Pharmacokinetic interaction between boceprevir and etravirine in HIV/HCV seronegative volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine the bioequivalence of boceprevir, an HCV protease inhibitor and etravirine, an HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor; area under the concentration time curve (AUC(0,τ)); maximum concentration (C(max)); and trough concentration (C(8) or C(min)) when administered in combination versus alone. DESIGN: Open-label crossover study in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Boceprevir, etravirine, and the combination were administered for 11-14 days with intensive sampling between days 11 and 14 of each sequence. Boceprevir and etravirine were quantified using validated liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet assays, respectively and pharmacokinetics determined using noncompartmental methods. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the combination versus each drug alone were evaluated using 2 one-sided t tests. The hypothesis of equivalence was rejected if 90% GMR CI was not contained in the interval (0.8-1.25). RESULTS: Twenty subjects completed study. GMRs (90% CI) for etravirine AUC(o,τ), C(max), and C(min) were 0.77 (0.66 to 0.91), 0.76 (0.68 to 0.85), and 0.71 (0.54 to 0.95), respectively, in combination versus alone. Boceprevir GMRs (90% CI) for AUC(o,τ), C(max), and C(8) were 1.10 (0.94 to 1.28), 1.10 (0.94 to 1.29), and 0.88 (0.66 to 1.17), respectively, in combination versus alone. All adverse events (n = 112) were mild or moderate. Six subjects discontinued: 4 due to rash, 1 due to central nervous system effects, and 1 for a presumed viral illness. CONCLUSIONS: Etravirine AUC(o,τ), C(max), and C(min)decreased 23%, 24%, and 29%, respectively, with boceprevir. Boceprevir AUC(0,τ) and C(max) increased 10% and C(8) decreased 12% by etravirine. Additional research is needed to elucidate the mechanism(s) and therapeutic implications of the observed interaction.

A regulatory network for coordinated flower maturation.

For self-pollinating plants to reproduce, male and female organ development must be coordinated as flowers mature. The Arabidopsis transcription factors AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 6 (ARF6) and ARF8 regulate this complex process by promoting petal expansion, stamen filament elongation, anther dehiscence, and gynoecium maturation, thereby ensuring that pollen released from the anthers is deposited on the stigma of a receptive gynoecium. ARF6 and ARF8 induce jasmonate production, which in turn triggers expression of MYB21 and MYB24, encoding R2R3 MYB transcription factors that promote petal and stamen growth. To understand the dynamics of this flower maturation regulatory network, we have characterized morphological, chemical, and global gene expression phenotypes of arf, myb, and jasmonate pathway mutant flowers. We found that MYB21 and MYB24 promoted not only petal and stamen development but also gynoecium growth. As well as regulating reproductive competence, both the ARF and MYB factors promoted nectary development or function and volatile sesquiterpene production, which may attract insect pollinators and/or repel pathogens. Mutants lacking jasmonate synthesis or response had decreased MYB21 expression and stamen and petal growth at the stage when flowers normally open, but had increased MYB21 expression in petals of older flowers, resulting in renewed and persistent petal expansion at later stages. Both auxin response and jasmonate synthesis promoted positive feedbacks that may ensure rapid petal and stamen growth as flowers open. MYB21 also fed back negatively on expression of jasmonate biosynthesis pathway genes to decrease flower jasmonate level, which correlated with termination of growth after flowers have opened. These dynamic feedbacks may promote timely, coordinated, and transient growth of flower organs.

AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR1 and AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR2 regulate senescence and floral organ abscission in Arabidopsis thaliana.

In plants, both endogenous mechanisms and environmental signals regulate developmental transitions such as seed germination, induction of flowering, leaf senescence and shedding of senescent organs. Auxin response factors (ARFs) are transcription factors that mediate responses to the plant hormone auxin. We have examined Arabidopsis lines carrying T-DNA insertions in AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR1 (ARF1) and ARF2 genes. We found that ARF2 promotes transitions between multiple stages of Arabidopsis development. arf2 mutant plants exhibited delays in several processes related to plant aging, including initiation of flowering, rosette leaf senescence, floral organ abscission and silique ripening. ARF2 expression was induced in senescing leaves. ARF2 regulated leaf senescence and floral organ abscission independently of the ethylene and cytokinin response pathways. arf1 mutations enhanced many arf2 phenotypes, indicating that ARF1 acts in a partially redundant manner with ARF2. However, unlike arf2 mutations, an arf1 mutation increased transcription of Aux/IAA genes in Arabidopsis flowers, supporting previous biochemical studies that indicated that ARF1 is a transcriptional repressor. Two other ARF genes, NPH4/ARF7 and ARF19, were also induced by senescence, and mutations in these genes enhanced arf2 phenotypes. NPH4/ARF7 and ARF19 function as transcriptional activators, suggesting that auxin may control senescence in part by activating gene expression.

Auxin response factors ARF6 and ARF8 promote jasmonic acid production and flower maturation.

Pollination in flowering plants requires that anthers release pollen when the gynoecium is competent to support fertilization. We show that in Arabidopsis thaliana, two paralogous auxin response transcription factors, ARF6 and ARF8, regulate both stamen and gynoecium maturation. arf6 arf8 double-null mutant flowers arrested as infertile closed buds with short petals, short stamen filaments, undehisced anthers that did not release pollen and immature gynoecia. Numerous developmentally regulated genes failed to be induced. ARF6 and ARF8 thus coordinate the transition from immature to mature fertile flowers. Jasmonic acid (JA) measurements and JA feeding experiments showed that decreased jasmonate production caused the block in pollen release, but not the gynoecium arrest. The double mutant had altered auxin responsive gene expression. However, whole flower auxin levels did not change during flower maturation, suggesting that auxin might regulate flower maturation only under specific environmental conditions, or in localized organs or tissues of flowers. arf6 and arf8 single mutants and sesquimutants (homozygous for one mutation and heterozygous for the other) had delayed stamen development and decreased fecundity, indicating that ARF6 and ARF8 gene dosage affects timing of flower maturation quantitatively.