Developing a measure of unmet health care needs for a pediatric population.

BACKGROUND: Quantified measures of unmet health care needs can be used to evaluate health care interventions, assess the impact of managed care, monitor health status trends in populations, or assess equity of access to medical care across population subgroups. Such a measure needs to be simple, relatively easy to obtain, inexpensive, and appropriately targeted to the population of interest. OBJECTIVE: To develop a measure of unmet health care needs that is specifically targeted to a pediatric population. SUBJECTS: Study participants consisted of children, aged 1 to 5 years (n = 1,031), and adolescent mothers, aged 13 to 19 years (n = 172), predominantly from poor, minority families in New York City. RESEARCH DESIGN: Based on a measure, the symptoms-response ratio, developed for all age groups, this study replicated Taylor's procedures specifically for children and adolescents. Respondents were asked if they had experienced a set of physical symptoms and if they saw a doctor in response. A panel of pediatricians rated the same symptoms as to whether health care should be sought. RESULTS: The measure achieved adequate inter-rater reliability and good construct validity. The children's overall use of health services did not differ from the pediatric panel's expectations, but with differing degrees of unmet needs by symptom. Adolescents sought care less often than the expert panel members believed they should. CONCLUSIONS: The symptoms-response ratio provides a good balance of a simple and inexpensive measure while yielding a fair estimate of unmet needs for primary care. This analysis created a pediatric measure targeted to the needs of young children and adolescent females.

A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the prostate is the most common surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare this surgery with watchful waiting in men with moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: Of 800 men over the age of 54 years who were screened between July 1986 and July 1989, 556 (mean [+/- SD] age, 66 +/- 5 years) were studied (280 in the surgery group and 276 in the watchful-waiting group). Patients' symptoms and the degree to which they were bothered by urinary difficulties were measured with standardized questionnaires and medical evaluations. The primary outcome measure was treatment failure, which was defined as the occurrence of any of the following: death, repeated or intractable urinary retention, a residual urinary volume over 350 ml, the development of bladder calculus, new and persistent incontinence, a high symptom score, or a doubling of the serum creatinine concentration. Patients were followed for three years. RESULTS: Of the men randomly assigned to the surgery group, 249 underwent surgery within two weeks after the assignment. Surgery was not associated with impotence or urinary incontinence. The average follow-up period was 2.8 years. In an intention-to-treat analysis, there were 23 treatment failures in the surgery group, as compared with 47 in the watchful-waiting group (relative risk, 0.48; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.77). Of the men assigned to the watchful-waiting group, 65 (24 percent) underwent surgery within three years after the assignment. Surgery was associated with improvement in symptoms and in scores for urinary difficulties and interference with activities of daily living (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The outcomes of surgery were best for the men who were most bothered by urinary symptoms at base line. CONCLUSIONS: For men with moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia, surgery is more effective than watchful waiting in reducing the rate of treatment failure and improving genitourinary symptoms. Watchful waiting is usually a safe alternative for men who are less bothered by urinary difficulty or who wish to delay surgery.

Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome prevention. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care physicians.

We conducted a telephone survey of a probability sample of 473 internists, family practitioners, general practitioners, and obstetrician-gynecologists in New York City (NY) in 1988 to assess their knowledge, attitudes, and practices with respect to the prevention of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Although 71% of the physicians had cared for a patient with AIDS and 90% had been involved in ordering the human immunodeficiency virus antibody test, only about a third of them took appropriate sexual histories of new patients and only about a quarter (28%) counseled new patients about reducing the risk of contracting AIDS. Multivariate analysis revealed that physician knowledge about AIDS prevention was associated with younger age, more positive attitude toward homosexual males and intravenous drug users, confidence that counseling would result in behavioral change among patients, and specialty other than obstetrics-gynecology. Results indicate a need for increased training and education of primary care physicians about AIDS prevention.

Health promotion and disease prevention in HMOs: a survey of newly established IPAs in New York City.

Independent Practice Associations (IPAs) are the fastest growing segment of the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) industry, but little is known about their provision of health promotion and disease prevention to subscribers. To examine the extent to which IPA policies encourage health promotion and disease prevention, we interviewed medical directors and other senior administrators of six newly developing IPA-HMOs in New York City. We also reviewed promotional literature to assess how extensively health promotion and disease prevention were marketed to the potential subscriber. Although medical protocols for preventive screening exist in most IPAs, compliance with guidelines is left largely to the individual physician's judgment for implementation. IPA respondents suggested that their physician panels are oriented toward prevention, but there is uncertain evidence in this regard, and incentive payments could discourage referrals for screening. Health education programs are sporadic. Health promotion and disease prevention do not appear to be a high priority among six newly established IPAs in New York City. We recommend several steps that would encourage IPA-HMOs to increase their health promotion activities.

Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients.

A telephone survey of 120 randomly selected primary care physicians in New York City was completed in October, 1984 (response rate = 90%) concerning physicians' recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention. Responses from physicians with 50% or more Black and Hispanic patients were compared with responses from physicians with 50% or more White patients. The former were found to be less likely to follow guidelines from nationally recognized organizations for health promotion and disease prevention, although they were just as likely to value the importance of prevention in primary care. For example, physicians with predominantly Black and Hispanic patient populations were significantly less likely to recommend screening mammography (7% versus 23%) or recommend influenza vaccination for patients 65 or older (48% versus 74%) when compared with physicians with predominantly White patient populations. Factors that appeared to contribute to the difference in prevention practice patterns include physician training and education, the socioeconomic status of the patients, and the time physicians spend with patients. Differences in quality of preventive care provided to minority patients may be an additional factor in the disparity between the health status of White and non-White Americans.

Prevention in primary care: variability in physician practice patterns in New York City.

We conducted a telephone survey of 120 randomly selected primary care physicians in New York City. This survey, which was completed in October 1984, concerned physicians' recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention. The recommendations by these physicians were often at variance with the recommendations of nationally recognized organizations such as the American Cancer Society and the American College of Physicians. Multivariate analysis revealed that board-certified physicians, U.S. medical graduates, and younger physicians agreed more frequently with the recommendations of national organizations. The physicians surveyed agreed upon the need to include health promotion and disease prevention in their practices. Eighty-seven percent agreed with the statement, "Physicians should probably practice more preventive medicine than they presently do." Reasons given for the failure to practice more prevention included lack of time (70 percent), inadequate reimbursement (60 percent), and "unclear recommendations" (58 percent). Approximately four out of five of the physicians felt a task force was needed to "clarify recommendations" for preventive medicine. The findings of this survey suggest a need for increased physician training and education in disease prevention and health promotion.