Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Wound J ; 15(1): 75-83, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068153

RESUMO

Groin wound infections in patients undergoing vascular procedures often cause a lengthy process of wound healing. Several clinical studies and case reports show a reduction of surgical site infections (SSIs) in various wound types after using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT). The aim of this prospective, randomised, single-institution study was to investigate the effectiveness of ciNPT (PREVENA™ Therapy) compared to conventional therapy on groin incisions after vascular surgery. From 1 February to 30 October 2015, 100 patients with 129 groin incisions were analysed. Patients were randomised and treated with either ciNPT (n = 58 groins) or the control dressing (n = 71 groins). ciNPT was applied intraoperatively and removed on days 5-7 postoperatively. The control group received a conventional adhesive plaster. Wound evaluation based on the Szilagyi classification took place postoperatively on days 5-7 and 30. Compared to the control group, the ciNPT group showed a significant reduction in wound complications (P < 0·0005) after both wound evaluation periods and in revision surgeries (P = 0·022) until 30 days postoperatively. Subgroup analysis revealed that ciNPT had a significant effect on almost all examined risk factors for wound healing. ciNPT significantly reduced the incidence of incision complications and revision procedures after vascular surgery.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/etiologia , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/métodos , Reoperação/métodos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Cicatrização/fisiologia
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 67(2): 649-655, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29157681

RESUMO

In high-risk patients with diseases of the ascending aorta, endovascular repair might be a therapeutic alternative to surgical repair. We developed a combined access route with transapical and transfemoral externalization of the wire and report the operative technique as well as our initial experience of six patients treated with this method. Improved wire control resulted in precise deployment of endovascular prostheses, respecting the integrity of the coronary ostia and the supra-aortic vessels. Procedural success was 100%, and follow-up until 32 months postoperatively showed no need for reintervention or mortality. However, long-term results of the presented technique are still unknown.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Aorta/cirurgia , Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Artéria Femoral , Idoso , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Aórtico/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aortografia/métodos , Prótese Vascular , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Punções , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Am Soc Hypertens ; 10(6): 490-2, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27184290

RESUMO

Clinical trials have demonstrated significant and durable reduction in arterial pressure from baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) in patients with resistant arterial hypertension. There is a lack of data, however, concerning the use of BAT in a rescue approach during therapy-refractory hypertensive crisis resulting in life-threatening end-organ damage. Here, we describe the first case in which BAT was applied as a rescue procedure in an intensive care setting after ineffective maximum medical treatment. A 34-year-old male patient presented with Stanford B aortic dissection and hypertensive crisis. The dissection membrane extended from the left subclavian artery down to the right common iliac artery, resulting in a total arterial occlusion of the right leg. After emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair and femorofemoral crossover bypass, the patient developed a compartment syndrome of the right lower limb, ultimately leading to amputation of the right leg above the knee. Even under deep sedation recurrent hypertensive crises of up to 220 mm Hg occurred that could not be controlled by eight antihypertensive drugs of different classes. Screening for secondary hypertension was negative. Eventually, rescue implantation of right-sided BAT was performed as a bailout procedure, followed by immediate activation of the device. After a hospital stay of a total of 8 weeks, the patient was discharged 2 weeks after BAT initiation with satisfactory blood pressure levels. After 1-year follow-up, the patient has not had a hypertensive crisis since the onset of BAT and is currently on fourfold oral antihypertensive therapy. The previously described bailout procedures for the treatment of life-threatening hypertensive conditions that are refractory to drug treatment have mainly comprised the interventional denervation of renal arteries. The utilization of BAT is new in this emergency context and showed a significant, immediate, and sustained reduction of blood pressure levels after activation. To our knowledge, we report the first case of an immediate activation of a barostim while the device is usually not activated before 2 to 4 weeks after implantation to allow time for the surgical site to heal. During the follow-up period, the healing process was not impaired, and a significant, immediate, and sustained reduction of blood pressure levels after activation could be observed. This treatment option offers maximum adherence to antihypertensive therapy to avoid future cardiovascular end-organ damage and possibly reduce antihypertensive medication and undesirable side effects.


Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Barorreflexo , Vasoespasmo Coronário/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Hipertensão/terapia , Adulto , Dissecção Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dissecção Aórtica/etiologia , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Pressão Sanguínea , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Seio Carotídeo/fisiologia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Vasoespasmo Coronário/complicações , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Humanos , Hipertensão/complicações , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...