The Association Between Mammography Screening Frequency and Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for optimal frequency of screening mammography vary by professional society. Sparse evidence exists on the association between screening frequency and breast cancer treatment options. The main objective was to examine differences in cancer treatment rendered for U.S. women with different numbers of screenings prior to breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer stage at diagnosis and health care cost were assessed in secondary analyses. METHODS: This IRB-exempt retrospective study used administrative claims data to identify women aged 44 or older with various numbers of mammographic screenings ≥11 months apart, during the four years prior to incident breast cancer diagnosis from January 2010 to December 2018. Outcomes were assessed over the six months following diagnosis. Generalized linear regression models were used to compare women with differing numbers of mammograms, adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Claims data review identified 25 492 women who met inclusion criteria. There was a stepwise improvement in each of these screening categories such that women with four screenings, compared to women with only one screening, experienced higher rates of lumpectomy (70% vs 55%) and radiation therapy (48% vs 36%), lower rates of mastectomy (27% vs 34%) and chemotherapy (28% vs 36%), less stage 3 or 4 cancer at diagnosis (15% vs 29%), and lower health care costs within six months postdiagnosis (P < 0.001). Results were similar in a subgroup limited to women aged 44 to 49 at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Potential benefits of more frequent screening include less aggressive treatment and lower health care costs among women who develop breast cancer.

Occurrence and Characteristics of Hospitalizations During First-Line Chemotherapy Among Individuals with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Choosing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) requires balancing clinical effectiveness and risk of complications. This study characterized real-world inpatient/emergency department (ED) hospitalizations during first-line chemotherapy among individuals with mCRC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from medical and pharmacy claims. All patients had mCRC with ≥1 claim for ≥1 of the 5 most frequently utilized first-line chemotherapy agents (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, irinotecan, capecitabine). The main outcome was all-cause hospitalizations (inpatient or ED setting) identified from claims via ICD-9/10-CM coding from index date until 30 days after the end of first-line chemotherapy or last available data. RESULTS: A total of 717 individuals (mean age 55 years; 58% male; ECOG 0/1/2+/missing in 44%/39%/6%/11%; median follow-up 116 days) met study criteria. Thirty-four distinct chemotherapy regimens were used. Overall, 40% of patients had ≥1 hospitalization (n=285; total 415 hospitalizations); 12% (n=85) had ≥2 hospitalizations. The median time to first hospitalization was 52 days; median inpatient length of stay was 4 days; infections/neutropenia (21%) and bowel-related complications (17%) were the most common issues associated with inpatient hospitalizations. In univariate analyses, insurance plan type, geographical location, ECOG, and renal disease were associated with hospitalization. In multivariable analyses, ECOG ≥1 was associated with a 67% increase (p<0.01) in the odds of hospitalization vs ECOG= 0. CONCLUSION: Approximately 40% of patients with mCRC were hospitalized during the study period. Hospital stays were typically short. Further research is needed to determine how many of these hospitalizations may be avoidable. We also observed a large amount of variation in regimens used in the first-line setting.

Results From a Health Insurer's Clinical Pathway Program in Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE:: Pathway regimens are value-driven, evidence-based therapies that aim at high-quality, affordable cancer care. There are few real-world data to support the value of such regimens, especially for patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:: Using nationally representative claims data from Anthem, together with clinical data from its Cancer Care Quality Program, we identified patients with breast cancer for whom chemotherapy was initiated between January 2015 and October 2016. On the basis of demographic and clinical characteristics, patients receiving a pathway regimen (on-pathway cohort) were matched to those who did not (off-pathway cohort) using 1:1 propensity score matching. We compared post-6-month quality-of-care outcomes including hospitalization, emergency department visits, need for supportive drugs such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and cost outcomes between the cohorts. RESULTS:: There were 959 patients in each cohort after matching. Patients in both cohorts had a similar age distribution (median age, 52 years in the off-pathway cohort v 53 years in the on-pathway cohort), and most presented with stage II disease (49.4% in the off-pathway cohort v 49.8% in the on-pathway cohort); nearly two thirds of each cohort had hormone receptor positive cancer (67.3% in the off-pathway cohort v 64.9% in the on-pathway cohort). The two cohorts had similar rates of hospitalization and emergency department visits; however, the rate of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use was significantly lower in the on-pathway cohort (72.5% in the on-pathway cohort v 82.8% in the off-pathway cohort; odds ratio, 0.55; P ≤ .0001). The average post-6-month cost of care was $16,176 lower (95% CI, -$24,291 to -$8,061; P ≤ .0001) in the on-pathway cohort. CONCLUSION:: Pathway regimens for breast cancer demonstrate an example of high-value care. They are associated with a reduced cost of care without compromising quality of care.

Clozapine prescribing in a Canadian outpatient population.

OBJECTIVE: Description of demographics of an outpatient population of clozapine users. METHODS: Retrospective chart review study of an urban population diagnosed with schizophrenia. Assessment of therapeutic histories in relation to clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy-seven of the 467 patients were on clozapine therapy. Average patients' age was 39.4 ± 11.8 years) and 68% were males. The majority of patients (68%) had tried 3 or more antipsychotics before switching to clozapine, 21% had tried two and 11% had tried one. Median length of therapy prior to clozapine initiation was 8.9 years in males and 7.7 years in females. CONCLUSION: Until 2010, the use of clozapine was often delayed and more than 2 antipsychotic medications were tried for relatively long periods of time before patients were switched to this effective agent.

Cetuximab as primary treatment for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to the neck.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) metastatic to lymph nodes is commonly treated with surgery plus radiotherapy. METHODS: We present the case of a 92-year-old man with cutaneous SCC metastatic to the neck (7 cm) who was treated with primary cetuximab and has had a durable complete response for 7 months. Because of his age, comorbidities, and unresectable neck lymphadenopathy, he received primary cetuximab. He received a 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and a 250 mg/m(2) weekly dose for 3 months and then had to discontinue as a result of other unrelated medical issues. RESULTS: The patient had a complete response by 6 weeks. Seven months after discontinuing cetuximab, he continues to have a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Primary cetuximab for cutaneous SCC metastatic to lymph nodes is an area that bears further investigation because of its apparent efficacy and excellent toxicity profile.

Phase 2 trial of sorafenib in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: There is no effective second-line systemic chemotherapy for patients with disease progression after cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A phase 2 trial of sorafenib was performed to determine the activity and toxicity of this agent in a multi-institutional setting in patients previously treated with 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma were treated with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: There were no objective responses observed. The 4-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 9.5%; median overall survival of the group was 6.8 months. There were no therapy-related deaths, and common grade 3 toxicities included fatigue and hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Although sorafenib as a single agent has minimal activity in patients with advanced urothelial cancer in the second-line setting, further investigation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors using different trial designs with PFS endpoints is warranted.

Evaluation of an interchangeability switch in patients treated with clozapine: A retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: To report the findings of a switch from brand-name to generic clozapine in a Canadian outpatient population. METHOD: The medical records of 58 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders and stabilized on brand-name clozapine therapy were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were switched from brand-name to generic clozapine on their next dispensing supply after September 29, 2003. Data regarding clozapine dose regimens, physicians' visits, hospitalizations, and adverse events were collected from the patients' charts for the 6 months preceding and the 6 months after the switch from brand-name to generic clozapine. Relevant measurement changes in those data associated with the switch are evaluated. RESULTS: No significant changes in dose, number of physician's visits, or hospitalization rates were observed as a consequence of the switch from brand-name to generic clozapine. In addition, there were no reported increases in the frequency of the most common adverse events, including decreases in white blood cell counts. None of the patients received a "nonrechallengeable" status, and no discontinuation of clozapine therapy occurred for any reason (toxicity or treatment failure) in the 6 months after the formulation switch. CONCLUSION: In the current outpatient population, retrospective evaluation of the conversion from brand-name clozapine to the first generic alternative available on the Canadian market did not reveal any significant treatment changes.

Do antipsychotics ameliorate or exacerbate Obsessive Compulsive Disorder symptoms? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxically, some reports in the literature support the use of antipsychotics in the treatment of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), while other reports suggest that antipsychotics can exacerbate OCD symptoms. To date, there is no published systematic review of the relationship between OCD symptoms and antipsychotic drugs. METHODS: A Medline and PsychInfo search (1980-2003) was conducted to collect published reports of the interactions between antipsychotics and OCD symptoms. RESULTS: In the treatment of refractory OCD, case series, open label trials and placebo-controlled trials were found suggesting efficacy of antipsychotic augmentation to ongoing antidepressant treatment. In the placebo-controlled trials with haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine, a significantly higher response rate (46-71%) was found for the antipsychotic groups, compared to no response for the placebo groups. Reports of exacerbation of OCD symptoms with the use of atypical antipsychotics were limited to individuals with a primary psychotic disorder. LIMITATIONS: Definition of response in most of these treatment studies was based on a modest reduction of OCD symptoms, and no studies were available on long-term efficacy. There were also no published reports that systematically evaluated the incidence of OCD symptoms associated with atypical antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: All antipsychotics mentioned above had short-term controlled evidence to support their use as augmenting agents in the treatment of refractory OCD. The suggested management of OCD induction/exacerbation due to atypical antipsychotics is to increase the dose of the atypical antipsychotic and/or add a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.