Comparative Analysis of Ventral Hernia Repair and Transverse Abdominis Release With and Without Panniculectomy: A 4-Year Match-Pair Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Amid rising obesity, concurrent ventral hernia repair and panniculectomy procedures are increasing. Long-term outcomes of transverse abdominis release (TAR) combined with panniculectomy remain understudied. This study compares clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after TAR, with or without panniculectomy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review from 2016 to 2022 evaluated patients undergoing TAR with and without panniculectomy. Propensity-scored matching was based on age, body mass index, ASA, and ventral hernia working group. Patients with parastomal hernias were excluded. Patient/operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and QoL were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty subjects were identified (25 per group) with a median follow-up of 48.8 months (interquartile range, 43-69.7 months). The median age and body mass index were 57 years (47-64 years) and 31.8 kg/m2 (28-36 kg/m2), respectively. The average hernia defect size was 354.5 cm2 ± 188.5 cm2. There were no significant differences in hernia recurrence, emergency visits, readmissions, or reoperations between groups. However, ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy demonstrated a significant increase in delayed healing (44% vs 4%, P < 0.05) and seromas (24% vs 4%, P < 0.05). Postoperative QoL improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.005) across multiple domains, which continued throughout the 4-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences in QoL among ventral hernia working group, wound class, surgical site occurrences, or surgical site occurrences requiring intervention (P > 0.05). Patients with concurrent panniculectomy demonstrated a significantly greater percentage change in overall scores and appearance scores. CONCLUSIONS: Ventral hernia repair with TAR and panniculectomy can be performed safely with low recurrence and complication rates at long-term follow-up. Despite increased short-term postoperative complications, patients have a significantly greater improvement in disease specific QoL.

State-of-the-art abdominal wall reconstruction and closure.

Open ventral hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons. Appropriate patient selection and preoperative optimization are important to ensure high-quality outcomes and prevent hernia recurrence. Preoperative adjuncts such as the injection of botulinum toxin and progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum are proven to help achieve fascial closure in patients with hernia defects and/or loss of domain. Operatively, component separation techniques are performed on complex hernias in order to medialize the rectus fascia and achieve a tension-free closure. Other important principles of hernia repair include complete reduction of the hernia sac, wide mesh overlap, and techniques to control seroma and other wound complications. In the setting of contamination, a delayed primary closure of the skin and subcutaneous tissues should be considered to minimize the chance of postoperative wound complications. Ultimately, the aim for hernia surgeons is to mitigate complications and provide a durable repair while improving patient quality of life.

Predicting rare outcomes in abdominal wall reconstruction using image-based deep learning models.

BACKGROUND: Deep learning models with imbalanced data sets are a challenge in the fields of artificial intelligence and surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and compare deep learning models that predict rare but devastating postoperative complications after abdominal wall reconstruction. METHODS: A prospectively maintained institutional database was used to identify abdominal wall reconstruction patients with preoperative computed tomography scans. Conventional deep learning models were developed using an 8-layer convolutional neural network and a 2-class training system (ie, learns negative and positive outcomes). Conventional deep learning models were compared to deep learning models that were developed using a generative adversarial network anomaly framework, which uses image augmentation and anomaly detection. The primary outcomes were receiver operating characteristic values for predicting mesh infection and pulmonary failure. RESULTS: Computed tomography scans from 510 patients were used with a total of 10,004 images. Mesh infection and pulmonary failure occurred in 3.7% and 5.6% of patients, respectively. The conventional deep learning models were less effective than generative adversarial network anomaly for predicting mesh infection (receiver operating characteristic 0.61 vs 0.73, P < .01) and pulmonary failure (receiver operating characteristic 0.59 vs 0.70, P < .01). Although the conventional deep learning models had higher accuracies/specificities for predicting mesh infection (0.93 vs 0.78, P < .01/.96 vs .78, P < .01) and pulmonary failure (0.88 vs 0.68, P < .01/.92 vs .67, P < .01), they were substantially compromised by decreased model sensitivity (0.25 vs 0.68, P < .01/.27 vs .73, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional deep learning models, generative adversarial network anomaly deep learning models showed improved performance on imbalanced data sets, predominantly by increasing model sensitivity. Understanding patients who are at risk for rare but devastating postoperative complications can improve risk stratification, resource utilization, and the consent process.

Intercostal Lung Hernia Following Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Reconstruction.

Acquired lung hernias typically result from trauma or intra-thoracic surgery is defined as the protrusion of lung parenchyma beyond the anatomic boundaries of the thoracic wall. A 40-year-old woman underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction following her mastectomies. Post-operatively, she returned to the emergency department with severe chest pain, shortness of breath, and localized chest swelling. CT angiography demonstrated intercostal right lung hernia with concern for incarceration. She returned emergently to the operating room. The lung was reduced, but the flap was ultimately determined to be nonviable and was removed. Post-operative course was uneventful and the patient recovered well. Intercostal lung hernia is an uncommon clinical entity that has not previously been described as a complication of DIEP breast reconstruction. Its development is associated with significant morbidity including flap loss in this case. Early recognition of this rare complication is essential to avoid more severe sequelae of tissue ischemia.

Factors Predicting Increased Length of Stay in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have become increasingly popular in general surgery, yet no guidelines exist for an abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR)-specific program. We aimed to evaluate predictors of increased length of stay (LOS) in the AWR population to aid in creating an AWR-specific ERAS protocol. METHODS: A prospective, single institution hernia center database was queried for all patients undergoing open AWR (1999-2019). Standard statistical methods and linear and logistic regression were used to evaluate for predictors of increased LOS. Groups were compared based on LOS below or above the median LOS of 6 days (IQR = 4-8). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 2,505 patients. On average, the high LOS group was older, with higher rates of CAD, COPD, diabetes, obesity, and pre-operative narcotic use (all P < .05). Longer LOS patients had more complex hernias with larger defects, higher rates of mesh infection/fistula, and more often required a component separation (all P < .05). Multivariate analysis identified age (ß0.04,SE0.02), BMI (ß0.06,SE0.03), hernia defect size (ß0.003,SE0.001), active mesh infection or mesh fistula (ß1.8,SE0.72), operative time (ß0.02,SE0.002), and ASA score >4 (ß3.6,SE1.7) as independently associated factors for increased LOS (all P < .05). Logistic regression showed that an increased length of stay trended toward an increased risk of hernia recurrence (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple patient and hernia characteristics are shown to significantly affect LOS, which, in turn, increases the odds of AWR failure. Weight loss, peri-operative geriatric optimization, prehabilitation of comorbidities, and operating room efficiency can enhance recovery and shorten LOS following AWR.

Emergency General Surgery Regionalization: Retrospective Cohort Study of Emergency General Surgery Patients at a Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients presenting at tertiary care hospitals may bypass local hospitals with adequate resources. However, many tertiary care hospitals frequently operate at capacity. We hypothesized that understanding patient geographic origin could identify opportunities for enhanced system triage and optimization and be an important first step for EGS regionalization and care coordination that could potentially lead to improved utilization of resources. METHODS: We analyzed patient zip code and categorized EGS patients who were cared for at our tertiary care hospital as potentially divertible if the southern region hospital was geographically closer to their home, regional hospital admission (RHA) patients, or local admission (LA) patients if the tertiary care facility was closer. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared for RHA and LA patients. RESULTS: Of 14 714 EGS patients presenting to the tertiary care hospital, 30.2% were categorized as RHA patients. Overall, 1526 (10.4%) patients required an operation including 527 (34.5%) patients who were potentially divertible. Appendectomy and cholecystectomy comprised 66% of the operations for potentially divertible patients. Length of stay was not significantly different (P = .06) for RHA patients, but they did have lower measured short-term and long-term mortality when compared to their LA counterparts (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: EGS diagnoses and patient geocode analysis can identify opportunities to optimize regional operating room and bed utilization. Understanding where EGS patients are cared for and factors that influenced care facility will be critical for next steps in developing EGS regionalization within our system.

The "Frogger Flap": A Novel Quadruple Rhomboid Flap for Complex Central Upper Lip Reconstruction.

Upper lip reconstruction represents a unique challenge for the reconstructive plastic surgeon. Given its prominent aesthetic role in addition to its functional role in facial expression, speech, and oral intake, preservation of this region's natural form and function is paramount. In this report, we present a novel technique for the reconstruction of a complex central upper lip defect, restoring the natural aesthetic of this essential structure. We describe the case of a 51-year-old woman who presented with recurrence of a previously resected basal cell carcinoma center on the upper lip at the level of the white roll and philtral depression. Following surgical resection via Mohs micrographic surgery, a 1.8 × 1.6 cm partial-thickness defect centered around the Cupid bow involving both cutaneous and vermillion tissues remained. Reconstruction was achieved through a novel quadruple rhomboid flap primarily based on the preservation of the aesthetic subunits of the upper lip. A functional and aesthetic reconstruction was achieved through local tissue rearrangement, restoring the appearance of the white roll and red line. Native perfusion and innervation were preserved during the reconstruction of the Cupid bow, recreating this region's natural appearance. The design of the flap resembles a jumping frog, which is the etiology of the "Frogger flap" moniker. The Frogger flap recreates the natural aesthetic of the central upper lip through the geometric transposition of tissue commensurate with native anatomy. Through the application of aesthetic subunit principles, it reliably reconstructs central upper lip defects while preserving function and providing an aesthetically pleasing outcome.

Multicenter analysis of laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repair with mesh: outcomes and quality of life (QoL).

INTRODUCTION: Umbilical hernia repair (UHR) is a common operation with varying surgical approaches. Laparoscopic (LUHR) and open (OUHR) operations are routinely performed, but their impact on quality of life (QoL) is not well described. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative outcomes and QoL of LUHR versus OUHR. METHODS: The prospectively collected International Hernia Mesh Registry was queried for patients undergoing UHR with mesh placement. QoL was measured using the Carolinas Comfort Scale preoperatively and 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Propensity match was performed controlling for hernia defect size (HDS), recurrent hernias, and BMI. RESULTS: 585 patients underwent 178 (30.4%) LUHR and 407 (69.6%) OUHR. LUHR patients had higher BMI, larger HDS, and more recurrent hernias (p < 0.05). Rates of other comorbidities were similar (p > 0.05). Tacks were used more frequently in LUHR (91.6% vs 1.7%, p < 0.001), and suture was used more often in OUHR (97.1% vs 47.8%, p < 0.001). Postoperative outcomes were similar (p > 0.05) except LUHR had higher rates of seroma (13.9% vs 4.3%, p < 0.001). Overall recurrence rates trended to favor OUHR, but not significantly (4.7% vs 8.4%, p = 0.07). The propensity match yielded 138 matched pairs. LUHR had more seromas and OUHR had higher infection rates (p < 0.05). Hernia recurrence was higher following LUHR (9.4% vs 2.9%, p = 0.02). QoL data were available for an average of 457 patients at each time period. QoL was superior in the OUHR group for pain and overall QoL at each time point and activity limitations at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). When examining patients who were asymptomatic preoperatively, OUHR had improved one-month overall QoL, but both groups had over 90% of patients report being asymptomatic postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: OUHR is associated with higher rates of surgical site infections, but significantly lower rates of seroma formation and hernia recurrence compared to LUHR, while having superior QoL in both short- and long-term follow-up. Asymptomatic patients tend to have excellent QoL outcomes.

Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Decreases Wound Morbidity in Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction With Concomitant Panniculectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with concomitant panniculectomy (CP) may be at higher risk for wound complications due to the need for large incisions and tissue undermining. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) decreases wound complications in AWR patients undergoing CP. METHODS: Beginning in February 2018, all patients at this institution who underwent AWR with CP received ciNPT. These patients were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. A standard dressing (non-NPT) group was then created in a 1:1 fashion by identifying patients who had AWR with CP immediately before the beginning of ciNPT use (2016-2018). A univariate comparison was made between the ciNPT and non-NPT groups. The primary outcome was wound complication rate; however, other perioperative outcomes, such as requirement for reoperation, were also tracked. Standard statistical methods and logistic regression were used. RESULTS: In total, 134 patients met criteria, with 67 patients each in the ciNPT and non-NPT groups. When comparing patients in the ciNPT and non-NPT groups, they were demographically similar, including body mass index, smoking, and diabetes (P < 0.05). Hernias was large on average (289.5 ± 158.2 vs 315.3 ± 197.3 cm2, P = 0.92) and predominantly recurrent (58.5% vs 72.6%, P = 0.14). Wound complications were much lower in the ciNPT group (15.6% vs 35.5%, P = 0.01), which was mainly driven by a decrease in superficial wound breakdown (3.1% vs 19.7%, P < 0.01). Patients in the ciNPT group were less likely to require a return trip to the operating room for wound complications (0.0% vs 13.3%, P < 0.01). In logistic regression, the use of ciNPT continued to correlate with reduced wound complication rates (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In AWR with CP, the use of ciNPT significantly decreased the risk of postoperative wound complications, particularly superficial wound breakdown, and lessened the need for wound-related reoperation.

Outcomes and CT scan three-dimensional volumetric analysis of emergent paraesophageal hernia repairs: predicting patients who will require emergent repair.

INTRODUCTION: Elective repair versus watchful waiting remains controversial in paraesophageal hernia (PEH) patients. Generation of predictive factors to determine patients at greatest risk for emergent repair may prove helpful. The aim of this study was to evaluate patients undergoing elective versus emergent PEH repair and supplement this comparison with 3D volumetric analysis of hiatal defect area (HDA) and intrathoracic hernia sac volume (HSV) to determine risk factors for increased likelihood of emergent repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively enrolled, single-center hernia database was performed on all patients undergoing elective and emergent PEH repairs. Patients with adequate preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging were analyzed using volumetric analysis software. RESULTS: Of the 376 PEH patients, 32 (8.5%) were emergent. Emergent patients had lower rates of preoperative heartburn (68.8%vs85.1%, p = 0.016) and regurgitation (21.9%vs40.2%, p = 0.04), with similar rates of other symptoms. Emergent patients more frequently had type IV PEHs (43.8%vs13.5%, p < 0.001). Volumetric analysis was performed on 201 patients, and emergent patients had a larger HSV (805.6 ± 483.5vs398.0 ± 353.1cm3, p < 0.001) and HDA (41.7 ± 19.5vs26.5 ± 14.7 cm2, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, HSV increase of 100cm3 (OR 1.17 CI 1.02-1.35, p = 0.022) was independently associated with greater likelihood of emergent repair. Post-operatively, emergent patients had increased length of stay, major complication rates, ICU utilization, reoperation, and mortality (all p < 0.05). Emergent group recurrence rates were higher and occurred faster secondary to increased use of gastropexy alone as treatment (p > 0.05). With a formal PEH repair, there was no difference in rate or timing of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Emergent patients are more likely to suffer complications, require ICU care, have a higher mortality, and an increased likelihood of reoperation. A graduated increase in HSV increasingly predicts the need for an emergent operation. Those patients presenting electively with a large PEH may benefit from early elective surgery.

Biologic mesh is non-inferior to synthetic mesh in CDC class 1 & 2 open abdominal wall reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Biologic mesh has historically been used in contaminated abdominal wall reconstructions (AWRs). No study has compared outcomes of biologic and synthetic in clean and clean-contaminated hernia ventral hernia repair. METHODS: A prospective AWR database identified patients undergoing open, preperitoneal AWR with biologic mesh in CDC class 1 and 2 wounds. Using propensity score matching, a matched cohort of patients with synthetic mesh was created. The objective was to assess recurrence rates and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were matched in each group. Patient in the biologic group had higher rates of immunosuppression, history of transplantation, and inflammatory bowel disease (p ≤ 0.05). Operative variables were comparable for biologic vs synthetic, including defect size (230.5 ± 135.4 vs 268.7 ± 194.5 cm2, p = 0.62), but the synthetic mesh group had larger meshes placed (575.6 ± 247.0 vs 898.8 ± 246.0 cm2 p < 0.0001). Wound infections (15.5% vs 8.9%, p = 0.28) were equivalent, and recurrence rates (1.7% vs 3.4%, p = 1.00) were similar on follow up (19.3 ± 23.3 vs 23.3 ± 29.7 months, p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In matched, lower risk, complex AWR patients with large hernia defects, biologic and synthetic meshes have equal outcomes.

Delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissues following complex, contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR): a propensity-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Wound complications following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in a contaminated setting are common and significantly increase the risk of hernia recurrence. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of short-term negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) followed by operative delayed primary closure (DPC) of the skin and subcutaneous tissue after AWR in a contaminated setting. METHODS: A prospective institutional hernia database was queried for patients who underwent NPWT-assisted DPC after contaminated AWR between 2008 and 2020. Primary outcomes included wound complication rate and reopening of the incision. A non-DPC group was created using propensity-matching. Standard descriptive statistics were used, and a univariate analysis was performed between the DPC and non-DPC groups. RESULTS: In total, 110 patients underwent DPC following AWR. The hernias were on average large (188 ± 133.6 cm2), often recurrent (81.5%), and 60.5% required a components separation. All patients had CDC Class 3 (14.5%) or 4 (85.5%) wounds and biologic mesh placed. Using CeDAR, the wound complication rate was estimated to be 66.3%. Postoperatively, 26.4% patients developed a wound complication, but only 5.5% patients required reopening of the wound. The rate of recurrence was 5.5% with mean follow-up of 22.6 ± 27.1 months. After propensity-matching, there were 73 patients each in the DPC and non-DPC groups. DPC patients had fewer overall wound complications (23.0% vs 43.9%, p = 0.02). While 4.1% of the DPC group required reopening of the incision, 20.5% of patients in the non-DPC required reopening of the incision (p = 0.005) with an average time to healing of 150 days. Hernia recurrence remained low overall (2.7% vs 5.4%, p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: DPC can be performed with a high rate of success in complex, contaminated AWR patients by reducing the rate of wound complications and avoiding prolonged healing times. In patients undergoing AWR in a contaminated setting, a NPWT-assisted DPC should be considered.

Perceptions and understanding about mesh and hernia surgery: What do patients really think?

BACKGROUND: Surgical mesh and hernia repair have come under increasing scrutiny with large amounts of press, Internet, and social media reportage regarding ongoing mesh litigation, recalls, and patient testimonials. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient perceptions of mesh in hernia surgery. METHODS: A 16-question survey was given to patients presenting for hernia surgery at a tertiary hernia center by trained data analysts before surgeon interaction. RESULTS: Two hundred and two patients were surveyed. Patients believed mesh caused complications (45.1%) and reported concerns about mesh (38.2%). Those who performed their own research, females, and patients with recurrent hernias were more likely to have concerns about mesh (P ≤ 0.03). Most patients (81.7%) thought they were at average risk or less for complications; patients with recurrent hernias (versus primary hernias) and incisional hernias (compared with inguinal or umbilical hernias) had more negative outlooks on complications (all P < .05). Recovery expectations varied, but the failed repair and incisional hernia groups were more likely to expect prolonged recovery (>3 months) (all P < .05). After surgeon-directed education and a mesh education handout, all but one patient agreed to and underwent a mesh repair as indicated. CONCLUSION: Patients had concerns about mesh and were aware of mesh related complications. Patients performing their own research, as well as females and recurrent hernia patients, had worse perceptions of mesh. Recurrent and incisional hernia patients had greater concerns about complications, recurrence, and recovery. Preoperative education concerning mesh and mesh choice for each operation eased patient anxiety.

Are laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs truly comparable?: A propensity-matched study in large ventral hernias.

BACKGROUND: The merits of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (OPPVHR) have been debated for more than 2 decades. Our aim was to determine peri-operative and long-term outcomes in large hernias. METHODS: A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center was queried for patients undergoing LVHR and OPPVHR. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for hernia defect size and follow-up. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-two LVHR and OPPVHR patients were identified with defect sizes closely matched between laparoscopic (182.0 ± 110.0 cm2) and open repairs (178.3 ± 99.8 cm2), p = 0.64. LVHR and OPPVHR patients were comparable: mean age 57.2 ± 12.1 vs 56.6 ± 12.0 years (p = 0.52), BMI: 32.9 ± 6.6 vs 32.0 ± 7.4 kg/m2 (p = 0.16), diabetes 19.0% vs 19.7% (p = 0.87), and smoking history 8.7% vs 23.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. OPPVHR had higher number of recurrent hernias (14.2% vs 44.9%, p < 0.001), longer operative time (168.1 ± 64.3 vs 186.7 ± 67.7 min, p = 0.006), and more components separation (0% vs 20.3%, p < 0.001). Mean mesh size was larger (p < 0.001) in the open group (634.4 ± 243.4 cm2 vs 841.8 ± 277.6 cm2). The hernia recurrence rates were similar (10.8% vs 9.2%, p = 0.62), with average follow-up of 39.3 ± 32.5 vs 40.0 ± 35.0 months (p = 0.89). Length of stay was higher in the OVHR cohort (5.4 ± 3.0 vs 6.3 ± 3.6 days, p < 0.001), but 30-day readmission rates (4.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.31) were similar. Overall wound infection rate (2.9% vs 8.4%, p = 0.03) was higher in the OPPVHR group, but the mesh infection rate was similar between LVHR (1.7%) and OPPVHR (0.6%) (p = 0.33). Postoperative pain (41.1% vs 41.4%, p = 0.95) and overall QOL based on the Carolinas Comfort Scale at 6 months (p = 0.73) and 5-years (p = 0.36) were similar. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic and open preperitoneal repair for large ventral hernias have equivalent hernia recurrence rates, postoperative pain, and QOL on long-term follow-up. Patients undergoing OPPVHR were more likely to be recurrent, complex, require components separation, and more likely to develop postoperative wound complications.

Image-guided botulinum toxin injection in the lateral abdominal wall prior to abdominal wall reconstruction surgery: review of techniques and results.

Ventral hernias represent the most common complication after abdominal surgery. Loss of domain and/or large ventral hernias in patients are especially challenging for surgeons to manage, but preoperative image-guided botulinum toxin injection has emerged as an effective adjunct to abdominal wall surgery. Loss of domain is caused by chronic muscle retraction of the lateral abdominal wall and leads to an irreducible protrusion of abdominal viscera into the hernia sac. Botulinum toxin can be used in the oblique muscles as a chemical component relaxation technique to aid abdominal wall reconstruction. Intramuscular botulinum toxin injection causes functional denervation by blocking neurotransmitter acetylcholine release resulting in flaccid paralysis and elongation of lateral abdominal wall muscles, increasing the rate of fascial closure during abdominal wall reconstruction, and decreasing recurrence rates. In total, 200-300 units of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) or 500 units of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dypsort®) in a 2:1 dilution with normal saline is most commonly used. Botulinum toxin can be injected with ultrasonographic, EMG, or CT guidance. Injection should be performed at least 2 weeks prior to abdominal wall reconstruction, for maximal effect during surgery. At minimum, botulinum toxin should be injected into the external and internal oblique muscles at three separate sites bilaterally for a total of six injections. Although botulinum toxin use for abdominal wall reconstruction is currently not indicated by the Food and Drug Administration, it is safe with only minor complications reported in literature.

Best reoperative strategy for failed fundoplication: redo fundoplication or conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric diversion?

BACKGROUND: Failed fundoplication is a difficult reoperative challenge, with limited evidence differentiating outcomes of a redo fundoplication versus conversion to Roux-en-Y anatomy with a gastric diversion (RYGD). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of these reoperative strategies on symptom resolution. METHODS: A retrospective single institution study of patients with failed fundoplications undergoing conversion to RYGD or redo fundoplication between 2006 and 2019 was conducted. Patient characteristics, preoperative evaluation, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: 180 patients with symptomatic, failed fundoplications were identified: 101 patients (56.1%) underwent conversion to RYGD, and 79 patients (43.9%) underwent redo fundoplication. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly higher for the patients undergoing RYGD with mean BMI of 34.3 ± 6.9 vs 27.7 ± 3.9 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing conversion to RYGD were also more comorbid than their counterparts, with higher rates of obstructive sleep apnea (17.8% vs 5.1%, p = 0.01), but similar rates of hypertension (54.5% vs 44.3%, p = 0.18, asthma/COPD (25.7% vs 16.5%, p = 0.13), diabetes (10.9% vs 10.1%, p = 0.87), and hyperlipidemia (29.7% vs 36.7%, p = 0.32). Mean operative times were significantly higher for the RYGD (359.6 ± 90.4 vs 238.8 ± 75.6 min, p < 0.0001), as was mean estimated blood loss (168.8 ± 207.5 vs 81.0 ± 145.4, p < 0.0001). Conversion rates from minimally invasive to open were similar (10.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.92). The incidence of recurrent reflux symptoms was not significantly different (p = 0.46) between RYGD (16.8%) and redo fundoplication (12.8%), at an average follow-up of 50.6 ± 140.7 vs 34.7 ± 39.2 months, (p = 0.03). For the RYGD cohort, patients also had resolution of other comorbidities including obesity 35.6%, OSA 16.7%, hyperlipidemia 10.0%, hypertension 9.1%, and diabetes 9.1%. On average, patients decreased their BMI by 6.8 ± 5.5 kg/m2 and lost 69.6% of their excess body weight. Mean length of stay was higher in patients undergoing RYGD (5.3 ± 7.3 vs 3.0 ± 1.9 days, p = 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar (9.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.12). The reoperation rate was higher in the RYGD cohort (17.8% vs 2.5%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RYBG and redo fundoplication are equivalent in terms of resolution of reflux. RYGD resulted in significant loss of excess body weight.

Preoperative patient opioid education, standardization of prescriptions, and their impact on overall patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has reached a crisis level in America, and many institutions are implementing new guidelines to decrease opioid prescriptions. Although these may positively impact opioid addiction, its influence on patient satisfaction is inadequately described. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of standardized patient education and postoperative opioid regimens on patient satisfaction. METHODS: General surgery patients were counselled and given educational materials preoperatively regarding postoperative pain management. Inpatient discharge prescriptions were based on milligrams of oral narcotic required 24 hours before discharge. Outpatient procedure prescriptions were standardized. Postoperatively, patients received surveys regarding pain control and satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 198 patients studied, 96% agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their pain control. 92% agreed or strongly agreed they received enough medication; 7% disagreed, and 1% strongly disagreed. Educational materials were evaluated with 97% agreeing or strongly agreeing they received appropriate information concerning when and what to take. Fifty-five patients (28%) refused opioids or did not take any. Only 10 (5%) requested a refill. CONCLUSION: Preoperative education and standardized postoperative narcotic prescribing can be highly effective while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Introduction across broad fields of surgery will allow uniformity for surgeons, trainees, nurses, pharmacists, and patients.

Impact of panniculectomy in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity matched analysis in 624 patients.

INTRODUCTION: In complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR), the role of concomitant panniculectomy has been debated due to concern for increased wound complications that impact outcomes; however, long-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) have not been well described. The aim of our study was to evaluate the outcomes and QOL in patients undergoing AWR with panniculectomy utilizing 3D volumetric-based propensity match. METHODS: A prospective database from a tertiary referral hernia center was queried for patients undergoing open AWR. 3D CT volumetrics were analyzed and a propensity match comparing AWR patients with and without panniculectomy was created including subcutaneous fat volume (SFV). QOL was analyzed using the Carolinas Comfort Scale. RESULTS: Propensity match yielded 312 pairs, all with adequate CT imaging for volumetric analysis. The panniculectomy group had a higher BMI (p = 0.03) and were more likely female (p < 0.0001), but all other demographics and comorbidities were similar. The panniculectomy group was more likely to have undergone prior hernia repair (77% vs 64%, p < 0.001), but hernia area, SFV, and CDC wound class were similar (all p > 0.05). Requirement of component separation (61% vs 50%, p = 0.01) and mesh excision (44% vs 35%, p = 0.02) were higher in the panniculectomy group, but operative time were similar (all p ≥ 0.05). Panniculectomy patients had a higher overall wound occurrence rate (45% vs 32%, p = 0.002) which was differentiated only by a higher rate of wound breakdown (24% vs 14%, p = 0.003); all other specific wound complications were equal (all p ≥ 0.05). Hernia recurrence rates were similar (8% vs 9%, p = 0.65) with an average follow-up of 28 months. Overall QOL was equal at 2 weeks, and 1, 6, and 12 months (all p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite panniculectomy patients and their hernias being more complex, concomitant panniculectomy increased wound complications but did not negatively impact infection rates or long-term outcomes. Concomitant panniculectomy should be considered in appropriate patients to avoid two procedures.

Impact of perforator sparing on anterior component separation outcomes in open abdominal wall reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior component separation (ACS) is a well-established, highly functional technique to achieve fascial closure in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Unfortunately, ACS is also associated with an increased risk of wound complications. Perforator sparing ACS (PS-ACS) has more recently been introduced to maintain the subcutaneous perforators derived from the deep epigastric vessels. The aim of this study is to evaluate wound-related outcomes in patients undergoing open AWR after implementation of a PS-ACS technique. METHODS: A prospectively collected database were queried for patients who underwent open AWR and an ACS from 2006 to 2018. Patients who underwent PS-ACS were compared to patients undergoing ACS using standard statistical methods. Patients undergoing concomitant panniculectomy were included in the standard ACS group. RESULTS: In total, 252 patients underwent ACS, with 24 (9.5%) undergoing PS-ACS. Age and specific comorbidities were similar between groups (all p > 0.05) except for the PS-ACS groups having a higher rate of prior tobacco use (45.8% vs 19.6%, p = 0.003). Mean hernia defect area was 381.6 ± 267.0 cm2 with 64.3% recurrent hernias, and both were similar between groups (all p > 0.05). The PS-ACS group did have more complex wounds with more Ventral Hernia Working Group Grade 3 and 4 hernias (p = 0.04). OR time and length of stay were similar between groups (all p > 0.05). Despite increased complexity, wound complication rates were much lower in the PS-ACS group (20.8% vs 46.1%, p = 0.02), and all specific wound complications were lower but not statistically different. Hernia recurrence rate was similar between PS-ACS and ACS groups (4.2% vs 7.0%, p > 0.99) with mean follow-up of 27.7 ± 26.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: In complex AWR, preservation of the deep epigastric perforating vessels during ACS significantly lowers the rates of wound complications, despite its performance in more complex patients with an increased risk of infection. PS-ACS should be performed preferentially over a standard ACS whenever possible.

Recurrent incisional hernia repairs at a tertiary hernia center: Are outcomes really inferior to initial repairs?

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ventral hernia repairs are reported to have higher recurrence and complication rates than initial ventral hernia repairs. This is the largest analysis of outcomes for initial versus recurrent open ventral hernia repairs reported in the literature. METHODS: A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center was queried for patients undergoing open ventral hernia repairs with complete fascial closure and synthetic mesh placement. RESULTS: A total of 1,694 open ventral hernia repairs patients were identified, including 896 (52.9%) initial ventral hernia repairs and 798 (47.1%)recurrent ventral hernia repairs. Recurrent ventral hernia repair patients were more complex: older (P = .003), higher body mass index (P < .001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < .001), incidence of diabetics (P = .003), comorbidities (P < .001), and larger hernia defects (133.3 ± 171.9 vs 220.2 ± 210.0; P < .001). Recurrent ventral hernia repairs also had longer operative times (161.6 ± 82.4 vs 188.2 ± 68.9 minutes; P < .001), increased use of preoperative botulinum toxin A injection (4.3% vs 10.1%; P = .01), components separation (19.2% vs 39.5%; P < .001), and panniculectomy (20.3% vs 35.8%; P < .001). The overall hernia recurrence rate was 4.4% at a mean follow-up of 36.6 ± 45.5 months. Between the initial ventral hernia repairs and recurrent ventral hernia repairs, the hernia recurrence rates were equivalent (4.2% vs 4.7%, P = .63). Rates of wound infection, seromas, hematomas, mesh infections, and wound related reoperations (P > .05) were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: At a tertiary hernia center, despite higher-risk patients, larger hernia defects, and increased components separation in recurrent ventral hernia repairs, early recurrence rates, wound complications, and reoperations are similar to initial ventral hernia repairs.