Inaugural Results of the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy: A Phase II Platform Trial for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Using Bayesian Adaptive Randomization.

PURPOSE: The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial that uses response adaptive randomization and genomic profiling to efficiently identify novel therapies for phase III testing. Three initial experimental arms (abemaciclib [a cyclin-dependent kinase [CDK]4/6 inhibitor], neratinib [an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor], and CC-115 [a deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor]) were simultaneously evaluated against a common control arm. We report the results for each arm and examine the feasibility and conduct of the adaptive platform design. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma were eligible if they had tumor genotyping to identify prespecified biomarker subpopulations of dominant glioblastoma signaling pathways (EGFR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and CDK). Initial random assignment was 1:1:1:1 between control (radiation therapy and temozolomide) and the experimental arms. Subsequent Bayesian adaptive randomization was incorporated on the basis of biomarker-specific progression-free survival (PFS) data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and one-sided P values are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02977780). RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-seven patients were treated (71 control; 73 abemaciclib; 81 neratinib; 12 CC-115) in years 2017-2021. Abemaciclib and neratinib were well tolerated, but CC-115 was associated with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicity in 58% of patients. PFS was significantly longer with abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.06; one-sided P = .046) and neratinib (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.02; one-sided P = .033) relative to the control arm but there was no PFS benefit with CC-115 (one-sided P = .523). None of the experimental therapies demonstrated a significant OS benefit (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The INSIGhT design enabled efficient simultaneous testing of three experimental agents using a shared control arm and adaptive randomization. Two investigational arms had superior PFS compared with the control arm, but none demonstrated an OS benefit. The INSIGhT design may promote improved and more efficient therapeutic discovery in glioblastoma. New arms have been added to the trial.

Association of Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccination With Extension of Survival Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Phase 3 Prospective Externally Controlled Cohort Trial.

Importance: Glioblastoma is the most lethal primary brain cancer. Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor, and new treatments are needed. Objective: To investigate whether adding autologous tumor lysate-loaded dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax-L) to standard of care (SOC) extends survival among patients with glioblastoma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 3, prospective, externally controlled nonrandomized trial compared overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM) and recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) treated with DCVax-L plus SOC vs contemporaneous matched external control patients treated with SOC. This international, multicenter trial was conducted at 94 sites in 4 countries from August 2007 to November 2015. Data analysis was conducted from October 2020 to September 2021. Interventions: The active treatment was DCVax-L plus SOC temozolomide. The nGBM external control patients received SOC temozolomide and placebo; the rGBM external controls received approved rGBM therapies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and secondary end points compared overall survival (OS) in nGBM and rGBM, respectively, with contemporaneous matched external control populations from the control groups of other formal randomized clinical trials. Results: A total of 331 patients were enrolled in the trial, with 232 randomized to the DCVax-L group and 99 to the placebo group. Median OS (mOS) for the 232 patients with nGBM receiving DCVax-L was 19.3 (95% CI, 17.5-21.3) months from randomization (22.4 months from surgery) vs 16.5 (95% CI, 16.0-17.5) months from randomization in control patients (HR = 0.80; 98% CI, 0.00-0.94; P = .002). Survival at 48 months from randomization was 15.7% vs 9.9%, and at 60 months, it was 13.0% vs 5.7%. For 64 patients with rGBM receiving DCVax-L, mOS was 13.2 (95% CI, 9.7-16.8) months from relapse vs 7.8 (95% CI, 7.2-8.2) months among control patients (HR, 0.58; 98% CI, 0.00-0.76; P < .001). Survival at 24 and 30 months after recurrence was 20.7% vs 9.6% and 11.1% vs 5.1%, respectively. Survival was improved in patients with nGBM with methylated MGMT receiving DCVax-L compared with external control patients (HR, 0.74; 98% CI, 0.55-1.00; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, adding DCVax-L to SOC resulted in clinically meaningful and statistically significant extension of survival for patients with both nGBM and rGBM compared with contemporaneous, matched external controls who received SOC alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00045968.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Expression in Meningioma: A Promising Theranostic Target.

Meningioma is the most common intracranial neoplasm, yet there is no effective therapy for recurrent/refractory meningiomas after surgery and radiation. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an enzyme upregulated on endothelial cells of multiple neoplasms and is being investigated as a theranostic target. Until now, PSMA has not been studied in meningiomas. We aimed to verify PSMA endothelial expression in meningiomas, detect tumor grade variability, and investigate the relationship of PSMA signal with tumor recurrence. We analyzed 96 archival meningiomas including 58 de novo and 38 recurrent specimens. All specimens were stained routinely and immunostained for CD31 and PSMA. Slides were scanned and analyzed producing raw data for images of PSMA, CD31, PSMA/CD31, and PSMA/vasculature. PSMA expression was seen within 98.9% of meningioma samples. In the total cohort, higher-grade tumors had increased expression of raw PSMA and PSMA/CD31, and PSMA/vasculature ratios compared to grade 1 tumors. PSMA expression and PSMA/vasculature ratios (p = 0.0015) were higher in recurrent versus de novo tumors among paired samples. ROC curves demonstrated PSMA/CD31, PSMA/vasculature, and raw CD31 as indicators of tumor recurrence. Thus, PSMA is expressed within endothelial cells of meningiomas, is increased with tumor grade and recurrence, and persists with prior irradiation.

Predicting access to postoperative treatment after glioblastoma resection: an analysis of neighborhood-level disadvantage using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI).

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health (SDoH)-socioeconomic and environmental factors-impact outcomes. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a composite of seventeen SDoH factors, has been correlated with poorer outcomes. We aimed to compare outcomes and treatment access for glioblastoma, a universally fatal malignant brain tumor, in patients more (ADI 34-100%) versus less disadvantaged (ADI 0-33%). METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study of Rhode Island Hospital and Mayo Clinic databases was conducted from 2012 to 2017 for patients ≥ 18 years with glioblastoma. Patient addresses were matched to ADI percentiles and grouped into more (top 66% ADI) and less disadvantaged. Adjusted multivariable regressions were used to compare outcomes between groups. RESULTS: A total of 434 patients met inclusion; 92.9% were insured, 56.2% were more disadvantaged (n = 244), and the more disadvantaged cohort was younger on average (62 years). After adjustment, the more disadvantaged group had decreased odds of receiving gross total resection (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.43, 95% CI [0.27-0.68]; p < 0.001). This cohort also had decreased odds of undergoing chemotherapy (aOR 0.51[0.26-0.98]), radiation (aOR 0.39[0.20-0.77]), chemoradiation (aOR 0.42[0.23-0.77]), tumor-treating fields (aOR 0.39[0.16-0.93]), and clinical trial participation (aOR 0.47[0.25-0.91]). No differences in length of survival or postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status Scale were observed. CONCLUSION: More disadvantaged glioblastoma patients had decreased odds of receiving gross total resection. They also exhibited decreased odds of receiving standard of care like chemoradiation as well as participating in a clinical trial, compared to the less disadvantaged group. More research is needed to identify modifiable SDoH barriers to post-operative treatment in disadvantaged patients with glioblastoma.

Dimorphic glioblastoma with glial and epithelioid phenotypes: Clonal evolution and immune selection.

Purpose: Epithelioid glioblastoma is an unusual histologic variant of malignant glioma. The present study investigates both the genomic and transcriptomic determinants that may promote the development of this tumor. Methods: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-transcriptome sequencing (WTS) were performed on an epithelioid glioblastoma, along with a specific bioinformatic pipeline to generate electronic karyotyping and investigate the tumor immune microenvironment. Microdissected sections containing typical glioblastoma features and epithelioid morphology were analyzed separately using the same methodologies. Results: An epithelioid glioblastoma, with immunopositivity for GFAP, Olig-2, and ATRX but negative for IDH-1 and p53, was identified. The tumor cell content from microdissection was estimated to be 85-90% for both histologic tumor components. WES revealed that both glioma and epithelioid sections contained identical point mutations in PTEN, RB1, TERT promoter, and TP53. Electronic karyotype analysis also revealed similar chromosomal copy number alterations, but the epithelioid component showed additional abnormalities that were not found in the glioblastoma component. The tumor immune microenvironments were strikingly different and WTS revealed high levels of transcripts from myeloid cells as well as M1 and M2 macrophages in the glioma section, while transcripts from CD4+ lymphocytes and NK cells predominated in the epithelioid section. Conclusion: Epithelioid glioblastoma may be genomically more unstable and oncogenically more advanced, harboring an increased number of mutations and karyotype abnormalities, compared to typical glioblastomas. The tumor immune microenvironment is also different.

Cancer and Peripheral Nerve Disease.

Patients with cancer may experience neuropathy at any stage of malignancy, ranging from symptoms that are the earliest signs of cancer to side effects of treatment. Peripheral nerves are affected most commonly in a symmetric, stocking-glove pattern. Sensory neuronopathies, plexopathies, and radiculopathies may also be seen. The most common type of neuropathy in patients with cancer is related to chemotherapy, and recently peripheral nerve complications have been described as an effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors too. Other causes include paraneoplastic syndromes, direct tumor infiltration, and radiation. Treatment focuses on addressing the underlying cancer and management of neuropathic pain.

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan and Metronomic Temozolomide for Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: BrUOG329, A Phase I Brown University Oncology Research Group Trial.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal formulations may improve the solubility and bioavailability of drugs potentially increasing their ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. We performed a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose and preliminary efficacy of pegylated nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI)+metronomic temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with glioblastoma who progressed after at least 1 line of therapy were eligible. All patients received TMZ 50 mg/m2/d until disease progression. Three dose levels of nal-IRI were planned, 50, 70, and 80 mg/m2, intravenously every 2 weeks. Patients were accrued in a 3+3 design. The study included a preliminary assessment after the first 13 evaluable patients. The trial would be terminated early if 0 or 1 responses were observed in these patients. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated over 2 dose levels (nal-IRI 50 and 70 mg/m2). At dose level 2, nal-IRI 70 mg/m2, 2 of 3 patients developed dose-limiting toxicities including 1 patient who developed grade 4 neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea and anorexia and 1 patient with grade 3 diarrhea, hypokalemia fatigue, and anorexia. Accrual to dose level 1 was expanded to 9 patients. The Drug Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviewed the data of the initial 12 patients-there were 0/12 responses (0%) and the median progression-free survival was 2 months and accrual was halted. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of nal-IRI was 50 mg/m2 every 2 weeks with TMZ 50 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and neutropenia. No activity was seen at interim analysis and the study was terminated.

Correction to: First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of one of the author names. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author names are indicated and the author name has been updated in the original publication. The authors also reported an error in the Methods section of the original article. In this Correction the incorrect and correct versions of the affected sentence are indicated. The original article has not been updated with regards to the error in the Methods section.

First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This Phase 3 trial evaluates the addition of an autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax®-L) to standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: After surgery and chemoradiotherapy, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive temozolomide plus DCVax-L (n = 232) or temozolomide and placebo (n = 99). Following recurrence, all patients were allowed to receive DCVax-L, without unblinding. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 331), median OS (mOS) was 23.1 months from surgery. Because of the cross-over trial design, nearly 90% of the ITT population received DCVax-L. For patients with methylated MGMT (n = 131), mOS was 34.7 months from surgery, with a 3-year survival of 46.4%. As of this analysis, 223 patients are ≥ 30 months past their surgery date; 67 of these (30.0%) have lived ≥ 30 months and have a Kaplan-Meier (KM)-derived mOS of 46.5 months. 182 patients are ≥ 36 months past surgery; 44 of these (24.2%) have lived ≥ 36 months and have a KM-derived mOS of 88.2 months. A population of extended survivors (n = 100) with mOS of 40.5 months, not explained by known prognostic factors, will be analyzed further. Only 2.1% of ITT patients (n = 7) had a grade 3 or 4 adverse event that was deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. Overall adverse events with DCVax were comparable to standard therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of DCVax-L to standard therapy is feasible and safe in glioblastoma patients, and may extend survival. Trial registration Funded by Northwest Biotherapeutics; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00045968; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00045968?term=NCT00045968&rank=1 ; initially registered 19 September 2002.

PPX and Concurrent Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Without MGMT Methylation: A Randomized Phase II Study: BrUOG 244.

PURPOSE: Efficacy signals but substantial myelosuppression were demonstrated in a single arm phase II study of paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX) in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) for first-line treatment of glioblastoma. The objective of this randomized phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of single-agent PPX with RT (PPX/RT) versus TMZ with RT (TMZ/RT) for glioblastoma without O-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT without prior chemotherapy or RT were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to PPX, 50 mg/m/wk for 6 weeks, or standard TMZ, with concurrent 60.0 Gy RT. One month after completion of chemoradiation all patients received standard maintenance TMZ. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Of the 164 patients enrolled, 86 were MGMT unmethylated. Of these, 63 patients were randomized (42 to PPX/RT and 21 to TMZ/RT). Fifty-nine patients could be analyzed. The median PFS was 9 months in the PPX/RT group and 9.5 months in the TMZ/RT group (hazard ratio in the PPX/RT group, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-2.08; P=0.75). Median overall survival was 16 versus 14.8 months for PPX/RT and TMZ/RT groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-2.77; P=0.27). In the PPX and TMZ groups 44% versus 22% of patients, respectively, experienced one or more grade 3 or higher toxicities during chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS: PPX/RT did not improve PFS or overall survival. This study provides an effective trial design for screening RT sensitizers in glioblastoma.

Longitudinal DSC-MRI for Distinguishing Tumor Recurrence From Pseudoprogression in Patients With a High-grade Glioma.

OBJECTIVE: For patients with high-grade glioma on clinical trials it is important to accurately assess time of disease progression. However, differentiation between pseudoprogression (PsP) and progressive disease (PD) is unreliable with standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI (DSC-MRI) can measure relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and may help distinguish PsP from PD. METHODS: A subset of patients with high-grade glioma on a phase II clinical trial with temozolomide, paclitaxel poliglumex, and concurrent radiation were assessed. Nine patients (3 grade III, 6 grade IV), with a total of 19 enhancing lesions demonstrating progressive enhancement (≥25% increase from nadir) on postchemoradiation conventional contrast-enhanced MRI, had serial DSC-MRI. Mean leakage-corrected rCBV within enhancing lesions was computed for all postchemoradiation time points. RESULTS: Of the 19 progressively enhancing lesions, 10 were classified as PsP and 9 as PD by biopsy/surgery or serial enhancement patterns during interval follow-up MRI. Mean rCBV at initial progressive enhancement did not differ significantly between PsP and PD (2.35 vs. 2.17; P=0.67). However, change in rCBV at first subsequent follow-up (-0.84 vs. 0.84; P=0.001) and the overall linear trend in rCBV after initial progressive enhancement (negative vs. positive slope; P=0.04) differed significantly between PsP and PD. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal trends in rCBV may be more useful than absolute rCBV in distinguishing PsP from PD in chemoradiation-treated high-grade gliomas with DSC-MRI. Further studies of DSC-MRI in high-grade glioma as a potential technique for distinguishing PsP from PD are indicated.

Updates in Molecular Pathology of Central Nervous System Gliomas in Adults.

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms divided into two broad categories, glial and non-glial. Non-glial tumors are derived from such diverse structures as the pineal gland, meninges, germ cells, and hematopoietic cells, as well as metastases. Primary glial neoplasms, or those which originate from astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, or ependymal cells, include astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, ependymomas, and mixed gliomas. Each entity has a unique morphology and pattern of biologic behavior which portends a distinct prognosis and outcome. Individual outcomes show some variability based on tumor location and age of symptom onset; however, the underlying aggressiveness of the tumor often dictates the time course of the disease. With the advent and widespread use of fluorescent in-situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques, molecular phenotyping of brain tumors has become mainstream and is now an integral part of patient care. The molecular genetics of CNS tumors is a rapidly growing field, and the volume of discoveries is growing at an ever increasing rate, compelling the need for updates in this exciting area of science.

Paclitaxel poliglumex, temozolomide, and radiation for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a Brown University Oncology Group Study.

OBJECTIVES: Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX), a drug conjugate that links paclitaxel to poly-L-glutamic acid, is a potent radiation sensitizer. Prior studies in esophageal cancer have demonstrated that PPX (50 mg/m/wk) can be administered with concurrent radiation with acceptable toxicity. The primary objective of this study was to determine the safety of the combination of PPX with temozolomide and concurrent radiation for high-grade gliomas. METHODS: Eligible patients were required to have WHO grade 3 or 4 gliomas. Patients received weekly PPX (50 mg/m/wk) combined with standard daily temozolomide (75 mg/m) for 6 weeks with concomitant radiation (2.0 Gy, 5 d/wk for a total dose of 60 Gy). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, 17 with glioblastoma and 8 with grade 3 gliomas. Seven of 25 patients had grade 4 myelosuppression. Hematologic toxicity lasted up to 5 months suggesting a drug interaction between PPX and temozolomide. For patients with glioblastoma, the median progression-free survival was 11.5 months and the median overall survival was 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: PPX could not be safely combined with temozolomide due to grade 4 hematologic toxicity. However, the favorable progression-free and overall survival suggest that PPX may enhance radiation for glioblastoma. A randomized study of single agent PPX/radiation versus temozolomide/radiation for glioblastoma without MGMT methylation is underway.

Treatment outcomes for patients with glioblastoma multiforme and a low Karnofsky Performance Scale score on presentation to a tertiary care institution. Clinical article.

OBJECT: The object of this study was to determine the benefit of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and a low Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score. METHODS: The authors retrospectively evaluated the records of patients who underwent primary treatment for pathologically confirmed GBM and with a KPS score ≤ 50 on initial evaluation for radiation therapy at a tertiary care institution between 1977 and 2006. Seventy-four patients with a median age of 69 years (range 19-88 years) and a median KPS score of 50 (range 20-50) were retrospectively grouped into the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Classes IV (11 patients), V (15 patients), and VI (48 patients). Patients underwent biopsy (38 patients) or tumor resection (36 patients). Forty-seven patients received radiation. Nineteen patients also received chemotherapy (53% temozolomide), initiated concurrently (47%) or after radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median survival overall was 2.3 months (range 0.2-48 months). Median survival stratified by RPA Classes IV, V, and VI was 6.6, 6.6, and 1.8 months, respectively (p < 0.001, log-rank test). Median survival for patients receiving radiation (5.2 months) was greater than that for patients who declined radiation (1.6 months, p < 0.001). Patients in RPA Class VI appeared to benefit from radiotherapy only when tumor resection was also performed. The median survival from treatment initiation was greater for patients receiving chemotherapy concomitantly with radiotherapy (9.8 months) as compared with radiotherapy alone (1.7 months, p = 0.002). Of 20 patients seen for follow-up in the clinic at a median of 48 days (range 24-196 days) following radiotherapy, 70% were noted to have an improvement in the KPS score of between 10 and 30 points from the baseline score. On multivariate analysis, only RPA class (p = 0.01), resection (HR = 0.37, p = 0.001), and radiation therapy (HR = 0.39, p = 0.02) were significant predictors of a decreased mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a KPS score ≤ 50 appear to have increased survival and functional status following tumor resection and radiation. The extent of benefit from concomitant chemotherapy is unclear. Future studies may benefit from reporting that utilizes a prognostic classification system such as the RTOG RPA class, which has been shown to be effective at separating outcomes even in patients with low performance status. Patients with GBMs and low KPS scores need to be evaluated in prospective studies to identify the extent to which different therapies improve outcomes.

Aggressive treatment is appropriate for glioblastoma multiforme patients 70 years old or older: a retrospective review of 206 cases.

Elderly patients have largely been excluded from randomized trials for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We reviewed the results of treatment approaches, which included surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation in this group of patients. Patients were treated during the period 1979-2007 and were 70 years of age and older with histologically confirmed GBM. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint of this retrospective study. Two hundred six patients 70 years of age and older were identified. Median age was 75 years (range 70-90). Median OS time was 4.5 months. Univariate analysis showed that OS was significantly impacted by KPS score (1.8 months for KPS ≤ 50 to 17.2 months for KPS ≥ 90, P < .001), age at diagnosis (5.1 months for age 70-79 versus 3.1 months for age ≥ 80, P < .001), and extent of disease (worse for bilateral disease [P = .003], multifocal disease [P = .005], and multicentric disease [P = .02]). On multivariate analysis, higher KPS score (P = .006), surgical resection (any surgery beyond biopsy) (P < .001), radiation therapy (P < .001), and chemotherapy (P < .001) were all found to be independently associated with improved OS. In this study of newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients over the age of 70 years, aggressive treatment with radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery is associated with OS.

Irinotecan and bevacizumab in progressive primary brain tumors, an evaluation of efficacy and safety.

Recurrent high-grade gliomas are resistant to chemotherapy and have poor prognosis. The combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab has been reported to be an active regimen in the treatment of this disease. Herein we report our experience with this regimen with the objective of evaluating its efficacy and examining its safety profile. We performed a retrospective review of 27 patients with recurrent or progressive high-grade gliomas treated at the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center from 7/2005 through 10/2006. Patients with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen were included. Patients with prior irinotecan or bevacizumab were excluded. Outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis and estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age of the group was 46 years and the median number of prior therapies was two. Eighteen of 27 patients have progressed, and 11 patients have died at time of analysis. Progression-free survival at 6 months is 46% and overall survival at 6 months is 84% with a median overall survival of 12.6 months. Of 12 patients with pretreatment radiographic evidence of intracranial hemorrhage, only one developed symptomatic progression of hemorrhage that required termination of therapy. Our experience suggests that the combination of irinotecan and bevacizumab improves the outcome in progressive high-grade gliomas when compared to historical results. While the rate of severe toxicities is consistent with prior reports and mandates careful selection of patients, asymptomatic, stable intracranial blood products or hemorrhage is likely not an absolute contraindication to therapy.