Evaluation of a bedside immunotest to predict individual anti-tetanus seroprotection: a prospective concordance study of 1018 adults in an emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Unscheduled tetanus prophylaxis (UTP) used in the emergency room (ER) in patients with wounds who are unaware of their vaccination history is erroneous in 40% of cases. Evaluation of bedside tetanus immunity with the Tétanos Quick Stick (TQS) test may improve UTP. OBJECTIVES: To show that (1) a positive TQS result reflects immunity to tetanus; and (2) TQS is reproducible by ER workers. METHODS: In a prospective concordance study, immunity to tetanus of patients with wounds was assessed by two techniques: (1) TQS at the bedside, which detects specific tetanus antitoxins at concentrations > or =0.2 IU/ml in whole blood or > or =0.1 IU/ml in serum; (2) ELISA in the laboratory (threshold >0.1 IU/ml). The study comprised three groups: (A) healthcare personnel self-tested with the two techniques to determine the effect of training; (B) selected patients with wounds were double-tested with TQS by two healthcare providers whose readings were compared to test reproducibility; and (C) all patients with wounds aged > or =15 years were consecutively included. RESULTS: Of 1018 individuals included, 60 were in group A, 50 were in group B and 908 were in group C. 403 patients who were not included were similar to those included for age, vaccination history and types of wounds. The reproducibility of the test was 98%. TQS sensitivity was 83.0%, specificity 97.5%, positive predictive value 99.6% and negative predictive value 42.9%. CONCLUSIONS: TQS reliably predicts tetanus immunity and is reproducible by healthcare providers. Although it may not accurately discriminate between patients with ongoing and declining immunity, it is currently the most sensitive and specific tool for guiding tetanus prophylaxis and should be included in current guidelines on UTP.

[A prospective study of antibiotic prescribing in an emergency care unit]. / Evaluation de la qualité des prescriptions d'antibiotiques dans le service d'accueil des urgences d'un CHU en région parisienne.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the quality of the initial prescription of antibiotics in an emergency care unit (ECU). DESIGN: A two-week prospective observational study was performed in the ECU Ambroise-Paré covering all patients that were given antibiotic prescriptions. The antibiotic treatments were reviewed by medical experts and confronted with the recommendations of the local guide to antibiotic protocols (referential). Treatments were considered appropriate if indication, choice of the molecule, and route of administration complied to protocols; unacceptable if the indication or the choice of antibiotic was incorrect; debatable in all other cases. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were reviewed over the two-week period. Treatments were prescribed mainly for urinary infections (31 cases), pulmonary (26) or cutaneous (23). In 84.5% of cases, indication was present in the referential. Beta-lactams accounted for 60% of prescriptions, followed by fluoroquinolones (32.5%). By combining three criteria (indication, choice and route of administration), only 54% of prescriptions were considered appropriate, 31% were debatable, and 15% unacceptable. Analysis showed that the quality of antibiotherapy was significantly better if the prescriber was informed about the inquiry and if the indication was present in the guidelines. CONCLUSION: The antibiotherapy manual is an indispensable tool for prescribers in the ECU, but it is insufficient to guarantee the quality of antibiotic prescriptions. Training sessions must be set up for emergency doctors, and the intervention of an infectious diseases specialist, as well as discussions about repeated clinical audit results, should enable a better use of antibiotics in the emergency unit.

[Bronchial involvement in an immunocompetent adult with varicella pneumonia]. / Atteinte bronchique au cours d'une pneumonie varicelleuse chez un adulte immunocompétent.

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonitis caused by varicella infection is a serious and potentially life-threatening complication of the disease when it occurs in adults. The incidence of this complication has increased in the last 10 years. OBSERVATION: We report the case of a non-immunocompromised patient admitted to hospital because of varicella pneumonia not requiring intensive care. Bronchoscopy revealed vesicular lesions on the bronchial mucosa. The patient made a full recovery with anti-viral therapy. CONCLUSION: Vesicular lesions can be observed on the bronchial mucosa of adult patients with varicella zoster infection.

Comparative activity of telithromycin against macrolide-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae: results of two years of the PROTEKT surveillance study.

UNLABELLED: The increase in resistance to macrolides has been linked with increasing use of these agents as empirical therapy for community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTIs). As part of the ongoing PROTEKT (Prospective Resistant Organism Tracking and Epidemiology for the Ketolide Telithromycin) surveillance program, over 7600 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were collected worldwide from 1999-2001 and evaluated for macrolide resistance. Globally, macrolide resistance was 31-33%, with considerable inter-country variation (<10-88%) and particularly high prevalence in the Far East (>71%). In Europe, France had the most resistant isolates (>53%). The highest rates of macrolide resistance were seen in 0-2 year olds. Co-resistance to clindamycin (64%) and all beta-lactams (14-79%) was seen among macrolide-resistant isolates, but >99% of these isolates were susceptible to telithromycin, vancomycin and linezolid. There was considerable variation in the prevalence of erm(B) (56-64%) and mef(A) (30-35%): erm(B) was prevalent in Europe and mef(A) in North America. Globally, 5-7% isolates carried both mechanisms (erm(B)+mef(A)); of these, 47-65% were from South Korea. These double resistance isolates were >90% resistant to the beta-lactams, except amoxicillin-clavulanate. Clindamycin was active against >98% mef(A) but poorly active against erm(B) and erm(B)+mef(A) isolates. Telithromycin, vancomycin and linezolid were highly active (>99.5%) across all three genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro, telithromycin, vancomycin and linezolid are highly active against antibiotic-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Telithromycin may be a useful therapeutic alternative to macrolides for the treatment of CARTIs.

Asthma severity and adequacy of management in accident and emergency departments in France: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines have enabled doctors to establish accident and emergency department management strategies for acute asthma on the basis of severity of exacerbations at presentation. However, there is no available information on acute asthma patients classified according to severity of disease. Our aim was to describe the severity of such exacerbations at presentation, and the adequacy of treatment and management. METHODS: We did a 12-month multicentre cross-sectional observational cohort study in adult patients with acute asthma who attended one of 37 accident and emergency departments in France. The doctors who examined the patients obtained information using a formatted chart. We classified exacerbations according to severity (life-threatening, severe, or mild to moderate), on the basis of clinical findings and peak expiratory flow value, as defined by currently used guidelines. FINDINGS: Of 3772 patients with acute asthma, 975 (26%) had life-threatening attacks, 1834 (49%) had severe exacerbations without life-threatening features, and 963 (26%) had mild to moderate exacerbations. Initial treatment included nebulised b2 agonists, anticholinergics, and systemic corticosteroids in 3492 (93%), 1841 (49%), and 2252 (60%), respectively. According to severity classification, anticholinergics were used in 494 (51%), 913 (50%), and 434 (45%) of patients in life-threatening, severe, and mild to moderate exacerbations groups, respectively; corticosteroids were given in 666 (68%), 1117 (61%), and 468 (49%), respectively. The overall admission rate was 54.2%, and mean stay was 6.1 (SD 6.0) days. Patients were admitted in 747 (77%), 1018 (55%), and 278 (29%) of cases in life-threatening, severe, and mild to moderate groups, respectively. Three patients died in hospital. INTERPRETATION: Acute asthma exacerbations are often life-threatening in patients who attend accident and emergency departments, and management of patients is not ideal, mainly because of underuse of corticosteroids and inappropriate admission rates according to severity.

Prognostic factors in unintentional mild carbon monoxide poisoning.

OBJECTIVES: To identify early predictors of recovery from mild carbon monoxide poisoning, and to search for qualitative interactions between subsets of patients and treatment effects. DESIGN AND SETTING: Inception cohort study from a 4-year, randomised, controlled trial, which compared normobaric oxygen therapy to the combination of normobaric plus hyperbaric oxygen therapy in 307 patients. Study was conducted at a hyperbaric oxygen therapy referral centre. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Victims of unintentional, non-fire-related, domestic, carbon monoxide intoxication were evaluated if the time elapsed from end of exposure to hospital admission was less than 12 h, the carboxyhaemoglobin level was greater than or equal to 10% or 5% for smoker or non-smoker, respectively, and if they did not suffer a loss of consciousness. One course of hyperbaric oxygen therapy or 6-h normobaric oxygen therapy was given. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The main outcome measure was status at the 1-month recovery. Of the 307 evaluated patients, 206 (67%, 95%CI: 62%-72%) had recovered at 1 month. None of the patients died or suffered severe sequelae. Apathy and headaches were the main moderate sequelae. The multivariate analysis selected dizziness before admission (OR=1.92, [1.17-3.15], p=0.010) and headaches upon hospital admission (OR=2.14, [1.09-4.17], p=0.026) as jointly associated with persistent neurological symptoms. No significant crossover interaction between each combination of these two predictors and treatment effects was observed. CONCLUSIONS: At 1 month after mild carbon monoxide intoxication, victims who presented with dizziness before hospital admission or headaches upon admission have an increased risk of minor persistent neurological symptoms, but almost all patients could resume their former occupation.

Relevance in the emergency department of a decisional algorithm for outpatient care of women with acute pyelonephritis.

The outcome of three types of management for patients with acute pyelonephritis, in an emergency department is assessed. This was carried out by a prospective enrolment of patients with acute pyelonephritis. Through a decisional algorithm, doctors were encouraged to discharge female patients under 60 years with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis, either directly from the emergency ward or after a short stay in the observation unit. All received a single intravenous dose of pefloxacin, after urine and blood cultures were obtained; before discharge a normal ultrasonography of the abdomen and the pelvis was required. Conversely, hospitalization was advised for patients who did not fit the criteria of uncomplicated pyelonephritis. Only females with positive urine cultures qualified. Of 83 patients enrolled, 70 were females with positive urine cultures, 60 of whom had uncomplicated pyelonephritis. At 3 weeks, two of 70 patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 68, favourable outcome was observed in 98% of 48 patients discharged from the observation unit (95% CI: [94%; 100%]), 90% of 10 discharged from the emergency ward (95% CI: [73%; 100%]) and 70% of 10 hospitalized (95% CI: [50%; 93%]). A decisional algorithm was useful in determining that over 85% of women who present to our emergency department with pyelonephritis have an uncomplicated form and may be safely treated as outpatients, if necessary after a brief stay in the observation unit. Prospective controlled trials are needed to determine duration of antimicrobial therapy, length of follow-up and finally, to compare tolerance and cost-effectiveness of outpatient vs. inpatient care of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis.

Impact of guidelines to alter antitetanus prophylaxis practices and reduce costs in the emergency department.

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an intervention to modify antitetanus prophylaxis of open wounds. This prospective, before-and-after study was conducted in an emergency department of a large metropolitan hospital. Consecutive patients with open wounds were managed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines before an intervention, then according to new guidelines afterwards. Locally developed guidelines were introduced and backed up by a teaching program, with emphasis on reducing unwarranted human tetanus immunoglobulins and costs. Serum tetanus antitoxins level was measured in postintervention patients mainly to verify the soundness of the intervention, eventually to complete patients' protection during follow-up, and to derive more reliable recommendations for the future. Main outcome measures included the number of treatments conforming to each set of guidelines, the rate of tetanus immunoglobulin prescriptions, and the cost of each strategy. Two groups of 389 and 459 patients were included. Treatment conforming to guidelines increased from 60% to 79%, undertreatment decreased from 31% to 19%, and overtreatment decreased from 9% to 2% (P < 0.001). Tetanus immunoglobulin prescriptions decreased from 23% to 1% (P < 0.001). On the basis of antitoxins level, 60% of 367 postintervention patients were correctly treated, 29% were overtreated, and 11% were undertreated. Nevertheless, with the WHO guidelines, only 49% would have been correctly treated, 39% would have been overtreated (29% with immunoglobulins), and 12% would have been undertreated (P < 0.001). Costs decreased from $32 to $24 per patient. New guidelines resulted in improved tetanus prophylaxis at reduced costs in an emergency department. Because they rely on immunization history, however, guidelines currently in use are misleading. More reliable recommendations, including a test for tetanus antibody status in some cases, are needed.

A new quantitative D-dimer assay appropriate in emergency: reliability of the assay for pulmonary embolism exclusion diagnosis.

Plasma D-dimers, degradation products of cross-linked fibrin, are elevated in several thrombotic diseases. In the last decade, their measurement has been performed with specific monoclonal antibody based ELISA assay, with a high negative predictive value of such pathologies. However these methods have a low clinical impact since they cannot be used in emergency because they are time consuming and require series. Recently, rapid tests have been proposed with similar accuracy and are feasible for use in emergency conditions. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential value of a new quantitative rapid assay, based on agglutination of latex microparticles coated with two monoclonal antibodies specific for D-dimers (Liatest D-Di, Diagnostica Stago), in the exclusion diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE). Eighty-five consecutive suspected PE patients were included in the study. D-dimer determination was performed with both standard ELISA and Liatest D-Di just before pulmonary scintigraphy. Sixty-nine patients were free of PE and 16 had PE. Our results confirm the excellent sensitivity and negative predictive values of the conventional D-dimer ELISA. Using a cut-off value of 500 ng/ml, the sensitivity and the negative predictive values of Liatest D-Di were 94% and 96%, respectively. Only one case of PE had a D-dimer value at 480 ng/ml, close to the cut-off value. This study demonstrates that the Liatest D-Di assay is sensitive enough to be used as the first step in the assessment of PE. However, the best cut-off value has to be determined to get an exclusion diagnosis with certainty.

Prospective assessment of an intervention to rationalize prescribing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Guidelines for the prescription of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), drawn in the Health Ministry and published by the Drug Regulatory Agency, were introduced in the emergency department of a university hospital. The main objective was to determine, in this prospective, before-and-after study, whether a teaching program could help doctors improve their NSAID prescribing practices. Correct prescribing included limiting NSAIDs to their most admitted indications, avoiding their prescription to accident-prone patients, and reducing treatment duration and daily dosage. An overall reduction of NSAID prescriptions was also expected. Prescribing errors were divided into violations (prescribing when unwarranted or against a contraindication) and inadequacies (if the compound or treatment schedule was not suited to the condition addressed). We measured the effect of the intervention 45 days after its initiation. Twenty-seven doctors participated in the two study phases (595 and 520 patients) and wrote 50 NSAID prescriptions in each (8.4% and 9. 6% of patients, respectively; P = 0.44). Prescribing errors decreased from 20% to 14% of cases (P = 0.60). There was a trend toward more prescriptions conforming to the Drug Regulatory Agency guidelines (P = 0.08). Treatment duration decreased from 10.4 +/- 5. 4 to 9.0 +/- 4.0 days (P = 0.03). The teaching of guidelines has helped physicians to improve their NSAID prescribing practices; however, it did not succeed in curbing the overall prescription rate. Unrestricted lists that include soft indications may influence younger doctors into prescribing more NSAIDs.

Prevention of venous thromboembolic risk in non-surgical patients.

The risk of deep-vein thrombosis in hospitalized medical patients varies considerably among diseases and should be systematically assessed as a function of the presence of different risk factors. The need for drug prophylaxis of thromboembolic risk in patients at moderate or high risk of thrombosis is now recommended. In such cases, only standard or low-molecular-weight heparins have been evaluated in controlled trials. The efficacy of heparin prophylaxis has been demonstrated in hospitalized cardiac patients following myocardial infarction, in neurological patients with paralysis of one or both lower limbs, and in intensive-care patients or in those with a serious medical condition, particularly if they have a history of deep-vein thrombosis. The choice between the different heparins, their dosages and treatment durations, and the possible indication for prophylaxis in patients at low thrombotic risk should be evaluated in controlled trials.

Orocecal transit time in humans assessed by sulfapyridine appearance in saliva after sulfasalazine intake.

PURPOSE: We propose a noninvasive method for the measurement of orocecal transit time assessed by the sulfapyridine appearance time in saliva after ingestion of sulfasalazine. METHOD: In 12 healthy volunteers, we studied the correlation between plasma and saliva sulfapyridine appearance times and then the sulfapyridine appearance times in saliva under various experimental conditions to assess the reproducibility, the effects of meals, and the role of the formulation, and the effects of gastrointestinal kinetic drugs. RESULTS: The correlation between saliva and plasma sulfapyridine appearance times was strong (r = 0.84; p = 0.0004). The sulfapyridine saliva appearance time was significantly delayed by the meal. Compared with placebo, the saliva sulfapyridine appearance time was reduced by cisapride (312 +/- 128 versus 551 +/- 97 minutes; p = 0.0001) and increased by loperamide (674 +/- 267 versus 501 +/- 131 minutes; p = 0.044). CONCLUSION: We propose the salivary sample method as a validated simplification of the plasma sulfasalazine-sulfapyridine test for the measurement of orocecal transit time.

[Therapeutic principles in gastroesophageal reflux]. / Principes thérapeutiques du reflux gastroesophagien.

Gastroesophageal reflux is a common disease. Its chronic course, even if mild, is sometimes complicated by erosive oesophagitis. Drug therapy acts against gastric acidity and motility disorders. Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease has three aims: improvement of symptoms and quality of life, healing erosive lesions and prevention of symptomatic and endoscopic relapses. Non-drug measures are always useful, even if their efficacy is not well established. Initial therapy of a symptomatic reflux or mild oesophagitis is most of the time effective (antacids, prokinetics, H2 receptor antagonists). Proton-pump inhibitors are also effective in healing and preventing severe oesophagitis. Questions about long-term treatment adverse events with powerful acid inhibitors, such as hypergastrinemia and the risk of gastric carcinoid tumours seem to be resolved. Studies are requested to define the optimal long-term maintenance treatment with cisapride, H2 receptor antagonists or proton-pump inhibitors at low doses in prevention of symptomatic and mild oesophagitis relapses.

[Prospective study of the prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in a reception medical service of a university hospital. Influence of the prescriptor]. / Etude prospective de la prescription d'anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens dans un service médical d'accueil d'un hôpital universitaire. Influence du prescripteur.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are estimated to be excessively prescribed. We have prospectively collected all drug prescriptions written by 50 doctors in an Outpatient Service, during a 5-day period. The purpose of this study was to draw the outline of NSAID prescriptors. Junior doctors (66%) wrote more controversial NSAID prescriptions (66%) than other doctors.

Evaluation of risk factors for laryngeal edema after tracheal extubation in adults and its prevention by dexamethasone. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter study.

Because laryngeal edema (LE) after tracheal extubation is likely to result from an exudative response, corticosteroids often are given routinely as a preventive treatment. No adequate controlled study supports this strategy, however. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial that included 700 consecutive patients requiring tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation was conducted to determine risk factors for LE occurrence after tracheal extubation in adults and to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids in its prevention. One hour before extubation, patients were given either an intravenous bolus of 8 mg dexamethasone or a placebo. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) those in whom short-duration intubation (SDI, less than 36 h) was administered; and 2) those in whom long-duration intubation (LDI, more than 36 h) was administered. Minor LE was diagnosed when either stridor or laryngeal dyspnea, or both, occurred; major LE was diagnosed when reintubation due to LE was required, with LE evidenced during direct laryngoscopy. The overall incidence of LE was 4.2% and varied among the six participating centers from 2.3 to 6.9% (not significant). In only seven patients (1%), all with LDI, was tracheal reintubation required for LE. Laryngeal edema occurred more frequently after LDI than after SDI (7.2 vs. 0.9%; P less than 0.001). It also was more frequent in female than in male patients (20/284 vs. 8/379; P less than 0.05), irrespective of intubation duration and treatment. There was no association between LE and either difficulty/route of intubation or admission diagnosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)