Structural modifications in the distal, regulatory region of histamine H3 receptor antagonists leading to the identification of a potent anti-obesity agent.

A series of 4-pyridylpiperazine derivatives with varying regulatory region substituents proved to be potent histamine H3 receptor (H3R) ligands in the nanomolar concentration range. The most influential modification that affected the affinity toward the H3R appeared by introducing electron-withdrawing moieties into the distal aromatic ring. In order to finally discuss the influence of the characteristic 4-pyridylpiperazine moiety on H3R affinity, two Ciproxifan analogues 2 and 3 with a slight modification in their basic part were obtained. The replacement of piperazine in 3 with piperidine in compound 2, led to slightly reduced affinity towards the H3R (Ki = 3.17 and 7.70 nM, respectively). In fact, 3 showed the highest antagonistic properties among all compounds in this series, hence affirming our previous assumptions, that the 4-pyridylpiperazine moiety is the key element for suitable interaction with the human histamine H3 receptor. While its structural replacement to piperidine is also tolerated for H3R binding, the heteroaromatic 4-pyridyl moiety seems to be essential for proper ligand-receptor interaction. The putative protein-ligand interactions responsible for their high affinity were demonstrated using molecular modeling techniques. Furthermore, selectivity, intrinsic activity at the H3R, as well as drug-like properties of ligands were evaluated using in vitro methods. Moreover, pharmacological in vivo test results of compound 9 (structural analogue of Abbott's A-331440) clearly indicate that it may affect the amount of calories consumed, thus act as an anorectic compound.

A series of novel aryl-methanone derivatives as inhibitors of FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia.

Mutants of the FLT3 receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) with duplications in the juxtamembrane domain (FLT3-ITD) act as drivers of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKi) of FLT3-ITD entered clinical trials and showed a promising, but transient success due to the occurrence of secondary drug-resistant AML clones. A further caveat of drugs targeting FLT3-ITD is the co-targeting of other RTKs which are required for normal hematopoiesis. This is observed quite frequently. Therefore, novel drugs are necessary to treat AML effectively and safely. Recently bis(1H-indol-2-yl)methanones were found to inhibit FLT3 and PDGFR kinases. In order to optimize these agents we synthesized novel derivatives of these methanones with various substituents. Methanone 16 and its carbamate derivative 17b inhibit FLT3-ITD at least as potently as the TKi AC220 (quizartinib). Models indicate corresponding interactions of 16 and quizartinib with FLT3. The activity of 16 is accompanied by a high selectivity for FLT3-ITD.

Structure-Activity Relationship of Hetarylpropylguanidines Aiming at the Development of Selective Histamine Receptor Ligands†.

New classes of alkylated hetarylpropylguanidines with different functionality and variation in spacer length were synthesized to determine their behavior at the four histamine receptor (H1R, H2R, H3R, H4R) subtypes. Alkylated guanidines with different terminal functional groups and varied basicity, like amine, guanidine and urea were developed, based on the lead structure SK&F 91486 (2). Furthermore, heteroatomic exchange at the guanidine structure of 2 led to simple analogues of the lead compound. Radioassays at all histamine receptor subtypes were accomplished, as well as organ bath studies at the guinea pig (gp) ileum (gpH1R) and right atrium (gpH2R). Ligands with terminal functionalization led to, partially, highly affine and potent structures (two digit nanomolar), which showed up a bad selectivity profile within the histamine receptor family. While the benzoylurea derivative 144 demonstrated a preference towards the human (h) H3R, S-methylisothiourea analogue 143 obtained high affinity at the hH4R (pKi=8.14) with moderate selectivity. The molecular basis of the latter finding was supported by computational studies.

Highly Potent, Stable, and Selective Dimeric Hetarylpropylguanidine-Type Histamine H2 Receptor Agonists.

On the basis of the long-known prototypic pharmacophore 3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propylguanidine (SK&F 91486, 2), monomeric, homodimeric, and heterodimeric bisalkylguanidine-type histamine H2 receptor (H2R) agonists with various alkyl spacers were synthesized. Aiming at increased H2R selectivity of the ligands, the imidazol-4-yl moiety was replaced by imidazol-1-yl, 2-aminothiazol-5-yl or 2-amino-4-methylthiazol-5-yl according to a bioisosteric approach. All compounds turned out to be partial or full agonists at the h/gp/rH2R. The most potent analogue, the thiazole-type heterodimeric ligand 63 (UR-Po461), was a partial agonist (Emax = 88%) and 250 times more potent than histamine (pEC50: 8.56 vs 6.16, gpH2R, atrium). The homodimeric structures 56 (UR-Po395) and 58 (UR-Po448) exhibited the highest hH2R affinities (pKi: 7.47, 7.33) in binding studies. Dimeric amino(methyl)thiazole derivatives, such as 58, generated an increased hH2R selectivity compared to the monomeric analogues, e.g., 139 (UR-Po444). Although monomeric ligands showed up lower affinities and potencies at the H2R, compounds with a short alkylic side chain like 129 (UR-Po194) proved to be highly affine hH4R ligands.

Design and biological evaluation of tetrahydro-ß-carboline derivatives as highly potent histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) inhibitors.

Various diseases are related to epigenetic modifications. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) and histone acetyl transferases (HATs) determine the pattern of histone acetylation, and thus are involved in the regulation of gene expression. First generation histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are unselective, hinder all different kinds of zinc dependent HDACs and additionally cause several side effects. Subsequently, selective HDACi are gaining more and more interest. Especially, selective histone deacetylase 6 inhibitors (HDAC6i) are supposed to be less toxic. Here we present a successful optimization study of tubastatin A, the synthesis and biological evaluation of new inhibitors based on hydroxamic acids linked to various tetrahydro-ß-carboline derivatives. The potency of our selective HDAC6 inhibitors, exhibiting IC50 values in a range of 1-10 nM towards HDAC6, was evaluated with the help of a recombinant human HDAC6 enzyme assay. Selectivity was proofed in cellular assays by the hyperacetylation of surrogate parameter α-tubulin in the absence of acetylated histone H3 analyzed by Western Blot. We show that all synthesized compounds, with varies modifications of the rigid cap group, were selective and potent HDAC6 inhibitors.

Marbostat-100 Defines a New Class of Potent and Selective Antiinflammatory and Antirheumatic Histone Deacetylase 6 Inhibitors.

Epigenetic modifiers of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) family contribute to autoimmunity, cancer, HIV infection, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Hence, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), which alter protein acetylation, gene expression patterns, and cell fate decisions, represent promising new drugs for the therapy of these diseases. Whereas pan-HDACi inhibit all 11 Zn2+-dependent histone deacetylases (HDACs) and cause a broad spectrum of side effects, specific inhibitors of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6i) are supposed to have less side effects. We present the synthesis and biological evaluation of Marbostats, novel HDAC6i that contain the hydroxamic acid moiety linked to tetrahydro-ß-carboline derivatives. Our lead compound Marbostat-100 is a more potent and more selective HDAC6i than previously established well-characterized compounds in vitro as well as in cells. Moreover, Marbostat-100 is well tolerated by mice and effective against collagen type II induced arthritis. Thus, Marbostat-100 represents a most selective known HDAC6i and the possibility for clinical evaluation of a HDAC isoform-specific drug.

Dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepines and dibenzo[b,e]oxepines: Influence of the chlorine substitution pattern on the pharmacology at the H1R, H4R, 5-HT2AR and other selected GPCRs.

Inspired by VUF6884 (7-Chloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepine), reported as a dual H1/H4 receptor ligand (pKi: 8.11 (human H1R (hH1R)), 7.55 (human H4R (hH4R))), four known and 28 new oxazepine and related oxepine derivatives were synthesised and pharmacologically characterized at histamine receptors and selected aminergic GPCRs. In contrast to the oxazepine series, within the oxepine series, the new compounds showed high affinity to the hH1R (pKi: 6.8-8.7), but no or moderate affinity to the hH4R (pKi:≤5.3). For one oxepine derivative (1-(2-Chloro-6,11-dihydrodibenzo[b,e]oxepin-11-yl)-4-methylpiperazine), the enantiomers were separated and the R-enantiomer was identified as the eutomer at the hH1R (pKi: 8.83 (R), 7.63 (S)) and the guinea-pig H1R (gpH1R) (pKi: 8.82 (R), 7.41 (S)). Molecular dynamic studies suggest that the tricyclic core of the compounds is bound in a similar mode into the binding pocket, as described for doxepine in the hH1R crystal structure. Moreover, docking studies of all oxepine derivatives at the hH1R indicate that the oxygen and the position of the chlorine in the tricyclic core determines, if the R- or the S-enantiomer is the eutomer. For some of the oxazepines and oxepines the affinity to other aminergic GPCRs is in the same range as to hH1R or hH4R, thus, those compounds have to be classified as dirty drugs. However, one oxazepine derivative (3,7-Dichloro-11-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)dibenzo[b,f][1,4]oxazepine was identified as dual hH1/h5-HT2A receptor ligand (pKi: 9.23 (hH1R), 8.74 (h5-HT2AR), ≤7 at other analysed GPCRs), whereas one oxepine derivative (1-(3,8-Dichloro-6,11-dihydrodibenzo[b,e]oxepin-11-yl)-4-methylpiperazine) was identified as selective hH1R antagonist (pKi: 8.44 (hH1R), ≤6.7 at other analyzed GPCRs). Thus, the pharmacological results suggest that the oxazepine/oxepine moiety and additionally the chlorine substitution pattern toggles receptor selectivity and specificity.

2,4-Diaminopyrimidines as dual ligands at the histamine H1 and H4 receptor-H1/H4-receptor selectivity.

Distinct diaminopyrimidines, for example, 4-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)-5,6-dihydrobenzo[h]quinazolin-2-amine are histamine H4 receptor (H4R) antagonists and show high affinity to the H4R, but only a moderate affinity to the histamine H1 receptor (H1R). Within previous studies it was shown that an aromatic side chain with a distinct distance to the basic amine and aromatic core is necessary for affinity to the human H1R (hH1R). Thus, a rigid aminopyrimidine with a tricyclic core was used as a lead structure. There, (1) the flexible aromatic side chain was introduced, (2) the substitution pattern of the pyrimidine core was exchanged and (3) rigidity was decreased by opening the tricyclic core. Within the present study, two compounds with similar affinity in the one digit µM range to the human H1R and H4R were identified. While the affinity at the hH1R increased about 4- to 8-fold compared to the parent diaminopyrimidine, the affinity to the hH4R decreased about 5- to 8-fold. In addition to the parent diaminopyrimidine, two selected compounds were docked into the H1R and H4R and molecular dynamic studies were performed to predict the binding mode and explain the experimental results on a molecular level. The two new compounds may be good lead structures for the development of dual H1/H4 receptor ligands with affinities in the same range.

[(3) H]UR-DE257: development of a tritium-labeled squaramide-type selective histamine H2 receptor antagonist.

A series of new piperidinomethylphenoxypropylamine-type histamine H2 receptor (H2 R) antagonists with different substituted "urea equivalents" was synthesized and characterized in functional in vitro assays. Based on these data as selection criteria, radiosynthesis of N-[6-(3,4-dioxo-2-{3-[3-(piperidin-1-ylmethyl)phenoxy]propylamino}cyclobut-1-enylamino)hexyl]-(2,3-(3) H2 )propionic amide ([(3) H]UR-DE257) was performed. The radioligand (specific activity: 63 Ci mmol(-1) ) had high affinity for human, rat, and guinea pig H2 R (hH2 R, Sf9 cells: Kd , saturation binding: 31 nM, kinetic studies: 20 nM). UR-DE257 revealed high H2 R selectivity on membranes of Sf9 cells, expressing the respective hHx R subtype (Ki values: hH1 R: >10000 nM, hH2 R: 28 nM, hH3 R: 3800 nM, hH4 R: >10000 nM). In spite of insurmountable antagonism, probably due to rebinding of [(3) H]UR-DE257 to the H2 R (extended residence time), the title compound proved to be a valuable pharmacological tool for the determination of H2 R affinities in competition binding assays.

Pharmacological profile of astemizole-derived compounds at the histamine H1 and H4 receptor--H1/H4 receptor selectivity.

Astemizole, a H1R antagonist shows high affinity to the histamine H1 receptor but only a moderate affinity to the histamine H4 receptor. This study aims to modify the astemizole to keep high affinity to the histamine H1 receptor and to increase affinity to the histamine H4 receptor. Therefore, 13 astemizole-derived compounds and astemizole-JNJ7777120-derived hybrid compounds were synthesized and pharmacologically characterized at the histamine H1 and H4 receptors. The new compounds show affinity to the histamine H1 receptor in the pK i range from 5.3 to 8.8, whereas the affinity of these compounds to the histamine H4 receptor was surprisingly rather low (pK i from 4.4 to 5.6). Three representative compounds were docked into the histamine H1 receptor and molecular dynamic studies were performed to explain the binding mode and the experimental results on a molecular level. Furthermore, taking into account the binding mode of compounds with high affinity to the histamine H4 receptor, a H1/H4-pharmacophore hypothesis was developed.

Synthesis and dual histamine H1 and H2 receptor antagonist activity of cyanoguanidine derivatives.

Premedication with a combination of histamine H1 receptor (H1R) and H2 receptor (H2R) antagonists has been suggested as a prophylactic principle, for instance, in anaesthesia and surgery. Aiming at pharmacological hybrids combining H1R and H2R antagonistic activity, a series of cyanoguanidines 14-35 was synthesized by linking mepyramine-type H1R antagonist substructures with roxatidine-, tiotidine-, or ranitidine-type H2R antagonist moieties. N-desmethylmepyramine was connected via a poly-methylene spacer to a cyanoguanidine group as the "urea equivalent" of the H2R antagonist moiety. The title compounds were screened for histamine antagonistic activity at the isolated ileum (H1R) and the isolated spontaneously beating right atrium (H2R) of the guinea pig. The results indicate that, depending on the nature of the H2R antagonist partial structure, the highest H1R antagonist potency resided in roxatidine-type compounds with spacers of six methylene groups in length (compound 21), and tiotidine-type compounds irrespective of the alkyl chain length (compounds 28, 32, 33), N-cyano-N'-[2-[[(2-guanidino-4-thiazolyl)methyl]thio]ethyl]-N″-[2-[N-[2-[N-(4-methoxybenzyl)-N-(pyridyl)-amino] ethyl]-N-methylamino]ethyl] guanidine (25, pKB values: 8.05 (H1R, ileum) and 7.73 (H2R, atrium) and the homologue with the mepyramine moiety connected by a six-membered chain to the tiotidine-like partial structure (compound 32, pKB values: 8.61 (H1R) and 6.61 (H2R) were among the most potent hybrid compounds. With respect to the development of a potential pharmacotherapeutic agent, structural optimization seems possible through selection of other H1R and H2R pharmacophoric moieties with mutually affinity-enhancing properties.

The bivalent ligand approach leads to highly potent and selective acylguanidine-type histamine H2 receptor agonists.

Bivalent histamine H(2) receptor (H(2)R) agonists were synthesized by connecting pharmacophoric 3-(2-amino-4-methylthiazol-5-yl)-, 3-(2-aminothiazol-5-yl)-, 3-(imidazol-4-yl)-, or 3-(1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)propylguanidine moieties by N(G)-acylation with alkanedioic acids of various chain lengths. The compounds were investigated for H(2)R agonism in GTPase and [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays at guinea pig (gp) and human (h) H(2)R-Gsα(S) fusion proteins including various H(2)R mutants, at the isolated gp right atrium, and in GTPase assays for activity on recombinant H(1), H(3), and H(4) receptors. The bivalent ligands are H(2)R partial or full agonists, up to 2 orders of magnitude more potent than monovalent acylguanidines and, with octanedioyl or decanedioyl spacers, up to 4000 times more potent than histamine at the gpH(2)R. In contrast to their imidazole analogues, the aminothiazoles are highly selective for H(2)R vs other HR subtypes. Compounds with (theoretically) sufficient spacer length (20 CH(2) groups) to simultaneously occupy two orthosteric binding sites in H(2)R dimers are nearly inactive, whereas the highest potency resides in compounds with considerably shorter spacers. Thus, there is no evidence for interaction with H(2)R dimers. The high agonistic potency may result from interaction with an accessory binding site at the same receptor protomer.

Synthesis and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Dibenzo[b,e]oxepin-11(6H)-one O-Benzoyloxime Derivatives.

A series of dibenzo[b,e]ox(thi)epin-11(6H)-one O-benzoyloximes has been synthesized and structurally elucidated by means of IR, (1)H-NMR, (13)C-NMR, MS, and elemental analysis. The newly developed compounds were screened at concentrations of 200-25 µg/mL for their antibacterial activity against Gram+ve organisms such as Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA), Gram-ve organisms such as Escherichia coli (E. coli), and at the same concentration range for their antifungal activity against fungal strain Aspergillus niger (A. niger) by the cup plate method. Ofloxacin and ketoconazole (10 µg/mL) were used as reference standards for antibacterial and antifungal activity, respectively. The dibenzo[b,e]oxepines 6a-c and 6e-h showed low antimicrobial activity (MIC 125-200 µg/mL) compared to the reference substances, whereas a major improvement (MIC 50-75 µg/mL) was achieved with the synthesis of the corresponding bromomethyl derivative 6d. Moreover, replacement of oxygen by its bioisosteric sulfur led to isomeric dibenzo[b,e]thi-epine derivatives 6g,h which significantly exhibited higher antimicrobial activity (MIC 25-50 µg/mL) against all tested culture strains used in the present study, demonstrating that a change of chemical class from dibenzo[b,e]oxepine to dibenzo[b,e]thiepine significantly improves the antimicrobial activity. Further variation, such as the oxidation of the thiepine sulfur to the corresponding isomeric dibenzo[b,e]thiepine 5,5-dioxide derivative 9, comparatively failed to exhibit high activity (MIC 200 µg/mL) against S. aureus, E. coli or A. niger.

Mepyramine-JNJ7777120-hybrid compounds show high affinity to hH(1)R, but low affinity to hH(4)R.

In literature, a synergism between histamine H(1) and H(4) receptor is discussed. Furthermore, it was shown, that the combined application of mepyramine, a H(1) antagonist and JNJ7777120, a H(4) receptor ligand leads to a synergistic effect in the acute murine asthma model. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop new hybrid ligands, containing one H(1) and one H(4) pharmacophor, connected by an appropriate spacer, in order to address both, H(1)R and H(4)R. Within this study, we synthesized nine hybrid compounds, which were pharmacologically characterized at hH(1)R and hH(4)R. The new compounds revealed (high) affinity to hH(1)R, but showed only low affinity to hH(4)R. Additionally, we performed molecular dynamic studies for some selected compounds at hH(1)R, in order to obtain information about the binding mode of these compounds on molecular level.

N (α)-Methylated phenylhistamines exhibit affinity to the hH(4)R-a pharmacological and molecular modelling study.

Histamine H(1)-receptor agonists and antagonists exhibit affinity to the human histamine H(4)-receptor (hH(4)R). However, the pharmacological profiles between hH(1)R and hH(4)R exhibit similarities and differences. Since suprahistaprodifen and trifluoromethylphenylhistamine show significant affinity to hH(4)R, the aim of this study was to analyse a large number of new phenylhistamines, histaprodifens and phenoprodifens at hH(4)R to extend the pharmacological profile of these compound classes at hH(4)R. The hH(4)R-RGS19 fusion protein was co-expressed with G(αi2) and G(ß1γ2) in Sf9 insect cells, and [(3)H]histamine competition binding as well as GTPase assays were performed. Based on adequate crystal structures, homology models of hH(4)R were generated. Molecular modelling studies, including molecular dynamics and prediction of Gibbs energy of ligand binding, were performed in order to explain the pharmacological data at hH(4)R on molecular level. The exchange of the phenyl moiety of phenylhistamines into the diphenylpropyl moiety of histaprodifens acts, in contrast to hH(1)R, as partial agonism-inverse agonism switch at hH(4)R. Based on our studies, some phenylhistamine derivatives with significantly higher affinity at hH(4)R than at hH(1)R were identified. The molecular dynamic simulations revealed two different conformations for the highly conserved Trp(6.48), suggested to be involved in receptor activation. Furthermore, the predicted Gibbs energy of ligand binding for six selected phenylhistamines was in very good agreement with the experimentally determined affinities. We identified phenylhistamine derivatives with higher affinity at hH(4)R than at hH(1)R. Besides, we have identified partial agonism-inverse agonism switch between phenylhistamines and histaprodifens at hH(4)R. These results are very important to understand selectivity between hH(1)R and hH(4)R and to design new potent H(1)R and/or H(4)R receptor ligands.

Effects of ginger constituents on the gastrointestinal tract: role of cholinergic M3 and serotonergic 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 receptors.

The herbal drug ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) may be effective for treating nausea, vomiting, and gastric hypomotility. In these conditions, cholinergic M (3) receptors and serotonergic 5-HT (3) and 5-HT (4) receptors are involved. The major chemical constituents of ginger are [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol. We studied the interaction of [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol (racemates), and [6]-shogaol with guinea pig M (3) receptors, guinea pig 5-HT (3) receptors, and rat 5-HT (4) receptors. In whole segments of guinea pig ileum (bioassay for contractile M (3) receptors), [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol slightly but significantly depressed the maximal carbachol response at an antagonist concentration of 10 µM. In the guinea pig myenteric plexus preparation (bioassay for contractile 5-HT (3) receptors), 5-HT maximal responses were depressed by [10]-gingerol from 93 ± 3 % to 65 ± 6 % at an antagonist concentration of 3 µM and to 48 ± 3 % at an antagonist concentration of 5 µM following desensitization of 5-HT (4) receptors and blockade of 5-HT (1) and 5-HT (2) receptors. [6]-Shogaol (3 µM) induced depression to 61 ± 3 %. In rat esophageal tunica muscularis mucosae (bioassay for relaxant 5-HT (4) receptors), [6]-gingerol, [8]-gingerol, [10]-gingerol, and [6]-shogaol (2-6.3 µM) showed no agonist effects. The maximal 5-HT response remained unaffected in the presence of the compounds. It is concluded that the efficiency of ginger in reducing nausea and vomiting may be based on a weak inhibitory effect of gingerols and shogaols at M (3) and 5-HT (3) receptors. 5-HT (4) receptors, which play a role in gastroduodenal motility, appear not to be involved in the action of these compounds.

Theoretical studies on the interaction of partial agonists with the 5-HT2A receptor.

A series of 51 5-HT(2A) partial agonistic arylethylamines (primary or benzylamines) from different structural classes (indoles, methoxybenzenes, quinazolinediones) was investigated by fragment regression analysis (FRA), docking and 3D-QSAR approaches. The data, pEC(50) values and intrinsic activities (E(max)) on rat arteries, show high variability of pEC(50) from 4 to 10 and of E(max) from 15 to 70%. FRA indicates which substructures affect potency or intrinsic activity. The high contribution of halogens in para position of phenethylamines to pEC(50) points to a specific hydrophobic pocket. Other results suggest the significance of hydrogen bonds of the aryl moiety for activation and the contrary effect of benzyl groups on affinity (increasing) and intrinsic activity (decreasing). Results from fragment regression and data on all available mutants were considered to derive a common binding site at the rat 5-HT(2A) receptor. After generation and MD simulations of a receptor model based on the ß(2)-adrenoceptor structure, typical derivatives were docked, leading to the suggestion of common interactions, e.g., with serines in TM3 and TM5 and with a cluster of aromatic amino acids in TM5 and TM6. The whole series was aligned by docking and minimization of the complexes. The pEC(50) values correlate well with Sybyl docking energies and hydrophobicity of the aryl moieties. With this alignment, CoMFA and CoMSIA approaches based on a training set of 36 and a test set of 15 compounds were performed. The correlation of pEC(50) with steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic and H-bond acceptor fields resulted in sufficient fit (q (2): 0.75-0.8, r (2): 0.92-0.95) and predictive power (r (pred) (2) : 0.85-0.88). The important interaction regions largely reflect the patterns provided by the putative binding site. In particular, the fit of the aryl moieties and benzyl substituents to two hydrophobic pockets is evident.

Chiral NG-acylated hetarylpropylguanidine-type histamine H2 receptor agonists do not show significant stereoselectivity.

A set of chiral imidazolylpropylguanidines and 2-aminothiazolylpropylguanidines bearing N(G)-3-phenyl- or N(G)-3-cyclohexylbutanoyl residues was synthesized and investigated for histamine H(2) receptor (H(2)R) agonism (guinea pig (gp) right atrium, GTPase assay on recombinant gp and human (h)H(2)R) and for hH(2)R selectivity compared to hH(1)R, hH(3)R and hH(4)R. In contrast to previous studies on arpromidine derivatives, the present investigation of acylguanidine-type compounds revealed only very low eudismic ratios (1.1-3.2), indicating the stereochemistry of the acyl moiety to play only a minor role in this series of H(2)R agonists.

N(G)-acylated imidazolylpropylguanidines as potent histamine H4 receptor agonists: selectivity by variation of the N(G)-substituent.

3-(1H-Imidazol-4-yl)propylguanidine (SK&F 91486, 4) was identified as a potent partial agonist at the human histamine H(3) receptor (hH(3)R) and human histamine H(4) receptor (hH(4)R). With the aim to increase selectivity for the hH(4)R, the guanidine group in 4 was acylated. N(1)-Acetyl-N(2)-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)propyl]guanidine (UR-PI288, 13) was a potent full agonist at the hH(4)R (pEC(50) = 8.31; alpha = 1.00), possessing more than 1000- and 100-fold selectivity relative to the hH(1)R and hH(2)R, respectively, and possessing only low intrinsic activity (alpha = 0.27) at the hH(3)R.

Molecular basis for the selective interaction of synthetic agonists with the human histamine H1-receptor compared with the guinea pig H1-receptor.

Previous studies revealed that phenylhistamines and histaprodifens possess higher potency and affinity at guinea pig histamine H(1)-receptor (gpH(1)R) than at human histamine H(1)-receptor (hH(1)R). However, we recently identified an imidazolylpropylguanidine [N(1)-(3-cyclohexylbutanoyl)-N(2)-[3-(1H-imidazol-4-yl)-propyl]guanidine (UR-AK57)] with higher potency and efficacy at hH(1)R compared with gpH(1)R. The aim of this study was to reveal the molecular basis for the species differences of synthetic ligands. We studied 11 novel phenylhistamines and phenoprodifens. H(1)R species isoforms were expressed in Sf9 insect cells, and [(3)H]mepyramine competition binding and GTPase assays were performed. We identified bulky phenylhistamines with higher potency and affinity at hH(1)R compared with gpH(1)R. Molecular dynamics simulations of ligand-H(1)R interactions revealed four potential binding modes for phenylhistamines possessing an additional histamine moiety; the terminal histamine moiety showed a high flexibility in the binding pocket. There are striking similarities in ligand properties in bulky phenylhistamines and UR-AK57. Comparison of bulky phenylhistamine binding mode with binding mode of UR-AK57 suggests that only one of these four binding modes should be established. The higher potency is explained by more effective van der Waals interaction of the compounds with Asn(2.61) (hH(1)R) relative to Ser(2.61) (gpH(1)R). In addition, two stable binding modes for phenoprodifens with different orientations in the binding-pocket were identified. Depending on phenoprodifen orientation, the highly conserved Trp(6.48), part of the toggle switch involved in receptor activation, was found in an inactive or active conformation, respectively. We identified the first phenylhistamines with higher potency at hH(1)R than at gpH(1)R and obtained insight into the binding mode of bulky phenylhistamines and imidazolylpropylguanidines.