Surgeon knowledge, behavior, and opinions regarding intraoperative cholangiography.

BACKGROUND: The risk of common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is 50% to 70% lower when an intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is used, and this effect is exaggerated among less experienced surgeons. Routine IOC is not universal, and barriers to its use, including surgeon knowledge, behavior, and attitudes, should be understood in developing quality-improvement interventions aimed at increasing IOC use. STUDY DESIGN: There were 4,100 general surgeons randomly selected from the American College of Surgeons who were mailed a survey about IOC. Surveys with a valid exclusion (retired, no LC experience) were considered responsive but were excluded from data analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four percent responded, with 1,417 surveys analyzed (mean age 51.8+/-9.6 years; 89.2% men; 55.3% private practice). Twenty-seven percent of respondents defined themselves as routine IOC users and 91.3% of routine users reported IOC use in more than 75% of LCs performed. Academic surgeons were less often routine users compared with nonacademics (15% versus 30%; p < 0.001). Selective users were more often low-volume (less than 20 LC/year) surgeons (8% versus 15%) as compared with routine users, who were more often high-volume (more than 100 LC/year) surgeons (27% versus 20%). Routine users had more favorable and accurate opinions about IOC (less costly and more protective of injury) than did selective users. Thirty-nine percent of routine users thought IOC decreased the risk of common bile duct injury by at least half compared with 10% of selective users. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons at greatest risk for causing common bile duct injury (inexperienced, low-volume surgeons) and those who have the greatest opportunity to train others are less likely to use IOC routinely. These represent target groups for quality-improvement interventions aimed at broader IOC use.

Risk taking and tolerance of uncertainty: implications for surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to evidence-based adverse outcome prevention techniques is a critical factor in providing high-quality patient care, but many of these interventions are not used by physicians. It is unclear if surgeons' risk attitudes and reactions to uncertainty influence their use of these or other interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify studies evaluating the effects of physicians' risk attitudes, reactions to uncertainty or ambiguity, and personality traits on clinical decision making. RESULTS: A variety of instruments to assess risk attitude and reactions to uncertainty have been developed and tested among physicians involved in critical care and emergency medicine. Scoring systems distinguish risk averse and risk seeking practitioners. In many studies, these characteristics were related to clinical decision making in situations of uncertainty. For example, among patients evaluated in the emergency room for chest pain, "risk-seeking" physicians admitted significantly fewer patients who did not have acute myocardial infarction than risk-avoiding physicians (29% and 47% of patients admitted, respectively). In contrast, risk-seeking physicians were no more likely to discharge a patient who eventually was found to have an acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: There are very limited data on the extent to which surgical decision making is linked to risk taking behavior and "comfort with uncertainty". Understanding the behaviors, attitudes and beliefs that make up surgical "judgment" remains a challenge for those interested in influencing behavior.

Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures.

CONTEXT: Case series demonstrate that bariatric surgery can be performed with a low rate of perioperative mortality (0.5%), but the rate among high-risk patients and the community at large is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries and to determine the relative risk of death among older patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: All fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, 1997-2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day, 90-day, and 1-year postsurgical all-cause mortality among patients undergoing bariatric procedures. RESULTS: A total of 16 155 patients underwent bariatric procedures (mean age, 47.7 years [SD, 11.3 years]; 75.8% women). The rates of 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.0%, 2.8%, and 4.6%, respectively. Men had higher rates of early death than women (3.7% vs 1.5%, 4.8% vs 2.1%, and 7.5% vs 3.7% at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year, respectively; P<.001). Mortality rates were greater for those aged 65 years or older compared with younger patients (4.8% vs 1.7% at 30 days, 6.9% vs 2.3% at 90 days, and 11.1% vs 3.9% at 1 year; P<.001). After adjustment for sex and comorbidity index, the odds of death within 90 days were 5-fold greater for older Medicare beneficiaries (aged > or =75 years; n = 136) than for those aged 65 to 74 years (n = 1381; odds ratio, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-8.0). The odds of death at 90 days were 1.6 times higher (95% confidence interval, 1.3-2.0) for patients of surgeons with less than the median surgical volume of bariatric procedures (among Medicare beneficiaries during the study period) after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity index. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries, the risk of early death after bariatric surgery is considerably higher than previously suggested and associated with advancing age, male sex, and lower surgeon volume of bariatric procedures. Patients aged 65 years or older had a substantially higher risk of death within the early postoperative period than younger patients.