RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite remarkable progress, the immunotherapies currently used in the clinic, such as immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, still have limited efficacy against many types of solid tumors. One major barrier to effective treatment is the lack of a durable long-term response. Tumor-targeted superantigen (TTS) therapy may overcome this barrier to enhance therapeutic efficacy. TTS proteins, such as the clinical-stage molecule naptumomab estafenatox (NAP), increase tumor recognition and killing by both coating tumor cells with bacterial-derived superantigens (SAgs) and selectively expanding T-cell lineages that can recognize them. The present study investigated the efficacy and mechanism of action of repeated TTS (C215Fab-SEA) treatments leading to a long-term antitumor immune response as monotherapy or in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in murine tumor models. METHODS: We used syngeneic murine tumor models expressing the human EpCAM target (C215 antigen) to assess the efficacy and mechanism of action of repeated treatment with TTS C215Fab-SEA alone or with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. Tumor draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) and tumor tissues were processed and analyzed by immunophenotyping and immunohistochemistry. Isolated RNA from tumors was used to analyze gene expression and the TCR repertoire. Tumor rechallenge and T-cell transfer studies were conducted to test the long-term antitumor memory response. RESULTS: TTS therapy inhibited tumor growth and achieved complete tumor rejection, leading to a T-cell-dependent long-term memory response against the tumor. The antitumor effect was derived from inflammatory responses converting the immunosuppressive TME into a proinflammatory state with an increase in T-cell infiltration, activation and high T-cell diversity. The combination of TTS with ICB therapy was significantly more effective than the monotherapies and resulted in higher tumor-free rates. CONCLUSIONS: These new results indicate that TTSs not only can turn a "cold" tumor into a "hot" tumor but also can enable epitope spreading and memory response, which makes TTSs ideal candidates for combination with ICB agents and other anticancer agents.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Animais , Camundongos , Superantígenos/uso terapêutico , Linfócitos T , Neoplasias/patologia , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Imunoterapia , Microambiente Tumoral , Linhagem Celular TumoralRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have raised concerns, particularly as repeated doses are required. Skin tests with the vaccines excipient were found to be of low value, whereas the utility of skin tests with the whole vaccine is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a panel of skin tests and the outcomes of subsequent doses of immunization among subjects who suffered an immediate allergic reaction to the BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: Between March and December 2021, patients who experienced symptoms consistent with immediate allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine and were referred to the Sheba Medical Center underwent skin testing with polyethylene glyol (PEG)-containing medicines, Pfizer-BNT162b2, and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (AZD1222). Further immunization was performed accordingly and under medical observation. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients underwent skin testing for suspected allergy to the COVID vaccines, of which 38 of 51 (74.5%) were nonreactive, 7 of 51(13.7%) had no skin sensitization but suffered a clinical reaction during skin testing (mainly cough), and 6 of 51 (11.7%) exhibited immediate skin sensitization. Both skin sensitization and cough during testing were related to a higher use of adrenaline following immunization (P = .08 and P = .024, respectively). Further immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine was recommended unless sensitization or severe reaction to previous immunization was evident. The latter were referred to be tested/receive the alternative AZD1222 vaccine. Ten patients underwent skin testing with AZD1222: 2 of 10 (20%) demonstrated skin sensitization to both vaccines; thus, 8 of 10 were immunized with the AZD1222, of which 2 of 8 (25%) had allergic reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines are rare but can be severe and reoccur. Intradermal testing with the whole vaccine may discriminate sensitized subjects, detect cross-sensitization between vaccines, and enable estimation of patients at higher risk.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidade Imediata , Hipersensibilidade , Vacinas , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Tosse , Epinefrina , Excipientes , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/diagnóstico , Imunização , Vacinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Importance: Allergic reactions among some individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine discourage patients with allergic conditions from receiving this vaccine and physicians from recommending the vaccine. Objective: To describe the assessment and immunization of highly allergic individuals with the BNT162b2 vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a prospective cohort study from December 27, 2020, to February 22, 2021, 8102 patients with allergies who applied to the COVID 19 vaccine referral center at the Sheba Medical Center underwent risk assessment using an algorithm that included a detailed questionnaire. High-risk patients (n = 429) were considered "highly allergic" and were immunized under medical supervision. Exposures: Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: Allergic and anaphylactic reactions after the first and second doses of BNT162b2 vaccine among highly allergic patients. Results: Of the 429 individuals who applied to the COVID-19 referral center and were defined as highly allergic, 304 (70.9%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 52 (16) years. This highly allergic group was referred to receive immunization under medical supervision. After the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, 420 patients (97.9%) had no immediate allergic event, 6 (1.4%) developed minor allergic responses, and 3 (0.7%) had anaphylactic reactions. During the study period, 218 highly allergic patients (50.8%) received the second BNT162b2 vaccine dose, of which 214 (98.2%) had no allergic reactions and 4 patients (1.8%) had minor allergic reactions. Other immediate and late reactions were comparable with those seen in the general population, except for delayed itch and skin eruption, which were more common among allergic patients. Conclusions and Relevance: The rate of allergic reactions to BNT162b2 vaccine, is higher among patients with allergies, particularly among a subgroup with a history of high-risk allergies. This study suggests that most patients with a history of allergic diseases and, particularly, highly allergic patients can be safely immunized by using an algorithm that can be implemented in different medical facilities and includes a referral center, a risk assessment questionnaire, and a setting for immunization under medical supervision of highly allergic patients. Further studies are required to define more specific risk factors for allergic reactions to the BNT162b2 vaccine.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia/etiologia , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Vacina BNT162 , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) are expressed simultaneously and have tumor-promoting roles in breast cancer. In parallel, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) undergo conversion at the tumor site to cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which are generally connected to enhanced tumor progression. Here, we determined the impact of consistent inflammatory stimulation on stromal cell plasticity. MSCs that were persistently stimulated by TNFα + IL-1ß (generally 14-18 days) gained a CAF-like morphology, accompanied by prominent changes in gene expression, including in stroma/fibroblast-related genes. These CAF-like cells expressed elevated levels of vimentin and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) and demonstrated significantly increased abilities to contract collagen gels. Moreover, they gained the phenotype of inflammatory CAFs, as indicated by the reduced expression of α smooth muscle actin (αSMA), increased proliferation, and elevated expression of inflammatory genes and proteins, primarily inflammatory chemokines. These inflammatory CAFs released factors that enhanced tumor cell dispersion, scattering, and migration; the inflammatory CAF-derived factors elevated cancer cell migration by stimulating the chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR1/2 and Ras-activating receptors, expressed by the cancer cells. Together, these novel findings demonstrate that chronic inflammation can induce MSC-to-CAF conversion, leading to the generation of tumor-promoting inflammatory CAFs.