

Five years' experience treating locally advanced cervical cancer with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: results from a single institution.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of female cancer death. In Morocco it is the second most common cancer, our department recruits more than 500 patients each year and proximally half of the cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2008, all patients with diagnosis of locally advanced cervical cancer referred to our department and treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy were retrieved. We analyzed outcomes for this particular population; overall survival, local control, and toxicities, we also retrieved prognostic factors influencing outcomes for this population. RESULTS: The overall survival rate for the cohort was 68 % at 2 years, and reached 47 % at 5 years. The overall LC rate was 71 % at 2 years and 58 % at 5 years. The most important prognostic factors for OS and LC were the pretreatment hemoglobin, the tumor size, total duration of treatment, and the use of brachytherapy. For OS, the presence of enlarged lymph nodes was also important. For LC, the number of chemotherapy's courses was important. Of the included patients, 20 % experienced late grade 3 or 4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that despite all the treatment strategies available, locally advanced cervical cancer is associated with bad outcomes. In this cohort, the most important prognostic factors were the pretreatment hemoglobin level and the tumor size.

Clinical prognostic factors in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Moroccan population.

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a distinct cancer of head and neck by its pathology, etiology, epidemiology and clinical behavior. Morocco is considered an endemic region with intermediate incidence. The aim of our report is to underline some clinical determinants of survival in locally advanced disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study from January 2003 to December 2005. All patients with undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in the National Institute of Oncology of Rabat, Morocco were recorded. Classified stage II to IVB disease according to TNM classification adopted by the AJCC (American Joint Committee of Cancer) 6th edition. RESULTS: The study included 339 patients, 122 women and 217 men (sex-ratio: 1.7). Mean age was 43 years old (range: 6-91years). Median duration to diagnosis was 6 months (range: 1-72) presenting symptoms at diagnosis were predominantly cervical lymph node in 79%. Forty- two patients have T1 tumors, 159 = T2 tumors, 64 = T3 tumors and 69 = T4 tumors. Sixty-five patients do not have lymph-node involvement, 49 have N1, 128 have N2 and 95 have N3. Three patients were at stage IIA, 57 patients were at stage IIB, 40 patients were at stage III, and 57 patients were at stage IVA and the remaining 96 patients were at stage IVB. Eighty-seven percent of patients underwent sequential chemoradiation and 17% underwent concurrent chemo-radiation (CTR). Response to induction chemotherapy was assessed in 235 patients. There were 31 patients with complete response and 59 patients have partial response. Complete response to radiotherapy was reached in 235 patients. Mean overall survival (OS) was 66.2%. Gender was a prognostic factor of OS (p=0.045) and DFS favoring women. Age wasn't a prognostic factors determining the outcome with no difference between patients aged more than 40 years old and patients younger. Tumor size was not a determinant of survival with a non-significant p in OS and DFS (0.27 and 0.46 respectively) but T4 stage patients appear to have a worse prognosis. Lymph node involvement was significantly determining the outcome either in OS and DFS (p=0.001 and 0.009 respectively). TNM stage was also a significant prognostic factor in OS but not in DFS favoring those with early stage (p= 0, 004 and p= 0, 13 respectively). The treatment strategy was not a significant prognostic factor with no difference between patients who underwent sequential or concurrent chemoradiation (OS p= 0, 48 and DFS p= 0, 9). In multivariate analysis, lymph-node involvement is the most significant factor. CONCLUSION: Our findings were mostly concordant with the literature data in endemic areas for TNM staging; however we are limited by the bias of retrospective studies. Prospective studies would be more accurate to define those prognostic factors in our population. KEYWORDS: UCNT, prognostic factors, endemic areas, lymph node involvement.