A retrospective analysis of anticoagulant safety among heart transplant recipients undergoing endomyocardial biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous endomyocardial biopsy is an invasive procedure which is used to diagnose rejection following an orthotopic heart transplant. Endomyocardial biopsy is widely regarded as low risk with all-cause complication rates below 5% in most safety studies. Following transplant, some patients require therapeutic anticoagulation. It is unknown whether anticoagulation increases endomyocardial biopsy bleeding risk. METHODS: Records from 2061 endomyocardial biopsies performed for post-transplant rejection surveillance at our institution between November 2016 and August 2022 were reviewed. Bleeding complications were defined as vascular access-related hematoma or bleeding, procedure-related red blood cell transfusion, and new pericardial effusion. Relative risk and small sample-adjusted 95% confidence interval was calculated to investigate the association between bleeding complications and anticoagulation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of bleeding was 1.2% (25/2061 cases). There was a statistically significant increase in bleeding among patients on intravenous (RR 4.46, CI 1.09-18.32) but not oral anticoagulants (RR .62, CI .15-2.63) compared to patients without anticoagulant exposure. There was a trend toward increased bleeding among patients taking warfarin with INR ≥ 1.8 (RR 3.74, CI .90-15.43). Importantly, no bleeding events occurred in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants such as apixaban. Based on these results, intravenous rather than oral anticoagulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of bleeding complications following endomyocardial biopsy.

Impact of Temporary Preoperative Mechanical Support on Heart Transplant Outcomes.

We sought to assess the impact of temporary preoperative mechanical circulatory support (TPMCS) on heart transplantation outcomes. A total of 4,060 adult heart transplants from June 1, 2006, to December 31, 2019, were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database as having TPMCS. Recipients were divided into groups based on their type of TPMCS: intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), temporary ventricular assist device (VAD), biventricular assist device (BIVAD), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Perioperative outcomes and survival were compared among groups. Recipients with IABP were associated with older age, a smoking history, and a significantly shorter wait list time ( p < 0.01). Recipients with ECMO had a significantly increased in-hospital mortality as well as an increased incidence of dialysis ( p < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed worse 1 and 5 year survival for recipients with ECMO. Cox model demonstrated a significantly increased risk of mortality with BIVAD (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.57; p < 0.01) and ECMO (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33-2.03; p < 0.01). While patients with IABP have a survival comparable to patients without TPMCS or durable left VAD, outcomes for BIVADs and ECMO are not as favorable. Transplantation centers must continue to make careful choices about the type of TPMCS utilized before heart transplant.

Allocation changes in heart transplantation: What has really changed?

OBJECTIVE: In 2018, the heart allocation system changed status classifications and broadened geographic distribution. We examined this change at a national level based on the immediate pre- and postchange periods. METHODS: Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database, we identified all adult primary, isolated heart transplants from October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2019. Two time periods were compared: (1) October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2018 (pre); and (2) October 18, 2018, to October 17, 2019 (post). Comparisons were made between groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with pretransplant temporary mechanical circulatory support. Volume analysis at the regional, state, and center level was also conducted as the primary focus. RESULTS: A total of 5381 independent heart transplants were identified within the time frame. On unadjusted analysis, there was a significant increase in temporary mechanical circulatory support (pre, 11.1%; post, 36.2%, P < .01) and decrease in waitlist days (pre, 93 days; post, 41 days; P < .01). Distance traveled (nautical miles) (pre, 83; post, 225; P < .01) and ischemic time (hours) (pre, 3.0; post, 3.4; P < .01) were significantly increased. On multivariable analysis, the postallocation time period was independently associated with temporary MCS (odds ratio, 4.463; 95% confidence interval, 3.844-5.183; P < .001). Transplant volumes did not significantly change after the allocation change at a regional, state, and center level. CONCLUSIONS: Since the planned alteration to the allocation system, there have been changes in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support as well as distance and ischemic time associated with transplant, but no significant volume changes were observed. Continued observation of outcomes and volume under the new allocation system will be necessary in the upcoming years.

Evaluation and Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea in Patients with Heart Failure.

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure (HF). Prevalence of the most common subtypes of SDB, central sleep apnea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), is increasing, which is concerning due to the association of SDB with increased mortality in patients with HF. Despite an increasing burden of CSA in HF, it is difficult to detect using current diagnostic tools and the treatment modalities are limited by variable efficacy and patient adherence. Though positive airway pressure therapies remain the cornerstone of OSA treatment, the management of CSA in the setting of HF continues to evolve. The association of the presence of CSA with worse prognosis in HF patients warrants the need for routine screening for signs and symptoms of CSA in this population. In this review, we examine the connection between CSA and HF, and highlight advancements in timely diagnostics, treatment modalities, and strategies to promote facilitation of compliance in this high-risk cohort.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in solid organ transplant recipients: A meta-analysis.

There is limited evidence comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We performed a pooled analysis to study the safety and efficacy of DOACs in this patient population. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases using the search terms "heart transplant" or "lung transplant" or "liver transplant" or "kidney transplant" or "pancreas transplant" and "direct oral anticoagulant" for literature search. Random effects model with Mantel-Haenszel method was used to pool the outcomes. Pooled analysis included 489 patients, of which 259 patients received DOACs and 230 patients received warfarin. When compared to warfarin, the use of DOACs was associated with decreased risk of composite bleed (RR .49, 95% CI .32-.76, p = .002). There were no differences in rates of major bleeding (RR .55, 95% CI .20-1.49, p = .24) or venous thromboembolism (RR .65, 95% CI .25-1.70, p = .38) between the two groups. Evidence from pooled analysis suggests that DOACs are comparable to warfarin in terms of safety in SOT recipients. Further research is warranted to conclusively determine whether DOACs are safe alternatives to warfarin for anticoagulation in SOT recipients.

Interatrial shunt devices for the treatment of heart failure.

Despite ongoing advances in the treatment of heart failure, overall symptom burden remains high. Underlying the primary symptom of dyspnea are often elevations in left atrial pressures, which occur across the spectrum of heart failure subgroups. Current therapies do not directly address improvements in left atrial pressures; however, passive left atrial decompression may offer a new avenue to treat heart failure. New technologies are currently being evaluated in clinical testing and may offer a novel therapeutic approach to heart failure.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes of Therapies for Patients With Central Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and predominant central sleep apnea pose treatment challenges. A system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were undertaken. Electronic searches of digital repositories, journals, specialty society and manufacturer websites, manual searches of reference sections of RCTs, and published clinical guidelines were performed. Studies were graded for bias. Meta-analytic random effects models were used. Outcomes of interest included: sleep, cardiovascular, mortality, and quality of life (QoL). Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation was performed. Nineteen randomized studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria of apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥10, predominant central sleep apnea (CSA), and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) ≤50%. Most trials examined adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) (8 studies) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (9 studies). Bias existed in that: 15 of 19 (79%) of the trials lacked blinding, 10 of 19 were manufacturer funded, and with attrition in 8 of 19 studies. In meta-analysis, ASV performed better than control on sleep but not on QoL or cardiovascular outcomes, including mortality. CPAP demonstrated positive short-term outcomes on sleep, cardiovascular, and QoL (3 months). Longer-term cardiovascular and mortality data did not show benefit. Drug therapies demonstrated a positive clinical effect short term on sleep outcomes only. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) demonstrated positive treatment outcomes on sleep and QoL at 6 months. Evidence suggests improvement in cardiovascular outcomes with TPNS. In conclusion, ASV and CPAP therapies improve sleep, but long-term QoL or cardiovascular benefit was lacking. TPNS exhibited positive outcomes on sleep and QoL at 6 months with positive trends in CV outcomes.

Worsening Renal Function in Cardiac Mechanical Support.

BACKGROUND: Venous congestion in heart failure (HF) may lead to worsening renal failure (WRF). We hypothesised that WRF in patients hospitalised for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with increased 1-year mortality. There is limited data regarding WRF in HF patients with mechanical support. The objective of this paper is to determine whether WRF in HF patients hospitalised for LVAD implantation is associated with increased 1-year mortality and to identify risk factors for WRF. METHODS: We performed a single centre retrospective chart analysis of 162 patients who received an LVAD between August 2006 and December 2014 with pre-LVAD right heart catheterisation data. We stratified patients to those who demonstrated WRF and the use of haemodialysis (HD) or ultrafiltration (UF). RESULTS: Patients with a higher central venous pressure (CVP) >16 mmHg (17-24 mmHg range) developed WRF (29.7% vs. 14.1%, p=0.019). A CVP ≥16 and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min/1.74m2 increased the odds of WRF. Worsening renal failure and HD/UF use were associated with increased 1-year mortality. Furthermore GFR <30, atherosclerosis, and right ventricular failure were independent predictors for increased 1-year mortality. A GFR <30 increased the odds of developing WRF five-fold (OR 4.14, CI [1.95-8.78], p<0.0001), and GFR <30 and central venous pressure (CVP) >16 increased the odds of requiring HD/UF. CONCLUSIONS: Worsening renal failure is associated with a higher CVP at the time of LVAD implantation and increases the risk of 1-year mortality and the odds of requiring HD/UF. Careful evaluation of renal function and comorbid conditions during LVAD implantation is critical to reduce mortality and for risk stratification.

Ultrafiltration for the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure.

Ultrafiltration (UF) mechanically removes excess fluid volume through an extracorporeal circuit and has been applied to clinical situations in which volume removal is the mainstay of therapy. Because of this ability, UF serves as an enticing method to treat acute heart failure (AHF) in which most symptoms are driven by congestion due to excess volume. Additional physiologic properties of UF and the biochemical composition of the extracted fluid confer additional theoretic benefits in the treatment of AHF. Herein the concepts underlying UF, clinical evidence evaluating its efficacy, and ongoing challenges understanding the role of UF are reviewed.

Complications of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

Heart failure patients on durable left ventricular assist device support experience improved survival, quality of life, and exercise capacity. The complication rate, however, remains unacceptably high, although it has declined with improvements in pump design, better patient selection, and greater understanding of the pump physiology and flow dynamics. Most complications are categorized as those related to the pump-patient interface or those related to patient physiology. It is hoped that further engineering progress, and better patient selection through risk stratification, will allow for left ventricular assist device to be totally biocompatible and perform effectively, without affecting biology and homeostasis of the different organ systems.

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Readmission for Heart Failure Using Novel Tablet and Nurse Practitioner Education.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure education programs are not standardized. The best form of education is unclear. We evaluated whether addition of a novel tablet application to nurse practitioner (NP) education was superior to NP education alone in reducing 30-day readmission after heart failure hospitalization. METHODS: From February 2015-March 2016, patients admitted to a quaternary academic center with primary diagnosis of heart failure were randomized to 1) treatment - NP education plus tablet application (interactive conditional logic program that flags patient questions to medical staff), or 2) control - NP education. The primary outcome was reduction in 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction and education assessed via survey. RESULTS: Randomization included 60 patients to treatment and 66 to control. A total of 13 patients withdrew prior to intervention (treatment n = 4, control n = 1) or were lost to follow-up (treatment n = 3, control n = 5). The 30-day readmission rate trended lower for treatment compared with control, but results were not statistically significant (13.2% [7/53], 26.7% [16/60], respectively, P = .08). Similarly, satisfaction trended higher with treatment than control (P = .08). Treatment patients rated explanations from their physicians higher than control (Always: 83.7%, 55.8%, respectively, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: NP education plus tablet use was not associated with significantly lower 30-day readmission rates in comparison with NP alone, but a positive trend was seen. Patient satisfaction trended higher and heart failure explanations were better with NP education plus tablet. A larger study is needed to determine if NP education plus tablet reduces readmission rates following heart failure admission.

Does recipient work status pre-transplant affect post-heart transplant survival? A United Network for Organ Sharing database review.

BACKGROUND: Recipient-related factors, such as education level and type of health insurance, are known to affect heart transplantation outcomes. Pre-operative employment status has shown an association with survival in abdominal organ transplant patients. We sought to evaluate the effect of work status of heart transplant (HTx) recipients at the time of listing and at the time of transplantation on short- and long-term survival. METHODS: We evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry for all adult HTx recipients from 2001 to 2014. Recipients were grouped based on their work status at listing and at heart transplantation. Kaplan-Meier estimates illustrated 30-day, 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival comparing working with non-working groups. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was applied to adjust for covariates that could potentially confound the post-transplantation survival analysis. RESULTS: Working at listing for HTx was not significantly associated with 30-day and 1-year survival. However, 5- and 10-year mortality were 14.5% working vs 19.8% not working (p < 0.0001) and 16% working vs 26% not working (p < 0.0001), respectively. Working at HTx appeared to be associated with a survival benefit at every time interval, with a trend toward improved survival at 30 days and 1 year and a significant association at 5 and 10 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a 5% and 10% decrease in 5- and 10-year mortality, respectively, for the working group compared with the group not working at transplantation. The Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that working at listing and working at transplantation were each associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 0.91; and HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first analysis of UNOS STAR data on recipient work status pre-HTx demonstrating: (1) an improvement in post-transplant survival for working HTx candidates; and (2) an association between working pre-HTx and longer post-HTx survival. Given that work status before HTx may be a modifiable risk factor for better outcomes after HTx, we strongly recommend that UNOS consider these important findings for moving forward this patient-centered research on work status. Working at listing and working at HTx are associated with long-term survival benefits. The association may be reciprocal, where working identifies less ill patients and also improves well-being. Consideration should be given to giving additional weight to work status during organ allocation. Work status may also be a modifiable factor associated with better post-HTx outcomes.

Early intervention for lactate dehydrogenase elevation improves clinical outcomes in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device: Insights from the PREVENT study.

BACKGROUND: Hemolysis, assessed by elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), is strongly associated with HeartMate II pump thrombosis (PT). However, it is unknown whether early intervention for elevated LDH circumvents the risk of serious PT requiring pump exchange. We sought to evaluate the relationship between elevated LDH and clinical outcomes, the effectiveness of early medical intervention, and risk factors for elevated LDH. METHODS: We studied 268 patients in the prospective, multicenter PREVENT study who had 2 or more LDH measurements at ≥30 days post-implant. Elevated LDH was defined as LDH ≥2.5× upper limit of normal (ULN) for 2 consecutive measurements. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of patients had elevated LDH. Stroke-free survival at 6 months was lower in patients with elevated LDH vs patients with normal LDH (83 ± 6% vs 93 ± 2%, p = 0.035). Elevated LDH resolved without intervention in 19% of patients, with intensified medical therapy in 43% and required surgical intervention in 38%. For patients receiving only medical therapy, survival was 94 ± 6% at 6 months post-treatment. In this subgroup, resolution of symptoms with intensified medical therapy was sustained in 15 of 16 patients, with PT occurring in 1 patient at 171 days after initial treatment for elevated LDH (202 days post-implant). Early medical intervention at moderately elevated LDH (2.5× to 3.2× ULN), as compared with higher levels (>3.2× ULN), led to more sustained resolution of symptoms without subsequent PT or need for surgical intervention (91% vs 26% at 6 months post-treatment, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Early medical intervention can successfully resolve moderate LDH elevations (2.5× to 3.2× ULN) with a low incidence of death or PT at 6 months post-treatment.

Anticoagulation management following left ventricular assist device implantation is similar across all provider strategies.

OBJECTIVES: Thromboembolic and bleeding events are potential complications following left ventricular assist device implantation. A tight control of the international normalized ratio (INR) is believed to be crucial in the reduction of postimplant complications. There is significant variability among institutions as to whether a device implanting centre should be managing the INR. In this study, we evaluated the effect of INR management strategies in maintaining a therapeutic INR. METHODS: A retrospective review was utilized to identify patients implanted with either the HeartMate II or the HeartWare HVAD between January 2011 and February 2016. Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on the post-discharge INR management strategy: outside hospital system anticoagulation clinic, outside hospital primary care provider, implanting centre anticoagulation clinic or implanting centre ventricular assist device office. The INR data were collected and analysed for both the early (discharge, 7, 14, 21 and 30 days) and late (3, 6, 9 and 12 months) postoperative periods. RESULTS: There were 163 patients identified during the study period who met the study inclusion criteria: 49 (30%) patients were managed by an outside hospital system anticoagulation clinic, 59 (36.2%) patients by an outside hospital physician/primary care provider, 22 (13.5%) patients by the implanting centre anticoagulation clinic and 33 (20.2%) patients by the implanting centre ventricular assist device office. There were no statistically significant differences found between management strategies across all time points. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference found between the management strategies examined. Regardless of the chosen INR management strategy, patients have similar INR values and postoperative outcomes.

Multicenter Evaluation of Octreotide as Secondary Prophylaxis in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one of the most common complications after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. More than one third of patients with incident bleed go on to develop recurrent GI bleeding. Octreotide, a somatostatin analog, is proposed to reduce the risk of recurrent GI bleeding in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter, retrospective analysis evaluated 51 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients who received secondary prophylaxis with octreotide after their index GI bleed from 2009 to 2015. All patients had a hospitalization for GI bleed and received octreotide after discharge. Patient demographics, medical and medication history, and clinical characteristics of patients who rebled after receiving octreotide were compared with non-rebleeders. These data were also compared with matched historical control patients previously enrolled in the HMII (HeartMate II) clinical trials, none of whom received octreotide, to provide a context for the bleeding rates. Twelve patients (24%) who received secondary octreotide prophylaxis developed another GI bleed, whereas 39 (76%) did not. There were similar intergroup demographics; however, significantly more bleeders had a previous GI bleeding history before left ventricular assist device placement (33% versus 5%; P=0.02) and greater frequency of angiodysplasia confirmed during endoscopy (58% versus 23%; P=0.03). Fewer patients in this study experienced a recurrent GI bleed compared with a matched historical control group that did not receive octreotide (24% versus 43%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device receiving secondary prophylaxis with octreotide had a significantly lower GI bleed recurrence compared with historical controls not treated with octreotide. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.

Getting to the Heart of the Matter: Review of Treatment of Cardiorenal Syndrome.

Acute decompensated heart failure is a common cause of hospitalization with worsening kidney function or acute kidney injury often complicating the admission, which can result in further dysfunction of both systems in the form of a cardiorenal syndrome. Therapy in this arena has been largely empiric as rigorous clinical trial data to inform therapeutic choices are lacking. Here we review and discuss the available clinical evidence for common approaches to the management of this condition. A multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with cardiorenal syndrome that relies on the experience of nephrologists and cardiologists to individualize treatment is critical given the paucity of rigorous clinical trial data.

Remote Monitoring to Reduce Heart Failure Readmissions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rehospitalization for heart failure remains a challenge in the treatment of affected patients. The ability to remotely monitor patients for worsening heart failure may provide an avenue through which therapeutic interventions can be made to prevent a rehospitalization. Available data on remote monitoring to reduce heart failure rehospitalizations are reviewed within. RECENT FINDINGS: Strategies to reduce readmissions include clinical telemonitoring, bioimpedance changes, biomarkers, and remote hemodynamic monitoring. Telemonitoring is readily available, but has low sensitivity and adherence. No data exist to demonstrate the efficacy of this strategy in reducing admissions. Bioimpedance offers improved sensitivity compared to telemonitoring, but has not demonstrated an ability to reduce hospitalizations and is currently limited to those patients who have separate indications for an implantable device. Biomarker levels have shown variable results in the ability to reduce hospitalizations and remain without definitive proof supporting their utilization. Remote hemodynamic monitoring has shown the strongest ability to reduce heart failure readmissions and is currently approved for this purpose. However, remote hemodynamic monitoring requires an invasive procedure and may not be cost-effective. All currently available strategies to reduce hospitalizations with remote monitoring have drawbacks and challenges. Remote hemodynamic monitoring is currently the most efficacious based on data, but is not without its own imperfections.