Professional stakeholders' perceptions of barriers to behavioral health care following pediatric traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To examine professional stakeholders' perspectives of barriers to behavioral health care (BHC) follow-up and telepsychology after pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Twenty-nine professionals participated in a focus group (FG) or key informant interview (KII) between January and March 2020. Professionals answered questions about facilitators and barriers to BHC follow-up and telepsychology. Given widespread telepsychology implementation since COVID-19, a follow-up survey assessing telehealth perceptions since the pandemic was sent out in December 2020. Nineteen professionals completed the survey. RESULTS: Professionals identified individual (e.g., family factors, insurance coverage/finances, transportation/distance, availability, planning follow-up care) and system-level (e.g., lack of access to BHC providers) barriers to BHC post-injury. Possible solutions, like collaborative follow-up care, were also identified. Generally, clinical professionals have favorable impressions of telepsychology and utilized services as a delivery modality for clinical care. Though telepsychology could reduce barriers to care, professionals also expressed concerns (e.g., technology issues, security/safety) and challenges (e.g., funding, accessibility, training/licensure for clinicians) with implementing telepsychology. CONCLUSION: Barriers identified highlight the need for context-specific solutions to increase BHC access, with telepsychology generally recognized as a beneficial modality for BHC. Future work should continue to focus on understanding barriers to BHC and potential solutions after pediatric TBI.

Long term effects of early childhood traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse gist and psychosocial functioning.

Purpose: To examine the long-term consequences of early childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI), approximately 6.8 years post-injury, on cognitive communication competency within a complex interplay of individual, contextual, and psychosocial factors. Additionally, we were interested in looking at the association of communication competence with social competence and overall functioning.Methods: 64 children with orthopedic injury, 40 children with moderate traumatic brain injury, and 14 children with severe traumatic brain injury who were between 3 years and 6 years 11 months at injury completed a narrative discourse task and clinical measures in a single visit at a longer term follow up in early adolescence, an average of 6.8 years post injury. Analyses of covariance were conducted to compare groups on the discourse task, and hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to examine the association of discourse measures with clinical measures of cognitive and psychosocial functioning.Results: Children with severe traumatic brain injury performed worse than children with moderate traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injury on all discourse indices and clinical measures. Injury severity, pragmatic skills, and socioeconomic status were associated with discourse gist. Discourse gist was the most sensitive measure of communication competence, and it was significantly associated with psychosocial outcomes independent of group.Conclusion: Children who sustain a severe traumatic brain injury in early childhood are at risk for long-term cognitive communication impairments that may be related to a complex interplay of injury, individual, and social factors.Implications for rehabilitationThe assessment and treatment of cognitive communication impairments after traumatic brain injury are complex and require consideration of individual, contextual, and psychosocial factors.Discourse, in general, and gist reasoning specifically, is a sensitive measure for detecting cognitive communication competence several years after pediatric traumatic brain injury.Treatments to address gist reasoning deficits may support improvements in global and social functioning.