Hormone replacement therapy: a survey of Ontario physicians' prescribing practices.

BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about hormone replacement therapy (HRT), there are few clearcut recommendations on its use. The purpose of this study was to determine Ontario physicians' patterns of and reasons for prescribing HRT, their use of pretreatment investigations and their surveillance of HRT users, and to determine whether physicians' reported practice is consistent with existing recommendations. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was mailed to a nonproportional stratified sample of 327 Ontario physicians (23.9% gynecologists, 76.1% general practitioners/family physicians [GP/FPs]). Outcome measures were ranking of reasons for prescribing HRT, nature of preliminary testing, regimens prescribed, duration of HRT and frequency of follow-up. RESULTS: The response rate was 60.9% overall (70.9% of the gynecologists, 58.3% of the GP/FPs). Prevention of osteoporosis was reported by 97.4% as an important or very important reason for prescribing HRT; prevention of coronary artery disease was important or very important for 89.3%. When considering whether or not to prescribe HRT, 97.3% stated that breast cancer was an important or very important factor. When presented with hypothetical cases, 97.0% stated that they would prescribe combined estrogen-progestin for a symptomatic woman with an intact uterus; 13.6% stated that they would do so for a woman with no uterus. Most reported that they would prescribe HRT for 12 or more years (73.3%) and would follow up patients every 1 to 2 years (70.6%). INTERPRETATION: Despite controversy about HRT in the published literature, the Ontario physicians surveyed reported similar reasons and patterns of prescribing, pretreatment investigations, and surveillance of postmenopausal women using HRT. These results suggest that Ontario physicians' knowledge about HRT is consistent with recommendations in the published literature.

A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation.

Although postmenopausal women are advised to consider their values when deliberating about potential benefits and risks of hormone therapy (HRT), feasible, effective methods of decision support in primary care have yet to be established. Using an explicit decision support framework, we developed a self-administered HRT decision aid and evaluated it in a before/after study of 94 women from six family practices. An audiotape guided women through an illustrated booklet including: detailed information about HRT benefits and risks tailored to a woman's clinical risk, and a values clarification exercise to promote informed decision making consistent with personal values. After using the decision aid participants: had better general knowledge and more realistic personal expectations of HRT benefits and risks; and, felt more certain, informed, clear about values, and supported in decision making. Women's values elicited in the clarification exercise were 84% accurate in discriminating between decisions. Women with polarized preferences at baseline did not change their minds, but were better informed. Changes in preferences occurred in the uncertain group, with equal numbers accepting or declining HRT. Most participants found the decision aid comprehensible, acceptable in length and pace, and balanced. Decision aids are useful in preparing women for decision making about this complex, personal issue.

Randomized trial of a portable, self-administered decision aid for postmenopausal women considering long-term preventive hormone therapy.

Although practice guidelines suggest that postmenopausal women learn about the benefits and risks and consider their values when deciding about hormone therapy, the optimal decision-support method has not been established. In a randomized controlled trial, the authors compared the efficacy of a general educational pamphlet with that of a tailored decision aid. The pamphlet briefly summarized benefits, risks, and likely beneficiaries in general terms. The decision aid, delivered via booklet and audiotape, provided: detailed benefits and risks using functional terms and probabilities tailored to clinical risk; and steps for considering the issue in a woman's own situation, including a value-clarification exercise. Compared with the pamphlet group, the decision-aid group had statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of realistic personal expectations of the benefits and risks, decisional conflict, and perceived acceptability of the intervention. Levels of general knowledge about the main benefits and risks were comparable for the two interventions. It is concluded that tailored decision aids prepare women for decision making better than do general pamphlets.

Screening for cognitive impairment in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent and type of screening for cognitive impairment primary care physicians use for their elderly patients, to identify perceived barriers to screening, and to explore whether physicians would be willing to use the clock drawing test as a cognitive screening tool. DESIGN: Mailed questionnaire. SETTING: Primary care practices in the Ottawa-Carleton region. PARTICIPANTS: Family physicians and general practitioners culled from the Yellow Pages and Canadian Medical Directory; 368 of 568 questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 70%. Six respondents had fewer than 30 patients weekly and two responded too late to be included in the analysis; 360 cases were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Responses to 10 questions on cognitive screening and five on demographics and the nature of respondents' practices. RESULTS: About 80% of respondents reported doing at least one mental status examination during the past year. Only 24% routinely screened patients, although 82% believed screening was needed. Major barriers to cognitive screening were lack of time, risk of offending patients, and possible negative consequences of follow up. Clock drawing was perceived as an acceptable method of screening, if it were proven effective. CONCLUSIONS: Most primary care physicians believe cognitive screening is needed, but few routinely screen their elderly patients. Lack of time is the most important perceived barrier to screening. Primary care physicians are receptive to using the clock drawing test, and, because it is not time-consuming, are less likely to consider lack of time a barrier to testing. The clock test might help bridge the gap between perceived need for screening and actual screening.

Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations.

To develop an appearance scale that will allow the objective and scientific comparison of the cosmetic results of healed lacerations, 33 photographs of healed lacerations and incisions with variable cosmetic results were shown to four plastic surgeons. These plastic surgeons were asked to independently rate the photographs on two separate occasions using two scales, a Visual Analogue Scale and a Categorical Scale. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement were determined for each scale. Comparison of the scales with each other was done to assess consistency. The Visual Analogue Scale showed good interobserver agreement with an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.75. Intraobserver agreement was also high across the four observers with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.73 to 0.87. The agreement of the categorical scale was also good with a kappa coefficient for interobserver agreement of 0.53. The kappa coefficient for intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.48 to 0.72. Because the visual analogue scale and categorical scale showed good interobserver and intraobserver agreement, both may be considered good measurement tools in the comparison of alternate methods of laceration care.

Depression in primary care. Why do we miss the diagnosis?

Depressed patients are often undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, or underdiagnosed. Is this because family physicians are trained mainly to treat somatic complaints? Are patients reluctant to accept psychological causes for their physical symptoms? High volume of patients and short visits make it difficult for doctors to recognize depression. We propose strategies for identifying depressed patients in primary care.

A randomized, controlled trial comparing a tissue adhesive with suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the tissue adhesive Histoacryl Blue with suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Emergency department of a pediatric teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-one children presenting with clean facial lacerations less than 4 cm in length and 0.5 cm in width. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated randomly to have their lacerations repaired with sutures or Histoacryl Blue. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for demographic and clinical characteristics. Photographs taken at three months were rated by two plastic surgeons blinded to the method of closure. There was no difference between groups for appearance scores on a visual analog scale (60.5 mm for Histoacryl Blue versus 57.2 mm for suture, P = .45) or on a categorical scale (Histoacryl Blue versus sutures: unacceptable, 11% versus 13%; acceptable, 59% versus 71%; excellent, 30% versus 16%; P = .76). Measures of observer agreement produced Pearson correlations of .72 and .94 on the visual analog scale and kappa coefficients of .46 and .73 on the categorical scale. Histoacryl Blue was assessed as less painful on a visual analog scale (24.7 versus 43.7 mm, P < .01) and faster (7.9 versus 15.6 minutes, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Histoacryl Blue is a faster and less painful method of facial laceration repair that has cosmetic results similar to the use of sutures.

Diagnosis of dystocia and management with cesarean section among primiparous women in Ottawa-Carleton.

We carried out a chart review study to determine the rate of diagnosis of dystocia (abnormal progress) and the use of cesarean section to treat dystocia among 3887 primiparous women who gave birth to a single baby in the vertex presentation at four hospitals in Ottawa-Carleton in 1984. Of the 3740 women who had some labour 1127 (30.1%) were given a diagnosis of dystocia. Cesarean section for dystocia was done during all phases of labour (41% of procedures in the latent phase, 38% in the active phase and 21% in the second stage). The cesarean section rate varied among the hospitals from 11.8% to 19.6%. A total of 75% of the cesarean sections were for dystocia, disproportion or failed induction. The findings suggest that cesarean section is being done for disproportion without a trial of labour beyond the latent phase and for dystocia in the absence of fetal distress. If these practices were modified the cesarean section rate could be reduced from 16% to about 8%, the rate found in some other centres and that observed in Canada in the early 1970s.

Approach to dyspepsia.

Dyspepsia is a common presenting problem of patients in family medicine. Dyspepsia can be caused by a number of underlying conditions, from peptic ulcer disease to functional disorders. Primary-care physicians need to develop an approach to the investigation and treatment of dyspepsia which maximizes symptom relief while minimizing patient discomfort and health costs. This article assesses the current literature on dyspepsia and outlines the evidence for various management strategies.

The pap smear and cervical cancer screening.

While the effectiveness of cervical cancer-screening programs is well accepted, further decreases in incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer may require a changing role for the family physician. Especially important will be the use of computerized call-recall systems to ensure that all eligible women are screened at least once, and that appropriate follow-up is made for those with positive test results. Since concern is growing over false negative results, it will also be important to ensure that the Pap smear is done adequately.

Computerization of family practice.

The primary focus of computer systems for family practice is on patient billing. Primary care physicians should be aware of the many other benefits that can and should be considered when planning a system for their practice. This article describes the type and extent of information that can be stored in a family practice data base and explores some of the applications in areas of practice and patient management, prevention and research.

Is cimetidine being prescribed indiscriminately? An analytic survey of patients who present with symptoms of peptic ulcer disease.

An analytic survey was done to determine the influence of previously documented peptic ulcer disease (PUD) on the frequency of prescribing cimetidine to patients who present at a family medicine centre with symptoms of PUD. It was found that of 293 patients who presented with such symptoms over 1 year cimetidine was prescribed to 57 (19%). From the 236 patients who did not receive cimetidine 57 patients were selected at random for comparison. Information on these two groups of patients was obtained by chart review. The patients who received cimetidine were found to be significantly more likely (p less than 0.001) to have previously documented PUD than those who did not receive cimetidine. In patients in whom subsequent confirmation of PUD was not obtained, either because the results of investigations were negative or because the investigations were not ordered, cimetidine was prescribed to 63% of those who had previously documented PUD, compared with only 6% of those who did not. Of the patients who were investigated 73% of those with previously documented PUD had positive results, compared with 8% of those without previously documented PUD. The positive results were obtained by endoscopic examination in 88% of the patients with previously documented PUD, whereas upper gastrointestinal tract roentgenography was the definitive test in 73% of the patients without previously documented PUD. These findings suggest that previously documented PUD influences both the frequency of prescribing cimetidine and the investigations that are carried out.