Axial MR Angiography in Evaluating Revascularization after Indirect Bypass Surgery for Moyamoya.

INTRODUCTION: At our institution, revascularization after indirect moyamoya surgery is routinely evaluated using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) rather than catheter angiography. This study reviews how revascularization can be visualized on axial MRA versus catheter angiography and compares clinical outcomes of surgeries evaluated by routine postoperative MRA versus routine catheter angiography. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients treated at our institution who underwent unilateral encephaloduroarteriosynangiosis (EDAS)/pial synangiosis 2004-2021 at 1-21 years of age. Inclusion criteria included undergoing preoperative MRA within 18 months of surgery and postoperative MRA 3 to 30 months after surgery. Clinical outcome measures included postoperative stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), changes in symptoms (improved, unchanged, worsened), and new postoperative symptoms. Measures were compared between surgeries evaluated by routine postoperative MRA versus routine postoperative angiograms. For each surgery, we determined the ratios of the diameters and areas of the donor and contralateral corresponding vessels and the relative signal intensities of these two vessels on preoperative- and 3-to-30-month postoperative MRA. We did the same for the middle meningeal artery (MMA) ipsilateral to the donor artery and the contralateral MMA. We assessed changes from pre- to post-operation in diameter ratios, area ratios, relative signal intensity, ivy sign, and brain perfusion on arterial spin labeled (ASL) imaging. MRI and MRA measures of revascularization and flow were compared to Matsushima grades in patients who had postoperative catheter angiograms. RESULTS: Fifty-one operations were included. There were no significant differences in rates of strokes, TIAs, changes or new symptoms after surgeries evaluated by routine postoperative MRA versus catheter angiogram. Significant associations existed between greater collateralization on postoperative MRA and greater median increases in preoperative-to-postoperative ratios of donor-vessel-over-contralateral-vessel diameter (p=0.0461) and ipsilateral-MMA-over-contralateral-MMA diameter (p=0.0135). The median increase in the ratio of the donor-vessel-over-corresponding-contralateral-vessel diameters was significantly higher for Matsushima grade A versus B (p=0.036). The median increase in the ratio of the sum of donor-and-ipsilateral-MMA diameters over the sum of the contralateral vessel diameters was significantly higher for improved-versus-unchanged perfusion on ASL imaging (p=0.0074). There was a nonsignificant association between greater postoperative collateralization on MRA and Matsushima grade (p=0.1160) Conclusion: Cerebral revascularization after EDAS/pial synangiosis can be evaluated on axial MRA by comparing the diameter and/or signal intensity of the donor vessel and ipsilateral MMA to those of the corresponding contralateral vessels on postoperative-versus-preoperative MRA. The use of routine postoperative MRA rather than catheter angiography does not appear to negatively affect outcomes.

A Subdural Hygroma Necessitating a Subdural-Peritoneal Shunt in a Pediatric Patient Following Total Cranial Vault Remodeling Surgery.

Sagittal synostosis is a common non-syndromic synostosis treated with open or endoscopic cranial vault remodeling. Early intervention is recommended to avoid restricted brain growth, increased intracranial pressure, and resultant developmental delay. Common complications such as failure or reconstruction, cerebrospinal fluid leak, blood loss, and stroke are well-reported in the literature. Here, we present a rare case of the development of a subdural hygroma following cranial vault remodeling in a seven-month-old male, necessitating the insertion of a subdural-peritoneal shunt.

Spinal Metastasis of Cerebral Glioblastoma with Genetic Profile: Case Report and Review of Literature.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastasis of cerebral glioblastoma (GBM) is rare, with some reports suggesting a prevalence of 1%-2%. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein, we present 2 unique cases of spinal metastasis of cerebral GBM, 1 of which was histologically proven to be a drop spinal GBM metastasis. The first case was a 25-year-old female who presented with a spinal intradural intramedullary spinal lesion a few months after resection of a left temporal lobe GBM (isocitrate dehydrogenase wild type). The patient underwent surgical resection of the new lesion, and subsequent histopathologic examination proved that the intramedullary spinal lesion was GBM. The patient experienced full recovery postoperatively, and then a few months later, she presented again with widespread drop metastasis of the spinal cord. The second case is a middle-aged male with right temporal GBM who developed spinal metastasis 10 months after his diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: We are reporting these 2 cases due to the rarity of spinal metastasis in GBM. We reviewed the current literature and included genetic and molecular profiles in the discussion. Currently, there are no established treatment guidelines for GBM spinal metastasis. The Stupp protocol after initial brain surgery for GBM did not appear to have beneficial effects on prolonging survival in these patients with spinal metastasis. The goal of treatment was primarily to alleviate pain and neurologic deficits with no effect on overall outcome. Prognosis following the diagnosis of spinal metastasis is poor.