Interferon-free treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with inherited bleeding disorders.

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes significant mortality in patients with inherited bleeding disorders, however, data of interferon-free antiviral regimes are scarce in this population. PATIENTS, METHODS: Real-life data of interferon-free therapies of 18 patients with inherited bleeding disorders and chronic HCV genotype 1 infection (94% male, liver cirrhosis Child A/B n = 4/1). RESULTS: Treatment naïve patients were treated for eight weeks with sofosbuvir (SOF)/ledipasvir (n = 3) or for 12 weeks with SOF/ledipasvir (n = 4), SOF/ledipasvir/ribavirin (n = 1), or paritaprevir/r, ombitasvir, dasabuvir (n = 1). Treatment experienced patients without cirrhosis received SOF/ledipasvir (n = 3) or paritaprevir/r, ombitasvir, dasabuvir ± ribavirin (n = 2) for 12 weeks. Re-treated cirrhotic individuals were treated for 24 weeks with SOF/ledipasvir (n = 2) and SOF/daclatasvir (n = 1), or for 12 weeks SOF/simeprevir/1200 mg/d ribavirin (n = 1). Sustained virologic response (SVR-12) was achieved by 17/18 individuals without severe on-treatment side effects. CONCLUSIONS: In real-life, HCV-infected patients with inherited bleeding disorders can be effectively and safely treated with interferon-free therapies.

Prophylactic Transcatheter Arterial Embolization After Successful Endoscopic Hemostasis in the Management of Bleeding Duodenal Ulcer.

GOALS: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the new strategy of prophylactic transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of the gastroduodenal artery after endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding duodenal ulcers. BACKGROUND: TAE is a well-established method for the treatment of recurrent or refractory ulcer bleeding resistant to endoscopic intervention, which increasingly replaces surgical procedures. A new approach for improving outcome and reducing rebleeding episodes is the supplemental and prophylactic TAE after successful endoscopic hemostasis. STUDY: This retrospective study included all patients (n=117) treated from 2008 to 2012 for duodenal ulcer bleeding. After initial endoscopic hemostasis, patients were assessed regarding their individual rebleeding risk. Patients with a low rebleeding risk (n=47) were conservatively treated, patients with a high risk for rebleeding (n=55) had prophylactic TAE of the gastroduodenal artery, and patients with endoscopically refractory ulcer bleeding received immediate TAE. RESULTS: The technical success of prophylactic TAE was 98% and the clinical success was 87% of cases. Rebleeding occurred in 11% of patients with prophylactic TAE and was successfully treated with repeated TAE or endoscopy. The major complication rate was 4%. Surgery was necessary in only 1 prophylactic TAE patient (0.9%) during the whole study period. Mortality associated with ulcer bleeding was 4% in patients with prophylactic TAE. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic TAE in patients with duodenal ulcers at high risk for rebleeding was feasible, effective at preventing the need for surgery, and had low major complication rates. Given these promising outcomes, prophylactic TAE should be further evaluated as a preventative therapy in high-risk patients.