Evaluating the role of level 3 axillary lymph node dissection in metastatic melanoma: Can we predict involvement?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: MSLT-2 and DECOG-SLT established that immediate complete axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) did not correlate with an increase in melanoma-specific survival when compared with active ultrasound observation in patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive disease. After those trials, there was a shift toward performing CLND only for clinically node-positive disease. With these changes, we sought to determine the role of level III axillary lymph nodes in bulky disease and how the use of neoadjuvant therapy may impact the rate of positivity in level III axillary nodes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review on all patients who underwent axillary CLND for cutaneous melanoma by one surgeon at an academic center from 2014 to 2022. These patients underwent CLND based on either having SLN+ disease or having clinically palpable or radiographically bulky disease. RESULTS: Of 95 patients included, there were 7 (7.3%) patients with level III positivity. One was SLN+ (1.0%), while 3 (3.1%) had bulky disease and neoadjuvant therapy, and 3 (3.1%) had bulky disease without neoadjuvant therapy. No preoperative factors were identified that predicted level III involvement. After performing CLND, the patients who had clinically palpable or radiographically bulky disease and neoadjuvant therapy had higher percent necrosis of nodes in levels I and II but not III. At 5 years, overall survival and recurrence-free survival were improved in those without level III involvement (58% and 64%, respectively) when compared to those with level III involvement (41% and 50%), though this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Further study may identify better prognostic factors for level III positivity, allowing for the possibility of dissecting only levels I and II or even replacing CLND with targeted node dissections.

Radar-Guided Localization and Resection for Metastatic Nodal and Soft Tissue Melanoma: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Radar-guided localization (RGL) offers a wire-free, nonradioactive surgical guidance method consisting of a small percutaneously-placed radar reflector and handheld probe. This study investigates the feasibility, timing, and outcomes of RGL for melanoma metastasectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients at our cancer center who underwent RGL resection of metastatic melanoma between December 2020-June 2023. Data pertaining to patients' melanoma history, management, reflector placement and retrieval, and follow-up was extracted from patient charts and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Twenty-three RGL cases were performed in patients with stage III-IV locoregional or oligometastatic disease, 10 of whom had reflectors placed prior to neoadjuvant therapy. Procedures included soft tissue nodule removals (8), index lymph node removals (13), and therapeutic lymph node dissections (2). Reflectors were located and retrieved intraoperatively in 96% of cases from a range of 2 to 282 days after placement; the last reflector was not able to be located during surgery via probe or intraoperative ultrasound. One retrieved reflector had migrated from the index lesion, thus overall success rate of reflector and associated index lesion removal was 21 of 23 (91%). All RGL-localized and retrieved index lesions that contained viable tumor (10) had microscopically negative margins. There were no complications attributable to reflector insertion and no unexpected complications of RGL surgery. CONCLUSION: In our practice, RGL is a safe and effective surgical localization method for soft tissue and nodal melanoma metastases. The inert nature of the reflector enables implantation prior to neoadjuvant therapy with utility in index lymph node removal.

There are a variety of tools available to localize melanoma that had spread to deep layers of the skin or lymph nodes that can guide surgeons to the cancer when the tumor cannot be felt. We evaluated a marker that reflects radar signals that has been studied in breast surgery but not in melanoma. The marker was placed in the tumor before surgery and was located during surgery using a handheld probe, guiding the surgeon to the correct location. An advantage of the radar-reflecting marker we studied is that since it is safe to stay in the body, it can be placed ahead of the use of cancer medications and can keep track of the tumor as it responds to treatment. In a review of 23 surgeries in which the radar-reflecting marker was used, there was one case where the marker migrated away from the tumor and one case where the marker was not able to be located. Monitoring or alternative definitive treatment was provided in each of these cases. Overall, we found the marker to be an effective tumor localization tool for surgeons and safe for patients. Other marker options available are unable or less suitable to be placed a long time in advance of surgery due to either technical or safety reasons, so the radar-reflecting marker is especially useful when it is placed in a tumor ahead of medical treatment leading up to planned surgical treatment.

Factors Associated With Node-Positive Disease in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Larger tumor size and shorter tumor-to-nipple distance at diagnosis are associated with greater risk of lymph node involvement in breast cancer. However, the relationship between receptor subtype status and lymph node metastasis remains unclear. Our objective was to examine the association between primary tumor size, location, and nodal metastasis across estrogen receptor (ER)+/ progesterone receptor (PR)+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, ER+/PR-/HER2-, ER+/PR+/HER2+, and ER+/PR-/HER2+ tumors. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted of breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 who underwent nodal evaluation during primary surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pure ductal carcinoma in situ, inflammatory, recurrent, metastatic, bilateral, multicentric, and multifocal disease were excluded. Descriptive statistics (proportions and frequencies for categorical variables and medians [Q1-Q3] for continuous variables) were used to summarize patient characteristics. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to test the association of outcome variables and continuous variables. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was applied to test the association of outcome variables and categorical variables. RESULTS: Six hundred eighteen ER + patients had a median tumor size of 1.7 cm (1.1-2.5 cm). Two hundred ninety six out of 618 (47.9%) were node-positive and 188/618 (30.4%) had axillary dissection. Eighty four point three percent of patients were ER+/PR+/HER2-, 6.31% were ER+/PR-/HER2-, 6.96% were ER+/PR+/HER2+, and 1.13% were ER+/PR-/HER2+. Median tumor size was significantly larger in node-positive cases compared to node-negative cases in ER+/PR+/HER2-, ER+/PR+/HER2+, and ER+/PR-/HER2- subgroups. In ER+/PR+/HER2-patients, median tumor-nipple distance was significantly shorter in node-positive patients compared to node-negative patients. Upper outer quadrant location was significantly associated with nodal positivity in ER+/PR-/HER2- patients. CONCLUSIONS: Across ER + patients, the significance between tumor size, location, and lymph node positivity varied significantly when differentiating by PR and HER2 status.

Factors Predictive of Positive Lymph Nodes for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Axillary node status is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. The primary aim was to evaluate tumor size and other characteristics relative to axillary disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single institution retrospective chart review of stage I-III breast cancer patients collected demographic and clinical/pathologic data from 1998-2019. Student's t-test, Chi-squared test (or Fisher exact test if applicable), and logistic regression models were used for testing the association of pN+ to predictive variables. RESULTS: Of 728 patients (mean age 59 yrs) with mean follow up of 50 months, 86% were estrogen receptor +, 10% Her2+, 78% ER+HER2-negative, and 10% triple-negative. In total, 351/728 (48.2%) were pN+ and mean tumor size was larger in pN+ cases compared to pN- cases (mean = 27.7 mm versus 15.5 mm) (p < 0.001). By univariate analysis, pN+ was associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI), higher grade, Her2, and histology (p < 0.005). Tumor-to-nipple distance was shorter in pN+ compared to pN- (45 mm v. 62 mm; p< 0.001). Age < 60, LVI, recurrence, mastectomy, larger tumor size, and shorter tumor-nipple distance were associated with 3+ positive nodes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Larger tumor size and shorter tumor-nipple distance were associated with higher lymph node positivity. Age less than 60, LVI, recurrence, mastectomy, larger tumor size, and shorter tumor-nipple distance were all associated with 3+ positive lymph nodes.

Successful treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel in melanoma progression after immune-related adverse events.

The overall survival of melanoma patients has improved using antibodies targeting immune checkpoints (anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4 and anti-LAG-3). Systemic chemotherapy was administered in melanoma for many years with limited effectiveness. Here we report a case of a patient who experienced immune-mediated adverse effects from checkpoint blockade therapy and subsequently responded to chemotherapy. The patient presented with melanoma and paraneoplastic digital ischemia. She received a combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab and experienced G3 myocarditis, followed by melanoma progression after a steroid taper. This patient achieved a partial and durable response with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. This report suggests the possibility of a subset of patients who experience progression after immune-based side effects where chemotherapy may be effective in the modern age of melanoma treatment.

We describe a patient with a type of skin cancer called melanoma. At first, we tried to treat it with a medication that made the patient's body's defense system fight against it, but it caused problems with her heart so we had to stop it. Instead, we used another type of treatment called chemotherapy, which worked. The patient remains off therapy 4.5 years later. The lesson learned from this case is that chemotherapy is still helpful in certain situations. The initial treatment did not stop the melanoma growth. In addition, the patient had life-threatening toxicity.

Genitourinary melanoma: An overview for the clinician.

Genitourinary (GU) melanoma is a rare presentation of melanoma accounting for approximately 0.5% of all melanomas. GU melanomas include primary melanomas of the vulva, vagina, uterine cervix, ovary, penis, scrotum, urethra, bladder, ureter, and kidney. These melanomas are often diagnosed in advanced stages and stigma is thought to contribute to delays in presentation. As the likely diagnosing provider, it is imperative that dermatologists, urologists, and gynecologists are aware of these uncommon sites of presentation. While there have been major advances in the treatment of melanomas as a whole in the last 10 years, their applications to GU melanomas have often been overlooked. GU melanomas have not been included in many of the major phase III clinical trials which brought contemporary advanced treatments to market and the prognoses for GU melanomas remain poor. Due to the rarity of GU melanomas, much of the literature provides generalized recommendations across multiple different organs affected by GU melanomas or omits certain topics, making it difficult to appreciate the fundamentals of the individual presentations. This review aimed to provide background information on the pathogenesis and epidemiology of the different sites of GU melanomas and categorize data specific to the presentation, staging, treatment, and prognosis of each type of GU melanoma to guide the clinician. It was also meant to encourage a multidisciplinary approach to the management of these patients as it spans the expertise of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologist, dermatologists, urologists, and gynecologists.

Current State of Cell Therapies for Breast Cancer.

ABSTRACT: Metastatic breast cancer (BC) is an aggressive form of cancer and is an absolute challenge to treat. This review discusses the standard treatments available for metastatic BC. It further highlights the rationale for targeting oncodrivers, tumor-associated antigens, and neoantigens in BC. Explaining the significance of immune response in successful immunotherapeutic studies, it draws attention towards how adoptive cell therapy can be a useful immunotherapeutic tool. We focus on adoptive cell therapy in BC covering tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, engineered T cell receptor therapy, chimeric antigen receptor therapy, dendritic cell therapy and natural killer cell therapy. In this work, we aim to provide an overview of clinical data regarding the use of cellular immunotherapies in BC. Eventually, we conclude by proposing future adoptive cell therapy approaches, which can be used to cure BC.

An update on local and systemic therapies for nonmelanoma skin cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) as a group exceed the incidence of all other malignancies combined. NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. As the incidence continues to rise, it is important to appreciate the available treatment options. AREAS COVERED: This article discusses the treatment of NMSC through surgical, topical, regional, and systemic modalities. EXPERT OPINION: As there are many treatment options available for these diseases, selection of the appropriate method can be difficult. With time, we expect treatment decisions to become even more complex and personalized. The role of systemic immunotherapies and neoadjuvant therapies in the treatment of NMSC is still not well defined. Local treatment with intralesional injections and isolated limb infusion may prove to be promising alternative therapies.