Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 2024 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857766

RESUMO

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a common comorbidity of psoriasis occurring in up to a third of patients. Dermatologists hold an essential role in screening patients with psoriasis for PsA, since as many as 85% of patients develop psoriasis before PsA. Early detection and treatment of PsA are important for both short and long-term patient outcomes and quality of life. Many factors must be weighed when selecting the appropriate therapy for PsA. One must consider the 'domains of disease' that are manifested, the disease severity, patient comorbidities, patient preferences (routes of dosing or frequency, as examples) as well as factors often outside of patient-physician control, such as access to medications based on insurance coverage and formularies. As many patients will have involvement of multiple domains of psoriatic disease, selecting the therapy that best captures the patient's disease is required. In this review, we will address PsA screening, diagnosis, therapeutic approach to psoriatic disease, comorbidity considerations and co-management.

2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 2024 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857765

RESUMO

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory seronegative arthritis strongly associated with psoriasis. Recognition of the clinical features of PsA is critical, as delayed detection and untreated disease may result in irreparable joint damage, impaired physical function, and a significantly reduced quality of life. Dermatologists are poised for the early detection of PsA, as psoriasis predates its development in as many as 80% of patients. In an effort to further acquaint dermatologists with PsA, this review provides a detailed overview, emphasizing its epidemiology, comorbidities, etiopathogenesis, and diagnostic features.

3.
Clin Dermatol ; 2024 Jun 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38909858

RESUMO

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been steadily integrated into dermatology with AI platforms already attempting to identify skin cancers and diagnose benign versus malignant lesions. While not as widely known, AI programs have also been utilized as diagnostic and prognostic tools for dermatologic conditions with systemic or extracutaneous involvement, especially for diseases with autoimmune etiologies. We have provided a primer on commonly used AI platforms and practical applicability of these algorithms in dealing with psoriasis, systemic sclerosis, and dermatomyositis as a microcosm for future directions in the field. With a rapidly changing landscape in dermatology and medicine as a whole, AI could be a versatile tool to support clinicians and enhance access to care.

4.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 23(6): 480-484, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834209

RESUMO

Limited studies explore the role social determinants of health have on urban-rural health disparities, particularly for Skin of Color. To further evaluate this relationship, a cross-sectional study was conducted on data from five states using the 2018 to 2021 Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, a national state-run health survey. Prevalence of skin cancer history and urban/rural status were evaluated across these social determinants of health: sex, age, race, insurance status, number of personal healthcare providers, and household income. Overall, rural counterparts were significantly more likely to have a positive skin cancer history across most social determinants of health. Rural populations had a higher prevalence of skin cancer history across all races (P<.001). Rural non-Hispanic Whites had greater odds than their urban counterparts (OR=1.40; 95% CI 1.34 - 1.46). The odds were approximately twice as high for rural Black (OR=1.74; 95% CI 1.14 - 2.65), Hispanic (OR=2.31; 95% CI 1.56 - 3.41), and Other Race, non-Hispanic (OR=1.99; 95% CI 1.51 - 2.61), and twenty times higher for Asians (OR=20.46; 95% CI 8.63 - 48.54), although no significant difference was seen for American Indian/Alaskan Native (OR=1.5; 95% CI 0.99 - 2.28). However, when household income exceeded $100,000 no significant difference in prevalence or odds was seen between urban and rural settings. Despite increasing awareness of metropolitan-based health inequity, urban-rural disparities in skin cancer prevalence continue to persist and may be magnified by social determinants such as income and race. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):480-484.    doi:10.36849/JDD.8094.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , População Rural , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Transversais , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Prevalência , Saúde da População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/etnologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Hispânico ou Latino , Brancos
5.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 316(6): 233, 2024 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795205

RESUMO

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies carry the risk of major immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among the most severe irAEs is epidermal necrosis that may clinically mimic Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN). The aim of this study was to provide a summary of the clinical and histological features of ICI-associated epidermal necrosis, with a special focus on factors associated with fatal outcomes in cases of extensive disease. A total of 98 cases, 2 new cases and 96 reported on PubMed and in the literature, of ICI-associated epidermal necrosis were assessed. Development of epidermal necrosis occurred between 1 day and 3 years after starting ICI therapy, with an average onset of 13.8 weeks for patients with limited (< 30% BSA) and 11.3 weeks for those with extensive (≥ 30% BSA) involvement, and a median onset of 5.8 weeks and 4 weeks respectively. A preceding rash was seen in 52 cases and was more common in extensive cases. Mucosal involvement was only reported in 65% of extensive cases but was significantly associated with fatal reactions. Co-administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy was associated with more extensive disease. Recovery was observed in 96% and 65% of those with limited and extensive involvement respectively and no specific therapy was associated with improved survival. Young age was significantly associated with poor outcomes in extensive disease, the average age of surviving patients was 64.5 years old versus 55.1 years old for deceased patients, p < 0.01. Both superficial perivascular and interface/lichenoid inflammatory infiltrates were commonly seen. These findings suggest that ICI-associated epidermal necrosis should be considered a distinct clinical entity from drug-induced SJS/TEN.


Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Necrose , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/efeitos adversos , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/patologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/imunologia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/diagnóstico , Necrose/induzido quimicamente , Epiderme/patologia , Epiderme/efeitos dos fármacos , Epiderme/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Adulto
10.
JAMA Dermatol ; 160(1): 37-44, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37966824

RESUMO

Importance: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare but potentially fatal drug hypersensitivity reaction. To our knowledge, there is no international consensus on its severity assessment and treatment. Objective: To reach an international, Delphi-based multinational expert consensus on the diagnostic workup, severity assessment, and treatment of patients with DRESS. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Delphi method was used to assess 100 statements related to baseline workup, evaluation of severity, acute phase, and postacute management of DRESS. Fifty-seven international experts in DRESS were invited, and 54 participated in the survey, which took place from July to September 2022. Main Outcomes/Measures: The degree of agreement was calculated with the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as a statement with a median appropriateness value of 7 or higher (appropriate) and a disagreement index of lower than 1. Results: In the first Delphi round, consensus was reached on 82 statements. Thirteen statements were revised and assessed in a second round. A consensus was reached for 93 statements overall. The experts agreed on a set of basic diagnostic workup procedures as well as severity- and organ-specific further investigations. They reached a consensus on severity assessment (mild, moderate, and severe) based on the extent of liver, kidney, and blood involvement and the damage of other organs. The panel agreed on the main lines of DRESS management according to these severity grades. General recommendations were generated on the postacute phase follow-up of patients with DRESS and the allergological workup. Conclusions and Relevance: This Delphi exercise represents, to our knowledge, the first international expert consensus on diagnostic workup, severity assessment, and management of DRESS. This should support clinicians in the diagnosis and management of DRESS and constitute the basis for development of future guidelines.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos , Eosinofilia , Adulto , Humanos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/etiologia , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidade a Medicamentos/terapia , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Eosinofilia/induzido quimicamente , Eosinofilia/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(6): 1015-1020, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37667973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To understand the landscape of industry payments to pediatric dermatologists to foster transparency and identify potential disparities in funding. METHODS: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments database, a national cross-sectional study was performed examining payments to pediatric dermatologists from 2015 to 2021. RESULTS: Of the 147 pediatric dermatologists who received industry funding, 35 were male and 112 were female. $9 million in payments was amassed, with 10% of pediatric dermatologists accounting for 94% of total industry payments. Consulting was the most common service, with Pfizer Inc., Amgen Inc., and Regeneron Healthcare Solutions Inc. representing the top three companies. Mean payment was $143,836 for males and $35,943 for females (p < .001). Eight female and seven male pediatric dermatologists received payments in the top 10th percentile, with different average payment in this subgroup (females $447,588 vs. males $698,746, p = .03). 11 states did not have a pediatric dermatologist receiving industry payments, while California (19) and Texas (12) had the most. CONCLUSIONS: There are approximately 400 board-certified pediatric dermatologists in the United States and fewer than 40% are receiving monetary compensation from private industry. A fraction of physicians accounted for a majority of total industry payments and industry payments to male pediatric dermatologists were higher despite nearly triple the number of female pediatric dermatologists. With the rise of valuable partnerships between healthcare and industry in modern medicine, the implications of geographic, gender, and financial disparity of industry payments in pediatric dermatology are worthy of further study.


Assuntos
Dermatologistas , Médicos , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Medicare , Indústrias , Bases de Dados Factuais
19.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(6): 1801-1803, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36629934

RESUMO

Recent calls for increased transparency from dermatology residency programs have revealed important opportunities, particularly including information on program websites. One piece of information that may especially benefit applicants assessing potential training programs is the program's mission statement. From August 9, 2022, to August 21, 2022, the websites of all ACGME-accredited dermatology residencies were examined to investigate the use and content of mission statements. Statements were categorized based on inclusion of mission, vision, virtue/value, aims, and goals. A total of 133 out of 143 dermatology programs (93.0%) were included. Overall, 46.15% of programs used at least one of the five mission statement categories on their websites, while 53.85% used none. Programs used the category "mission" (39.85%) most, and "vision" (3.01%) least. There was overlap in word choice across categories. The word "care" was among the top four words used in every category. Other words to appear frequently across multiple categories included "dermatology" (4/5), "residents" (3/5), "knowledge" (2/5), and "provide" (2/5). Other top words included "clinical" in the mission category, "advanced" and "leaders" in the vision category, "excellence" and "diversity" in the value/virtue category, and "patient" and "professional" in the objective category. Explicitly stating residency program missions may not only help programs plan more effectively, but also help applicants who may be undecided about which programs best align with their career goals.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Humanos , Estudos Transversais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...