Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions.

AIMS: The methodology of studies that reported data on individuals who recovered from an alcohol or other drug problem (cigarette smokers were excluded) without formal help or treatment were reviewed. DESIGN/MEASUREMENTS: Potential studies were identified (a) through computerized literature searches, (b) by reviewing references from key publications and (c) by correspondence with researchers in the field. Studies had to (a) be in English, (b) be published, in press, or presented before the end of 1997, (c) report original results or be part of an original survey and (d) separately report respondents whose recoveries were and were not attributable to treatment. No case studies were included. Eligible studies were evaluated with respect to meeting criteria for (a) natural recovery, (b) methodological rigor and (c) reporting demographic and substance abuse history variables. FINDINGS: Until 1997 only 38 articles (40 different respondent samples) met the inclusion criteria for this review. This small number of studies is not surprising, as natural recovery from substance abuse is a relatively new area of study. Moreover, the majority of the 38 articles were published in the past 8 years. For most studies, descriptions of the respondent samples at pre- and post-recovery were seriously deficient. Alcohol was the most studied drug, with heroin a distant second. Low-risk drinking (78.6%) and limited drug use (46.2%) were commonly reported outcomes in natural recovery studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review, future natural recovery studies should: (a) report respondents' demographic characteristics at the time of their recovery; (b) describe respondents' pre-recovery problem severity; (c) explore in some depth what factors, events or processes are associated with the self-change process; (d) provide corroboration of respondents' self-reports; (e) examine factors related to the maintenance of recoveries; (f) conduct interviews with individuals who have naturally recovered from cocaine, marijuana and polydrug abuse; (g) include a second interview at a later time to examine stability of natural recoveries; and (h) require a minimum 5-year recovery time frame.

Alcohol abusers who want to quit smoking: implications for clinical treatment.

Although most alcohol abusers are dependent on nicotine, studies of such individuals have been scarce. Consequently, little information is available for advising clients who wish to consider resolving both problems. Clients entering an outpatient alcohol treatment program who were also current smokers were asked about their temporal preferences for changing their alcohol and cigarette use. Over three-quarters of alcohol abusers who were also smokers when asked said they would be willing to consider stopping smoking during or after treatment for an alcohol problem. Individuals who were interested in quitting smoking cigarettes while in treatment for an alcohol problem were different from those who did not want to stop smoking, and such differences may influence their ability to successfully address both problems together. Compared to those who preferred to change their drinking first then address their smoking, those who said they would be willing to address both problems (i.e. smoking and drinking) together in treatment were not only considerably more likely to think that quitting smoking would affect quitting drinking, but also more likely to be planning to quit smoking in the next six months. These results suggest that some individuals whose alcohol problems are not severe and who also smoke cigarettes will be more receptive to a dual recovery approach than others. In the absence of research findings, health care practitioners who encounter individuals who drink heavily and smoke cigarettes should at a minimum explore the option of dual cessation with their clients. The clinical and research implications of the present results are discussed.